On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:06:25 +0100,
François Patte wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bonjour,
>
> 1- I am wondering if I have any chances to use my gnome-2 config if I
> install f-16 on my computers. I can't believe that developpers do not
> care about backward c
On Monday 13 February 2012 12:51:57 François Patte wrote:
> Le 13/02/2012 11:55, Marko Vojinovic a écrit :
> > On Monday 13 February 2012 10:06:25 François Patte wrote:
> >> 2- Are there LTSP packages in f-16
> >
> > [root@Yoda ~]# yum search ltsp
> > [snip]
> > =
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 13/02/2012 11:55, Marko Vojinovic a écrit :
> On Monday 13 February 2012 10:06:25 François Patte wrote:
>> 1- I am wondering if I have any chances to use my gnome-2 config if I
>> install f-16 on my computers. I can't believe that developpers do not
On Monday 13 February 2012 10:06:25 François Patte wrote:
> 1- I am wondering if I have any chances to use my gnome-2 config if I
> install f-16 on my computers. I can't believe that developpers do not
> care about backward compatibility...
Believe it.
Gnome3 is as different from Gnome2 as KDE4 i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
1- I am wondering if I have any chances to use my gnome-2 config if I
install f-16 on my computers. I can't believe that developpers do not
care about backward compatibility...
2- Are there LTSP packages in f-16
Thanks.
- --
François Patt