On 6/19/19 4:22 PM, François Patte wrote:
> What is BLS? google gives me:
BLS = Boot Loader Specification
https://systemd.io/BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BootLoaderSpecByDefault
--
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the defaul
François Patte, 19.6.2019 10:22 +0200:
> What is BLS? google gives me:
Adding "Linux" or "Fedora" to your search would have resulted in more
relevant results.
To answer your question: it's short for "BootLoaderSpec"
for example:
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/
ht
Message transféré
Sujet : Re: please... help me about grubby!
Date : Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:40:10 +0200
De : François Patte
Organisation : Université Paris Descartes
Pour : Chris Murphy
Le 19/06/2019 à 05:03, Chris Murphy a écrit :
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 3:24 PM Franç
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 3:24 PM François Patte
wrote:
>
> parttion in the /boot/grub2/grub.cfg file
That location tells me this is BIOS GRUB (not UEFI GRUB). I also
suggest making sure the pre-boot GRUB binaries are up to date before
you convert to BLS or upgrade to Fedora 30, by using 'grub2
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 2:34 AM François Patte
wrote:
>
> Running manualy grub2-mkconfig corrects this mistake.
Fedora 29 grubby has not changed since August 2018 according to koji
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8562
grubby-8.40-18.fc29
It's a bit misleading with fc30
Le 15/06/2019 à 23:23, François Patte a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> I sent several messages about kernel updates and grubby.
>
> Once upon a time I made 4 partitions on a ssd drive where the system is
> installed. I use raid1+lvm
>
> on sda1 and sdb1 I put the a /boot partition (raid1) for a debian i
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 07:34:43 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> I recall that my problem occurs since f29 and when I upgraded to f29
> kernel updates had not this problem, it occurs only since a few
> months.
There is some more information about setting the default here.
https://fedoraproject.org/wi
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 07:34:43 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> ]# grub2-editenv - list
>
> saved_entry=Fedora (4.10.8-200.fc25.x86_64) 25 (Twenty Five)
> boot_success=1
> boot_indeterminate=1
>
> What does it mean?
I think it means that your last booted kernel is not saved.
> f25 is over since ye
Le 16/06/2019 à 19:17, stan via users a écrit :
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 23:23:36 +0200
> François Patte wrote:
>
>> I have now destroyed these partitions but grubby still uses them and
>> writes a faulty /boot/grub2/grub.cfg file.
>>
>> Where does it find that these partitions still exist?
>
> Pos
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 23:23:36 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> I have now destroyed these partitions but grubby still uses them and
> writes a faulty /boot/grub2/grub.cfg file.
>
> Where does it find that these partitions still exist?
Posted by Tom Horsley, from another thread.
"""
No doubt the "de
Le 16/06/2019 à 01:45, Samuel Sieb a écrit :
> On 6/15/19 2:23 PM, François Patte wrote:
>> Everything was ok untill grubby replaced grub2-mkconfig: when there is a
>> kernel update, grubby uses the disabled sda3-sda4 partitions as the /
>> parttion in the /boot/grub2/grub.cfg file.
>
> grubb
On 6/15/19 2:23 PM, François Patte wrote:
Everything was ok untill grubby replaced grub2-mkconfig: when there is a
kernel update, grubby uses the disabled sda3-sda4 partitions as the /
parttion in the /boot/grub2/grub.cfg file.
grubby has never replaced grub2-mkconfig. They are independen
Bonjour,
I sent several messages about kernel updates and grubby.
Once upon a time I made 4 partitions on a ssd drive where the system is
installed. I use raid1+lvm
on sda1 and sdb1 I put the a /boot partition (raid1) for a debian install
on sda3 and sdb3 I also put /boot partition (raid1) for a
13 matches
Mail list logo
