filtered out by exclude filtering
- package nvidia-xconfig-3:560.35.03-1.fc39.x86_64 from
cuda-fedora39 is filtered out by exclude filtering
Package Arch Version Repository Size
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
cuda-12-6
On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 14:20:35 + Paul Smith wrote:
> Thanks, Francis. I did as you suggested, but now the conflict are different:
> # dnf --disablerepo=rpmfusion-nonfree update
...
> Problem: package cuda-12-6-12.6.2-1.x86_64 from cuda-fedora39 requires
> cuda-runtime-12-6 >= 12.6.2, but none o
uda-fedora39 is filtered out by exclude filtering
- package nvidia-xconfig-3:560.35.03-1.fc39.x86_64 from
cuda-fedora39 is filtered out by exclude filtering
Package Arch Version Repository Size
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
cuda-12-6
Hi.
On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 13:26:55 + Paul Smith wrote:
> I am getting the below issues. Could you please help me?
> # dnf update
> Updating and loading repositories:
> Repositories loaded.
> Problem: package cuda-runtime-12-6-12.6.2-1.x86_64 from cuda-fedora39
> requires nvidia-open-560 >= 560.
filtered out by exclude filtering
Package Arch Version Repository Size
Skipping packages with conflicts:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda x86_64 3:560.35.03-5.fc41 rpmfusion-non 6.1 MiB
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
cuda-12-6
On 26/10/24 02:58, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 22:30 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 25/10/24 09:25, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 09:09 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
I don't want to turn off
sending in html because that will impact all emails I send, and
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 22:30 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 25/10/24 09:25, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 09:09 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> > > I don't want to turn off
> > > sending in html because that will impact all emails I send, and
> > > Thunderbird doesn't have t
Hi,
The below command can show when it was installed.
dnf history info python3-dnf-plugin-local
Regards,
Tshimanga
On 10/25/24 12:33, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 25/10/24 17:07, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/24/24 3:02 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 24/10/24 20:43, Barry wrote:
What does dnf repoli
On 25/10/24 12:36, Tim via users wrote:
On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 08:43 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
When did _dnf_local come into effect?, the last couple of months are the
first time I've seen any reference to that repository as a repository
being refreshed when all the repository lists are automa
On 25/10/24 17:07, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/24/24 3:02 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 24/10/24 20:43, Barry wrote:
What does dnf repolist show you have?
If it lists a _dnf_local then show us what its repo file has in it.
dnf repolist
repo id
On 25/10/24 09:25, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 09:09 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
I don't want to turn off
sending in html because that will impact all emails I send, and
Thunderbird doesn't have the option any more to tailor those options for
specific addresses.
Both that
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 3:39 AM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have some old hardware that needs a refresh. The old machine is
> running Fedora 40 x86_64 fully patched. The new machine is running the
> same on a fresh OS install. I want to get a list of packag
On 24/10/24 20:43, Barry wrote:
On 23 Oct 2024, at 22:31, Stephen Morris
wrote:
On 22/10/24 08:30, Barry wrote:
On 21 Oct 2024, at 22:14, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
How do I remove kmod-nvidia packages from _dnf_local when sudo dnf remove
kmod-nvidia-6.10.10-200.fc40.x86_64 says
On 10/24/24 3:02 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 24/10/24 20:43, Barry wrote:
What does dnf repolist show you have?
If it lists a _dnf_local then show us what its repo file has in it.
dnf repolist
repo id
On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 08:43 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> When did _dnf_local come into effect?, the last couple of months are the
> first time I've seen any reference to that repository as a repository
> being refreshed when all the repository lists are automatically
> refreshed or when sudo d
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 09:09 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I don't want to turn off
> sending in html because that will impact all emails I send, and
> Thunderbird doesn't have the option any more to tailor those options for
> specific addresses.
Both that message and your previous one *do* hav
On 25/10/24 08:58, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 08:29 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 24/10/24 21:25, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 10:43 +0100, Barry wrote:
[...]
If you must post in HTML, please include a plain-text alternative.
https://fedoraproject.
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 08:29 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 24/10/24 21:25, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 10:43 +0100, Barry wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > If you must post in HTML, please include a plain-text alternative.
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_lis
On 24/10/24 21:25, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 10:43 +0100, Barry wrote:
[...]
If you must post in HTML, please include a plain-text alternative.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#No_HTML_Mail,_Please
Sorry Patrick, I have my Thunderbird composition se
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 2:39 AM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> I have some old hardware that needs a refresh. The old machine is
> running Fedora 40 x86_64 fully patched. The new machine is running the
> same on a fresh OS install. I want to get a list of packages I
> manually installe
On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 02:38 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Does anyone know of a good strategy (or have a script) to list
> manually installed packages;
My strategy won't help you now, but may in the future. When I install
extra packages, I log them to a post-install text file.
In m
On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 10:43 +0100, Barry wrote:
[...]
If you must post in HTML, please include a plain-text alternative.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#No_HTML_Mail,_Please
poc
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedorapr
On 23 Oct 2024, at 22:31, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 22/10/24 08:30, Barry wrote:
On 21 Oct 2024, at 22:14, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
How do I remove kmod-nvidia packages from _dnf_local when sudo dnf remove kmod-nvidia-6.10.10-200.fc40
Hi Everyone,
I have some old hardware that needs a refresh. The old machine is
running Fedora 40 x86_64 fully patched. The new machine is running the
same on a fresh OS install. I want to get a list of packages I
manually installed on the old machine, like Certbot, Emacs and Nginx,
so I can
On 22/10/24 08:30, Barry wrote:
On 21 Oct 2024, at 22:14, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
How do I remove kmod-nvidia packages from _dnf_local when sudo dnf remove
kmod-nvidia-6.10.10-200.fc40.x86_64 says the package is not found and there is
nothing to do and sudo akmods --force won&#
On 22/10/24 08:30, Barry wrote:
On 21 Oct 2024, at 22:14, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
How do I remove kmod-nvidia packages from _dnf_local when sudo dnf remove
kmod-nvidia-6.10.10-200.fc40.x86_64 says the package is not found and there is
nothing to do and sudo akmods --force won&#
On 22/10/24 08:30, Barry wrote:
On 21 Oct 2024, at 22:14, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
How do I remove kmod-nvidia packages from _dnf_local when sudo dnf remove
kmod-nvidia-6.10.10-200.fc40.x86_64 says the package is not found and there is
nothing to do and sudo akmods --force won&#
> On 21 Oct 2024, at 22:14, Stephen Morris wrote:
>
> Hi,
> How do I remove kmod-nvidia packages from _dnf_local when sudo dnf remove
> kmod-nvidia-6.10.10-200.fc40.x86_64 says the package is not found and there
> is nothing to do and sudo akmods --force won't
Hi,
How do I remove kmod-nvidia packages from _dnf_local when sudo dnf
remove kmod-nvidia-6.10.10-200.fc40.x86_64 says the package is not found
and there is nothing to do and sudo akmods --force won't rebuild it
because the 6.10.10 kernel headers don't exist any more and sudo
dates 14 M
> git x86_642.46.2-1.fc40 updates 52 k
> info x86_647.1-2.fc40 fedora 182 k
> libtree-sitter-java x86_640.20.2-2.fc40 fedora 62 k
> perl-NDBM_Filex86_641.16-50
-java x86_640.20.2-2.fc40 fedora 62 k
perl-NDBM_Filex86_641.16-506.fc40 fedora 23 k
Transaction Summary
==
Install 87 Packages
Total download size: 176 M
Installed
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 18:32:07 +0100
GianPiero Puccioni wrote:
> I didn't know that "err" didn't show on the terminal!
Probably to avoid huge amounts of messages.
> Apparently the problem was
> "qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.15.12-4.fc38.x86_64" I removed that and
> everything is back to normal, sh
On 15/11/2023 18:05, stan via users wrote:
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:23:16 +0100
GianPiero Puccioni wrote:
Hi,
During a normal upgrade (F38 with KDE on a Dell G15 Laptop) I got
this errors:
Skipping packages with conflicts:
qt5-qtbasex86_645.15.11-3.fc38updates
3.6
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:23:16 +0100
GianPiero Puccioni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During a normal upgrade (F38 with KDE on a Dell G15 Laptop) I got
> this errors:
>
> Skipping packages with conflicts:
> qt5-qtbasex86_645.15.11-3.fc38updates
> 3.6 M Skipp
Hi,
During a normal upgrade (F38 with KDE on a Dell G15 Laptop) I got this errors:
Skipping packages with conflicts:
qt5-qtbasex86_645.15.11-3.fc38updates3.6 M
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
kf5-akonadi-sex86_6423.08.1-2.fc38
On 8/10/23 12:28, Ger van Dijck wrote:
In the recent past I had problems with skipping packages with broken
dependencies : ffmpeg-libs , libavdevice : Dorian Rosse adviced to
install with " rpmfind ffmpeg-libs and libavdevice".
No result.
Tom Horsley did advice "dnf swap ffm
Hello All,
In the recent past I had problems with skipping packages with broken
dependencies : ffmpeg-libs , libavdevice : Dorian Rosse adviced to
install with " rpmfind ffmpeg-libs and libavdevice".
No result.
Tom Horsley did advice "dnf swap ffmpeg-free ffmpeg --allower
Hi
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 15:11:06 -0700 richard emberson wrote:
> What is the problem (aside from the fact that I interrupted the update) and
> How can I recover?
Try first to clean duplicates with: dnf removes --duplicates
I'll personally call it like that to see what would be done, answer no
to
eck succeeded.
> Running transaction test
> The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
> transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean
> packages'. Error: Transaction test error:
>file /usr/share/doc/glib2/NEWS from inst
Running "dnf update --allowerasing results in:
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Err
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 5:12 PM richard emberson
wrote:
> I had a "dnf update" interrupted.
>
> Running "dnf clean all" and then "dnf update" again results in:
>
> Running transaction check
> Transaction check succeeded.
> Running transaction
I had a "dnf update" interrupted.
Running "dnf clean all" and then "dnf update" again results in:
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You
: Saturday, June 10, 2023 5:08:16 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Broken packages DNF Update.
Hay all,
Little problem : When giving the command dnf update I get the message
"Skipping packages with broken dependencies".
ffmpeg-libs x86_646.0.11.fc38 rpmf
On Sat, 10 Jun 2023 17:08:16 +0200
Ger van Dijck wrote:
> How do I proceed ?
I asked that a while back, and got this advice which worked for me:
dnf sawp ffmpeg-free ffmpeg --allowerasing
Replaces the incompatible stuff in the fedora repos with the
"normal" stuff from rpmfusion.
___
Hay all,
Little problem : When giving the command dnf update I get the message
"Skipping packages with broken dependencies".
ffmpeg-libs x86_64 6.0.11.fc38 rpmfusion-free-updates
libavdevice x86_64 6.0.11.fc38 rpmfusion-free-updates
How do I proceed ?
Kind rega
provides libheif(x86-64) = 1.16.1 needed by
Skipping packages with conflicts:
(add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):
libheif x86_64 1.15.2-1.fc37 updates 258 k
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
libheif-freeworld x86_64 1.1
.1 needed by
> Skipping packages with conflicts:
> (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):
> libheif x86_64 1.15.2-1.fc37 updates 258 k
> Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
> libheif-freeworld x86_64 1.16.1-1.fc37 rpmfusio
On Sun, May 14 2023 at 18:40:04 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II via users
wrote:
On 14 May 2023 at 9:18, Simon Colston wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 14 May 2023 09:18:54 +0100
From: Simon Colston
Subject:dnf upgrade - problem with libheif
packages
To
ed by
libheif-freeworld-1.16.1-1.fc37.x86_64
...
Skipping packages with conflicts:
(add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their
upgrade):
libheif x86_64 1.15.2-1.fc37 updates 258 k
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
libheif-freeworld
= 1.16.1 needed by
> libheif-freeworld-1.16.1-1.fc37.x86_64
>
> ...
>
> Skipping packages with conflicts:
> (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their
> upgrade):
> libheif x86_64 1.15.2-1.fc37 updates 258 k
> Skipping packages wit
On 14 May 2023 at 9:18, Simon Colston wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 14 May 2023 09:18:54 +0100
From: Simon Colston
Subject:dnf upgrade - problem with libheif
packages
To: Fedora Users Mailing List
Send reply to: Community
.fc37.x86_64
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
libheif-1.15.1-2.fc37.x86_64
- nothing provides libheif(x86-64) = 1.16.1 needed by
libheif-freeworld-1.16.1-1.fc37.x86_64
...
Skipping packages with conflicts:
(add '--best --allowerasing' to comman
On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 15:49 -0600, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 9/30/22 15:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Please remember to quote the text you are responding to in replies.
>
> And trim out everything that's not relevant to your reply, as I did
> here, especially including signatures and/or footers.
On 9/30/22 15:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Please remember to quote the text you are responding to in replies.
And trim out everything that's not relevant to your reply, as I did
here, especially including signatures and/or footers.
___
users mail
On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 19:28 +0200, Mgr. Janusz Chmiel wrote:
> Dear MR Horne,
> Thank you very much for this very useful command line option.
> I will always type it when even I will want to perform AN systém
> upgrade on my chroot container.
Please remember to quote the text you are respo
Dear MR Horne,
Thank you very much for this very useful command line option.
I will always type it when even I will want to perform AN systém upgrade on my
chroot container.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe s
On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 13:41 +, old sixpack13 wrote:
> > Dear advanced users and developers,
> ...
> > Or unfortunately, Dnf and also Yum do not allow users to skip or exclude
> > kernel related
> > packages?
> ...
>
> sudo dnf upgrade --exclude=kernel-c
> Dear advanced users and developers,
...
> Or unfortunately, Dnf and also Yum do not allow users to skip or exclude
> kernel related
> packages?
...
sudo dnf upgrade --exclude=kernel-core
will exclude:
- kernel and
- kernel-core and
- kernel-modules
I'm unsure about kerne
Dear advanced users and developers,
Because Redhad elite programmers allow users to run their chroot Fedora
containers for AArch64 architecture, I Am using Fedora 35 on Termux with
Android 8.0. For obvious reason, all kernel related Fedora packages are
redundand for Me in this scenario.
I would
Hi, you need to swap the release identity package. That determines what
desktop packages are protected by dnf.
Type dnf search fedora-release-identity- to see what's available. Then
run
sudo dnf swap fedora-release-identity-workstation fedora-release-
identity-(kde, cinnamon, mate-compiz,
that group from being removed, so the
entire group has to go.
Thanks a lot for info! Unfortunately it does not work: [root@c340-sev
~]# dnf --noautoremove group remove gnome-desktop Error: Problem: The
operation would result in removing the
following protected packages: gnome-shell (try to add
entire group has to go.
Thanks a lot for info! Unfortunately it does not work:
[root@c340-sev ~]# dnf --noautoremove group remove gnome-desktop
Error: Problem: The operation would result in removing the
following protected packages: gnome-shell (try to add
'--skip-broken' to skip uni
info!
Unfortunately it does not work:
[root@c340-sev ~]# dnf --noautoremove group remove gnome-desktop
Error:
Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected
packages: gnome-shell
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
Why in the world woul
:
[root@c340-sev ~]# dnf --noautoremove group remove gnome-desktop
Error:
Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected
packages: gnome-shell
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
Why in the world would be gnome-shell unremovable?
And does anyo
h and without that option before answering y to do it
to make sure it does not remove more than you want removed.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 6:59 AM Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>
> Hi! I was trying to remove the gnome packages and because of gnome-shell
> i'm stuck with this list:
> gnome-auto
Hi! I was trying to remove the gnome packages and because of gnome-shell
i'm stuck with this list:
gnome-autoar-0.4.3-1.fc36.x86_64
gnome-bluetooth-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64
gnome-bluetooth-libs-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64
gnome-control-center-42.3-1.fc36.x86_64
gnome-control-center-filesystem-42.3-1.fc36.n
> On 6 Jul 2022, at 16:13, Federico Alaimo wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> I wanted to know if epel 9 will bring fusion inventory agent packages (as
> done in epel7 and 8) and if yes, when that is expected to happen.
Try requesting via a bugzilla ticket so the maintainer know th
Hello all,
I wanted to know if epel 9 will bring fusion inventory agent packages (as done
in epel7 and 8) and if yes, when that is expected to happen.
Thanks!!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hello all,
I first mentioned a couple of months ago that I would like to retire
from maintaining mathematical packages in Fedora, so that I can focus
on code analysis and formal methods packages. Thank you to those who
responded and took some of those packages from me. I still have quite
a pile
Hi Oğuz,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:35 PM Oğuz Ersen via users
wrote:
> I have no packaging experience and not a packager myself, so can I take
> `material-icons-fonts` since that one seems easy? My fas username is ersen.
You're not a packager. So that means you need a sponsor? If so,
contact
I have no packaging experience and not a packager myself, so can I take
`material-icons-fonts` since that one seems easy? My fas username is ersen.
--
Best Regards, Oğuz
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
hese do not relate solely to the collection of mathematical packages? Will
> mizdebsk (automatically) take them on alone?
That's a good question. Let's see what needs these packages. Using
the command "dnf --repo=rawhide --repo=rawhide-source repoquery
--whatrequires [package] --alldep
content to Fedora, so if
> you see something you think should be on docs.fedoraproject.org, feel free to
> tell me so. Also feel free to suggest additions or changes to what I have
> there.
>
> Packages for which I am the primary maintainer
> ———
> ...
>
For some years now, I have maintained a collection of mathematical packages
and some of their dependencies in Fedora. I actually stopped using the
packages in question awhile ago, but have been maintaining them out of
inertia. I would like to free up time to get some code checking and formal
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:40:51 -0500
Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I use systemd-boot, so I try to avoid having unneeded GRUB packages
> installed. When I run dnf update, grub2-tools-efi and
> grub2-tools-extra get installed, even though they aren't required by
> any of my other installed
> On 7 Oct 2021, at 18:38, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> On 10/5/21 16:36, Barry wrote:
>>> On 5 Oct 2021, at 19:41, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>>>
>>> I use systemd-boot, so I try to avoid having unneeded GRUB packages
>>> installed. When I run dnf update,
On 10/5/21 16:36, Barry wrote:
On 5 Oct 2021, at 19:41, Ian Pilcher wrote:
I use systemd-boot, so I try to avoid having unneeded GRUB packages
installed. When I run dnf update, grub2-tools-efi and grub2-tools-extra
get installed, even though they aren't required by any of my
On 10/5/21 3:36 PM, Barry wrote:
Try dnf remove package and see what dnf wants to remove.
Just answer no so that dns does no damage.
That’s the trick I used to find out why a package is needed.
You can also do rpm queries, but I do recall the incantation.
Just to be safe, add -n to the dnf comm
> On 5 Oct 2021, at 19:41, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> I use systemd-boot, so I try to avoid having unneeded GRUB packages
> installed. When I run dnf update, grub2-tools-efi and grub2-tools-extra
> get installed, even though they aren't required by any of my other
> ins
I use systemd-boot, so I try to avoid having unneeded GRUB packages
installed. When I run dnf update, grub2-tools-efi and grub2-tools-extra
get installed, even though they aren't required by any of my other
installed packages.
I already have install_weak_deps=False set in dnf.conf.
Anyone
ated build process, if there is one?
>
I'm not 100% sure if you mean a request to Fedora or upstream, but most of
the info you're looking for should be found here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kubernetes
The key is you have to use the source name even thou
I've looked on multiple occasions for a 'dnf whomaintains', or a section in
info containing 'source' or maintainer.
Let's take an example:
$ dnf info kubernetes-client
Source : kubernetes-1.20.5-1.fc34.src.rpm
Repository : @System
From repo: fedora
URL : https://k8s.io/kubern
ystem.
Not really interested in that.
Are there any packages for Horde Groupware Webmail Edition that anyone
knows of? A cursory Google search doesn't find anything.
Thomas
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 11:33, Matti Pulkkinen wrote:
> The other message first has a long list of packages, and then ends with "Too
> many packages to process (7664/5200)".
That is indeed a large number of packages; if you file an issue
upstream we can bump the limit an or
gh I don't quite know what I'm supposed to report and where.
The other message first has a long list of packages, and then ends with "Too
many packages to process (7664/5200)". Now, that is indeed a lot of packages,
but I don't think unreasonably so, because most of them com
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:08:57 -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
> 2. Why is it downgrading my packages?
A likely cause is that you have come from an x86_64-only installation that
has had access to more recent package repositories than what you using
currently. Possibly because you'
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:06:39 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> Except that I would expect the 32-bit and 64-bit packages would be
> going in the same updates, so it shouldn't be possible to get only
> one of them. But maybe that's not the case.
It’s complicated and one of the trick
day, October 27.
Except that I would expect the 32-bit and 64-bit packages would be going
in the same updates, so it shouldn't be possible to get only one of
them. But maybe that's not the case.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedorap
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:44:07 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 10/23/20 1:08 PM, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
> > I am looking to install wine on my new Fedora 33 laptop. When doing
> > 'dnf install wine' I am getting:
>
> Since Fedora 33 hasn't been released yet, I expect someone will tell
> you
On Fri, 2020-10-23 at 15:08 -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
> Can someone direct me to a good way to install a regular version of wine
>
> in F33? I have tried looking for info but have not found a lot.
This is really a topic for the Fedora Test list. F33 is unreleased
software.
poc
___
uld be at least partly
right. The downgrading issue should be raised on the test list. The
rest is more suitable here.
A bunch of i686 packages that will be installed (I think this is
normal), and a bunch of installed x86_64 packages to be downgraded (I
believe to the version corresponding to the
hello,
I am looking to install wine on my new Fedora 33 laptop. When doing 'dnf
install wine' I am getting:
A bunch of i686 packages that will be installed (I think this is
normal), and a bunch of installed x86_64 packages to be downgraded (I
believe to the version correspond
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 01:47:31PM -0500, David wrote:
> I have never used snap packages in any distro,
> and know nothing about them.
>
I've been using them for nextcloud (open source cloud server - it has "apps"
and can also be
used via web browsers) and openhab (hom
I have never used snap packages in any distro,
and know nothing about them.
I was bored yesterday, and so I tried to install some
snaps and tinker with them. I loaded the game
"knavalbattle," and the new GIMP fork, "glimpse," and
a note-taking application, "standard
On 10/11/20 7:29 PM, stan via users wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 19:16:02 -0500
> ITwrx wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to find out why the nim-lang package "nim" is very old (q4
>> 2019), but when i go to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ i
>> get a 503.
On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 19:16:02 -0500
ITwrx wrote:
> I'm trying to find out why the nim-lang package "nim" is very old (q4
> 2019), but when i go to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ i
> get a 503.
>
> Am i going to the right place to see the source code, buil
On 10/11/20 7:16 PM, ITwrx wrote:
> I'm trying to find out why the nim-lang package "nim" is very old (q4
> 2019), but when i go to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ i get a
> 503.
>
> Am i going to the right place to see the source code, build status
I'm trying to find out why the nim-lang package "nim" is very old (q4
2019), but when i go to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ i get a
503.
Am i going to the right place to see the source code, build status of
the package, and who the maintainer i
On 2020-08-06 20:34, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
> Could someone tell me, if I wanted to know, which are all the python packages
> (modules) that come installed by default in Fedora 32 Workstation, how would
> I be able to get that list?
Is this an already installed system?
If so,
hello,
Could someone tell me, if I wanted to know, which are all the python
packages (modules) that come installed by default in Fedora 32
Workstation, how would I be able to get that list?
thank you,
___
users mailing list -- users
1 - 100 of 800 matches
Mail list logo
