On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 07:39:09 -0400
Robert McBroom via users wrote:
> What shell are you using? In Bash--
>
> ~]$ echo 'exec startlxde' >> $XCLIENTS
>
> bash: $XCLIENTS: ambiguous redirect
My error. I do this from a bash script, and have the variable XCLIENTS
defined in the script. I just cu
multiuser / runlevel 3 and start X from there. For
LXDE I use the following to put the correct command in ~/.Xclients
echo 'exec startlxde' >> $XCLIENTS
If you are always going to start LXDE, you should only have to do that
once.
Once that is in place, it is only necessary to run
startx --
unlevel 3 and start X from there. For
LXDE I use the following to put the correct command in ~/.Xclients
echo 'exec startlxde' >> $XCLIENTS
If you are always going to start LXDE, you should only have to do that
once.
Once that is in place, it is only necessary to run
startx -- vt1
k to
LXDE session
** Message: 12:00:19.021: main.vala:124: No desktop environnement set,
fallback to LXDE
** Message: 12:00:21.473: main.vala:145: log directory:
/home/rm3/.cache/lxsession/LXDE
** Message: 12:00:21.473: main.vala:146: log path:
/home/rm3/.cache/lxsession/LXDE/run.log
The syste
following messages in the window--
~]$ lxsession &
[1] 4047
~]$ ** Message: 12:00:19.020: main.vala:113: Session is (null)
** Message: 12:00:19.021: main.vala:114: DE is (null)
** Message: 12:00:19.021: main.vala:118: No session set, fallback to
LXDE session
** Message: 12:00:19.021: main.vala
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 12:18:28PM -, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
> The Fn key is disable because I don't have a response from xev command:
> $ xev
It is often the case that these keys don't ever send anything to the system,
and instead actually change what key is sent. So you might not be a
The Fn key is the wakeup key when the machine is suspended.
If anyone wants to map it to other functions, then that's okay.
I want to map the Fn key on Fedora 33 LXDE.
My keyboard hardware come with an Fn key, see:
[img]https://i.imgur.com/HJlpSEt.jpg[/img]
These are the infos about my Linu
Hi,
Is it possible to send notification (from a script) login screen of LXDE?
Idea is to let anyone to read notifications from background job without
login in to the system.
Regards,
--
Danishka Navin
___
users mailing list -- users
I have never done dnf update, but I suspect you are getting this
message because the current updates are now installing kernel V5.0.
On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 18:21 +0200, Andreas Aßmann wrote:
> When trying to update by typing "dnf update" I always get the error message
>
> """
> Error:
> Problem:
On Tue, 15 May 2018 16:02:12 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> You can go into the ~/Desktop folder and see the files that
> correspond to the icons. They should be .desktop files, but maybe
> they weren't before.
They are all desktop now. I'm pretty sure I would have noticed if they
weren't before,
On 05/15/2018 03:02 PM, stan wrote:
Restarting X didn't work, but the above gave me the hint I needed. I
deleted the offending icons and re-created them, and now they work like
they always did. It seems some api changed, and needed the re-creation
to configure it so it would work properly. That
On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:18:35 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> When I double-click a .desktop file in Nautilus, Gnome pops up a
> dialog box saying that the file is not trusted and do I want to trust
> it and execute it. After agreeing, the proper icon shows up instead
> of the basic file icon. I don'
On 05/15/2018 01:12 PM, stan wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2018 11:55:38 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
Check that the executable bit is set on those files.
It's strange, spectacle had no executable permission, and when I looked
at the properties it says no one can execute it. The problem icons all
had ex
On Tue, 15 May 2018 11:55:38 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 05/15/2018 08:06 AM, stan wrote:
> > The subject pretty much says it. In the last week or so, the
> > behavior of the icons on the desktop has changed to require
> > confirmation before opening the application i
On 05/15/2018 08:06 AM, stan wrote:
The subject pretty much says it. In the last week or so, the behavior
of the icons on the desktop has changed to require confirmation before
opening the application in LXDE. There is one icon, the one for
spectacle, the screen capture application, that this
Hi,
The subject pretty much says it. In the last week or so, the behavior
of the icons on the desktop has changed to require confirmation before
opening the application in LXDE. There is one icon, the one for
spectacle, the screen capture application, that this does not happen
for. So there
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 13:22 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/26/2017 12:42 PM, evade. wrote:
> > Does anybody know the best way to upgrade from Fedora 25 LXDE to
> > Fedora 26 LXQt? I've not found an upgrade path documented
> > anywhere.
> >
> > I'm not
On 07/26/2017 06:17 PM, evade. wrote:
> Thanks very much!
> I would have missed step 3.
Welcome. If you did miss step 3 you'd have a minor problem. The removal of
LXDE
would remove lxdm so when you boot you wouldn't get into a graphical login
screen.
But that would be easy
On 26 July 2017 7:54:02 pm AEST, Ed Greshko wrote:
>On 07/26/2017 05:26 PM, evade. wrote:
>> On 26/07/17 15:22, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 07/26/2017 12:42 PM, evade. wrote:
>>>> Does anybody know the best way to upgrade from Fedora 25 LXDE to
>Fedora 26 LXQt?
&g
On 07/26/2017 05:26 PM, evade. wrote:
> On 26/07/17 15:22, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/26/2017 12:42 PM, evade. wrote:
>>> Does anybody know the best way to upgrade from Fedora 25 LXDE to Fedora 26
>>> LXQt?
>>> I've not found an upgrade path documented
On 26/07/17 15:22, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/26/2017 12:42 PM, evade. wrote:
Does anybody know the best way to upgrade from Fedora 25 LXDE to Fedora 26
LXQt? I've not found an upgrade path documented anywhere.
I'm not concerned about leaving configuration data behind, but would like
On 07/26/2017 12:42 PM, evade. wrote:
> Does anybody know the best way to upgrade from Fedora 25 LXDE to Fedora 26
> LXQt? I've not found an upgrade path documented anywhere.
>
> I'm not concerned about leaving configuration data behind, but would like to
> clean up u
Hello,
Does anybody know the best way to upgrade from Fedora 25 LXDE to Fedora 26
LXQt? I've not found an upgrade path documented anywhere.
I'm not concerned about leaving configuration data behind, but would like to
clean up unnecessary packages after the transition.
Rebuildin
the archives seem to be pure spam for the past two months,
> I am not sure if anyone reads it any more.
>
> So, I thought that I would try my luck here.
>
> I have been trying to build the LXDE spin iso using the default
> Fedora 25 kickstarts
> available /usr/share/spin-kicks
more.
So, I thought that I would try my luck here.
I have been trying to build the LXDE spin iso using the default Fedora 25
kickstarts available
/usr/share/spin-kickstarts/fedora-live-lxde.ks and the dependent kickstart
files. So, I try the following and get:
$sudo setenforce 0
$ sudo livecd
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 07/21/2016 11:34 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using a Thinkpad X1 Carbon laptop with Fedora 24 LXDE spin
> > installed. The default resolution of 2560x1440 is too small and
> > i
On 07/21/2016 11:34 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using a Thinkpad X1 Carbon laptop with Fedora 24 LXDE spin
> installed. The default resolution of 2560x1440 is too small and
> irritates my eyes.
>
> I tired changing the resolution with lxrandr but couldn&#x
Hi,
I am using a Thinkpad X1 Carbon laptop with Fedora 24 LXDE spin installed.
The default resolution of 2560x1440 is too small and irritates my eyes.
I tired changing the resolution with lxrandr but couldn't find any
resolution which is compatible with the screen ratio of 16:9.
Is ther
Hi,
Even with Fedora Media Writer, I got the same issue. Created [1] and
reported the same via test@
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346674
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda
wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback Chris, I will do a quick test with Fedora Media
> W
Thanks for the feedback Chris, I will do a quick test with Fedora Media
Writer and then respond.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:24 AM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> Also note unetbootin isn't supported or recommended by Fedora. Use dd or
> Fedora Media Writer, a.k.a LiveUSB Creator.
>
> Chris Murphy
> --
> u
Also note unetbootin isn't supported or recommended by Fedora. Use dd or
Fedora Media Writer, a.k.a LiveUSB Creator.
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject
Please file a bug ASAP, and include the logs in /tmp. Attach each .log
individually. Next post a message on test@ list with your summary and the
bug URL.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016, 8:31 PM Kalpa Welivitigoda
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was trying LXDE 24 spin pre release yesterday with a live i
Hi all,
I was trying LXDE 24 spin pre release yesterday with a live image made with
unetbooting, it booted without no issues. But when I try to install to
disk, in the storage device recognizing phase, it says "probing for storage
device" (I am not sure about the exact wording though) a
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 08:14:32AM +0200, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 07:53 +0200, Luigi Votta wrote:
> >
> > sudo dnf history rollback
>
> Yes in this case it worked. I discovered you need to do it immediately
> after you messed up, or you will remove *all* transaction ba
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 07:53 +0200, Luigi Votta wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 06:51:29 +0200
> Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > By mistake I ran "sudo dnf install @lxde-desktop" on Fedora 22.
> > How do I reverse that? Grouperase or remove lx
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 06:51:29 +0200
Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> By mistake I ran "sudo dnf install @lxde-desktop" on Fedora 22.
> How do I reverse that? Grouperase or remove lxde-desktop doesn't seem
> to work as it can't find lxde-desktop.
>
Hi,
By mistake I ran "sudo dnf install @lxde-desktop" on Fedora 22.
How do I reverse that? Grouperase or remove lxde-desktop doesn't seem
to work as it can't find lxde-desktop.
/Martin S
--
This address is for technical mail lists only.For all other matters, please use
m
Hi,
I am running a fully-updated F21 LXDE installed from the official spin. How
does one enable the laptop keybindings for brightness, volume, etc? Do I need
an additional package, etc?
Many thanks,
Ranjan
--
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on
hello all,
does somebody tell me, lxde can handle the dual monitor? I mean, the DE
will give 2 desktop instead of monitor extend or duplication. So, if I
press, ctrl-tab on 1 monitor it will show the windows in that screen and
the other will be independent.
Balint
--
users mailing list
f with
> man 1 paplay
>
>> Also, I'm not sure what you meant by linking me to the youtube video,
>> but the image I booted from when my audio worked was this one:
>> http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/20/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-LXDE-x86_64-20-1.iso
>
1 paplay
> Also, I'm not sure what you meant by linking me to the youtube video,
> but the image I booted from when my audio worked was this one:
> http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/20/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-LXDE-x86_64-20-1.iso
That specific live image prob
didn't.
Also, I'm not sure what you meant by linking me to the youtube video,
but the image I booted from when my audio worked was this one:
http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/20/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-LXDE-x86_64-20-1.iso
I don't know the first thing abo
On 18.04.2014 16:00, Someone wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 12:02 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 17.04.2014 04:14, Someone wrote:
>>> On 04/17/2014 09:24 AM, poma wrote:
It's OK, you got it.
$ dmesg | grep -i sound
poma
>>>
>>> Huh? What do you mean? Am I meant to run that command
On 04/17/2014 12:02 PM, poma wrote:
> On 17.04.2014 04:14, Someone wrote:
>> On 04/17/2014 09:24 AM, poma wrote:
>>>
>>> It's OK, you got it.
>>>
>>> $ dmesg | grep -i sound
>>>
>>>
>>> poma
>>
>> Huh? What do you mean? Am I meant to run that command? Here's the
>> output: https://dpaste.de/diPR
>>
On 17.04.2014 04:14, Someone wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 09:24 AM, poma wrote:
>>
>> It's OK, you got it.
>>
>> $ dmesg | grep -i sound
>>
>>
>> poma
>
> Huh? What do you mean? Am I meant to run that command? Here's the
> output: https://dpaste.de/diPR
>
HD Audio models:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Do
On 04/17/2014 09:24 AM, poma wrote:
>
> It's OK, you got it.
>
> $ dmesg | grep -i sound
>
>
> poma
Huh? What do you mean? Am I meant to run that command? Here's the
output: https://dpaste.de/diPR
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription option
On 17.04.2014 03:07, Someone wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 01:01 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 16.04.2014 18:10, Someone wrote:
>>> FWIW, I've just reinstalled alsa-plugins-pulseaudio and rebooted. While
>>> the widget seems to be here to stay, the only channel remains "Dummy
>>> Output", and sound still doesn't
On 04/17/2014 01:01 AM, poma wrote:
> On 16.04.2014 18:10, Someone wrote:
>> FWIW, I've just reinstalled alsa-plugins-pulseaudio and rebooted. While
>> the widget seems to be here to stay, the only channel remains "Dummy
>> Output", and sound still doesn't play.
>>
>> On 04/17/2014 12:01 AM, Someon
On 16.04.2014 18:10, Someone wrote:
> FWIW, I've just reinstalled alsa-plugins-pulseaudio and rebooted. While
> the widget seems to be here to stay, the only channel remains "Dummy
> Output", and sound still doesn't play.
>
> On 04/17/2014 12:01 AM, Someone wrote:
>>> What is your make/model lapto
FWIW, I've just reinstalled alsa-plugins-pulseaudio and rebooted. While
the widget seems to be here to stay, the only channel remains "Dummy
Output", and sound still doesn't play.
On 04/17/2014 12:01 AM, Someone wrote:
>> What is your make/model laptop?
>
> It's a Lenovo Thinkpad.
>
>> Not famil
> What is your make/model laptop?
It's a Lenovo Thinkpad.
> Not familiar with laptopsbut I suppose their audio device still sits on
> the PCI bus What does
>
> lspci | grep -i audio
>
> show?
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio
Controller (rev 0
On 04/16/14 16:04, Someone wrote:
> My sound abruptly stopped working, and the notification area widget
> stopped appearing. It hasn't been working for a couple of weeks, at this
> point, though it had been working fine before that. (Before it stopped
> working, the notification area widget had bee
My sound abruptly stopped working, and the notification area widget
stopped appearing. It hasn't been working for a couple of weeks, at this
point, though it had been working fine before that. (Before it stopped
working, the notification area widget had been displaying, as well.
I can run pavucont
On 07/13/13 15:47, antonio montagnani wrote:
> Ed Greshko ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 13/07/2013 09:03:
>> On 07/13/13 15:01, antonio wrote:
>>> Ed Greshko ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 13/07/2013 08:53:
On 07/13/13 13:52, antonio wrote:
> poma ha scri
Ed Greshko ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 13/07/2013 09:03:
On 07/13/13 15:01, antonio wrote:
Ed Greshko ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 13/07/2013 08:53:
On 07/13/13 13:52, antonio wrote:
poma ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 12/07/2013 23:03:
On 07/13/13 15:01, antonio wrote:
> Ed Greshko ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 13/07/2013 08:53:
>> On 07/13/13 13:52, antonio wrote:
>>> poma ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 12/07/2013 23:03:
On 12.07.2013 11:12, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
>
>
>
Ed Greshko ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 13/07/2013 08:53:
On 07/13/13 13:52, antonio wrote:
poma ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 12/07/2013 23:03:
On 12.07.2013 11:12, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981738
he
On 07/13/13 13:52, antonio wrote:
> poma ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 12/07/2013 23:03:
>> On 12.07.2013 11:12, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981738
>>>
>>> here we are :-)
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
poma ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 12/07/2013 23:03:
On 12.07.2013 11:12, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981738
here we are :-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800658
poma
should it be already fixed in F19???
On 12.07.2013 11:12, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981738
>
> here we are :-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800658
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
ht
f we issue poweroff or reboot when logged as root in text mode with
> Ctrl+Alt+F2 poweroff or reboot works fine.
> We had such an issue in F18.
>
> Any idea??
http://lxde.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lxde/lxsession;a=commit;h=eadab747cd597ddf64d147289aa98f847f4b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981738
here we are :-)
Messaggio originale
Da: antonio.montagn...@alice.it
Data: 12-lug-2013 10.58
A:
Ogg: F18 to F19: shutdown doesn't work in LXDE
Fedup worked fine also on a small old laptop.
We have a minor issue, wh
Fedup worked fine also on a small old laptop.
We have a minor issue, when we try to switch off from the menu, machine
doesn't shut down and we have to use the power button to poweroff
But if we issue poweroff or reboot when logged as root in text mode with
Ctrl+Alt+F2 poweroff or reboot wor
On 29.04.2013 07:08, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have installed several F17 desktop with LXDE spin.
> It's OK.
>
> Now I have a F18 "server" (on a 1U racked server), where I enabled XDMCP.
>
> I want the F17 desktops to be the X clients
Hi all,
I have installed several F17 desktop with LXDE spin.
It's OK.
Now I have a F18 "server" (on a 1U racked server), where I enabled XDMCP.
I want the F17 desktops to be the X clients of the server, in a simple
way (users are not geeks). To achieve this,
- I want the LX
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:13:40 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:24:49AM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>> Can I easily switch from LDXE and gnome 3 and back (in fedora 18)?
[]
> Just that easy. I do that with XFCE, although I confess I haven't used
> GNOME in mont
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:24:49AM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Can I easily switch from LDXE and gnome 3 and back (in fedora 18)?
Yes. If both are installed, you will be presented with a choice in the login
screen (GDM). (You have to select a user first, and then before y
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:24:49AM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Can I easily switch from LDXE and gnome 3 and back (in fedora 18)?
Yes. If both are installed, you will be presented with a choice in the login
screen (GDM). (You have to select a user first, and then before you hit
enter for your pa
Hello,
Can I easily switch from LDXE and gnome 3 and back (in fedora 18)?
Thank.
--
==
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@kegtux.org
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère
Université du Littoral-Côte d
Hi
Running FC17 with LXDE -- I did not load any gnome packages off the install
DVD.
--
I want two or three X11 sessions running simultaneously as user1 on tty1
user 2 on tty2, user 3 on tty3 ...
1) I have one active LXDE desktop on pts/0 as user1 running perfectly from
the startup scripts
2
Joel Rees wrote:
Proof my brain has not been working right lately --
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Rick Stevens
wrote:
On 04/10/2012 03:55 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
Anybody using XFCE or LXDE who are missing their hibernate button in
the
Proof my brain has not been working right lately --
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Rick Stevens
> wrote:
>> On 04/10/2012 03:55 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>>>
>>> Anybody using XFCE or LXDE who are missing their hibe
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:42:46 +0900,
Joel Rees wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Rick Stevens
wrote:
On 04/10/2012 03:55 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
Anybody using XFCE or LXDE who are missing their hibernate button in
the logout dialog after the recent kernel upgrade?
Which new
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Rick Stevens
wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 03:55 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>>
>> Anybody using XFCE or LXDE who are missing their hibernate button in
>> the logout dialog after the recent kernel upgrade?
>
>
> Which new kernel? I'm runni
On 04/10/2012 03:55 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
Anybody using XFCE or LXDE who are missing their hibernate button in
the logout dialog after the recent kernel upgrade?
Which new kernel? I'm running 3.3.1-3.fc16.x86_64 and I see it.
Or should I suspect that moving the /home partition to
Anybody using XFCE or LXDE who are missing their hibernate button in
the logout dialog after the recent kernel upgrade?
Or should I suspect that moving the /home partition to a new partition
yesterday is to blame?
(Need to look up what I have to do with SELinux after a move like
this. I remember
just start doing
> that.
>
> > Also, how does fvwm relate with fluxbox?
>
> Don't have any idea what a fluxbox is :-).
>
You're just like me, HA. I like LXDE because its fast and simple too. if
you're still using fvwm, you might enjoy looking at something c
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:29:24 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> I am curious: how do you handle wifi connections? Do you do things from
> the command line, and then, where do you put in the passwords and other
> codes? Or do you use wicd-tools or NetworkManager or the like? How
> about bluetooth?
I don
s get a bee in their bonnet. That pretty
> much totally excludes both gnome and KDE from any consideration.
>
> I strongly suspect both XFCE and LXDE will wind up having the
> same thing happen, they both seem to exhibit evidence of being
> actively developed, which means bees c
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 09:17 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 24.09.2011 03:22, schrieb Craig White:
> > clearly the best way not to interrupt your workflow is not to upgrade at
> > all... who is being stupid here?
>
> so you recommend in other words using F4 after EOL in december this year
> ei
Am 25.09.2011 11:13, schrieb Alexander Volovics:
> And all these other 'changes' making laptops much more
> difficult to use, such as say
> - UEFI
only for multi-boot systems
in times of virtualization where you can even run an ESXi5 in
VMware-Workstation and inside this x86_64 guests with good
Am 24.09.2011 19:23, schrieb pct...@mybellybutton.com:
> I find it ironic that the people that were screaming about KDE when they went
> this route are
> defending Gnome for going the same route.
i do not!
why?
because it has taken years to get the epic-fail of KDE 4.0 corrected
one th
gt; different controls than driving a car (or a boat). Don't force me to use
> boat controls for my plane if you don't mind :-)
that is exactly the point!
> Of course we have the other DE's which are better suited - so my
> suggestion is move Gnome-3 to a tablet spin and
Am 24.09.2011 13:46, schrieb Craig White:
> Whether people are programmers or not is decidedly not the point here.
> The GNOME developers have made a decision to revamp the UI to account
> for the fact that computers are extending beyond the model borne out of
> Xerox PARC... a keyboard, screen a
Am 24.09.2011 03:22, schrieb Craig White:
> On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 06:16 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.09.2011 02:21, schrieb Craig White:
>>
>>> People who are getting worked up about the current state of GNOME 3 are
>>> just being stupid... they have other DM's to choose from
>>
>> thi
On 09/25/2011 09:36 AM, Tim wrote:
> And, in my case, I do not like being close to monitors. Particularly
> VDUs that strobe. So I'm using to viewing them from probably double the
> distance most people would.
And that'd be about three times the distance I find comfortable.
--
users mailing lis
Tim:
>> Most screens tend to be rather poor resolution, so you have little
>> choice but to run windows full-screen, and with biggish fonts.
Joe Zeff:
> I've never had a problem with that, and until April, when I had cataract
> surgery, I was intensely nearsighted. Of course, I do keep my monito
On 09/25/2011 05:49 AM, Tim wrote:
> Most screens tend to be rather poor resolution, so you have little
> choice but to run windows full-screen, and with biggish fonts.
I've never had a problem with that, and until April, when I had cataract
surgery, I was intensely nearsighted. Of course, I do
On 09/25/2011 02:13 AM, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> I could probably produce on short notice say about 20 'users'
> who do not agree with you.
> And these masses keep the manufacturers (Dell, Lenovo, etc)
> in business, not us.
> A lot of them will have little difficulty adapting to Unity/Gnome 3
On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 11:13 +0200, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> And all these other 'changes' making laptops much more
> difficult to use, such as say
> - the 16:9 format of the screens
That depends on the use of the computer. For spreadsheets, which are
usually wider than taller, they can be usef
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 12:12 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> I suspect that touch screens will become prominent for desktop use in
> the near future. They've always been available but very little
> software actually made sense of them, thus there's been nothing to
> drive sales (save for maybe the Wacom
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:26:49AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:>
> Its one thing to add tablet/phone ("metro") mode - its another to make
> laptops (or desktops) much more difficult to use.
You should stop and think about how 'ego-centric' your remarks
are. "We" on this mailing list hardly re
Can we get back to LXDE, GNOME or anything Fedora related?
--
Regards,
Olav
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
On 09/24/2011 05:20 PM, Craig White wrote:
>
>> lets
>>> not pretend you're gonna hold your laptop up to your face and make a
>>> call ... are you?
>
> You seem to be conveniently ignoring the context.
>
> Craig
>
>
So did you a bit - I put a smiley in there ... my comment was light
hearte
On 09/24/2011 07:36 PM, Craig White wrote:
> I think it's rather analogous.
>
> This is not the first time that you have impressed me with your ability
> to create inference out of your own impressions.
>
It may or may not be a valid analogy, but it's certainly phrased in an
insulting way. I'l
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 14:32 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 09/24/2011 02:20 PM, Craig White wrote:
> > fair enough though I'm not certain that it doesn't add anything to my
> > point... especially when it comes in response to an overtly sarcastic
> > comment, specifically:
> >
> >> > lets
> >>> > >
On 09/24/2011 02:20 PM, Craig White wrote:
> fair enough though I'm not certain that it doesn't add anything to my
> point... especially when it comes in response to an overtly sarcastic
> comment, specifically:
>
>> > lets
>>> > > not pretend you're gonna hold your laptop up to your face and ma
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 13:03 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 09/24/2011 12:12 PM, Craig White wrote:
> > The flat earth people apparently don't want to believe that
> > the telephone in my pocket with an 854x480 screen is actually a computer
> > and yes, someday I just might want to be able to run Fedor
On 09/24/2011 10:40 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 10:02 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>> +1
> Did you read the part about trimming posts or is this some strange
> postmodern joke?
>
> poc
yes. ;)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or chang
On 09/24/2011 12:12 PM, Craig White wrote:
> The flat earth people apparently don't want to believe that
> the telephone in my pocket with an 854x480 screen is actually a computer
> and yes, someday I just might want to be able to run Fedora or Ubuntu on
> it.
Please keep *argumentum ad hominem* o
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
