make any sense?
Never mind, II decided to drop F12 and install the latest.
Sorry for the noise!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mai
On 11/02/2012 10:24 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
>
> Apparently, my disk started failing and dropped
> some critical files.
>
> I tried to use LiveCD but I cannot do a linux rescue
>
> What I planned to do was to yum reinstall and try to
> recover what is missing.
>
> Does this make any sense?
Not r
Apparently, my disk started failing and dropped
some critical files.
I tried to use LiveCD but I cannot do a linux rescue
What I planned to do was to yum reinstall and try to
recover what is missing.
Does this make any sense?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:52 AM, tom wrote:
> thx everyone.
> this is a old 1.4ghz cpu, and i assumed that f12 would be faster on that as
> the latest fedora. any ideas? i tried lxde spin, but the system didnt boot
> up ;-(
How much memory do you have? That's likely the lim
thx everyone.
this is a old 1.4ghz cpu, and i assumed that f12 would be faster on that as
the latest fedora. any ideas? i tried lxde spin, but the system didnt boot
up ;-(
thx
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:43 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth <
tchollingswo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 201
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:03 AM, tom wrote:
> well, i didnt specify any size limitations during installation.
> so how do i change that now?
First, you need to shrink your root (/) volume. This will shrink it
to 10GB, but you can change that if you'd like, just change the "10G":
lvresize -rL 10G
> well, i didnt specify any size limitations during installation.
> so how do i change that now?
> thx
Well, if it is a new system, it could be easy to copy all your home
data to a usb pendrive or hard drive, and reinstall, also think about
installing a new version F15 or F16.
If you have too muc
On 15 December 2011 11:03, tom wrote:
> well, i didnt specify any size limitations during installation.
> so how do i change that now?
> thx
>
>
Don't use LVM myself, but see the LVM HOWTO for some info:
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
You'll want to review section 11.10 to shrink the systemro
gt; >
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Reindl Harald <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>
> <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 15.12.2011 11:17, schrieb tom:
30M 7% /boot
> > /dev/mapper/vg_acertm-lv_home
> > ext44,5G 2,5G 1,8G 60% /home
> >
> > needed something 'light', and i didnt like the lubuntu wiki.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Reindl Harald
> > h.rei...@thelounge.net
2011 at 11:25 AM, Reindl Harald <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 15.12.2011 11:17, schrieb tom:
> > just installed F12 on a pc with 60GB hdd. but when i click on the users
> home directory, it says only 1.7 gb
> > available. i don
ext44,5G 2,5G 1,8G 60% /home
needed something 'light', and i didnt like the lubuntu wiki.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 15.12.2011 11:17, schrieb tom:
> > just installed F12 on a pc with 60GB hdd. but when i click on t
Am 15.12.2011 11:17, schrieb tom:
> just installed F12 on a pc with 60GB hdd. but when i click on the users home
> directory, it says only 1.7 gb
> available. i dont see anythign about a quota nor do i recall having selected
> antyhing like that during install
> what is my m
hi
just installed F12 on a pc with 60GB hdd. but when i click on the users
home directory, it says only 1.7 gb available. i dont see anythign about a
quota nor do i recall having selected antyhing like that during install
what is my mistake?
thx
--
users mailing list
users
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:49:21 -0800,
>> Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>>> Going from F12 to F14
>>> 200MB /boot partition (software raid1)
&g
Robert Arkiletian:
>Here is a question.
>Currently got /boot as a separate raided partition. What if I boot
>into linux rescue mode with install cd and copy /boot dir to the /
> partition. Essentially removing the separate /boot partition. Then
> edit
>/etc/fstab (remove /boot partition m
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:49:21 -0800,
> Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>> Going from F12 to F14
>> 200MB /boot partition (software raid1)
>> I know Preupgrade won't work as /boot is too small.
>> Can I use
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:49:21 -0800,
Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> Going from F12 to F14
> 200MB /boot partition (software raid1)
> I know Preupgrade won't work as /boot is too small.
> Can I use an F14 netinstall cd with Anaconda to upgrade or does that
> also require a la
Going from F12 to F14
200MB /boot partition (software raid1)
I know Preupgrade won't work as /boot is too small.
Can I use an F14 netinstall cd with Anaconda to upgrade or does that
also require a larger /boot partition?
--
Robert Arkiletian
Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada
--
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Danishka Navin
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Robert Arkiletian
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I've got a F12 32bit box with raid1
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Danishka Navin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Robert Arkiletian
> wrote:
>>
>> I've got a F12 32bit box with raid1 (software mdadm) 200MB /boot. I
>> know I can't use preupgrade (/boot too small) but what
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> I've got a F12 32bit box with raid1 (software mdadm) 200MB /boot. I
> know I can't use preupgrade (/boot too small) but what about using an
> F14 install DVD? Will that upgrade work?
>
AFAIK, F12 > F1
I've got a F12 32bit box with raid1 (software mdadm) 200MB /boot. I
know I can't use preupgrade (/boot too small) but what about using an
F14 install DVD? Will that upgrade work?
--
Robert Arkiletian
Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproj
On 06/11/2011 02:43 PM, Andrew Jamison wrote:
> I have heard if you plan to upgrade in this manner it is best to upgrade from
> f12 to f13 then from 13 - 14 due to the rapid change in technologies from f12
> to f14 but again this just what I have heard not sure if this is actually th
I have heard if you plan to upgrade in this manner it is best to upgrade from
f12 to f13 then from 13 - 14 due to the rapid change in technologies from f12
to f14 but again this just what I have heard not sure if this is actually the
case
-Original Message-
From: users-boun
My first ever attempt preupgrade; F12 to F14
I muddled through it and eventually able to boot F14:
$ uname -r
2.6.35.13-91.fc14.i686.PAE
In general looks ok;
I had to change hostname manually after booting F14.
But, now, occasionally when starting emacs as root
getting error:[root@f12 grub
> Is it possible to recover the memory and resume the program where it had to
> terminate unexpectedly.
It's gone when the power goes.
> The program was running for 2-3 weeks, hence don't want to start the program
> from fresh.
I would check the documentation and see whether the software checkpo
All,
I’m working on upgrading my Amahi 5/F12 install to Amahi 6.1/F14 and I’m
running into an issue.
First off, during the system check, the installer comes back and says it can’t
save the install.img file in /boot (/dev/sda1) because the partition is too
small. Then after I’ve had preupgrade
It depends on the design of the program but generally speaking, it's not
> possible. Some programs save datafiles and the like as they run so in
> those
> cases it might be possible to recover and carry on from a mid-point in the
> program run but unless the program is specifically designed to do
> If it was written to "read, compute, write, cycle back", you could
> probably start it up again at will.
>
>
Yes it was mainly "read, compute,write" cycle.
It was a perl program, running HMMer (hidden markov model program) on a set
of genome data.
I'm not familiar with UPS...???
--
users mail
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 10:49:19 +1000
Nermin Celik wrote:
> Is it possible to recover the memory and resume the program where it had to
> terminate unexpectedly.
It depends on the design of the program but generally speaking, it's not
possible. Some programs save datafiles and the like as they run
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 10:49 +1000, Nermin Celik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've F12 installed on my PC.
> An electricity cut happened while running a program on the terminal
> line. A general electricity cut nothing to do with PC hardware
> failure. Hence PC restarted itself aft
Hello,
I've F12 installed on my PC.
An electricity cut happened while running a program on the terminal line. A
general electricity cut nothing to do with PC hardware failure. Hence PC
restarted itself after electricity was back however the program that was
runing terminated before compl
Attached the history of today:
procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system--
-cpu-
r b swpd free buff cache si sobibo in cs us sy id
wa st
2 0 265408 76740 4492 10422400 0 0 358 176 11 1 88
0 0
0 0 265408 76740 45
--- On Wed, 3/9/11, JB wrote:
> madunix gmail.com
> gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > I will try to add more RAM to it. I have done the yum
> check ... all went OK
> > ... but it didn't change the behaviour. Thanks for
> your help.
> > ...
>
> OK.
> Now you can look at your system components.
>
madunix gmail.com gmail.com> writes:
>
> I will try to add more RAM to it. I have done the yum check ... all went OK
> ... but it didn't change the behaviour. Thanks for your help.
> ...
OK.
Now you can look at your system components.
> Mem:500128k total, 484136k used,15992k free,
I will try to add more RAM to it. I have done the yum check ... all went OK
... but it didn't change the behaviour. Thanks for your help.
# dmidecode 2.10
SMBIOS 2.3 present.
74 structures occupying 2320 bytes.
Table at 0x000F0450.
Handle 0xDA00, DMI type 218, 35 bytes
OEM-specific Type
--- On Mon, 3/7/11, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Recently upgraded from Fedora 9 to Fedora 12 (upgrade
> procedure not
> fresh install) and Xorg appears to behave strange, cpu
> jumps to high
> utilization and Xorg getting 50% or more and swap
> keep increasing.
> Any suggestions.
Yes.
First, di
stions.
Not really, but note that F12 is no longer supported. If you want to use
Fedora it's important to keep up to date. You should try F13 or F14.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
madunix gmail.com gmail.com> writes:
>
> Dears,
>
> Recently upgraded from Fedora 9 to Fedora 12 (upgrade procedure not
> fresh install) and Xorg appears to behave strange, cpu jumps to high
> utilization and Xorg getting 50% or more and swap keep increasing.
> Any suggestions.
This may help
Dears,
Recently upgraded from Fedora 9 to Fedora 12 (upgrade procedure not
fresh install) and Xorg appears to behave strange, cpu jumps to high
utilization and Xorg getting 50% or more and swap keep increasing.
Any suggestions.
0 0 243616 7684 42256 9436810 1 1 358 200 10
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Adil Adil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if there is a way to upgrade directly from F8 to F12 instead of
> upgrading to 9, then 10, 11 nd finally 12 as explained in this page:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_from_EOL_Fedora_using_y
--
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 12/05/2010 01:01 PM, Adil Adil wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm wondering if there is a way to upgrade directly from >> F8 to F12
>> instead of...
&g
On 12/05/2010 01:01 PM, Adil Adil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if there is a way to upgrade directly from F8 to F12 instead of
> upgrading to 9, then 10, 11 nd finally 12 as explained in this page:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_from_EOL_Fedora_using_yum
>
Yo
Hi,
I'm wondering if there is a way to upgrade directly from F8 to F12 instead of
upgrading to 9, then 10, 11 nd finally 12 as explained in this page:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_from_EOL_Fedora_using_yum
Thank you
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.o
or making an
>>> iso image. atop often shows disk activity above 90%. I do most of this
>>> using ionice -c3, (ie 'idle' scheduling) which is supposed to reduce
>>> impact on other tasks. The man page says "The impact of idle io
>>> processes on nor
On 12/04/2010 03:16 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 12/04/2010 11:56 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>> 1) It doesn't seem to matter what image I choose to use as my desktop
>> background. It doesn't stick.
>
> Try installing and using Wallpapoz. I originally tried it so I could
> have a different backgr
On 12/04/2010 11:56 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> 1) It doesn't seem to matter what image I choose to use as my desktop
> background. It doesn't stick.
Try installing and using Wallpapoz. I originally tried it so I could
have a different background on each desktop, but found it much more
inte
On 12/04/2010 12:55 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 12:46:32 -0500,
> "Kevin J. Cummings" wrote:
>> me. Anyone have any ideas on what might be wrong, or how I can change
>> my desktop appearance in a more *permanent* manner?
>
> This doesn't solve the desktop oddity, but y
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Adil Adil writes:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I burned the dvd as image with nero.
>>
>
>> He re is the error message:
>>
>> /sbin/load_policy: error while loading shared libraries:
>> /lib/libselinux.so.1: cannot read file data: Input/output error.
>>
Adil Adil writes:
Hi,
I burned the dvd as image with nero.
Now the boot from dvd is possibile but I have an error message at the beginning
of the installation.
I am wondering if this has something to do with the end of life of F12 that you
are mentionning
You are confusing Fedora, and
Hi,
I burned the dvd as image with nero.
Now the boot from dvd is possibile but I have an error message at the beginning
of the installation.
I am wondering if this has something to do with the end of life of F12 that you
are mentionning or it is just the support that won't be possible.
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 12:46:32 -0500,
"Kevin J. Cummings" wrote:
> me. Anyone have any ideas on what might be wrong, or how I can change
> my desktop appearance in a more *permanent* manner?
This doesn't solve the desktop oddity, but you could make a new image
at the correct resolution using
w (which is
labeled "Appearance Properties" and I can select "stretch" for the
Style, and the 2 white bars disappear as the picture streches to fill my
display. This is the way it was on both FC6 and F9. I have changed
nothing here. Since F12 and now on F14 I can "
ivity above 90%. I do most of this
>> using ionice -c3, (ie 'idle' scheduling) which is supposed to reduce
>> impact on other tasks. The man page says "The impact of idle io
>> processes on normal system activity should be zero" and certainly
>> under f12 t
3, (ie 'idle' scheduling) which is supposed to reduce
> impact on other tasks. The man page says "The impact of idle io
> processes on normal system activity should be zero" and certainly
> under f12 that seemed at least approximately true; but under f13
> termina
impact on other tasks. The man page says "The impact of idle io
processes on normal system activity should be zero" and certainly
under f12 that seemed at least approximately true; but under f13
terminal response is often very sluggish when these tasks are running.
Using kde 4.5.3,
stan wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:56:04 -0500
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>> stan wrote:
>
>>> #Fix console loglevel
>>> if [ -n "$LOGLEVEL" ]; then
>>> /bin/dmesg -n $LOGLEVEL
>>> else
>>> /bin/dmesg -n 3
>>> fi
>>
>> /bin/dmesg -n ${LOGLEVEL:-3}
>
> That's slick. I presume you m
On 11/17/2010 04:22 PM, stan wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:56:04 -0500
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>> stan wrote:
>
>>> #Fix console loglevel
>>> if [ -n "$LOGLEVEL" ]; then
>>>/bin/dmesg -n $LOGLEVEL
>>> else
>>>/bin/dmesg -n 3
>>> fi
>>
>> /bin/dmesg -n ${LOGLEVEL:-3}
>
> That
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:56:04 -0500
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> stan wrote:
> > #Fix console loglevel
> > if [ -n "$LOGLEVEL" ]; then
> >/bin/dmesg -n $LOGLEVEL
> > else
> >/bin/dmesg -n 3
> > fi
>
> /bin/dmesg -n ${LOGLEVEL:-3}
That's slick. I presume you meant
/bin/dmesg -n ${LO
On 11/17/10 12:48, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>> I tried sending this last week, but never saw it on the list.
>>
>> Recently F12 updated thunderbird to 3.0.10; however, there was no update
>> to thunderbird-lightning so I no longer have access to m
stan wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:25:08 -0600
> "Ryan O'Hara" wrote:
>
>> Those messages on the console (with the timestamp) are from
>> dmesg. These are visible on the console in F14 because rc.sysinit no
>> longer sets the dmesg logging level, thus all messages from dmesg end
>> up being writ
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I tried sending this last week, but never saw it on the list.
>
> Recently F12 updated thunderbird to 3.0.10; however, there was no update
> to thunderbird-lightning so I no longer have access to my calendar.
> When I start thunderbird I get a message s
"Kevin J. Cummings" wrote:
>
>> 2a) VESA has lots of problems returning to a proper video mode. If I
>> run dosbox in full-screen mode, when it returns to X11, the resolution
>> is less than stellar. Its the same size, but it seems like every other
>> pixel is missing. Heck, All I have to do is
I just wanted to send out an update after (almost) 2 weeks.
On 11/03/2010 02:52 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> Last night, after I successfully upgraded my F13 test desktop from
> F13->F14 w/preupgrade, I started the same operation on my F12 laptop.
>
> The results were not so go
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:29:27AM -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 09:42 AM, stan wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:25:08 -0600
> > "Ryan O'Hara" wrote:
> >
> >> Those messages on the console (with the timestamp) are from
> >> dmesg. These are visible on the console in F14 because rc.sy
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:42:17AM -0700, stan wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:25:08 -0600
> "Ryan O'Hara" wrote:
>
> > Those messages on the console (with the timestamp) are from
> > dmesg. These are visible on the console in F14 because rc.sysinit no
> > longer sets the dmesg logging level, thu
On 11/15/2010 09:42 AM, stan wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:25:08 -0600
> "Ryan O'Hara" wrote:
>
>> Those messages on the console (with the timestamp) are from
>> dmesg. These are visible on the console in F14 because rc.sysinit no
>> longer sets the dmesg logging level, thus all messages from dm
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:25:08 -0600
"Ryan O'Hara" wrote:
> Those messages on the console (with the timestamp) are from
> dmesg. These are visible on the console in F14 because rc.sysinit no
> longer sets the dmesg logging level, thus all messages from dmesg end
> up being written to the console. S
I tried sending this last week, but never saw it on the list.
Recently F12 updated thunderbird to 3.0.10; however, there was no update
to thunderbird-lightning so I no longer have access to my calendar.
When I start thunderbird I get a message saying lightning 1.0b2pre is
not compatible with
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 04:39:43PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:52:05 -0400
> "Kevin J. Cummings" wrote:
>
> > Last night, after I successfully upgraded my F13 test desktop from
> > F13->F14 w/preupgrade, I started the same operation on m
Dave Cross gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> Exactly the same results as every other attempt, I'm afraid. But,
> happily, I had no problem at all rebooting back into my old F12
> system.
>
> I've downloaded a DVD ISO and burned it onto a disk. I'm thinking I
>
"Configured Monitor"
> EndSection
>
> Section "Screen"
> Identifier "Default Screen"
> Monitor "Configured Monitor"
> Device "Configured Video Device"
> EndSection
>
> - make
eeds (it will come handy in emergency)
# cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf-vesa
- reboot
Note:
- if the system becomes unbootable/graphics unstable, restore to your old
config file with nvidia driver
# cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf-fedora12 /etc/X11/xorg.conf
- reboot to your F12 kernel
JB
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
On 10 November 2010 11:01, JB wrote:
> JB gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>
> Once you do the above, please do the following:
>
> # cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf-fedora12
>
> then
>
> # vi /etc/grub.conf
>
> In the Preupgarde kernel line:
> - remove this option
> rdblacklist=nouveau
> -
Dave Cross gmail.com> writes:
> ...
OK.
I will respond to this post when you try my second post from yesterday ?
It will try to set you up with a vesa graphics driver (presumably a sure bet).
If it succeeds, you should be in F14.
Then let me know and I will guide with a follow-up steps, even be
On 10 November 2010 08:15, JB wrote:
> Give me output of:
> $ cat /etc/modprobe.conf
It's an empty file.
> $ cat /etc/modprobe.d/anaconda.conf
# cat /etc/modprobe.d/anaconda.conf
# Module options and blacklists written by anaconda
(i.e. basically another empty file)
> $ cat /etc/modprobe.d/b
I'm running F12 on a system. There was an update to thunderbird yesterday;
however, there was no update
for thunderbird-lightning. When I start thunderbird it tells me that
lightning 1.0b2pre is not compatible with
thunderbird 3.0.10. Is there going to be an update for lightning?
JB gmail.com> writes:
> ...
Once you do the above, please do the following:
# cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf-fedora12
then
# vi /etc/grub.conf
In the Preupgarde kernel line:
- remove this option
rdblacklist=nouveau
- append these options
xdriver=vesa nomodeset
Save the file,
Dave Cross gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> # ls -al /etc/modprobe*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 2010-02-16 06:15 /etc/modprobe.conf
>
> /etc/modprobe.d:
> total 56
> drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 2010-07-18 10:44 .
> drwxr-xr-x. 126 root root 12288 2010-11-10 03:23 ..
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root
On 9 November 2010 21:33, JB wrote:
> Dave Cross gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>
> Hi,
> I thought you were done and forgot about us :-)
Yeah, sorry. I don't often have the free time to explore this. I
won't, for example, be able to try out any more suggestions until
Thursday evening at the earlie
JB gmail.com> writes:
> Please give me the output of:
> ...
> $ ls -al /etc/
> ...
Sorry, I do not need this one !
JB
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: htt
Dave Cross gmail.com> writes:
> ...
Hi,
I thought you were done and forgot about us :-)
We have to learn some more about your system (we could try and shoot it blindly
but that makes no sense).
I assume it is a problem with your display driver.
Please give me the output of:
$ lspci -v
$ ls -a
On 9 November 2010 19:44, Dave Cross wrote:
> On 7 November 2010 18:49, JB wrote:
>> Give it a shot and reboot to start Preupgrade.
>
> About to restart. I'll report on the results as soon as I can.
And we're back. But unfortunately the situation is exactly the same as
before. It's still prompt
On 7 November 2010 18:49, JB wrote:
> JB gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Dave Cross gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > ...
>> > #boot=/dev/sda
>> > default=1
>> > timeout=5
>> > splashimage=(hd0,4)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz
>> > hiddenmenu
>>
>> Please modify /etc/grub.conf as below:
>> default=0
>> # hiddenme
JB gmail.com> writes:
>
> Dave Cross gmail.com> writes:
>
> > ...
> > #boot=/dev/sda
> > default=1
> > timeout=5
> > splashimage=(hd0,4)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz
> > hiddenmenu
>
> Please modify /etc/grub.conf as below:
> default=0
> # hiddenmenu
>
> Reboot.
> JB
>
Hi,
I got your response
Dave Cross gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> #boot=/dev/sda
> default=1
> timeout=5
> splashimage=(hd0,4)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz
> hiddenmenu
Please modify /etc/grub.conf as below:
default=0
# hiddenmenu
Reboot.
JB
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subsc
On 6 November 2010 14:35, JB wrote:
> Dave Cross gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>> If it helps, my disk layout is as follows:
>>
>> $ df
>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
>> /dev/sda5 100790004 8666260 87003832 10% /
>> tmpfs 412564
Dave Cross gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> If it helps, my disk layout is as follows:
>
> $ df
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda5100790004 8666260 87003832 10% /
> tmpfs 4125644 3072 4122572 1% /dev/shm
> /dev/sda
I had a similar problem to this back in July when I tried to used
Preupgrade to move from F12 to F13. At the time I ran out of spare
time so I just stayed on F12. Now I'm trying to use Preupgrade to go
from F12 to F14 and I'm getting the same issue.
Preupgrade downloads all of the req
On 11/02/2010 04:37 AM, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:42 AM, dexter wrote:
>> /me I'm using Firefox-4.0-b8pre this last 2 months in F12 and its very
>> very fast :-)
>> Security comes straight from mozilla & before any repo esp, now the
>&
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:52:05 -0400
"Kevin J. Cummings" wrote:
> Last night, after I successfully upgraded my F13 test desktop from
> F13->F14 w/preupgrade, I started the same operation on my F12 laptop.
>
> The results were not so good.
>
> X86_64, Asus S96J lapt
On 11/03/2010 01:26 PM, Roger K. Wells wrote:
On 11/03/2010 03:38 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
On 11/03/2010 03:11 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
I think the main problem is that you skipped F13 and jumped to F14
directly. Usually the most well-tested upgrades are to $release+
*from: http://fedor
On 11/03/2010 12:11 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> Don't forget to go through all the .rpmnew and .rpmsave files and
> replace/merge them as necessary
Apparently there are also .rpmorig files... Someone should really create
a package to help users manage these after upgrade.
--
users mailing l
de to current release directly*
Preupgrade provides an upgrade directly to the latest version of Fedora.
It is not necessary to upgrade to intermediate versions.
For example, it is possible to go from Fedora 12 to Fedora 14 directly."
fyi,
roger wells
I surely hope that if F12->F14 is *not
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:11:45 -0700 Konstantin Svist wrote:
[ ... ]
> I think the main problem is that you skipped F13 and jumped to F14
> directly. Usually the most well-tested upgrades are to $release+
BTW, citing http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PreUpgrade
| Upgrade to current release directl
On 11/03/2010 03:11 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> I think the main problem is that you skipped F13 and jumped to F14
> directly. Usually the most well-tested upgrades are to $release+
I surely hope that if F12->F14 is *not* a supported upgrade path, then
preupgrade should *NOT* allow
On 11/03/2010 02:51 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 14:52:05 -0400,
> "Kevin J. Cummings" wrote:
>>
>> 2) X11 no longer starts up. I'm using the radeon driver for my ATI
>> Technologies Inc M56P [Radeon Mobility X1600]. It was working just fine
>> (as fine can be with the
On 11/03/2010 11:52 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> Last night, after I successfully upgraded my F13 test desktop from
> F13->F14 w/preupgrade, I started the same operation on my F12 laptop.
>
> The results were not so good.
>
> X86_64, Asus S96J laptop, w/ATI Mobility Ra
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 14:52:05 -0400,
"Kevin J. Cummings" wrote:
>
> 2) X11 no longer starts up. I'm using the radeon driver for my ATI
> Technologies Inc M56P [Radeon Mobility X1600]. It was working just fine
> (as fine can be with the radeon driver), but now it dies with a seg
> fault wit
1 - 100 of 995 matches
Mail list logo
