the pdf, and the phone uses the tools
> provided by google to view the pdf, tuned to work with the creation
> tools, so the errors aren't evident.
> _____
Thanks for the detailed response. When I save the document and open with
evince, I get:
On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 23:35:57 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> Over the past few months, I have noticed that some PDF documents do
> not render on Fedora 36 using zathura, evince or okular. The PDF
> document, however renders fine on my phone. All of them are PDF,
>
Dear friends,
Over the past few months, I have noticed that some PDF documents do not render
on Fedora 36 using zathura, evince or okular. The PDF document, however renders
fine on my phone. All of them are PDF, version 1.5, and they were sent to me by
email, which I read using mutt.
What
Hello,
since the switch to Fedora 40 I notice this odd change, that neither
nautilus context menu (Sendto entry missing), nor evince share/ sendto
button work. The latter doesn't work at all which makes things
unnecessary complicated.
I understand that the package nautilus-sendto has
an Epson WF-2760 (connection through the internet). I can print a pdf file
> by using xpdf without
> the option of recto-verso.
> If I use evince (which has the recto-verso option), the job is
> stopped, and does not print.
>
> How can
Hello,
On an Epson WF-2760 (connection through the internet). I can print a pdf file
by using xpdf without
the option of recto-verso.
If I use evince (which has the recto-verso option), the job is
stopped, and does not print.
How can I solve the issue?
Thanks
Tom Horsley writes:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:53:27 +0100
Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> Printing is there in the menu on the right: it is the leftmost icon in
> the top row
I think they held a contest to see who could come up with a design to
most effectively hide the controls for evince. T
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 17:35:10 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 12/04/18 16:54, stan wrote:
> > I presume they think the
> > learning curve for multiple platform interfaces is more costly than
> > the diminished user interface on larger screens.
> .
> I wonder if a stabdard set of three letter abbrev
On 12/5/18 6:34 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> I mean, why on
> Earth would you need a sign next to the M5 to warn people about bad
> umbrellas anyway?
High wind area ahead, obviously.
--
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default
color scheme
On 12/4/18 1:54 PM, stan wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:28:13 -0500
> Fred Smith wrote:
>
>> there seems to be a widespread desire to make UIs so minimal that
>> no one can figure out how to use them. Not to single out anyone, but
>> the Gnome-3 people seem to be on that bandwagon too. No offens
On 12/04/18 16:54, stan wrote:
I presume they think the
learning curve for multiple platform interfaces is more costly than the
diminished user interface on larger screens.
.
I wonder if a stabdard set of three letter abbreviations might not be
better ...
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, US
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:28:13 -0500
Fred Smith wrote:
> there seems to be a widespread desire to make UIs so minimal that
> no one can figure out how to use them. Not to single out anyone, but
> the Gnome-3 people seem to be on that bandwagon too. No offense meant
> to any particular person(s), it
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 03:17:28PM -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 12/04/18 14:20, Rick Stevens wrote:
> >I'm using Xfce as well with the LightDM display manager and there's
> >no text associated with the icon, just the icon (which sort of looks
> >like an abstract inkjet printer with a page going t
ld come up with a design to
> most effectively hide the controls for evince. Took me about 20 minutes
> to find it when I first wanted to print something in new evince.
there seems to be a widespread desire to make UIs so minimal that
no one can figure out how to use them. Not to single out an
On 12/04/18 14:20, Rick Stevens wrote:
I'm using Xfce as well with the LightDM display manager and there's
no text associated with the icon, just the icon (which sort of looks
like an abstract inkjet printer with a page going through it).
Are the developers running obfuscation contests that we'r
On 12/4/18 11:09 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 12/04/18 13:53, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
>> Printing is there in the menu on the right: it is the leftmost icon in
>> the top row
>> /Louis
> .
> Yes that is where I normally find it, I would click on the word "Print"
> in the list that the left-
On 12/4/18 11:06 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
> On 12/4/18 11:01 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>> On my evince (V3.30.2), you can click on the hamburger stack
>
>
> And all this time I thought those were pancakes.
Well, I guess you could "insert stacked food of your preference
On 12/04/18 13:53, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
Printing is there in the menu on the right: it is the leftmost icon in
the top row
/Louis
.
Yes that is where I normally find it, I would click on the word "Print"
in the list that the left-most icon brings up, but "Print" is no longer
there. Per
On 12/4/18 11:01 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On my evince (V3.30.2), you can click on the hamburger stack
And all this time I thought those were pancakes.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le
On 12/4/18 10:53 AM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 13:40 -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>> .
>> In Fedora 29 Evince has no "Print" function despite what its help
>> page
>> says. How can I restore it?
>>
>> Bob
>>
>
> P
On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:53:27 +0100
Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> Printing is there in the menu on the right: it is the leftmost icon in
> the top row
I think they held a contest to see who could come up with a design to
most effectively hide the controls for evince. Took me about 20 minu
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 13:40 -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> .
> In Fedora 29 Evince has no "Print" function despite what its help
> page
> says. How can I restore it?
>
> Bob
>
Printing is there in the menu on the right: it is the leftmost
.
In Fedora 29 Evince has no "Print" function despite what its help page
says. How can I restore it?
Bob
From evince help:
*
To print a document:
1.
Click theFile optionsmenu in the top right corner and
selectPrintor pressCtrl+P.
2.
Choose yo
.
I was never able to configure Fedora-28 to fit my needs, however
Fedora-29 [upgraded daily] has gone much better and I have actually been
able to use it for a few days. Now I find that evince has had its "View
Options" removed. I use the the Inverted Colors menu feature to read
Hi all Fedora users,
can anybody explain why evince is unable to perform calculations with
numerical rows or columns of pdf forms? So I must continue to use
acroread or foxit reader for such operations :-(
All comments are welcome.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 24 (Twenty
On 12/18/2014 09:51 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On 12/18/2014 06:12 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have used k3b on gnome desktop for a looong time. It is the CD/DVD
burner tool of choice. Now that I am switching to Xfce, after being
introduced to it on the Fedora 19 & 20 armv7 remixes, I still
On 12/18/2014 06:12 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> I have used k3b on gnome desktop for a looong time. It is the CD/DVD
> burner tool of choice. Now that I am switching to Xfce, after being
> introduced to it on the Fedora 19 & 20 armv7 remixes, I still use it
> for my CD/DVD burning.
I also use
use it not just for pdf, but a whole assortment of other
document
formats like dvi, djvu, ps, epub, and so on.
Okular is indeed the best pdf reader irrespective of what desktop
environment you use. Evince doesn't have annotation tools as rich as
Okular's.
What disqualifies okular for
of other document
formats like dvi, djvu, ps, epub, and so on.
Okular is indeed the best pdf reader irrespective of what desktop
environment you use. Evince doesn't have annotation tools as rich as
Okular's.
What disqualifies okular for me is this:
# yum install okular
...
Install
, and so on.
Okular is indeed the best pdf reader irrespective of what desktop
environment you use. Evince doesn't have annotation tools as rich as
Okular's.
What disqualifies okular for me is this:
# yum install okular
...
Install 1 Package (+50 Dependent packages)
...
Total downloa
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Roger Wells wrote:
> On 12/17/2014 08:47 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
>
> MasterPdfEditor is horribly slow to display my pdfs, which contain
> matplotlib
> pdfs with thousands of data points. evince is very fast at this.
>
>
>
>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 16 December 2014, Chris Murphy sent:
>> Android 7.61MB. This just displays them, there's no creation or
>> modification as far as I'm aware. So it's possible most of the code
>> complexity is in the creation and modification.
>>
2014-12-17 0:45 GMT+01:00, Tim :
> Allegedly, on or about 16 December 2014, Chris Murphy sent:
>> Android 7.61MB. This just displays them, there's no creation or
>> modification as far as I'm aware. So it's possible most of the code
>> complexity is in the creation and modification.
>>
>> The point
On 12/17/2014 08:47 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
MasterPdfEditor is horribly slow to display my pdfs, which contain
matplotlib
pdfs with thousands of data points. evince is very fast at this.
evince chokes on PDF files with heavy bitmap-image content, like dense
city GIS maps
MasterPdfEditor is horribly slow to display my pdfs, which contain matplotlib
pdfs with thousands of data points. evince is very fast at this.
evince chokes on PDF files with heavy bitmap-image content, like dense
city GIS maps. (Probably due to poorly-implemented scaling internally;
gtk
On 2014-12-16 05:14, Neal Becker wrote:
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:15:50 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
What are people doing for pdf reading native on Fedora other than
evince (F20 is 3.10, F21 is 3.14)?
Being a happy KDE user, I like okular.
And I use it not just for
On 2014-12-16 16:45, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 16 December 2014, Chris Murphy sent:
Android 7.61MB. This just displays them, there's no creation or
modification as far as I'm aware. So it's possible most of the code
complexity is in the creation and modification.
The point is that as an
Allegedly, on or about 16 December 2014, Paul Cartwright sent:
> when I click on a PDF in a thunderbird email, it starts to open a
> window, then crashes. once I save the attachment to my HD,
> double-click opens it.. Fedora21..
As a test, you could try changing the default application to somethi
Allegedly, on or about 16 December 2014, Chris Murphy sent:
> Android 7.61MB. This just displays them, there's no creation or
> modification as far as I'm aware. So it's possible most of the code
> complexity is in the creation and modification.
>
> The point is that as any software becomes more c
> Master PDF editor is quite nice but, strangely, when it comes to filling in
> PDF forms evince works better I've found. However if you need to actually
> fill in a PDF that doesn't have form fields master PDF editor is the way to
> go
Thanks a lot for the hint, the screen
On 12/16/2014 06:13 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Joe Wulf wrote:
>
>> evince has worked well for me for a good number of years now, and I use
>> cups-pdf for 'printing' pdf's of web pages and such. No issues here with
>> either.
>> From: Robert Mo
On 12/16/2014 12:33 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On 12/16/2014 12:44 AM, Doug wrote:
Have you looked at Master PDF Editor, as I mentioned in a previous
post to this list?
--doug
running fedora21.. tried to install Master-pdf-editor:
# rpm -i master*.rpm
file / from install of master-pdf-e
On 12/16/2014 08:46 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/16/2014 08:03 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
# dnf install libreoffice
Install 85 Packages
Total download size: 126 M
Installed size: 393 M
Yes, ... this is an issue, as well.
Well that's
Kevin Martin wrote:
> Master PDF editor is quite nice but, strangely, when it comes to filling in
> PDF forms evince works better I've found. However if you need to actually
> fill in a PDF that doesn't have form fields master PDF editor is the way to
> go.
>
>
On 12/16/2014 06:52 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 16.12.2014, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>
>> I have an annoying issue with PDF. I have evince installed, but when I
>> click on a PDF in a thunderbird email, it starts to open a window, then
> Just tried it out of curiosity on a L
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:15:50 -0500
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>> What are people doing for pdf reading native on Fedora other than
>> evince (F20 is 3.10, F21 is 3.14)?
>
> Being a happy KDE user, I like okular.
>
> And I
Joe Wulf wrote:
> evince has worked well for me for a good number of years now, and I use
> cups-pdf for 'printing' pdf's of web pages and such. No issues here with
> either.
> From: Robert Moskowitz
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Sent:
On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 10:11 +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> On 12/16/2014 10:03 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> This probably doesn't matter much to kde users, but pulling in 50
> >> additional
> >> >packages and 176 M to me is a serious issue.
> > Just as point of comparison, ... LibreOffice
On 16.12.2014, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I have an annoying issue with PDF. I have evince installed, but when I
> click on a PDF in a thunderbird email, it starts to open a window, then
Just tried it out of curiosity on a Lenovo laptop with bog standard
F21 and thunderbird. No problem
On 12/16/2014 12:44 AM, Doug wrote:
>
> Have you looked at Master PDF Editor, as I mentioned in a previous
> post to this list?
>
> --doug
running fedora21.. tried to install Master-pdf-editor:
# rpm -i master*.rpm
file / from install of master-pdf-editor-2.1.90-2.x86_64 conflicts
with file f
On 12/15/2014 11:12 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/16/2014 03:15 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> So here I am setting up my new F21 system and of course pdf processing
>> is a must, and on F20, I had many problems with evince.
>
I have an annoying issue with PDF. I have evi
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:15:50 -0500
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >
> > What are people doing for pdf reading native on Fedora other than
> > evince (F20 is 3.10, F21 is 3.14)?
>
> Being a happy KDE user, I lik
ment
>>>>> formats like dvi, djvu, ps, epub, and so on.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Okular is indeed the best pdf reader irrespective of what desktop
>>>> environment you use. Evince doesn't have annotation tools as rich as
&
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
wrote:
> On 12/16/2014 10:03 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> This probably doesn't matter much to kde users, but pulling in 50
>>> additional
>>> >packages and 176 M to me is a serious issue.
>>
>> Just as point of comparison, ... LibreOffi
assortment of other document
formats like dvi, djvu, ps, epub, and so on.
Okular is indeed the best pdf reader irrespective of what desktop
environment you use. Evince doesn't have annotation tools as rich as
Okular's.
What disqualifies okular for me is this:
# yum install okular
...
On 12/16/2014 10:03 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
This probably doesn't matter much to kde users, but pulling in 50 additional
>packages and 176 M to me is a serious issue.
Just as point of comparison, ... LibreOffice
on Linux is not some Tonka Toy app (although Tonka Toys are badass,
they're obviousl
ot just for pdf, but a whole assortment of other document
>>> formats like dvi, djvu, ps, epub, and so on.
>>
>>
>> Okular is indeed the best pdf reader irrespective of what desktop
>> environment you use. Evince doesn't have annotation tools as rich as
>>
reader irrespective of what desktop
environment you use. Evince doesn't have annotation tools as rich as
Okular's.
What disqualifies okular for me is this:
# yum install okular
...
Install 1 Package (+50 Dependent packages)
...
Total download size: 70 M
Installed size: 176 M
...
Thi
reader irrespective of what desktop
environment you use. Evince doesn't have annotation tools as rich as
Okular's.
I have discovered that evince doesn't seem to understand adobe's syntax
of fname.pdf#page=404 ... any of these alternatives capable? Or am I
missing something
what desktop
environment you use. Evince doesn't have annotation tools as rich as
Okular's.
--
Regards,
Sudhir Khanger,
sudhirkhanger.com,
github.com/donniezazen,
5577 8CDB A059 085D 1D60 807F 8C00 45D9 F5EF C394.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subsc
z wrote:
> >>>> So here I am setting up my new F21 system and of course pdf processing
> >>>> is a must, and on F20, I had many problems with evince.
> >>>
> >>> So had I.
> >>>
> >>> Besides evince's various UI-usab
On 16.12.2014, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> What are people doing for pdf reading native on Fedora other than evince
I've been using evince a lot during my mastergrade studies, and it
worked for me. For "special cases" as e.g. pdf annotation I've been
using Xournal.
with evince.
So had I.
Besides evince's various UI-usability issues (Admitted, these are
mostly a matter of taste),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161374
renders evince almost non-applicable to me.
I have AdbeRdr9.5.5-1_i486linux_enu.rpm here on my F20 system. Is
this
On 12/16/2014 12:13 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/15/2014 11:12 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/16/2014 03:15 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So here I am setting up my new F21 system and of course pdf processing
is a must, and on F20, I had many problems with evince.
So had I.
Besides
On 12/15/2014 11:12 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/16/2014 03:15 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So here I am setting up my new F21 system and of course pdf processing
is a must, and on F20, I had many problems with evince.
So had I.
Besides evince's various UI-usability issues (Adm
Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
> For now, I am using evince, firefox's built-in pdf reader and the
> old acroread. However, actually, I am disatified with all three of
> them, but haven't found a convincing alternative, yet.
Are there any alternatives to Adobe'
On 12/16/2014 03:15 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So here I am setting up my new F21 system and of course pdf processing
is a must, and on F20, I had many problems with evince.
So had I.
Besides evince's various UI-usability issues (Admitted, these are mostly
a matter of taste),
Master PDF editor is quite nice but, strangely, when it comes to filling in PDF
forms evince works better I've found. However if you need to actually fill in
a PDF that doesn't have form fields master PDF editor is the way to go.
Regards,
Kevin Martin
Sent from my Tab Pro runn
On 12/15/2014 09:47 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:15:50 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
What are people doing for pdf reading native on Fedora other than
evince (F20 is 3.10, F21 is 3.14)?
Being a happy KDE user, I like okular.
And I use it not just for pdf, but a whole
evince has worked well for me for a good number of years now, and I use
cups-pdf for 'printing' pdf's of web pages and such. No issues here with
either.
From: Robert Moskowitz
To: Community support for Fedora users
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 9:15 PM
Subject: So
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:15:50 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> What are people doing for pdf reading native on Fedora other than
> evince (F20 is 3.10, F21 is 3.14)?
Being a happy KDE user, I like okular.
And I use it not just for pdf, but a whole assortment of other document
formats
So here I am setting up my new F21 system and of course pdf processing
is a must, and on F20, I had many problems with evince. So I went to get
acrobat, and it seems to be truly gone.
I see a thread of people running it in Wine. I shutter at the thought,
though I suppose if ya got to.
I
For future reference, consider these two font families:
- The Liberation Fonts
https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts
- The Ubuntu Font Family
http://font.ubuntu.com
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.
On 05/14/2014 02:47 PM, Anthony Shipman wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2014 05:16:16 am Robert Moskowitz wrote:
OK. That points to an rpm. I downloaded it and did a 'yum
localinstall' which also installed cabextract as a dependency.
And still Acrobat is using the wrong font. :(
It seemed to take a
On Thu, 15 May 2014 05:16:16 am Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> OK. That points to an rpm. I downloaded it and did a 'yum
> localinstall' which also installed cabextract as a dependency.
>
> And still Acrobat is using the wrong font. :(
>
It seemed to take a little time before the system started us
better in rendering the font, but the chosen font is this
little skinny font that is really not readable and will not project
well
compared with whatever font evince is using.
Is the example at http://i.imgur.com/8hrG3Tp.png the sort of thing
that you are seeing? I have a few documents like this.
Yep
is this
little skinny font that is really not readable and will not project
well
compared with whatever font evince is using.
Is the example at http://i.imgur.com/8hrG3Tp.png the sort of thing
that you are seeing? I have a few documents like this.
Yep. That is what I am seeing in Acrobat.
The
On 05/14/14 14:42, Alan Evans wrote:
Nice, but that means you have to do the build yourself. Is this
in any additional repos for Fedora?
As I understand it, licensing of the fonts prevents distribution that
way. But I did it once and rebuilding the spec file as per their
instructi
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> http://corefonts.sourceforge.net/
>>
>
> Nice, but that means you have to do the build yourself. Is this in any
> additional repos for Fedora?
>
>
>
As I understand it, licensing of the fonts prevents distribution that way.
But I did
readable and will not project well
compared with whatever font evince is using.
Is the example at http://i.imgur.com/8hrG3Tp.png the sort of thing
that you are seeing? I have a few documents like this.
Yep. That is what I am seeing in Acrobat.
The pdffonts program reports, for one of them
readable and will not project well
>>> compared with whatever font evince is using.
>>>
>> Is the example at http://i.imgur.com/8hrG3Tp.png the sort of thing
>> that you are seeing? I have a few documents like this.
>
> Yep. That is what I am seeing in Acrobat.
&
On 05/14/2014 12:33 AM, Anthony Shipman wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2014 04:06:43 pm Robert Moskowitz wrote:
A little better in rendering the font, but the chosen font is this
little skinny font that is really not readable and will not project well
compared with whatever font evince is using.
Is
On Wed, 14 May 2014 04:06:43 pm Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> A little better in rendering the font, but the chosen font is this
> little skinny font that is really not readable and will not project well
> compared with whatever font evince is using.
>
Is the example at http:/
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 19:56 -1000, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> it is almost readable on the LCD, but when it gets projected on
> the screen for some reason there are all sorts of vertical lines next
> to many of the characters.
That sounds like "ringing," often caused by bad cabling, or badly
desi
for some reason there are all sorts of vertical lines next to
many of the characters.
If I recall/understand correctly, Adobe Reader uses font antialiasing by
default, something called Cooltype; whereas evince, and almost all the
Linux PDF readers built against poppler, don't apply an
er in rendering the font, but the chosen font is this
little skinny font that is really not readable and will not project well
compared with whatever font evince is using.
# yum install AdobeReader_enu
Do you have all these packages?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 05/13/2014 05:47 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am displaying IEEE 802 standard pdfs. In Acrobat that I get for Fedora
from Adobe's repo, the font used is basically unreadable, particularly when
I display it on the monitor in the meeting
On 05/13/2014 05:47 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am displaying IEEE 802 standard pdfs. In Acrobat that I get for Fedora
from Adobe's repo, the font used is basically unreadable, particularly when
I display it on the monitor in the meeting
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I am displaying IEEE 802 standard pdfs. In Acrobat that I get for Fedora
> from Adobe's repo, the font used is basically unreadable, particularly when
> I display it on the monitor in the meeting room.
>...
I don't understand why this sh
t claims
to refer to "standard" postscript fonts that
are supposed to be "built-in" that acrobat
goes completely looney. Other PDF documents
have no problem in acrobat.
I gave up a long time ago and just use
evince all the time.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.
I am displaying IEEE 802 standard pdfs. In Acrobat that I get for
Fedora from Adobe's repo, the font used is basically unreadable,
particularly when I display it on the monitor in the meeting room.
But switching to Evince document viewer, the fonts are 'normal' and
readabl
On 12/04/13 19:59, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/04/13 19:16, Tim wrote:
>> Allegedly, on or about 04 December 2013, Ed Greshko sent:
>>> The fact that it fails with the google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts
>>> package as well would indicate that it isn't a font file issue. In
>>> fact, if you use somethin
On 12/04/13 19:16, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 04 December 2013, Ed Greshko sent:
>> The fact that it fails with the google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts
>> package as well would indicate that it isn't a font file issue. In
>> fact, if you use something such as the Gnome Character Map you'd see
On 04.12.2013 11:37, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> [egreshko@meimei F20-TC4]$ echo Δ | od -bc
You are running ahead, Ed.
F20 ain't an official, so
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opti
Allegedly, on or about 04 December 2013, Ed Greshko sent:
> The fact that it fails with the google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts
> package as well would indicate that it isn't a font file issue. In
> fact, if you use something such as the Gnome Character Map you'd see
> that the character displays prop
On 12/04/13 18:37, Ed Greshko wrote:
> The fact that it fails with the google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts package as
> well would indicate that it isn't a font file issue. In fact, if you use
> something such as the Gnome Character Map you'd see that the character
> displays properly in that app n
..
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ echo ∆ | od -bc
000 342 210 206 012
342 210 206 \n
While the Delta character is U+0394 produces...
[egreshko@meimei F20-TC4]$ echo Δ | od -bc
000 316 224 012
316 224 \n
For completeness..
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ echo ∅ | od -bc
000
> >
> > In looking at the document's properties and selecting the "fonts" tab I
> > noticed that it was using /usr/share/fonts/google-croscore/SymbolNeu.ttf
> > for symbols on my F19 system. This comes with the
> > google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts package. Erasing this package resulted in a
> >
On 12/3/2013 8:39 PM, poma wrote:
> On 04.12.2013 02:32, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> FWIW, the same issue exists in the current F20 Beta. I'll be filling a
>> bugzilla on this.
>
> Getting tired of questioning about what's the bug number.
>
>
> poma
>
>
Easy solution? Stop asking.
--
On 04.12.2013 02:32, Ed Greshko wrote:
> FWIW, the same issue exists in the current F20 Beta. I'll be filling a
> bugzilla on this.
Getting tired of questioning about what's the bug number.
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription o
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
