2015-08-27 21:38 GMT+02:00, Patrick O'Callaghan :
>> > Currently Firefox tabs are not separate processes. Mozilla has been
>> > working on it for a while now but it will mean a change to the add
>> > -ons
>> > system. See
>> > http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/08/mozil
>> > la-sets
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 20:12 +0200, Andras Simon wrote:
> 2015-08-27 18:11 GMT+02:00, Patrick O'Callaghan <
> pocallag...@gmail.com>:
> > On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 22:54 +0930, Tim wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 12:40 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> > > > This abandoned extension is incredibly useful
2015-08-27 18:11 GMT+02:00, Patrick O'Callaghan :
> On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 22:54 +0930, Tim wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 12:40 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>> > This abandoned extension is incredibly useful:
>> >
>> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/61ovoc4hzgtm0qf/Suspend-background-tabs-m
>> > aster.
On 08/27/2015 10:11 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 22:54 +0930, Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 12:40 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
This abandoned extension is incredibly useful:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/61ovoc4hzgtm0qf/Suspend-background-tabs-m
aster.xpi?dl=0
Ja
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 22:54 +0930, Tim wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 12:40 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> > This abandoned extension is incredibly useful:
> >
> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/61ovoc4hzgtm0qf/Suspend-background-tabs-m
> > aster.xpi?dl=0
> >
> > Javascript is disabled for all backg
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 12:40 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> This abandoned extension is incredibly useful:
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/61ovoc4hzgtm0qf/Suspend-background-tabs-master.xpi?dl=0
>
> Javascript is disabled for all background tabs, so they won't use CPU
> time anymore.
I always won
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:40:04PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> On 08/03/2015 10:21 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On 3 August 2015 at 17:51, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> I tried very hard today to get FF into the condition you're reporting and
> >> could not. I went on eBay, YouTube, CNN, mlb.com, NYtim
On 08/04/15 18:40, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> I sometimes go beyond 300 tabs, approaching 500.
I guess I don't quite understand the usefulness of having so many open tabs.
Feels like a cluttered desk to me. Maybe it has something to do with my short
term memory not being what it used to be. Now,
On 08/03/2015 10:21 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On 3 August 2015 at 17:51, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> I tried very hard today to get FF into the condition you're reporting and
>> could not. I went on eBay, YouTube, CNN, mlb.com, NYtimes and a whole bunch
>> of other places. I had 8 tabs open including F
On 08/04/15 16:31, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 03:54:37PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 08/04/15 15:38, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:32:47AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
For the fun of it I fired up FF and opened up 50 tabs. I purposely picked
sites whic
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 03:54:37PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/04/15 15:38, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:32:47AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> For the fun of it I fired up FF and opened up 50 tabs. I purposely picked
> >> sites which have lots of adverts which get updated
On 08/04/15 15:38, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:32:47AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> For the fun of it I fired up FF and opened up 50 tabs. I purposely picked
>> sites which have lots of adverts which get updated. 10 of those tabs were
>> of a weather site which updates the dat
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:32:47AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> For the fun of it I fired up FF and opened up 50 tabs. I purposely picked
> sites which have lots of adverts which get updated. 10 of those tabs were of
> a weather site which updates the data very frequently.
Btw, FF nightly no
On 08/04/15 07:45, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 05:10:45AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 08/04/15 04:21, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> On 3 August 2015 at 17:51, Ed Greshko wrote:
I tried very hard today to get FF into the condition you're reporting and
could not. I went on eBa
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 05:10:45AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/04/15 04:21, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On 3 August 2015 at 17:51, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> I tried very hard today to get FF into the condition you're reporting and
> >> could not. I went on eBay, YouTube, CNN, mlb.com, NYtimes and a
On 08/03/15 10:19, jd1008 wrote:
<<>>
> My suspicion is that it is not html5.
>
> I say this because, even though I was cruising youtube, I was not playing
> anything. Furthermore, I used an addon to block all ads, so I had no
> animated ads, nor any ads on the pages. So, I am puzzled about what
On 08/04/15 04:21, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On 3 August 2015 at 17:51, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> I tried very hard today to get FF into the condition you're reporting and
>> could not. I went on eBay, YouTube, CNN, mlb.com, NYtimes and a whole bunch
>> of other places. I had 8 tabs open including Facebo
On 3 August 2015 at 17:51, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I tried very hard today to get FF into the condition you're reporting and
> could not. I went on eBay, YouTube, CNN, mlb.com, NYtimes and a whole bunch
> of other places. I had 8 tabs open including Facebook and G+. No issues.
> But, I also don
On 08/04/15 00:08, jd1008 wrote:
> Herr Greshko is the only one Not having this issue ?? :) :) :) (LOL)
I didn't say you're not having a problem. I just said you have many problems
and this is one of the many that I'm not able to reproduce.
--
If I wanted a blog or social media I'd go elsewhe
On 08/03/15 23:59, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 08/03/2015 09:51 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 08/03/15 23:19, jd1008 wrote:
>>> My suspicion is that it is not html5.
>>> I say this because, even though I was cruising youtube,
>>> I was not playing anything. Furthermore, I used an addon
>>> to block all ad
On 08/03/2015 10:04 AM, Andras Simon wrote:
2015-08-03 17:51 GMT+02:00, Ed Greshko :
On 08/03/15 23:19, jd1008 wrote:
My suspicion is that it is not html5.
I say this because, even though I was cruising youtube,
I was not playing anything. Furthermore, I used an addon
to block all ads, so I h
2015-08-03 17:51 GMT+02:00, Ed Greshko :
> On 08/03/15 23:19, jd1008 wrote:
>> My suspicion is that it is not html5.
>> I say this because, even though I was cruising youtube,
>> I was not playing anything. Furthermore, I used an addon
>> to block all ads, so I had no animated ads, nor any ads
>> o
2015-08-03 17:59 GMT+02:00, jd1008 :
> gdb shows stacks. How can one use gdb to find just exactly what
> is eating up so much cpu?
You could try strace. Not that it proved very useful for me (for the
same problem).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subsc
On 08/03/2015 09:51 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/03/15 23:19, jd1008 wrote:
My suspicion is that it is not html5.
I say this because, even though I was cruising youtube,
I was not playing anything. Furthermore, I used an addon
to block all ads, so I had no animated ads, nor any ads
on the pages
On 08/03/15 23:19, jd1008 wrote:
> My suspicion is that it is not html5.
> I say this because, even though I was cruising youtube,
> I was not playing anything. Furthermore, I used an addon
> to block all ads, so I had no animated ads, nor any ads
> on the pages. So, I am puzzled about what is eati
On 08/02/2015 08:53 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Since the Flash remote kill happened a few weeks ago by Mozilla and
Google, I purged all Flash including manually disabling the built-in
plugin in Chrome. But within days, I found that site have escalated
their migration to HTML5 video and I've notice
Since the Flash remote kill happened a few weeks ago by Mozilla and
Google, I purged all Flash including manually disabling the built-in
plugin in Chrome. But within days, I found that site have escalated
their migration to HTML5 video and I've noticed two things. a.) these
sites use more CPU than
On 08/02/2015 06:37 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 03:27:58PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
Certain web sites raise my cpu utilization to 99%.
The 2 websites that I visit very frequently are youtube and ebay.
I end up having to kill all the ebay and youtube tabs
in order to regain som
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 03:27:58PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> Certain web sites raise my cpu utilization to 99%.
> The 2 websites that I visit very frequently are youtube and ebay.
> I end up having to kill all the ebay and youtube tabs
> in order to regain some response for other interactive processes
Certain web sites raise my cpu utilization to 99%.
The 2 websites that I visit very frequently are youtube and ebay.
I end up having to kill all the ebay and youtube tabs
in order to regain some response for other interactive processes,
and bring cpu utilization down to about 2 to 4 %.
So, why
30 matches
Mail list logo
