Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

2017-08-04 Thread Anthony Messina
Quoting "Dr. Robert Marmorstein" : I've been working on this too, this week. I think I have it working from source but haven't finished testing yet. The source install wasn't really too bad, so I recommend it. The messinet rpms didn't work for me. Feel free to contact me offline to let

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

2017-08-02 Thread Dr. Robert Marmorstein
I've been working on this too, this week. I think I have it working from source but haven't finished testing yet. The source install wasn't really too bad, so I recommend it. The messinet rpms didn't work for me. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

2017-08-01 Thread Ed Greshko
On 08/01/2017 09:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 08/01/2017 08:48 PM, Greg Woods wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Greg Woods > > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Joe Zeff > > wrote: >> >> On 07/30/2017 01:54 PM, G

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

2017-08-01 Thread Ed Greshko
On 08/01/2017 08:48 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Greg Woods > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Joe Zeff > wrote: > > On 07/30/2017 01:54 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > > It looks like some

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

2017-08-01 Thread Greg Woods
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > >> On 07/30/2017 01:54 PM, Greg Woods wrote: >> >>> It looks like some warnings are being treated as errors, such as an >>> implicit function declaration in this case. Is there a way I can

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

2017-07-30 Thread Greg Woods
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 07/30/2017 01:54 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > >> It looks like some warnings are being treated as errors, such as an >> implicit function declaration in this case. Is there a way I can turn that >> off just long enough to get this module built? I'm

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

2017-07-30 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 07/30/2017 02:40 PM, Greg Woods wrote: I suppose so, but "upstream" in this case is a hardware vendor, who is much less motivated to keep supporting a 10-year-old card than they are to sell new hardware. The last update to the module source was around March of 2016. Unfortunately telephony c

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

2017-07-30 Thread Greg Woods
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > If they're going to supply a non-free kernel module, they'll have to > deal with the problems. > > I suppose so, but "upstream" in this case is a hardware vendor, who is much less motivated to keep supporting a 10-year-old card than they are

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

2017-07-30 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 07/30/2017 01:54 PM, Greg Woods wrote: /local/src/dahdi-linux-master/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c: In function ‘dahdi_ioctl_iomux’: /local/src/dahdi-linux-master/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c:5954:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘signal_pending’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

2017-07-30 Thread Joe Zeff
On 07/30/2017 01:54 PM, Greg Woods wrote: It looks like some warnings are being treated as errors, such as an implicit function declaration in this case. Is there a way I can turn that off just long enough to get this module built? I'm stuck running a non-updateable kernel until I can find a wa

compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

2017-07-30 Thread Greg Woods
The dahdi kernel module (used by asterisk for some Digium telephony cards, including the one I have) is not included in Fedora because it is not free software. The dahdi configuration tools are included, but not the kernel module. The software is free as in beer, it can be downloaded and built, and