On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Greg Woods <wo...@ucar.edu> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Joe Zeff <j...@zeff.us> wrote: > >> On 07/30/2017 01:54 PM, Greg Woods wrote: >> >>> It looks like some warnings are being treated as errors, such as an >>> implicit function declaration in this case. Is there a way I can turn that >>> off just long enough to get this module built? I'm stuck running a >>> non-updateable kernel until I can find a way around this. In my early >>> career I used to build stuff all the time, but it has been a while since I >>> have had to compile anything from source. >>> >> >> Have you discussed this with the people who wrote and maintain this? >> > > I did what I probably should have done in the first place: I posted this > to the asterisk list. And it turns out someone does have a patched src rpm. > When I get some time later this week, I'll try it out, because I definitely > don't want to be running a kernel that I can't update. > > Just to close out this thread in case someone encounters it in the archives later: I was able to find some patch files inside the source RPM at
https://messinet.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/26/SRPMS/ This also contains the 2.11 version of the dahdi-linux module. After refreshing my memory on how to use the patch program, I was able to apply the patches and build the module for the latest F24 kernel (4.11.12-100.fc24.x86_64) and it is working. Hopefully I can now proceed to upgrade the asterisk server box to F25 and then F26, and build the dahdi module for those kernels. --Greg
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
