Am 31.12.2011 16:11, schrieb Roberto Ragusa:
> On 12/31/2011 02:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
for better performance you could use RAID10 in the far layout instead
(raid10,f2),
this is a direct replacement with the enhanced raid10 driver, which gives
double
the sequential
On 12/31/2011 02:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> for better performance you could use RAID10 in the far layout instead
>>> (raid10,f2),
>>> this is a direct replacement with the enhanced raid10 driver, which gives
>>> double
>>> the sequential read speed compared to raid1. Use "--level=10 -p f2"
>> for better performance you could use RAID10 in the far layout instead
>> (raid10,f2),
>> this is a direct replacement with the enhanced raid10 driver, which gives
>> double
>> the sequential read speed compared to raid1. Use "--level=10 -p f2" as
>> additional
>> parameters when creating arra