Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:43:50 -0500
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 19:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/12/15 19:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > Thank you for your reply. I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this
> > would
> > work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back. Thanks again!
>
> You're
You are not running Enterprise Linux 7. This repo is not for Fedora.
Using it will cause conflicts and unpredictable problems.
--Pete
Thanks Pete finally figured that out too.
Greg
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Jul 11, 2015 12:38 PM, "Gregory P. Ennis" wrote:
>
> > > [root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
> > > error: Failed dependencies:
`rpm` knows about dependencies but does not pull other packages to resolve
them. That's dnf's job. Use dnf, do not use rpm directly.
On 12/07/15 10:36, Ed Greshko wrote:
In this particular case I would make it
exclude=CharLS,dcmtk,gconfmm26,libglademm24
Since those are the packages needed from F21 to get aeskulap from F21 to run.
It is clear from other info that updating dcmtk will break it since it supplies
a different
On 07/12/15 22:29, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> gpgcheck=1
> installonly_limit=3
> clean_requirements_on_remove=true
> exclude=fc21
>
>
> Do you think this would be sufficient, or perhaps it needs exclude=*fc21?
>
> Googling hasn't helped ...
In this particular case I would make it
On 12/07/15 09:55, Ed Greshko wrote:
>Where does the "exclude" go, other than in the update commend perhaps, I
didn't see a place in dnf.conf?
>
man dnf.conf has all the gory details. Read the section "Options for Both [Main]
and Repo"
.
[main]
gpgcheck=1
installonly_limit=3
clean_requi
On 07/12/15 21:39, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
>
> On 12/07/15 07:35, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> You may want to add an "exclude" in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so
>> they get skipped the next time you do an update to your system.
> .
>
> Where does the "exclude" go, other than in
On 12/07/15 07:35, Ed Greshko wrote:
You may want to add an "exclude" in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so they
get skipped the next time you do an update to your system.
.
Where does the "exclude" go, other than in the update commend perhaps, I
didn't see a place in dnf.conf?
Bob
--
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 19:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/12/15 19:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > Thank you for your reply. I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this
> > would
> > work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back. Thanks again!
>
> You're welcome.
>
> You may want to add an "
On 07/12/15 19:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Thank you for your reply. I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this would
> work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back. Thanks again!
You're welcome.
You may want to add an "exclude" in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so they
get skipped the
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 16:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/12/15 01:38, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using. Here is
> > what I got
>
> I used
>
> dnf -- nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap
>
> And it install just fine as well. It ins
On 07/12/15 00:48, John Austin wrote:
> This worked OK for me
>
> I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately
>
> 2015_07_10
>
> Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror
> Installed on F22 as follows
> dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install
> aeskulap-
On 07/12/15 01:38, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using. Here is
> what I got
I used
dnf -- nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap
And it install just fine as well. It installed a total of 5 packages from F21.
CharLS x86_64
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 11:00:52 -0500
"Gregory P. Ennis" wrote:
> > Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't
> > appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last
> > release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system
> > libraries other factor
On 11.07.2015, John Austin wrote:
> dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install
> aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
On my F22 machine, this ends up with:
Error: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc21.x86_64 requires
libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
Btw
On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 17:48 +0100, John Austin wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 11:00 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > > > Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21
> > > >
On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 11:00 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > > Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and
> > > before. It was a very decent dicom viewer.
> > >
> > > Do
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and
> > before. It was a very decent dicom viewer.
> >
> > Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good
> > pro
On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and
> before. It was a very decent dicom viewer.
>
> Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good
> product.
Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it d
Everyone,
Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and
before. It was a very decent dicom viewer.
Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good
product.
Greg Ennis
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscriptio
20 matches
Mail list logo
