On 02/23/16 05:22, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
> Am 22.02.2016 um 19:10 schrieb Rick Stevens:
>>
>> Angelo, I can see two possible reasons VLC may not see the insertion of
>> a CD or DVD once it's running:
>>
> As far as I remember (I really don't want to rescan this thread) Angelo
> has a much m
Am 22.02.2016 um 19:10 schrieb Rick Stevens:
Angelo, I can see two possible reasons VLC may not see the insertion of
a CD or DVD once it's running:
As far as I remember (I really don't want to rescan this thread) Angelo
has a much more fundamental problem with VLC: no graphical interface
come
On 02/22/16 12:10, Rick Stevens wrote:
<<>>
> Guys, the last 25 or 30 replies on this thread have nothing to do with
<>
--
while this is true, it does help maintain an observance of a thread where
op is lax in replying to those who have offered suggestions of help. ;-)
tho "off topic" discussin
On 02/20/2016 05:09 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 01:57 -0600, g wrote:
i can see that you are a gmail user, but that does not mean you have
to
go online to email thru it. you can handle your emails with
thunderbird,
or some of the other good email clients. such allows you
On 02/21/16 15:54, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
<<>>
> but I suggest we leave it at that.
>
--
i did in another response that i now presume you missed.
--
peace out.
If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes...
...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it!
-+-
in a world with out fenc
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 08:57 -0600, g wrote:
> no. you said that gmail was secure because it used SSL, which it is
> not.
This is what you said:
as for myself, *if* i was using gaagle mail, i still would not work
email online. too much chance for a mim attack.
To which I replied:
Gma
On 02/21/16 06:41, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
<<>>
> The point you appear to be making is that you don't use Gmail because
> of potential MITM attacks. If that's not what you meant, then please
> clarify.
>
--
no. you said that gmail was secure because it used SSL, which it is not.
> What I'm s
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 20:24 -0600, g wrote:
> > Plenty of SSL implementations have not been broken. If you don't
> > believe that, why are you even using the Internet?
> >
> .
> granted, plenty have not been.
>
> but plenty does not mean none.
>
> main of mim hacking are breaking of oos systems b
On 02/21/16 04:38, Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 09:22 +, Ntlworld wrote:
<<>>
> If you can't manage that, you can easily go elsewhere.
>
..
it could be said that he has. only it is to bicker more about top posting
in another thread.
therefore, would it not be better and wiser to reg
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 09:22 +, Ntlworld wrote:
> Most mail nowadays originates from ios or android or even OSX.
> And top-posted by default
Again, crap mail clients, lack of awareness by the authors, and still
ignoring the point that there are expectations about what you should be
doing on her
It just shows how "dated" this whole discussion is..
It must be quite a few months - years even- since i got email from anyone on a
windows box!
Most mail nowadays originates from ios or android or even OSX.
And top-posted by default
> On 21 Feb 2016, at 07:02, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
>
>
On 16/02/21 16:05, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 20 February 2016, Ntlworld sent:
Unless you live in cloud cuckoo land (academia?)! You surely cannot
have faiked to notice that all business people Top
post - which is why most mail clients are set to top post by default -
its about time maili
Allegedly, on or about 20 February 2016, Ntlworld sent:
> Unless you live in cloud cuckoo land (academia?)! You surely cannot
> have faiked to notice that all business people Top
> post - which is why most mail clients are set to top post by default -
> its about time mailing lists did the same!!
On 02/20/16 18:44, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 13:07 -0600, g wrote:
>>> Gmail enforces SSL on all online sessions.
>> .
>> like an ssl has not been broken?
>
> Plenty of SSL implementations have not been broken. If you don't
> believe that, why are you even using the Inter
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 13:07 -0600, g wrote:
> > Gmail enforces SSL on all online sessions.
> >
> .
> like an ssl has not been broken?
Plenty of SSL implementations have not been broken. If you don't
believe that, why are you even using the Internet?
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapr
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 20:25 +, Ntlworld wrote:
> Well - i can only assume that you never intend getting s job where
> people expect you to top-post - happy unemployment!
Corporate email generally does not use Internet-style mailing lists, so
every message in a conversation quotes every previou
On 02/20/2016 01:19 PM, g wrote:
congrats on getting disability compensation from the VA.
they turned mine down, but did give me name of a law firm to contact.
i called them and then wrote them as they asked. that was over 4 years
ago and still no reply. :-\
Try again. The first time I appli
> On 20 Feb 2016, at 21:19, g wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 02/20/16 15:01, Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 02/20/2016 12:53 PM, g wrote:
> <<<>>>
>
>>> while i presume that Joe Zeff would use top posting in a business
>>> environment.
>>
>> If I were still working, and at a company where it was company policy,
On 02/20/16 15:01, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/20/2016 12:53 PM, g wrote:
<<<>>>
>> while i presume that Joe Zeff would use top posting in a business
>> environment.
>
> If I were still working, and at a company where it was company policy,
> I'd follow policy, but I'd also be looking for a job at
On 02/20/16 14:53, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/20/2016 12:25 PM, Ntlworld wrote:
>> Well - i can only assume that you never intend getting s job where people
>> expect you to top-post - happy unemployment!
>
> I'm retired, living on Social Security and disability compensation from
> the VA. I can
On 02/20/2016 12:53 PM, g wrote:
On 02/20/16 14:25, Ntlworld wrote:
>Well - i can only assume that you never intend getting s job where
>people expect you to top-post - happy unemployment!
>
.
that is what only you assume.
while i presume that Joe Zeff would use top posting in a business
envi
On 02/20/2016 12:25 PM, Ntlworld wrote:
Well - i can only assume that you never intend getting s job where people
expect you to top-post - happy unemployment!
I'm retired, living on Social Security and disability compensation from
the VA. I can do what I damned well please, and when I was wo
On 02/20/16 14:25, Ntlworld wrote:
> Well - i can only assume that you never intend getting s job where
> people expect you to top-post - happy unemployment!
>
.
that is what only you assume.
while i presume that Joe Zeff would use top posting in a business
environment.
--
peace out.
If Bill
On 02/20/16 14:08, Ntlworld wrote:
>> On 20 Feb 2016, at 15:32, g wrote:
>> hello poc.
>>> On 02/20/16 07:09, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 01:57 -0600, g wrote:
i can see that you are a gmail user, but that does not mean you have
to go online to email thru it.
Well - i can only assume that you never intend getting s job where people
expect you to top-post - happy unemployment!
> On 20 Feb 2016, at 20:14, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
>> On 02/20/2016 12:08 PM, Ntlworld wrote:
>> Hi
>> Unless you live in cloud cuckoo land (academia?)! You surely cannot have
>> f
On 02/20/2016 12:08 PM, Ntlworld wrote:
Hi
Unless you live in cloud cuckoo land (academia?)! You surely cannot have faiked
to notice that all business people Top
post - which is why most mail clients are set to top post by default - its
about time mailing lists did the same!!
And if they were
> On 20 Feb 2016, at 15:32, g wrote:
>
>
> hello poc.
>
>> On 02/20/16 07:09, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 01:57 -0600, g wrote:
>>> i can see that you are a gmail user, but that does not mean you have
>>> to
>>> go online to email thru it. you can handle your emails w
On 02/20/16 11:10, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 09:32 -0600, g wrote:
>> as for myself, *if* i was using gaagle mail, i still would not work
>> email online. too much chance for a mim attack.
>
> Gmail enforces SSL on all online sessions.
>
.
like an ssl has not been broken?
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 09:32 -0600, g wrote:
> as for myself, *if* i was using gaagle mail, i still would not work
> email online. too much chance for a mim attack.
Gmail enforces SSL on all online sessions.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscrip
hello poc.
On 02/20/16 07:09, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 01:57 -0600, g wrote:
>> i can see that you are a gmail user, but that does not mean you have
>> to
>> go online to email thru it. you can handle your emails with
>> thunderbird,
>> or some of the other good email cl
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 01:57 -0600, g wrote:
> i can see that you are a gmail user, but that does not mean you have
> to
> go online to email thru it. you can handle your emails with
> thunderbird,
> or some of the other good email clients. such allows you to reply
> interspersed and after quoted po
first, please do not top post replies. ;-)
i can see that you are a gmail user, but that does not mean you have to
go online to email thru it. you can handle your emails with thunderbird,
or some of the other good email clients. such allows you to reply
interspersed and after quoted post.
On 02
If I insert the CD when VLC is running nothin happen...
I installed vlc using this command :
rpm -ivt
http://download1.rpfusion.org/free/fediora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm
and after
yum install vlc
I have Fedora 21.
Perhaps the installation is not good What can I tr
hello Angelo.
On 02/19/16 08:58, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
<>
> I would like to play a CD inside the DVD driver...
>
.
that ability is built into vlc.
open VLC in desktop, insert a cd/dvd in drive.
after a short pause, VLC will show a folder icon with CD/DVD.
click the the "Play" icon at lower
On 19/02/16 09:34, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
I installed VLC on my computer (fedora 21) with the purpose to play .VOB
files.
Actually I can run LVL on the line command, but I am not able to do
anything in this way... The help command give me this output :
-
It is a possibility to use
Am 19.02.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Angelo Moreschini:
thank you for answering me
this is the output tah I get for the command vlc
vlc
VLC media player 2.2.2 Weatherwax (revision 2.2.1-161-g360f42e)
[00d4d118] core libvlc: Running vlc with the default
interface. Use 'cvlc' to use
Hi Fernando,
could you be more clear by making an example ?
I would like to play a CD inside the DVD driver...
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On 2/19/16, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> > I installed VLC on my computer (fedora 21) with the purpose to play .VOB
> > fi
On 2/19/16, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> I installed VLC on my computer (fedora 21) with the purpose to play .VOB
> files.
>
> Actually I can run LVL on the line command, but I am not able to do
> anything in this way... The help command give me this output :
I am curious as to why you seem to ca
thank you for answering me
this is the output tah I get for the command vlc
vlc
VLC media player 2.2.2 Weatherwax (revision 2.2.1-161-g360f42e)
[00d4d118] core libvlc: Running vlc with the default interface. Use
'cvlc' to use vlc without interface.
[00e6c038] [cli] lua i
Am 19.02.2016 um 10:34 schrieb Angelo Moreschini:
I installed VLC on my computer (fedora 21) with the purpose to play
.VOB files.
Actually I can run LVL on the line command, but I am not able to do
anything in this way... The help command give me this output :
When you enter "vlc" into the
I installed VLC on my computer (fedora 21) with the purpose to play .VOB
files.
Actually I can run LVL on the line command, but I am not able to do
anything in this way... The help command give me this output :
-
> help
+[ CLI commands ]
| add XYZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41 matches
Mail list logo
