Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Patrick Dupre
ue, France === > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 2:06 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:55:47 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > > Is it the sa

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Patrick Dupre
ue, France === > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 1:57 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:48:28 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:55:47 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Is it the same when you run "dnf distro-sync"? > Error: package directfb-1.6.2-3.fc19.i686 requires libmng.so.1, but none of > the providers can be installed. > package pdftk-1.44-11.fc19.i686 requires itext(x86-32) >= 2.1.7-6, but none

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:48:28 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I run: > dnf remove xorg-x11-drv-ati > > and then: > dnf install xorg-x11-drv-ati > Last metadata expiration check performed 2:29:58 ago on Wed Jul 29 11:16:10 > 2015. > Error: package xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.5.0-3.fc22.i686 requires > xserv

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Patrick Dupre
doraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:32:49 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Dependencies resolved. > > Nothing to do. > > Complete! > > This is a major misdesign of dnf. It hides some problems and tries to >

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:32:49 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Dependencies resolved. > Nothing to do. > Complete! This is a major misdesign of dnf. It hides some problems and tries to be helpful, but the confusion that causes can be highly problematic in cases such as yours. It is a known issue. DNF

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Patrick Dupre
ts.fedoraproject.org > Cc: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > There are several issues: > kernel-PAE-4.1.2-200.fc22.i686 has not been installed! > > rpm -qa |grep kernel > libreport-plugin-kerneloops-2.6.1-1.fc22.i686 > kernel-PAE-modules-ex

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Patrick Dupre
ue, France === > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 1:09 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:02:27 +0200, P

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:02:27 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Extra Packages Irrelevant. As explained, your installation _must_ be up-to-date before this command makes sense. Not all old updates are kept in the repos, so the command would complain about old updates found on your machine when you don

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Patrick Dupre
doraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:52:57 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > parts of the output (rpm --last) > > According to that output, you have installed updates over the past two days. > Surprise, surprise! > >

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:52:57 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > parts of the output (rpm --last) According to that output, you have installed updates over the past two days. Surprise, surprise! > kernel-tools-4.1.2-200.fc22.i686 Wed 29 Jul 2015 12:18:06 PM CEST > kernel-tools-libs-4.1.2-

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Patrick Dupre
ue, France === > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 12:56 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:48:21 +0200, Patrick Dupre wro

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:48:21 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > hello, > > Sorry, but the file is huge even after compression. > It has been through the moderator! > How can I help? I've mentioned http://fpaste.org multiple times before. From "rpm -qa --last" output, only the top few pages would b

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Patrick Dupre
ue, France === > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 12:29 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:20:13 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > > > xorg-x11-drv-ati-7

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Patrick Dupre
= > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 12:29 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:20:13 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > > > xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.2.0-3.20131101

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:20:13 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.2.0-3.20131101git3b38701.fc20.i686 > > > xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse-13.0.0-6.fc20.i686 > > > xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.7.7-2.fc20.i686 > > > xorg-x11-drv-fbdev-0.4.3-10.fc20.i686 > > > > > > None of them has been updated!!

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Patrick Dupre
s.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:33:20 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Maybe I undertsand. > > THis is the list of xorg drivers: > > > > xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.23.0-5.fc20.i

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:33:20 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > Maybe I undertsand. > THis is the list of xorg drivers: > > xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.23.0-5.fc20.i686 > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.3.3-2.fc20.i686 > xorg-x11-drv-vmware-13.0.2-4.20140613git82c9b0c.fc20.i686 > xorg-x11-drv-vesa-2.3.

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:08:00 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > For trouble-shooting Plymouth try booting without "rhgb quiet" boot > > parameters. You can remove them inside the GRUB boot menu. > > I never run with rhgb and quiet option > In level 6, it starts Plymouth and stay stocked for ever Ag

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello, Maybe I undertsand. THis is the list of xorg drivers: xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.23.0-5.fc20.i686 xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.3.3-2.fc20.i686 xorg-x11-drv-vmware-13.0.2-4.20140613git82c9b0c.fc20.i686 xorg-x11-drv-vesa-2.3.2-10.fc20.i686 xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.8.4-1.fc20.i686 xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1.0

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Patrick Dupre
s.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 23:48:01 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > crash means, > > in running level 3: startx (with a new user) > > The graphics mode (if there is not xorg.conf.d

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 23:48:01 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > crash means, > in running level 3: startx (with a new user) > The graphics mode (if there is not xorg.conf.d > directory) starts asking about language and keyboard and > return to text mode (before, it says, Oh no! etc..) Tha

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Joe Zeff
On 07/28/2015 02:48 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: In running level 6. it there is a xorg.conf.d directory the machine need to be unplugged after starting Plymouth While your in runlevel 3, try activating and testing the Magic SysRq Key: http://aplawrence.com/Words2005/2005_04_13.html and finding ou

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello, It is now 2 days that this machine is broken, I really do not know what to do! Thus is out of the jouralctl Why all these permissions denied? Jan 29 16:16:33 sophocle gnome-session[2022]: (gnome-settings-daemon:2224): housekeeping-plugin-WARNING **: Failed to enumerate children of /tmp/

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Patrick Dupre
ue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 9:01 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22,

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:27:01 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > It _should_ just work. Did you need to configure anything when > > running the Live version? No. Why would you want to configure > > anything for your installation then? > > Starx would like to configure, but crashes. The verb "to cras

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Patrick Dupre
doraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:06:10 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > OK. > > But, since it work with the Live Version. Why should I use > > other drivers. > > In my opinio

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:06:10 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > OK. > But, since it work with the Live Version. Why should I use > other drivers. > In my opinion, it is "just" a configuration issue. > From 20 to 22, something is different!! It _should_ just work. Did you need to configure

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Patrick Dupre
40 Dunkerque, France === > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 4:32 PM > From: "Paul Cartwright" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > On 07/28/2015 09:39 AM, Patrick Dupr

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Paul Cartwright
On 07/28/2015 09:39 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > OK, sorry, it was a mistake, I was not in from of the machine!! > Now, this machine works fine with a Live Fedora 22. > So, the video configuration should be wrong. > What did the upgrade? > How, can I install/configure the graphics properly? I have a

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Patrick Dupre
e Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 3:29 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failu

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:36:24 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Here is the hardware: > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] > RV515/M54 [Mobility Radeon X1400] > > The list of modules used in fedora 20 > Module Size Used by > i2c_algo_bit

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Patrick Dupre
Here is the hardware: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML and 945GT Express Memory Controller Hub (rev 03) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML and 945GT Express PCI Express Root Port (rev 03) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporat

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:49:26 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > How do I troubleshoot ? > > > > Nowadays, trouble-shooting often starts with booting a Fedora 22 > > Live image (from USB or DVD) to see whether that works, at least. > > Beyond that, details, details, more details! Trouble-shooting >

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Patrick Dupre
doraproject.org > Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:38:27 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > After I upgraded from fedora 20 to 22, I cannot start the machine > > in graphics mode. > > in level 6, I get: &g

Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:38:27 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > After I upgraded from fedora 20 to 22, I cannot start the machine > in graphics mode. > in level 6, I get: > A start job is running for sendmail Mail Transport Agent > A start job is running for Plymouth Boot Screen to Quit >

Update 20 -> 22, failure

2015-07-28 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello, After I upgraded from fedora 20 to 22, I cannot start the machine in graphics mode. in level 6, I get: A start job is running for sendmail Mail Transport Agent A start job is running for Plymouth Boot Screen to Quit or in level 3, after login, I run startx the machine is stocked. In any