Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-31 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 09:52:38AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Actually that's neither gnome-shell or GNOME2, but yet another user > interface. > If it has a name other than fallback mode, I don't know it, and it's poorly > documented, as is appropriate for something which doesn't seem to be i

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-30 Thread Dotan Cohen
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 00:12, Bill Davidsen wrote: > I was looking at gnome3.org today, and their FAQ says that "The traditional > GNOME 2 desktop will not disappear overnight, however: releases of GNOME 2 > will > continue to be supported by distributions for years to come." so clearly they > d

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-30 Thread Greg Woods
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 15:14 -0400, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: > The way to get other VT's in Virtual Box is "right control"+"F" Thanks for the tip, works like a champ! --Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedorapr

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-30 Thread G.Wolfe Woodbury
On 05/30/2011 01:33 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > running with F14 as the host OS, and I can repeat this phenomenon with > the System Info. Very weird. CTRL-Alt-Backspace (sends you back to the > login screen) also works for recovery. I have yet to figure out how to > do a CTRL-ALT-F2 in a Vbox guest, as

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-30 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 06:54, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > and the VBox-provided drivers for > the WinXP client need to be installed when the client is in safe-mode, if they > are to work. Or something like that, I don't remember exactly. I don´t remember having to to boot into safe mode. The only t

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-30 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 04:20, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > VMs don't have a working 3D support. I don't know why you keep trying. Virtualbox does. At least when using Windows as the host. http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/475 FC -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-30 Thread Greg Woods
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 01:49 -0400, Chris Kloiber wrote: > VirtualBox 4.0.8 does enough 3d emulation (after installing the client > tools) to start Gnome3. > > I am having a problem though when I try to access the "System > Settings"/"System Info" icon. The window appears to open, but it's > co

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-30 Thread Misha Shnurapet
30.05.2011, 18:54, "Marko Vojinovic" : > On Monday 30 May 2011 08:20:40 Misha Shnurapet wrote: > >>  VMs don't have a working 3D support. I don't know why you keep trying. > > VirtualBox offers 3D support for the client system, up to the available > capabilities of the host system. This means that

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-30 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 30 May 2011 08:20:40 Misha Shnurapet wrote: > VMs don't have a working 3D support. I don't know why you keep trying. VirtualBox offers 3D support for the client system, up to the available capabilities of the host system. This means that if you have good 3D video accelerated drivers on

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-30 Thread Misha Shnurapet
VMs don't have a working 3D support. I don't know why you keep trying. -- Best regards, Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shnurapet shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, GPG: 00217306 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change s

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-29 Thread Chris Kloiber
On 05/28/2011 05:12 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > I was looking at gnome3.org today, and their FAQ says that "The traditional > GNOME 2 desktop will not disappear overnight, however: releases of GNOME 2 > will > continue to be supported by distributions for years to come." so clearly they > don't ima

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-29 Thread Bill Davidsen
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 17:12 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> I was looking at gnome3.org today, and their FAQ says that "The traditional >> GNOME 2 desktop will not disappear overnight, however: releases of GNOME 2 >> will >> continue to be supported by distributions for

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 05/29/2011 03:06 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Bill Davidsen writes: > >> I was looking at gnome3.org today, and their FAQ says that "The >> traditional >> GNOME 2 desktop will not disappear overnight, however: releases of >> GNOME 2 >> will >> continue to be supported by distributions for years

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-28 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 17:12 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > I was looking at gnome3.org today, and their FAQ says that "The traditional > GNOME 2 desktop will not disappear overnight, however: releases of GNOME 2 > will > continue to be supported by distributions for years to come." so clearly the

Re: Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-28 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Bill Davidsen writes: I was looking at gnome3.org today, and their FAQ says that "The traditional GNOME 2 desktop will not disappear overnight, however: releases of GNOME 2 will continue to be supported by distributions for years to come." so clearly they Oh? Where exactly can I find my famil

Today's GNOME3 funny

2011-05-28 Thread Bill Davidsen
I was looking at gnome3.org today, and their FAQ says that "The traditional GNOME 2 desktop will not disappear overnight, however: releases of GNOME 2 will continue to be supported by distributions for years to come." so clearly they don't imagine everyone will drop all their software and retrai