Forget USB stick as OS device as it told by others :)
If you want to keep SATA ports, you should add some more either
connecting to a low profile pci/pcie card or maybe to use some msata
add-on card. It is fast, reliable and not so expensive
L:
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.or
On 4/29/2014 5:30 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
My $0.02. IIRC, I don't think ZFS is supported (or fully supported at
any rate) in linux. I just did some research into that and couldn't
find anything recent about ZFS support for newer kernels. Granted, I
could have just missed it. If you want to use ZF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/14 14:11, Javier Perez wrote:
>> Putting your OS onto a 10 GB partition on that drive will take up
>> about
> 0.5% of its capacity. It will also be much safer >than having it
> on an external drive, especially if it's a flash drive.
>
> I
On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 16:18 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> > on the rotating drive. Note that a real SSD can go about twice as
> fast
> > as a SATA 2 port, which is probably what you have on your machine,
> but
> > it will still be dramatically faster than a USB stick.
>
> But there are USB 3.0 s
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 03:44:26PM -0500, Javier Perez wrote:
> So ask yourself: in a home server, just what does RAID give me? Are
> > you really bottlenecked for speed in a way that RAID will improve?
> > Perhaps RAID can help with High Availability (and perhaps not) -- is
> > that what you are
So ask yourself: in a home server, just what does RAID give me? Are
> you really bottlenecked for speed in a way that RAID will improve?
> Perhaps RAID can help with High Availability (and perhaps not) -- is
> that what you are hoping for? Just don't think of it as backup.
> --
>
Hmm, I was look
On 28.04.2014, Javier Perez wrote:
> My plan is to put the OS on a USB stick
In my experience, that's a bad idea. USB-sticks are not reliable over
a longer period, and you can expect data loss.
> and use the whole 2TB for Data. I'd rather not have a
> PATA SDD, and I do not want to lose one of
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> Also, a USB stick will wear out a lot quicker if it's used as a
> root filesystem with /tmp.
Well, I've been waiting for Samsung F2FS for a long time, but still no
boot support AFAIK
http://www.techspot.com/news/50428-samsung-creates-f
| From: Javier Perez
| I know, but I wanted the famous speed a SSD/flash system is supposed to
| give for the OS. Specially given that it is an old system.
I could be wrong, but I think
- most USB sticks are quite slow.
- USB2 sticks are guaranteed to be slow-ish
- USB sticks seem to have low
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
>>Putting your OS onto a 10 GB partition on that drive will take up about
>> 0.5% of its capacity. It will also be much safer >than having it on an
>> external drive, especially if it's a flash drive.
>
> I know, but I wanted the famous speed a
| From: Joe Zeff
| On 04/28/2014 10:44 AM, Javier Perez wrote:
| >
| > Is there anything I should know I am not taking into consideration?
|
| Putting your OS onto a 10 GB partition on that drive will take up about 0.5%
| of its capacity. It will also be much safer than having it on an external
Hi Robert.
>The get a 64Gb SSD internal as you primary device and put all data on a
secondary drive.
If I do that I lose one SATA port out of the 4 that the motherboard has.
I want to slowly upgrade it to a Raid 1+0 system, unless there is a better
option. Will ZFS on two mirrored HDDs be a viab
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 14:02:47 -0400,
Fred Smith wrote:
though I can't tell you the steps, it is possible to build a raid-1 array
using Linux Raid, with only one drive. it'll be in "degraded" mode
because of only one drive, but you could then easily (??) add a second
or subsequent drive to
On 04/28/2014 02:11 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
>Putting your OS onto a 10 GB partition on that drive will take up
about 0.5% of its capacity. It will also be much safer >than having
it on an external drive, especially if it's a flash drive.
I know, but I wanted the famous speed a SSD/flash syst
>Putting your OS onto a 10 GB partition on that drive will take up about
0.5% of its capacity. It will also be much safer >than having it on an
external drive, especially if it's a flash drive.
I know, but I wanted the famous speed a SSD/flash system is supposed to
give for the OS. Specially give
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
> 1. I could use ext4 on all HDDs eventually. But I wonder, can I use ZFS?
> Specially I would like to have the ability to expand the single HDD into a
> Raid once I get the second HDD as painlessly as possible. If I use ext4 I
> guess I will ha
On 04/28/2014 10:44 AM, Javier Perez wrote:
Is there anything I should know I am not taking into consideration?
Putting your OS onto a 10 GB partition on that drive will take up about
0.5% of its capacity. It will also be much safer than having it on an
external drive, especially if it's a
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:44:02PM -0500, Javier Perez wrote:
>HI
>I have a small home server (photos, videos, music) that is reaching
>full capacity.
>It is a 750GB, partitioned as a 50G OS and 700G Data + swap
>The mobo, an Intel DG31PR mobo has 1 PATA and 4 SATA ports (3G
HI
I have a small home server (photos, videos, music) that is reaching full
capacity.
It is a 750GB, partitioned as a 50G OS and 700G Data + swap
The mobo, an Intel DG31PR mobo has 1 PATA and 4 SATA ports (3GB/s).
Currently it is running FC20, having been continuously upgraded from almost
Fedor
19 matches
Mail list logo
