On 1/31/2024 12:21 AM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 03:54:50PM -0500, Bill Cunningham wrote:
On 1/29/2024 9:22 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500
Bill Cunningham wrote:
I installed from scrat
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:21:50 -0500 Jon LaBadie wrote:
Observation Oddity: glibc-headers uses -x86
whereas most packages use .x86 (dash vs dot)
The reason is that the name of the glibc-headers RPM is in fact
glibc-headers-x86
rpm -qi glibc-headers-x86
Name: glibc-headers-x86
Hi.
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:21:50 -0500 Jon LaBadie wrote:
> $ rpm --verify glibc-headers-x86
> $ rpm --verify glibc-devel.x86_64
> After renaming stdio.h the first command reports it as missing.
> Observation Oddity: glibc-headers uses -x86
> whereas most packages use .x86 (dash vs dot)
The r
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 03:54:50PM -0500, Bill Cunningham wrote:
On 1/29/2024 9:22 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500
Bill Cunningham wrote:
I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include
On 1/29/2024 9:15 PM, Go Canes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:12 PM Bill Cunningham wrote:
I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and
the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present.
On 1/29/2024 9:22 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500
Bill Cunningham wrote:
I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and
the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
> On 30 Jan 2024, at 09:28, Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 30 Jan 2024, at 00:23, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>
>> On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers:
>>
>> zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h
>> glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch
>> --
>
> On mine its from glibc-devel not
> On 30 Jan 2024, at 00:23, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers:
>
> zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h
> glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch
> --
On mine its from glibc-devel not glibc-headers...
: [1] root $ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora relea
On 1/30/24 01:40, Bill Cunningham wrote:
On 1/29/2024 7:23 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch
I tried dnf reinstall with that rpm. It (stdio.h) still isn't in /usr/include.
I'm really at a loss here with this one.
rpm -V gl
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500
Bill Cunningham wrote:
I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and
the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
glibc-devel are both installed. No standard
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:12 PM Bill Cunningham wrote:
> I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and
> the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
> glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does
> anyone have any idea what is g
On 1/29/2024 7:23 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500
Bill Cunningham wrote:
I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and
the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are pre
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500
Bill Cunningham wrote:
> I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and
> the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
> glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does
> anyone have any idea wha
13 matches
Mail list logo
