On 28 Feb 2025 at 12:55, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
To: fedora
Subject:startx
Date sent: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:55:47 +0100
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
From: Patrick Dupre via users
Copies to:
Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
>I have one x session running, but I wish to open a second one
Works find for me with FC41 on a Dell 9020:
$ w
13:24:55 up 7 days, 22:57, 6 users, load average: 0.23, 0.25, 0.18
USER TTYLOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
dave tty3 13:195:4
Fulko Hew composed on 2025-02-28 09:02 (UTC-0500):
> Roger Heflin wrote:
> I have never seen 2 X sessions with the same graphics hardware work
>> successfully.
> Now, I haven't had the need to do it in a few years, but 20 years ago,
> I did it ALL the time. But then again, it was mostly on SCO
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 6:56 AM Patrick Dupre via users
wrote:
>
> I have one x session running, but I wish to open a second one
> I try to open a session text mode and then
> startx -- :2
> but I get
>
> xf86EnableIOPorts: failed to set IOPL, for I/O (Operation not permitted)
> (II) modeset(0): I
On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 12:55 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> I have one x session running, but I wish to open a second one
> I try to open a session text mode and then
> startx -- :2
> but I get
>
> xf86EnableIOPorts: failed to set IOPL, for I/O (Operation not permitted)
> (II) modeset(0):
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 7:30 AM Roger Heflin wrote:
... snip ...
I have never seen 2 X sessions with the same graphics hardware work
> successfully.
>
Now, I haven't had the need to do it in a few years, but 20 years ago,
I did it ALL the time. But then again, it was mostly on SCO OpenDesktop
email: pdu...@gmx.com
> ===
>
>
> > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 at 1:05 PM
> > From: "Roger Heflin"
> > To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> > Cc: "Patrick Dupre"
> > Subject: Re: startx
> >
> > The graphics h
===
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 at 1:05 PM
> From: "Roger Heflin"
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Cc: "Patrick Dupre"
> Subject: Re: startx
>
> The graphics hardware/software is not setup to work with 2 x-servers
> runnin
The graphics hardware/software is not setup to work with 2 x-servers
running on the same graphics device, each X server expect to have
total control, and is not coded to share with a 2nd instance.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 5:56 AM Patrick Dupre via users
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have one x session r
George,
On 2023-09-26 23:45, George N. White III wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:13 AM Dave Close wrote:
I detest a graphical login and insist on running in multi-user mode
(old runlevel 3). To start an X11 session after login, I can use the
startx command. But I haven't found an equivalent
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:13 AM Dave Close wrote:
> I detest a graphical login and insist on running in multi-user mode
> (old runlevel 3). To start an X11 session after login, I can use the
> startx command. But I haven't found an equivalent command to start a
> Wayland session.
>
> An old post
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:04 AM Tim via users
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 21:12 -0700, Dave Close wrote:
> > I detest a graphical login and insist on running in multi-user mode
> > (old runlevel 3). To start an X11 session after login, I can use the
> > startx command. But I haven't found an
I asked:
> I detest a graphical login and insist on running in multi-user mode
> (old runlevel 3). To start an X11 session after login, I can use the
> startx command. But I haven't found an equivalent command to start a
> Wayland session.
>
> An old post on this list suggests using weston-launch
On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 21:12 -0700, Dave Close wrote:
> I detest a graphical login and insist on running in multi-user mode
> (old runlevel 3). To start an X11 session after login, I can use the
> startx command. But I haven't found an equivalent command to start a
> Wayland session.
I don't really
On 9/24/23 21:12, Dave Close wrote:
I detest a graphical login and insist on running in multi-user mode
(old runlevel 3). To start an X11 session after login, I can use the
startx command. But I haven't found an equivalent command to start a
Wayland session.
An old post on this list suggests usi
On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:37:01 -0700
stan via users wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:55:37 -0800
> Geoffrey Leach wrote:
>
> > suspend failed to do its thing, so I powered-down. > failed, dropping me into the > from the log, startup correctly, but no X. Running startx as root
> > gave me a displ
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:56 AM Geoffrey Leach wrote:
>
> suspend failed to do its thing, so I powered-down. dropping me into the startup correctly, but no X. Running startx as root gave me a display.
> However, running startx as a normal user, fails.
>
> So, I have the startx log, but its unc
On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:55:37 -0800
Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> suspend failed to do its thing, so I powered-down. dropping me into the startup correctly, but no X. Running startx as root gave me a display.
> However, running startx as a normal user, fails.
>
> So, I have the startx log, but its un
On 12/22/16 03:41, Rick Walker wrote:
>
>> ll /etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service
> (...): No such file or directory
That's not good Which I'm sure you found out
>
>
> Which suggested
>
> dnf install system-switch-displaymanager
> system-switch-displaymanager-gnome
>
Hi Ed,
> I suppose a little sanity check is in order.
> You wrote "F25 to F25" but that sure isn't correct.
Oops. F23->F25.
> ll /etc/systemd/system/default.target
4 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 36 Oct 24 2011
/etc/systemd/system/default.target ->
/lib/systemd/system/runlevel5.target
Hi Rick
it's probably worth a try:
mv /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf.orig
startx
I had a mess lately with X on a different Linux distro, but when I moved
away xorg.conf, X came back in old splendor.
suomi
On 12/21/2016 09:15 AM, Rick Walker wrote:
Just updated from F25 to F25. No l
On 12/21/16 16:15, Rick Walker wrote:
> Just updated from F25 to F25. No longer have a working KDE
> desktop. I'm configured for graphical boot, but just get a
> console. startx just errored out and returned after X11 died.
>
> I cobbled together a simple .xinitrc and am running a very
> painf
On 08/18/2016 06:53 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
it starts now in text mode and there is no startx command.
only one xorg file has been installed (abrt-addon-xorg).
Hi
To use startx, you must install xorg-x11-xinit
greetings
--
Maderios
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
On 08/18/2016 09:53 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I made a fresh install from the DVD Server fc24.
> The install did not let me choice the software that I
> wished to install (except the editor option).
> Worst.
> it starts now in text mode and there is no startx command.
> only one xorg f
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 06:53:59PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I made a fresh install from the DVD Server fc24.
> The install did not let me choice the software that I
> wished to install (except the editor option).
> Worst.
> it starts now in text mode and there is no startx command.
> only one
Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Quoting mar, 05 mar 2013 Frantisek Hanzlik :
>
>> Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> It looks like that the command:
>>> startx -- :1
>>> does not works any more.
>>>
>>> It was very convenient to open 2 X sessions.
>>>
>>> Thank for your help.
>>
>>
>> Tried You before
Quoting mar, 05 mar 2013 Frantisek Hanzlik :
Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
It looks like that the command:
startx -- :1
does not works any more.
It was very convenient to open 2 X sessions.
Thank for your help.
Tried You before this command set appropriate DE?
(e.g. switchdesk xfce)
Good
Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It looks like that the command:
> startx -- :1
> does not works any more.
>
> It was very convenient to open 2 X sessions.
>
> Thank for your help.
Tried You before this command set appropriate DE?
(e.g. switchdesk xfce)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fed
Check if the kernel driver of your video device is loaded.
On Mar 28, 2012 1:20 PM, "Ed Greshko" wrote:
> On 03/28/2012 11:11 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Can some body tell me what is wrong in the following xorg.conf file:
>
> Nothing???
> >
> >
> >
> > [1360469.183] The PCI devic
On 03/28/2012 11:11 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can some body tell me what is wrong in the following xorg.conf file:
Nothing???
>
>
>
> [1360469.183] The PCI device has a kernel module claiming it.
> [1360469.183] This driver cannot operate until it has been unloaded
lsmod is the nouve
Hello Marko,
Congratulations, I worked exactly like you said.
Thank again.
On Friday 24 February 2012 22:55:09 Patrick Dupre wrote:
(2) Run "mv /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf-backup". This will rename
the xorg.conf file (if you have it), and let X run with default
configuration (i.e. w
On Friday 24 February 2012 22:55:09 Patrick Dupre wrote:
> (2) Run "mv /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf-backup". This will rename
> the xorg.conf file (if you have it), and let X run with default
> configuration (i.e. without an xorg.conf file) after a reboot.
>
>
===
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Friday 17 February 2012 22:18:58 Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> On Wednesday 15 February 2012 20:08:22 Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> But could you tell me exactly what I should do?
>>
>> I removed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau (and xorg-x11-drivers), but I did
>> not g
Dear Marko,
Thank you very much for your long email.
See below my comments.
On Friday 17 February 2012 22:18:58 Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> On Wednesday 15 February 2012 20:08:22 Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> But could you tell me exactly what I should do?
>>
>> I removed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau (and xorg-
On 02/17/2012 10:46 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
The nvidia driver can be obtained in two different ways. One way is to download
the appropriate .run file from nVidia website and run it. This is the*wrong*
way, since it doesn't play nice with Fedora, overwrites some system files, and
is a pain to r
On 02/17/2012 02:21 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I don't know, but I assume yum will pull in any and all dependencies
required to make it work, including the kernel header packages and the
development toolchain for compilation.
Only if they're *listed* as dependencies. Back when I first installed
On Friday 17 February 2012 22:18:58 Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 15 February 2012 20:08:22 Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >> But could you tell me exactly what I should do?
> >>
> >> I removed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau (and xorg-x11-drivers), but I did
> >> not get any improvements (see below)
> >>
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, John Pilkington wrote:
On 16/02/12 11:55, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Thank for your email.
Before I do any thing, I can see that I have
kmod-nvidia-3.2.3-2.fc16.x86_64-290.10-1.fc16.12.x86_64
and
kmod-nvidia-3.2.5-3.fc16.x86_64-290.10-1.fc16.13.x86_64
Should I remove the first
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 12:54:30 Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/15/2012 12:38 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> (b) do a "yum install akmod-nvidia".
Back when I installed akmod-nvidia, it needed either kernel-devel or
kernel-headers, if not both. (It's been
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 20:08:22 Patrick Dupre wrote:
But could you tell me exactly what I should do?
I removed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau (and xorg-x11-drivers), but I did
not get any improvements (see below)
Then I even cannot get back with the 1920x1080 resolution even with
the previous ker
On 16/02/12 11:55, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Thank for your email.
Before I do any thing, I can see that I have
kmod-nvidia-3.2.3-2.fc16.x86_64-290.10-1.fc16.12.x86_64
and
kmod-nvidia-3.2.5-3.fc16.x86_64-290.10-1.fc16.13.x86_64
Should I remove the first one?
Thank.
Hi: I use the ATrpms repo and
On Thursday 16 February 2012 11:55:43 Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Before I do any thing, I can see that I have
> kmod-nvidia-3.2.3-2.fc16.x86_64-290.10-1.fc16.12.x86_64
> and
> kmod-nvidia-3.2.5-3.fc16.x86_64-290.10-1.fc16.13.x86_64
>
> Should I remove the first one?
The first kmod-nvidia is there for
Thank for your email.
Before I do any thing, I can see that I have
kmod-nvidia-3.2.3-2.fc16.x86_64-290.10-1.fc16.12.x86_64
and
kmod-nvidia-3.2.5-3.fc16.x86_64-290.10-1.fc16.13.x86_64
Should I remove the first one?
Thank.
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 20:08:22 Patrick Dupre wrote:
But could yo
On 02/15/2012 02:39 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
$ rpm -qR akmods|grep devel
kernel-devel
...so yes it's listed as a dependency and should get pulled in by yum.
...and that also answers my question.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
htt
On 02/15/2012 02:37 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
I don't know, but I assume yum will pull in any and all dependencies required
to make it work, including the kernel header packages and the development
toolchain for compilation.
That's true if and only if they're properly listed. Back when I
ins
On 15 February 2012 22:37, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 February 2012 12:54:30 Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 02/15/2012 12:38 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> > (b) do a "yum install akmod-nvidia".
>>
>> Back when I installed akmod-nvidia, it needed either kernel-devel or
>> kernel-headers, if no
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 12:54:30 Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/15/2012 12:38 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > (b) do a "yum install akmod-nvidia".
>
> Back when I installed akmod-nvidia, it needed either kernel-devel or
> kernel-headers, if not both. (It's been several years, so my memory's a
> tad
On 02/15/2012 12:38 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
(b) do a "yum install akmod-nvidia".
Back when I installed akmod-nvidia, it needed either kernel-devel or
kernel-headers, if not both. (It's been several years, so my memory's a
tad fuzzy.) However, for whatever reason, it didn't list them as
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 20:08:22 Patrick Dupre wrote:
> But could you tell me exactly what I should do?
>
> I removed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau (and xorg-x11-drivers), but I did
> not get any improvements (see below)
>
> Then I even cannot get back with the 1920x1080 resolution even with
> the p
Thank for your email.
But could you tell me exactly what I should do?
I removed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau (and xorg-x11-drivers), but I did
not get any improvements (see below)
Then I even cannot get back with the 1920x1080 resolution even with
the previous kernel. So reinstalled the removed packag
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 11:21:49 Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With te new kernel 3.2.5-3.fc16.x86_64
> I cannot start the graphics mode!
>
> [ 161.451] (II) LoadModule: "glx"
> [ 161.451] (II) Loading
> /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia/libglx.so
> [ 161.454] (II) Module
On 15/02/12 11:21, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
With te new kernel 3.2.5-3.fc16.x86_64
I cannot start the graphics mode!
You have a mix of nVidia and nouveau drivers, and probably need a nVidia
kmod that matches your new kernel.
See recent posts about 'no more nvidia' for hints.
John P
--
u
As you suggested, with iommu=soft everything went fine.
Thank you Brian
Filippo
Skype shinymetal-skype
--
From: "Brian Millett"
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:16 PM
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
Subject: Re: Start
Great, thank, I'll try tomorrow.
F
Skype shinymetal-skype
--
From: "Brian Millett"
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:16 PM
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
Subject: Re: Startx crash after update
> --
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 21:42 +0200, Fil-ShinyMetal wrote:
> Hi there,
> I will describe shortly my situation.
> 2 Z800 HP server, 6 GBytes of ram with 1 80 GB sata for the os and 2
> sata 1TB in software raid1.
> The graphic board is an Nvidia Quadro FX380
> I have other servers ( FC10 ) that mirror
55 matches
Mail list logo
