On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> Try again!
>
> I just realized that the changes requested by BZ actually damaged the
> package. Try downloading and seeing if this works now.
Thanks again, Ranjan. I have just done that, and now the command
pdf-stapler --help
works just fi
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:14:59 -0500 Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 09/02/2015 01:23 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Well, originally, I had posted the github source, but this had to be
> > changed to meet Fedora's guidelines.
>
> Pointing to a github release URL is valid. Whoever told you to change
On 09/02/2015 01:23 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Well, originally, I had posted the github source, but this had to be changed to
meet Fedora's guidelines.
Pointing to a github release URL is valid. Whoever told you to change "due to the
guidelines" is wrong.
Please post the review bugzilla URL.
Try again!
I just realized that the changes requested by BZ actually damaged the package.
Try downloading and seeing if this works now.
Best wishes,
Ranjan
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 19:20:40 +0100 Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have just installed Ranjan's rpm on F22, but getting the followi
pdfstapler -help
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 19:20:40 +0100 Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have just installed Ranjan's rpm on F22, but getting the following error:
>
> -
> $ pdf-stapler --help
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pdf-stapler", line 5, in
>
> Github exports archives for any given commit, tag, or branch head. If
> upstream has tagged releases on GitHub, you can use that as a source. I
> personally prefer to do this; it seems odd to involve a third party, and I
> can reliably associate the version in the package with the source rep
Dear All,
I have just installed Ranjan's rpm on F22, but getting the following error:
-
$ pdf-stapler --help
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pdf-stapler", line 5, in
from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-package
Well, but for that licensing discrepancy, it is good to go for Fedora. I did
not want to deal with another process so I went the official route.
I do hope that the licensing issue (it is really a non-issue -- the fact that
there is no license file in the pypi.org release, but is there in the gi
On Sep 2, 2015 12:51 PM, "Ranjan Maitra"
wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> I put in a review request to BZ, and it is a bit stuck there. The BZ
people are not to be blamed for this however.
>
> The issue is a license file which exists on the git site, but not in the
tar file on the pypi site. I have written se
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
>
> I put in a review request to BZ, and it is a bit stuck there. The BZ people
> are not to be blamed for this however.
>
> The issue is a license file which exists on the git site, but not in the tar
> file on the pypi site. I have written s
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234210
>
pdf-stapler or pdfshuffler are fine tools if you just want to collate
PDFs, but pdftk did a lot more. I've been using it for years to merge
data into pre-built template PDFs. pdftk has a
Ranjan, what about putting your package in copr
(https://copr.fedoraproject.org/) so that people can add it as a repo
easily e.g. "dnf copr enable ..."?
Regards,
Raman
On 09/02/2015 01:50 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I put in a review request to BZ, and it is a bit stuck there. The BZ pe
Paul,
I put in a review request to BZ, and it is a bit stuck there. The BZ people are
not to be blamed for this however.
The issue is a license file which exists on the git site, but not in the tar
file on the pypi site. I have written several times to the author (Philip
Stark) of the package
e | |
> > > Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
> > > 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
> > > ==
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> Btw, I have put my rpm for pdf-stapler here, in case it helps anyone:
>
> http://www.public.iastate.edu/~maitra/pdf-stapler-0.3.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
>
> I personally have found pdf-stapler to be a very good, perhaps better,
> commandline repla
mber 02, 2015 at 7:20 PM
> From: "Ranjan Maitra"
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Subject: Re: pdftk
>
> You need PyPdf installed.
>
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 19:17:03 +0200 Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > pdf-stapler --help
> > Traceba
3)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
> 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
> ===
>
>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 at 6:57 PM
> >
|
> Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
> 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
> ===
>
>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 02,
| | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 at 6:57 PM
> From: "Ranjan Maitra"
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Subject: Re: pdftk
>
> Try it now, with 1 instead of 2 (you know where).
>
&
| | 59140 Dunkerque, France
> ===
>
>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 at 4:26 PM
> > From: "Ranjan Maitra"
> > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Subject: Re: pdftk
>
: "Ranjan Maitra"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: pdftk
>
> Btw, I have put my rpm for pdf-stapler here, in case it helps anyone:
>
> http://www.public.iastate.edu/~maitra/pdf-stapler-0.3.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
>
> I personally have found pdf-stapler
Btw, I have put my rpm for pdf-stapler here, in case it helps anyone:
http://www.public.iastate.edu/~maitra/pdf-stapler-0.3.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
I personally have found pdf-stapler to be a very good, perhaps better,
commandline replacement for pdftk (for my purposes, but of course, your needs
ma
On 1 September 2015 at 17:09, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Unfortunately, pdfshuffler does not have the same capabilities than pdftk.
> It has a graphics interface.
> There is one command easy with pdftk:
> pdftk file.pdf cat 3-4 output file2.pdf
Something like this should give you the same functionali
On 01.09.2015, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> There is one command easy with pdftk:
> pdftk file.pdf cat 3-4 output file2.pdf
> that I cannot have with pdfshuffler.
This can easily be done with pdfshuffler. Just load the .pdf, mark
page 3 and 4, right click and choose "export selection".
> pdftk, is a
z Diehl"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: pdftk
>
> On 01.09.2015, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > What is the future of pdftk as part of fedora?
> > It did not find any good alternative.
>
> dnf install poppler-utils pdfshuffler
>
> These tool
On 01.09.2015, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> What is the future of pdftk as part of fedora?
> It did not find any good alternative.
dnf install poppler-utils pdfshuffler
These tools together can replace most pdftk functionality.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234210
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 14:20:54 +0100 Ian Malone wrote:
> On 1 September 2015 at 12:54, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > What is the future of pdftk as part of fedora?
> > It did not find any good alternative.
> >
> > Thank.
>
> Not sure
On 1 September 2015 at 12:54, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is the future of pdftk as part of fedora?
> It did not find any good alternative.
>
> Thank.
Not sure, maybe a question for the developers list. itext (I'm
assuming it's the same itext), appears to be back:
https://admin.fedorap
On 13.05.2015, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> You can only wait for a few more weeks while the alternative
> pdf-stapler is approved.
Or you can use poppler-utils, and you could also install F19 (the latest Fedora
with a working
pdftk) on an USB stick. That's what I did to tailor my documents. It's qui
> It looks like that the last version of pdftk is pdftk-1.44-11.fc19.x86_64
> for fc21!
> it provides me an error:
> pdftk: error while loading shared libraries:
> /usr/lib64/gcj/itext/itext-2.1.7.jar.so: cannot open shared object file: No
> such file or directory
>
> Where can I get:
> itext-2
On 13.12.2014 14:10, Heinz Diehl wrote:
...
> I depend a lot on pdf merging functionality, I chose the shortest and
> easiest way if all fails. At work, I'm bound to Windows anyway..
>
http://cygwin.com
Let go Luke
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change su
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:41:57 +0100 Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 13.12.2014, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfsam/?source=typ_t4_highlighted
> > Not clear if this satisfies OSS requirements of Fedora but it would be at
> > least a worthwhile alternative to pdftk's functi
On 13.12.2014, poma wrote:
> https://www.winehq.org
> Use the Force, Luke ...
I do not want to run any Windows software on a Linux machine. Since
I depend a lot on pdf merging functionality, I chose the shortest and
easiest way if all fails. At work, I'm bound to Windows anyway..
--
users mail
On 13.12.2014 10:41, Heinz Diehl wrote:
...
> (alternatively, I'll use a Windows 7 machine at work to do the pdf merging).
>
https://www.winehq.org
Use the Force, Luke ...
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorapro
On 13.12.2014, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfsam/?source=typ_t4_highlighted
> Not clear if this satisfies OSS requirements of Fedora but it would be at
> least a worthwhile alternative to pdftk's functions.
The author of this package states:
"It’s the first public a
Btw, I came across this:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfsam/?source=typ_t4_highlighted
Not clear if this satisfies OSS requirements of Fedora but it would be at least
a worthwhile alternative to pdftk's functions.
Best wishes,
Ranjan
___
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:08:54 +0100 Marco Guazzone
wrote:
> >
> > Regrettably it's a slightly modified AGPL and, though IANAL, it looks
> > like the problematic additional restriction is still there:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-June/001656.html
> >
> > Which is a pity
>
> Regrettably it's a slightly modified AGPL and, though IANAL, it looks
> like the problematic additional restriction is still there:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-June/001656.html
>
> Which is a pity, because I used to like pdftk and have been missing it
> since it was d
On 11 December 2014 at 10:59, Jon Ingason wrote:
> Den 2014-12-11 05:08, Paul Allen Newell skrev:
>>
>> On 12/10/2014 08:02 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:49:55 -0800 Paul Allen Newell
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 12/10/2014 04:07 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014
Den 2014-12-11 05:08, Paul Allen Newell skrev:
>
> On 12/10/2014 08:02 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:49:55 -0800 Paul Allen Newell
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/10/2014 04:07 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:55:10 -0500 Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On W
On 12/10/2014 08:02 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:49:55 -0800 Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 12/10/2014 04:07 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:55:10 -0500 Matthew Miller
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
It would be good
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:49:55 -0800 Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>
> On 12/10/2014 04:07 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:55:10 -0500 Matthew Miller
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > It would be good if someone who could pi
On 12/10/2014 04:07 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:55:10 -0500 Matthew Miller
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that
Fedora had would do it -- pdftk was a good package and wi
On 12/10/2014 04:31 PM, Doug wrote:
On 12/10/2014 07:07 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:55:10 -0500 Matthew Miller
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that
Fedora had would do
> I'm running pclos-kde, and I had not heard of pdftk, but my system has it
> available in
> the repos, so I looked up the description. It seems to be a very useful,
> competent tool
> with a lot of features, so I really don't understand why Fedora would drop
> it. However,
> it is available fr
On 12/10/2014 07:07 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:55:10 -0500 Matthew Miller
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that
Fedora had would do it -- pdftk was a good package and wil
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:55:10 -0500 Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > > > It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that
> > > > Fedora had would do it -- pdftk was a good package and will be
> > > > missed. Given that
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > > It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that
> > > Fedora had would do it -- pdftk was a good package and will be
> > > missed. Given that Fedora isn't going to continue, I understand it
> > > is a bit usel
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:04:12 -0500 Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:28:57AM -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> > It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that
> > Fedora had would do it -- pdftk was a good package and will be
> > missed. Given that Fedora
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:28:57AM -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that
> Fedora had would do it -- pdftk was a good package and will be
> missed. Given that Fedora isn't going to continue, I understand it
> is a bit useless to make
On 12/10/2014 04:23 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Ranjan Maitra
> wrote:
>> What is the story with pdftk?
>
> As pointed out by others, it used a really old Java stack that is no
> longer supported.
>
> There is a more modern replacement called mcpdf.
Thanks fo
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> What is the story with pdftk?
As pointed out by others, it used a really old Java stack that is no
longer supported.
There is a more modern replacement called mcpdf. It supports the same
command line syntax but has much more modern underpin
On 12/09/2014 09:48 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:01:46 -0500 Matthew Miller
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:37:08PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
What is the story with pdftk?
$ sudo yum list pdftk
.
Installed Packages
pdftk.x86_641.44-11.fc19
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:01:46 -0500 Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:37:08PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > What is the story with pdftk?
> > $ sudo yum list pdftk
> > .
> > Installed Packages
> > pdftk.x86_641.44-11.fc19
> >
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:37:08PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> What is the story with pdftk?
> $ sudo yum list pdftk
> .
> Installed Packages
> pdftk.x86_641.44-11.fc19
> @fedora
> Is it orphaned? That would be a bummer! I depend on it a lot.
> You've been affected by the recent selinux-policy-targeted bug, which
> broke installation of a few updates as long as you didn't apply the
> fix.
>
> Try reinstalling the java-1.7.0-openjdk-headless package and
> following these instructions:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=105
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:54:56 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:40:33 -0500 Deepak Bhole
> wrote:
>
> > * Ranjan Maitra [2014-01-28 15:02]:
> > > I have been having this error since this morning: I has no problems
> > > last Thursday when I last used this so some update mus
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:40:33 -0500 Deepak Bhole
wrote:
> * Ranjan Maitra [2014-01-28 15:02]:
> > I have been having this error since this morning: I has no problems
> > last Thursday when I last used this so some update must have created
> > some problem somewhere.
> >
> > $ pdftk --nup 2x2 ra
* Ranjan Maitra [2014-01-28 15:02]:
> I have been having this error since this morning: I has no problems
> last Thursday when I last used this so some update must have created
> some problem somewhere.
>
> $ pdftk --nup 2x2 random.pdf
> /usr/bin/build-classpath: Failed to set JAVACMD
> Can't get
59 matches
Mail list logo
