Thanks
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 10:58 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/7/20 4:58 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> > I though Fedora KDE was an official image, are you saying that its not ?
>
> I don't see how that relates to what I said. The official images are
> only released once for each release.
On 4/7/20 4:58 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
I though Fedora KDE was an official image, are you saying that its not ?
I don't see how that relates to what I said. The official images are
only released once for each release. There are unofficial respins done
for the workstation live, but onl
I though Fedora KDE was an official image, are you saying that its not ?
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:13 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/6/20 9:52 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> > Well I tried that it told me that I did not have enough space.
> >
> > The easiest option is use a distro which uses the u
On 4/6/20 9:52 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
Well I tried that it told me that I did not have enough space.
The easiest option is use a distro which uses the updated version. I
have no clue why Fedora a distro that lives on the bleeding edge does
not update its ISO images.
Because releasing
Well I tried that it told me that I did not have enough space.
The easiest option is use a distro which uses the updated version. I have
no clue why Fedora a distro that lives on the bleeding edge does not update
its ISO images.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 3:53 AM stan via users
wrote:
> On Tue, 7 A
On 04/06/2020 04:22 PM, stan via users wrote:
Actually, I think you can, since the live images are fully functional
in order to be installed. At least I have a memory of doing so years
ago. After the ISO image is running, you should be able to run a dnf
update for the lvm2 packages if you have a
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 01:12:01 +0530
Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> I got it by running
>
> lvconvert --version
>
> I can't update the ISO image now can I ?
Actually, I think you can, since the live images are fully functional
in order to be installed. At least I have a memory of doing so years
ago
I got it by running
lvconvert --version
I can't update the ISO image now can I ?
Which means I have to use a completely different distro for LVM snapshots
and merging.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:21 PM stan via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 17:53:13 +0530
> S
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 17:53:13 +0530
Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> The problem is with the LVM version that comes with the stock
> install. This is the version:
>
> LVM Version: 2.03.05(2)
> Library Version: 1.02.163
Where did you get this? My F31 has librarys
/usr/lib64/libdevmapper-event-lvm2.so.
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 11:52:15 +0530
Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> Do you know how to install the latest version of Rawhide ? I mean from
> where in the latest Anaconda installer do i select "Installation
> source" ?
You could get a snapshot of rawhide from the Fedora download page,
https://www.hap
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 11:17:35 +0530
Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> The problem with Bugzilla is that there are no replies there at all.
Yeah, that's a general issue with open source. If no one takes an
interest and puts in the work, it doesn't get done. The Fedora
maintainers tend to be very busy p
The problem is with the LVM version that comes with the stock install. This
is the version:
LVM Version: 2.03.05(2)
Library Version: 1.02.163
Driver Configuration: 4.40.0
Using a linux distro that uses a more recent version solves the problem.
For me, I used ArcoLinux which uses a more recent ver
Do you know how to install the latest version of Rawhide ? I mean from
where in the latest Anaconda installer do i select "Installation source" ?
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 11:17 AM Sreyan Chakravarty
wrote:
> The problem with Bugzilla is that there are no replies there at all.
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 20
The problem with Bugzilla is that there are no replies there at all.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:54 AM Sreyan Chakravarty
wrote:
> You think it may be a kernel bug ? It happens in Fedora, Ubuntu 19.10 does
> not have this.
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:27 AM stan via users <
> users@lists.fedorapro
You think it may be a kernel bug ? It happens in Fedora, Ubuntu 19.10 does
not have this.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:27 AM stan via users
wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 03:30:23 +0530
> Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
>
> > So you mean this is a problem with lvconvert itself ?
>
> I don't know that for su
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 03:30:23 +0530
Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> So you mean this is a problem with lvconvert itself ?
I don't know that for sure since I am not familiar with lvconvert. But,
the fact that it is hanging while doing its job suggests that it is a
good place to start.
> Giving up wai
So you mean this is a problem with lvconvert itself ?
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:22 AM stan via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:56:35 -0400
> Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
>
> > LVM merging from snapshots don't work.
> >
> > I have two logical volume - one is for
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:56:35 -0400
Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> LVM merging from snapshots don't work.
>
> I have two logical volume - one is for the entire system and one is a
> snapshot that I have created if I want to revert things if an upgrade
> breaks them.
[snip]
> And I issue the command
On 2020-03-26 14:42, Roger Heflin wrote:
you should be able to do exactly this:
mkdir -p /mnt/home
mount /dev/fedora_localhost-live/home /mnt/home
cd /mnt/home
ls -l
°
Yes, that worked. DF shows: /dev/mapper/fedora_localhost--live-home
860G 25G 792G 3% /mnt/home
And I can list the cont
On 2020-03-26 14:42, Roger Heflin wrote:
you should be able to do exactly this:
mkdir -p /mnt/home
mount /dev/fedora_localhost-live/home /mnt/home
cd /mnt/home
ls -l
°
Yes, that worked. DF shows: /dev/mapper/fedora_localhost--live-home
860G 25G 792G 3% /mnt/home
And I can list the cont
In lvm context this dm-1 is a magic device-mapper device/file that
sets up a block-mapping to the underlying device that allows access to
the blocks of the specific lv in the correct order (in this case
home). It really acts just like /dev/sda1 does if there is a
filesystem directly on /dev/sda1.
you should be able to do exactly this:
mkdir -p /mnt/home
mount /dev/fedora_localhost-live/home /mnt/home
cd /mnt/home
ls -l
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:41 PM Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020-03-26 12:34, Roger Heflin wrote:
> > make a directory say "/mnt/home" and then do mount
> > /dev/fedora_
On Thursday, March 26, 2020 1:39:13 PM EDT Bob Goodwin wrote:
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root7 Mar 26 12:58 home -> ../dm-1
This indicates that the file "home" is a synbolic reference to the
file (or directory) "../dm-1".
[snip]
> [root@Workstation-1 fedora_localhost-live]# ls -al home -> ../dm-1
On 2020-03-26 12:34, Roger Heflin wrote:
make a directory say "/mnt/home" and then do mount
/dev/fedora_localhost-live/home /mnt/home
Then handle it like a normal directory.
°
All I am able to do is: mount /dev/sda2 /media/test and then # cd
/dev/fedora_localhost-live/
That gets:
[root@W
make a directory say "/mnt/home" and then do mount
/dev/fedora_localhost-live/home /mnt/home
Then handle it like a normal directory.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:43 AM Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> I have copy of Fedora 29 on another drive in this computer and I would
> like to access the home partition
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 16:27:19 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello
>
> fdisk shows a list of lvm partitions which is not updated
> probably resulting from previous mounts of disks with different
> names.
>
> How can I update this list?
> pvscan does the same
Too vague to comment on.
_
On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 15:09:44 +0100
François Patte wrote:
> Is there any reason for this and can I disable them?
I always review and disable services I don't use following
a new install. There are usually many of them. I've never
had a problem when turning them off (which usually requires
"mask", n
On Friday 24 May 2013 07:32 PM, Ricardo Mendoza Huerta wrote:
Hi, I will try to recover some folder deleted from one disk that is
part of RAID 1 using Fedora Security Lab
scenario:
1. Is a disk from NAS iomega StorCenter ix2 (two disk, RAID 1)
2. this nas was configured to obtain accounts from
Am 21.01.2013 07:43, schrieb Bill Davidsen:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 20.01.2013 02:00, schrieb Ranjan Maitra:
>>> Thanks again for your quick response.
>>>
>>> OK, so you are suggesting I move to lvm, or leave things as is, to ext4?
>>> The new installer does not give me an option to fo
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.01.2013 02:00, schrieb Ranjan Maitra:
Thanks again for your quick response.
OK, so you are suggesting I move to lvm, or leave things as is, to ext4?
The new installer does not give me an option to format ext4 (but I can
keep it as is, I guess).
How does one convert
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 19:00 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> I move to lvm, or leave things as is, to ext4?
LVM is a container, if you like. It can span multiple disk drives, so
they appear as one huge drive. And it can be expanded across even more
drives, if you add them, in the future. That give
On 20.01.2013, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> F18 appears to give two options for installing from scratch: lvm or
> btrfs. Which one is better from the point of view of the longer-term.
While btrfs is a filesystem, lvm is not. Therefore, you can't compare
them. See e.g. http://www.howtoforge.com/linux_l
Am 20.01.2013 02:00, schrieb Ranjan Maitra:
> Thanks again for your quick response.
>
> OK, so you are suggesting I move to lvm, or leave things as is, to ext4?
> The new installer does not give me an option to format ext4 (but I can
> keep it as is, I guess).
>
> How does one convert from ext
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:50:34 +0100 Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.01.2013 01:45, schrieb Ranjan Maitra:
> > F18 appears to give two options for installing from scratch: lvm or
> > btrfs. Which one is better from the point of view of the longer-term.
> >
> > My current HDDs are ext4s. I switc
Am 20.01.2013 01:45, schrieb Ranjan Maitra:
> F18 appears to give two options for installing from scratch: lvm or
> btrfs. Which one is better from the point of view of the longer-term.
>
> My current HDDs are ext4s. I switched then because I understood that
> this was the future.
BTRFS is NOT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/26/2012 12:49 PM, Ian Chapman wrote:
> On 26/10/12 19:44, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> How can I manage such an issue?
>>
>>
>> WARNING: Duplicate VG name VolGrpSys0:
>> s4LnbI-FRjU-fsPt-2W3d-XIIL-LT7o-uPsVfo (created here) takes
>> p
On 26/10/12 19:44, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
How can I manage such an issue?
WARNING: Duplicate VG name VolGrpSys0:
s4LnbI-FRjU-fsPt-2W3d-XIIL-LT7o-uPsVfo (created here) takes precedence
over 4Nyva1-5hZi-Mdgr-KnoK-7NMd-56y1-9jczSF
WARNING: Duplicate VG name VolGrpUsr0:
wCV7BU-ulp2-GmUG-RHs7-
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.09.2012 21:35, schrieb Steven Stern:
On 09/06/2012 01:47 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 09/06/2012 11:23 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
For which I am deeply grateful. Most of the time LVM is fine, even
preferred, but some times I really "want it my way" and now that's easy.
P
Am 06.09.2012 21:35, schrieb Steven Stern:
> On 09/06/2012 01:47 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 11:23 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>> For which I am deeply grateful. Most of the time LVM is fine, even
>>> preferred, but some times I really "want it my way" and now that's easy.
>>
>> Personally
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 17:12 +1030, Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 15:13 -0500, Peter Larsen wrote:
> > The "partition type" is something DOS/Windows uses (to a degree) and
> > for backwards compatability reasons, you still see MS products use
> > these labels. Linux, however, does not adhere t
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 15:13 -0500, Peter Larsen wrote:
> The "partition type" is something DOS/Windows uses (to a degree) and
> for backwards compatability reasons, you still see MS products use
> these labels. Linux, however, does not adhere to or use the partition
> types at all.
I do not think
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 00:56 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 05.03.2012 00:35, schrieb Peter Larsen:
> > We're not longer using legacy grub. Even with F14 we shipped Grub2 (it
> > may even have been included earlier - not sure). We've had this ability
> > for a long time now.
>
> uninteresting
Am 05.03.2012 02:06, schrieb pringle...@gmail.com:
> another thing, why are so angry? is a discussion about lvm and
> partitions not if star wars is better or not than
> star trek
who in the world is angry?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@li
>
> first if you quote the mailing-list signature is difficult to read
>
> what is difficult to read?
>
> * not so long ago GRUB2 was no topic in Fedora (around 2009)
> * but ext4 got stable late in 2008
> * in 2009 ext4 was fully supported for /
> * but you could not boot from ext4
> * you needed
Am 05.03.2012 01:36, schrieb pringle...@gmail.com:
>
> On Mar 4, 2012 9:00 PM, "Reindl Harald" >
>> Am 05.03.2012 00:35, schrieb Peter Larsen:
>> > We're not longer using legacy grub. Even with F14 we shipped Grub2 (it
>> > may even have been included earlier - not sure). We've had this ability
On Mar 4, 2012 9:00 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 05.03.2012 00:35, schrieb Peter Larsen:
> > We're not longer using legacy grub. Even with F14 we shipped Grub2 (it
> > may even have been included earlier - not sure). We've had this ability
> > for a long time now.
>
> BTW:
>
> what does F
Am 05.03.2012 00:35, schrieb Peter Larsen:
> We're not longer using legacy grub. Even with F14 we shipped Grub2 (it
> may even have been included earlier - not sure). We've had this ability
> for a long time now.
BTW:
what does F14 matter in this context?
i am in production since 2009 with ext
Am 05.03.2012 00:35, schrieb Peter Larsen:
> We're not longer using legacy grub. Even with F14 we shipped Grub2 (it
> may even have been included earlier - not sure). We've had this ability
> for a long time now.
uninteresting in this context
you shipped and it was good to have a sepearte /boot
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 22:57 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 04.03.2012 22:20, schrieb Peter Larsen:
> > On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 21:17 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> is this a joke?
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> >>
> >> you really want to install a OS and put systema nd data on the same
> >> partition
Am 04.03.2012 22:20, schrieb Peter Larsen:
> On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 21:17 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> is this a joke?
>
> Nope.
>
>>
>> you really want to install a OS and put systema nd data on the same
>> partition? do this if you want but do not tell anybody this is a
>> smart setup-desig
On 03/04/2012 01:27 PM, Peter Larsen wrote:
lol - "Island of Confusions" - I like that!
Thanx. That's from The Phantom Tollbooth, by Norman Juster, illustrated
by Jules Feiffer. The thing about the Island of Conclusions (I must
have typoed that.) is that you can only get there by leaping.
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 12:44 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/04/2012 12:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Am 04.03.2012 21:13, schrieb Peter Larsen:
> >> > Only on systems that are dual-booted does
> >> > partitions make sense. With Grub2 we can now have a single partition for
> >> > everything - a
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 21:17 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 04.03.2012 21:13, schrieb Peter Larsen:
> > Only on systems that are dual-booted does
> > partitions make sense. With Grub2 we can now have a single partition for
> > everything - and the reason we have the partition table is due to the
Am 04.03.2012 21:48, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 03/04/2012 12:26 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>> You also used to run into a problem with some older BIOS where you
>> needed a /boot partition at the start of the disk to be sure the
>> BIOS could read it...
>
> In fact, this is the main reason for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2012 02:48 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/04/2012 12:26 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>> You also used to run into a problem with some older BIOS where you
>> needed a /boot partition at the start of the disk to be sure the
>> BIOS could read i
On 03/04/2012 12:26 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
You also used to run into a problem with some older BIOS where you
needed a /boot partition at the start of the disk to be sure the
BIOS could read it...
In fact, this is the main reason for a separate /boot partition. Once
the BIOS code was
On 03/04/2012 12:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.03.2012 21:13, schrieb Peter Larsen:
> Only on systems that are dual-booted does
> partitions make sense. With Grub2 we can now have a single partition for
> everything - and the reason we have the partition table is due to the
> bios needs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2012 02:13 PM, Peter Larsen wrote:
> The boot flag did before grub have a meaning, but since legacy grub
came around (even lilo if I remember right) it's also being ignored.
You have to be careful about the boot flag. The BIOS may requite the
Am 04.03.2012 21:13, schrieb Peter Larsen:
> Only on systems that are dual-booted does
> partitions make sense. With Grub2 we can now have a single partition for
> everything - and the reason we have the partition table is due to the
> bios needs during boot.
is this a joke?
you really want to i
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 18:27 +, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Peter Larsen
> wrote:
> > Patric,
> > fdisk (you have to start using -cul instead of -l) reports what-ever the
> > partition table contains. It's utterly ignorant to what's on the actual
> > partition. So sim
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Peter Larsen
wrote:
> Patric,
> fdisk (you have to start using -cul instead of -l) reports what-ever the
> partition table contains. It's utterly ignorant to what's on the actual
> partition. So simply login with fdisk, do a "t" and change the partition
> type to wh
On 03/04/2012 02:54 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> fdisk -l gives:
> /dev/sda9 174809088 2055290871536 83 Linux
> /dev/sda10 205531136 208603135 1536000 83 Linux
> /dev/sda11 208605184 221302783 6348800 83 Linux
> /dev/sda12 221304832 29
Patric,
fdisk (you have to start using -cul instead of -l) reports what-ever the
partition table contains. It's utterly ignorant to what's on the actual
partition. So simply login with fdisk, do a "t" and change the partition
type to what-ever you want.
Be aware that linux ignores those types - t
On 01/19/2012 10:51 AM, Dave Stevens wrote:
I have booted from a F16 live CD and can see the data on the drive but
can not seem to get enough access to copy off the data or get around the
check or get the check to correct the error.
Have you tried running fsck on the partition from the LiveCD?
> I have booted from a F16 live CD and can see the data on the drive but can
> not seem to get enough access to copy off the data or get around the check
When I need to do this kind of rescue, I like to use Knoppix distro, I
never had permissions problems copying hdd data with it.
Emilio.
--
use
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 12:59 +, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can I modify a logical partition size of a mounted partition
> by using system-config-lvm ?
First, I don't run system-config-lvm, so I'm not directly answering your
question.
Are you dealing with a logical partition, eg: sda5,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19.12.2010 14:03, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can I modify a logical partition size of a mounted partition
>> by using system-config-lvm ?
>>
>
> if you're growing it probably
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can I modify a logical partition size of a mounted partition
> by using system-config-lvm ?
>
if you're growing it probably yes
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
+55 11 4063 5033 (F
Hello Antonio,
Thank for your email.
TO remind you.
I have a V9256KMDC connexant System softmodem
on a HDA bus
I compiled the driver (version 7.80.02.06full) under fc13
(2.6.34.7-61.fc13.i686.PAE)
And the installation always gives me:
Warning: no device detected by hsf driver - HDA modems may
On 11/19/2010 11:17 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 06:23 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> How should I choice the extent size when I create a volume group ?
>> How can I avoid unallocated size in a volume goup, even when
>> I cannot allocated more size ?
>>
>> thank.
>
> vgcreat
On 11/18/2010 06:23 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How should I choice the extent size when I create a volume group ?
> How can I avoid unallocated size in a volume goup, even when
> I cannot allocated more size ?
>
> thank.
vgcreate --physicalextentsize PhysicalExtentSize[bBsSkKmMgGtTpPe
Patrick,
It is me, Antonio, from fedora list, users@lists.fedoraproject.org, I am sorry
That the driver(Conexant modem from linuxant did not work out for you ). I
apologize :(, if it was another modem, I am sure that I would have guided you
better. I am sorry for not replying back to you, but
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>To answer my own question here. The required bits (kernel, lvm,
>>device-mapper) appear to be available between F13 and F13-testing.
>>Since I'll be reinstalling for F13 I decided to go ahead and install
>>the F13 packages in F12 to see wh
>To answer my own question here. The required bits (kernel, lvm,
>device-mapper) appear to be available between F13 and F13-testing.
>Since I'll be reinstalling for F13 I decided to go ahead and install
>the F13 packages in F12 to see what happened. Everything appears to be
>working fine.
Richard,
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Does anyone know when LVM snapshot merging will be available in Fedora?
>
> I'm looking at making some significant upgrades/updates to my systems
> and the LVM snapshot feature would be really handy if merging was
> available.
>
> In lieu of h
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Gabriel VLASIU wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
>
> > I want to add a new disk (/dev/sdb1) to an existing VG.
> >
> > Here what I've done :
> >
> > * pvcreate /dev/sdb1
> > * vgextend VolGroup00 /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> I want to add a new disk (/dev/sdb1) to an existing VG.
>
> Here what I've done :
>
> * pvcreate /dev/sdb1
> * vgextend VolGroup00 /dev/sdb1
> * lvresize -l +20901 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
>
> (LogVol00 is
77 matches
Mail list logo
