On 03.02.2015 14:16, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
> poma píše v Čt 22. 01. 2015 v 18:44 +0100:
>> Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
>>
>> I see that some people are trying to "modernize" Fedora.
>> But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we have
>> NetworkManager/ModemManager and systemd-networkd
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 22 13:17, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> NM reads "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*" files but you have
>> to test whether you have some settings that NM doesn't grok.
>
> As long as NM doesn't grok all possible settings from the ifcfg sc
On 26.01.2015 04:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 05:17:24PM +0100, poma wrote:
>> On 23.01.2015 16:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:44:08PM +0100, poma wrote:
Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
I see that some people are tryin
On 23.01.2015 16:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:44:08PM +0100, poma wrote:
>>
>> Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
>>
>> I see that some people are trying to "modernize" Fedora.
>> But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we have
>> NetworkManager/Mode
On Jan 22 13:17, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jan 22 18:44, poma wrote:
> >>
> >> I see that some people are trying to "modernize" Fedora.
> >> But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we
> >> have NetworkManager/ModemMana
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 22 18:44, poma wrote:
>>
>> I see that some people are trying to "modernize" Fedora.
>> But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we
>> have NetworkManager/ModemManager and systemd-networkd,
>> when will thi
On Jan 22 18:44, poma wrote:
>
> Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
>
> I see that some people are trying to "modernize" Fedora.
> But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we have
> NetworkManager/ModemManager and systemd-networkd,
> when will this package "fall off"?
I hope not unless