On 12/8/18 9:38 AM, home user via users wrote:
Kevin (and everyone else),
View -> Message Source
and
More -> View Source
do the same thing as Control-U. Unfortunately, what I get (after the
header) is three blocks of seemingly random characters, not html.
Changing the
View -> Text Encoding
se
Howard:
> Thanks for the tip Bill, ...
Thank Kevin, not me.
Kevin (and everyone else),
View -> Message Source
and
More -> View Source
do the same thing as Control-U. Unfortunately, what I get (after the
header) is three blocks of seemingly random characters, not html.
Changing the
View -> Tex
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 21:03 -0500, Kevin Cummings wrote:
> On 12/1/18 3:51 PM, home user via users wrote:
>
> > I'm using Thunderbird on Fedora-28; there is no "anti-virus"
> > available.
> > Is this safe?
>
> If you're using Thunderbird, then a simple control-U works
> wonders. It
> shows the e
On 12/1/18 3:51 PM, home user via users wrote:
> I'm using Thunderbird on Fedora-28; there is no "anti-virus" available.
> Is this safe?
If you're using Thunderbird, then a simple control-U works wonders. It
shows the email "source code" unmasking any HTML hiding the link. This
is only useful i
On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 15:20 +1030, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
> > > Look in the View menu, inside the Layout section, enable the Show
> > > Status Bar item.
>
> Howard Howell:
> > It shows 4 options, all checked. What did you think I would find
> > there?
>
> Amongst other options, the one I just describ
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 10:11 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
> After the latest update I show five, too. They are all checked, but
> the hover function described still doesn't work. Maybe something in my
> setup or .config. I'll create a new user and see what shows up there.
>
> It's not a big deal,
Tim:
>> Look in the View menu, inside the Layout section, enable the Show
>> Status Bar item.
Howard Howell:
> It shows 4 options, all checked. What did you think I would find
> there?
Amongst other options, the one I just described...
If you do have a "Show Status Bar" item in the list, try un
On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 23:12 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 10:59 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 00:29 +1030, Tim wrote:
> > > Allegedly, on or about 2 December 2018, Howard Howell sent:
> > > > I'm still using evolution in F28 and it doesn't do that
Barracuda Networks provides common e-mail SPAM appliances and mail
archiving appliances
https://www.barracuda.com/
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 3:24 PM home user via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> Today, I received a message claiming to be from "nore...@barracuda.c
On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 10:59 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 00:29 +1030, Tim wrote:
> > Allegedly, on or about 2 December 2018, Howard Howell sent:
> > > I'm still using evolution in F28 and it doesn't do that. If I am
> > > interested, I copy the link location and paste it int
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 00:29 +1030, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 2 December 2018, Howard Howell sent:
> > I'm still using evolution in F28 and it doesn't do that. If I am
> > interested, I copy the link location and paste it into a new
> > email.
> > Generally I'm not interested, so it is n
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 00:29 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 2 December 2018, Howard Howell sent:
> > I'm still using evolution in F28 and it doesn't do that. If I am
> > interested, I copy the link location and paste it into a new email.
> > Generally I'm not interested, so i
Allegedly, on or about 1 December 2018, home user via users sent:
> Samuel: I understand what you said about anti-virus software. I was
> incorrect about wanting it for Thunderbird. In this case, it would
> be for the browser. I think you're mostly correct, but I still wish
> for something to p
Allegedly, on or about 2 December 2018, Howard Howell sent:
> I'm still using evolution in F28 and it doesn't do that. If I am
> interested, I copy the link location and paste it into a new email.
> Generally I'm not interested, so it is not too troubling. but it
> would be nice if the hover fun
Sam asked:
> How did you determine that this is the destination URL
> That's what you see, in the HTML-formatted E-mail?
I already knew about the "trick" that Ed Greshko suggests before he
posted his suggestion. (But thank-you, Ed, for trying to help.) That's
how I determined the destination
On Sun, 2018-12-02 at 12:59 -0500, Howard Howell wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-12-02 at 09:59 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-12-02 at 11:05 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > On 12/2/18 10:46 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > > > I'll be happy to send you an HTML message with a link whose
> >
On Sun, 2018-12-02 at 09:59 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-12-02 at 11:05 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 12/2/18 10:46 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > > I'll be happy to send you an HTML message with a link whose
> > > destination URL seems to be
> > > https://www.whitehouse.gov,
On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 20:45 +, finn via users wrote:
>
> and make sure there is a green lock on your browser address bar.
Have a look at:
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2018/11/half-of-all-phishing-sites-now-have-the-padlock/
AV
___
users mailing list
Sorry for the top post, but my phone seems to insist on it using K9 mail.
Anyway, I keep an old smartphone that I no longer use -- I have moved my SIM
card to my current phone. It can still connect to WiFi, though. I use it to
try out dodgy links. I figure there's little loss if it gets scre
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 at 17:18, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 12/1/18 12:51 PM, home user via users wrote:
> > Ryan,
> [...]
> > I'm using Thunderbird on Fedora-28; there is no "anti-virus" available.
> > Is this safe?
>
> I've never found "anti-virus" to have any use on a Linux system other
> than a way
On Sun, 2018-12-02 at 11:05 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/2/18 10:46 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > I'll be happy to send you an HTML message with a link whose destination URL
> > seems to be
> > https://www.whitehouse.gov, but once clicked you'll wind up on
> > https://pornhub.com
>
> FWIW,
> finn: I used Tor in this case. But in retrospect, one thing I was
> concerned about was the site downloading something malicious without me
> knowing it. Would Tor have protected me against that?
yep, Tor browser is harden enough to protect you from these kind of attack and
provide better anon
On 12/2/18 10:46 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I'll be happy to send you an HTML message with a link whose destination URL
> seems to be
> https://www.whitehouse.gov, but once clicked you'll wind up on
> https://pornhub.com
FWIW, with T-Bird it is easy to recognize this deception. To see if what
home user via users writes:
Ryan,
> Please make sure that the domain name in the link's destination
> URL ends in "barracuda.com".
The link's destination URL starts with
"https://encrypt.barracudanetworks.com/login?nid=";.
The rest is a very long alpha-numeric string.
How did you determine t
home user via users writes:
Good afternoon,
Today, I received a message claiming to be from "nore...@barracuda.com".
Never heard of them. The message tells me to click a link in the message to
view an encrypted message. Now I know that clicking links in e-mail is
risky. How do I safel
I pasted the link into the Tor Browser. The only info I had to give was
to set a password.
Sometime last month, I used the web site for the Colorado consumer
complaints office to ask where/how to file a federal complaint about
national-brand canned food products sold in supermarkets being
si
On 12/1/18 2:14 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
4: Are you expecting an encrypted message from someone you've never
heard of? I've never received one, and if I did I would expect it to be
encrypted _to me_ i.e. GPG encrypted with _my_ public key. The key take
here is that to retrieve it I don't have
On 01Dec2018 13:23, home user wrote:
Today, I received a message claiming to be from
"nore...@barracuda.com". Never heard of them. The message tells me to
click a link in the message to view an encrypted message. Now I know
that clicking links in e-mail is risky. How do I safely determine
On 12/1/18 12:51 PM, home user via users wrote:
Ryan,
> Please make sure that the domain name in the link's destination
> URL ends in "barracuda.com".
The link's destination URL starts with
"https://encrypt.barracudanetworks.com/login?nid=";.
The rest is a very long alpha-numeric string.
If
Ryan,
> Please make sure that the domain name in the link's destination
> URL ends in "barracuda.com".
The link's destination URL starts with
"https://encrypt.barracudanetworks.com/login?nid=";.
The rest is a very long alpha-numeric string.
I'm using Thunderbird on Fedora-28; there is no "anti-
copy link and paste this link to Tor browser(if possible otherwise any browser
in private window) and make sure link end with barracuda.com and there is a
green lock on your browser address bar.
Original Message
On 2 Dec 2018, 1:53 AM, home user via users wrote:
> Good afterno
El dic 1, 2018, a las 12:37 PM, Ryan Cunningham
escribió:
> [. . .] and also file a complaint with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission at
> ftccomplaintassistant.gov [. . .]
CORRECTION: You should instead file the complaint with the Internet Crime
Complaint Center (IC3) at ic3.gov.
> El dic 1, 2018, a las 12:23 PM, home user via users
> escribió:
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> Today, I received a message claiming to be from "nore...@barracuda.com".
> Never heard of them. The message tells me to click a link in the message to
> view an encrypted message. Now I know that clic
33 matches
Mail list logo
