On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 6:42 PM Barry wrote:
>
>
> > On 5 Nov 2024, at 22:23, Peter Lesterhuis
> wrote:
> >
> > Although this sounded like magic to me I couldn't resist giving it a try.
>
> On a reboot the device may not be fully reset.
> Windows may have set modes on devices that breaks the linu
On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 23:23 +0100, Peter Lesterhuis wrote:
> Wifi is working!
> Reading some of the links in the replies on my former post it was
> suggested that powering off the system (instead of rebooting) and
> then booting again could resolve the problem.
> Although this sounded like magic to
> On 5 Nov 2024, at 22:23, Peter Lesterhuis wrote:
>
> Although this sounded like magic to me I couldn't resist giving it a try.
On a reboot the device may not be fully reset.
Windows may have set modes on devices that breaks the linux driver.
When you do a cold boot, power off and back on, t
Wifi is working!
Reading some of the links in the replies on my former post it was suggested
that powering off the system (instead of rebooting) and then booting again
could resolve the problem.
Although this sounded like magic to me I couldn't resist giving it a try. and
it works! At least for
On 6/11/24 00:40, Peter Lesterhuis wrote:
Hi,
I would like your advice.
Recently I purchased a laptop (Asus Vivobook S15 M5506NA-MA056W).
I installed fedora 41 alongside Windows 11.
First I disabled "fast boot" and "secure boot".
Fedora installed fine, but there is no wifi connection, probably
b
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 13:40, Peter Lesterhuis
wrote:
> Hi,
> Recently I purchased a laptop (Asus Vivobook S15 M5506NA-MA056W).
> I installed fedora 41 alongside Windows 11.
>
> peter@fedora:~$ nmcli radio
> WIFI-HW WIFI WWAN-HW WWAN
> missing enabled missing disabled
>
What does "nmcli device" s
On 11/5/24 5:40 AM, Peter Lesterhuis wrote:
Hi,
I would like your advice.
Recently I purchased a laptop (Asus Vivobook S15 M5506NA-MA056W).
I installed fedora 41 alongside Windows 11.
First I disabled "fast boot" and "secure boot".
Fedora installed fine, but there is no wifi connection, probably
> On 5 Nov 2024, at 13:40, Peter Lesterhuis wrote:
>
> So the kernel module mt7921e is diabled.
Is this module documented to support the MT7922?
From the kernel messages it appears not to have that support.
Barry
--
___
users mailing list -- users
On 4/8/21 1:02 PM, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
My ISP is telling me to set both radios in their router to the same SSID
and password for the best coverage. Does this setup make any sense?
Yes. Most devices I've seen that support 5GHz will automatically pick
that if both SSIDs are the same
On 09/04/2021 04:02, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
My ISP is telling me to set both radios in their router to the same SSID and
password for the best coverage. Does this setup make any sense?
Yes, depending on your physical setup.
The 2.4 band, while slower, penetrates obstacles better. So
That's what I've done for the password, for the SSID I put a 5g in it so I
know the two apart.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 4:03 PM Robert McBroom via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> My ISP is telling me to set both radios in their router to the same SSID
> and password for the best cov
Joe Zeff:
> Indeed. At one point, I was doing senior tech support for an
> ISP. One day I got a call from a customer who was having connection
> issues with his ADSL, and the description made it sound like line
> noise. After asking some questions, I learned that the cable from
> the phone soc
Allegedly, on or about 7 October 2017, George N. White III sent:
> Don't ignore battery terminals, and don't use abrasives (which many
> erasers contain), as they will damage metal plating. At one time,
> carbon tetrachloride was used for cleaning contacts. These days
> there are much safer des
On 7 October 2017 at 16:59, fred roller wrote:
> You mentioned having this mouse for awhile. Used to have similar issues
> and something to try (low tech) is to clean the connections. An eraser or
> equivalent will do if you can get to the connectors on the dongle.
> Sometimes the connections g
You mentioned having this mouse for awhile. Used to have similar issues
and something to try (low tech) is to clean the connections. An eraser or
equivalent will do if you can get to the connectors on the dongle.
Sometimes the connections get a micro build up on them and a mild
non-residual abras
Joe Zeff ha scritto il 07/10/2017 alle 00:05:
On 10/06/2017 02:54 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
Yeah. As a hardware engineer that has, over many years, transitioned to
a software engineer, I always assume my software is buggy. I can't
believe how often it turns out it's hardware like a bad cable or
so
On 10/06/2017 04:46 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 04:18 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> In my experience, hardware deliberately waits till
>> the worst possible time to break. For instance: You've
>> just loaded a new operating system, and suddenly
>> nothing works right. Because the hardware k
On 10/06/2017 04:18 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> In my experience, hardware deliberately waits till
> the worst possible time to break. For instance: You've
> just loaded a new operating system, and suddenly
> nothing works right. Because the hardware knows
> you'll be sure the new OS is the problem, i
In my experience, hardware deliberately waits till
the worst possible time to break. For instance: You've
just loaded a new operating system, and suddenly
nothing works right. Because the hardware knows
you'll be sure the new OS is the problem, it chooses
that precise moment to break.
I have seen
On 10/06/2017 03:26 PM, George N. White III wrote:
Cables and connections were always a problem area for hardware; now we
need to think about whether problems are due to RF "interference", which
could be a too strong RF signal from some other device, or poorly
designed hardware that is not reje
On 6 October 2017 at 17:23, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 12:54 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
>>
>> He sent me the log directly and I've included the relevant lines below.
>> It definitely looks like a hardware problem. It keeps disconnecting,
>> maybe some connection inside is loose.
>>
>
> I woul
On 10/06/2017 03:05 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 02:54 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> Yeah. As a hardware engineer that has, over many years, transitioned to
>> a software engineer, I always assume my software is buggy. I can't
>> believe how often it turns out it's hardware like a bad cable or
On 10/06/2017 02:54 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
Yeah. As a hardware engineer that has, over many years, transitioned to
a software engineer, I always assume my software is buggy. I can't
believe how often it turns out it's hardware like a bad cable or
something. My rule of thumb is "If it always happ
On 10/06/2017 01:23 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 12:54 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>
>> He sent me the log directly and I've included the relevant lines below.
>> It definitely looks like a hardware problem. It keeps disconnecting,
>> maybe some connection inside is loose.
>
> I wouldn't be su
On 10/06/2017 12:54 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
He sent me the log directly and I've included the relevant lines below.
It definitely looks like a hardware problem. It keeps disconnecting,
maybe some connection inside is loose.
I wouldn't be surprised. I can remember, back in the '80s, when many
On 10/05/2017 02:09 PM, Antonio M wrote:
I have the log (tnx for help anyway) from 20:00:00 and forward: but the
full log is 225 lines and I suppose that I cannot load here..
He sent me the log directly and I've included the relevant lines below.
It definitely looks like a hardware problem. It
I had similar sounding problems with a bluetooth mouse, turns out that
the power management was shutting it down. Take a look at tlp or
powertop if you are using them, and see if you can put a powerdown
exception for your dongle.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Antonio M wrote:
> sometimes I loo
On Thu, 2017-10-05 at 22:00 +0200, Antonio M wrote:
> battery is new . Anyway for a long time I had no issue with this port and
> it started short ago after upgrading recent kernels.
>
> No idea how to debug it. (this port is the high-power port, but it should
> not matter). And this issue is real
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:00:25PM +0200, Antonio M wrote:
>battery is new . Anyway for a long time I had no issue with this port
>and it started short ago after upgrading recent kernels.
>No idea how to debug it. (this port is the high-power port, but it
>should not matter). And th
I have the log (tnx for help anyway) from 20:00:00 and forward: but the
full log is 225 lines and I suppose that I cannot load here..
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 26(Workstation)
inviato da Gmail
2017-10-05 22:58 GMT+02:00 Samuel Sieb :
> On 10/05/2017 01:45 PM, Antonio M wrote:
>
>> how can
On 10/05/2017 01:45 PM, Antonio M wrote:
how can I check it ?? especially after the mouse is working again? sorry
for the silly question
As root, run "journalctl -b". If you remember about what time it
happened, you can scroll down until you find that time. By default it
uses "less" as the
how can I check it ?? especially after the mouse is working again? sorry
for the silly question
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 26(Workstation)
inviato da Gmail
2017-10-05 21:55 GMT+02:00 Samuel Sieb :
> On 10/05/2017 12:12 PM, Antonio M wrote:
>
>> sometimes I loos the control of a wireless mo
battery is new . Anyway for a long time I had no issue with this port and
it started short ago after upgrading recent kernels.
No idea how to debug it. (this port is the high-power port, but it should
not matter). And this issue is really random, I worked one day with no
issue, but tonight I had t
On 10/05/2017 12:12 PM, Antonio M wrote:
sometimes I loos the control of a wireless mouse from Logitech: as soon
as I reinsert the receiver mouse starts again to work!!!
when mouse is dead
$ lsusb
Bus 002 Device 004: ID 8087:07da Intel Corp.
Bus 002 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrat
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Antonio M
wrote:
> sometimes I loos the control of a wireless mouse from Logitech: as soon as
> I reinsert the receiver mouse starts again to work!!!
>
> when mouse is dead
> $ lsusb
> Bus 002 Device 004: ID 8087:07da Intel Corp.
> Bus 002 Device 002: ID 8087:0024
On 29.01.2015 22:15, Jim Lewis wrote:
>
>> On 29.01.2015 06:07, Jim Lewis wrote:
>>>
>>> For those following this thread I solved the problem by getting a new
>>> router. Here's a quick recap:
>>>
>>> - I found I couldn't ping a wireless device from another wireless
>>> device.
>>>
>>> - I c
> On 29.01.2015 06:07, Jim Lewis wrote:
>>
>> For those following this thread I solved the problem by getting a new
>> router. Here's a quick recap:
>>
>> - I found I couldn't ping a wireless device from another wireless
>> device.
>>
>> - I could not ping a wireless device from a wired devi
On 29.01.2015 06:07, Jim Lewis wrote:
>
> For those following this thread I solved the problem by getting a new
> router. Here's a quick recap:
>
> - I found I couldn't ping a wireless device from another wireless device.
>
> - I could not ping a wireless device from a wired device unless
For those following this thread I solved the problem by getting a new
router. Here's a quick recap:
- I found I couldn't ping a wireless device from another wireless device.
- I could not ping a wireless device from a wired device unless I pinged
the wired device from the wireless device f
> On 01/25/15 12:46, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> When in this condition, what is the output of "arp" on big4?
>
> I meant "arp -n"
>
Great idea Ed! It's been years since I worked on Ethernet drivers for IBM
and forgot all about that command. Checking man it shows arp to be
obsolete so I used ip:
big4
On 25.01.2015 04:16, Jim Lewis wrote:
> I guess the only bad thing about spending time on crap like this is I
> used to get paid real money to debug and fix crap like this :).
>
There ain't no such lunch as a free thing.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
On 01/25/15 12:46, Ed Greshko wrote:
> When in this condition, what is the output of "arp" on big4?
I meant "arp -n"
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fed
On 01/25/15 12:16, Jim Lewis wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
>Ask anything you want, I enjoy the help:
>
>laptop1 is 192.168.1.111 (when wireless)
>
>LinkSys is 192.168.1.1
>
>big4 is 192.168.1.109 (desktop machine, always wired)
OK What I saw in a previous message seemed odd to me..
> On 01/25/15 11:39, Jim Lewis wrote:
>>> On 01/25/15 11:16, Jim Lewis wrote:
Okay, I was able to recreate the other problem after rebooting
laptop1
(Fedora 21 Mate-Compbiz Spin). I could not ping it from either wired
box. However, I tried pinging from the router and that wor
On 01/25/15 11:39, Jim Lewis wrote:
>> On 01/25/15 11:16, Jim Lewis wrote:
>>> Okay, I was able to recreate the other problem after rebooting laptop1
>>> (Fedora 21 Mate-Compbiz Spin). I could not ping it from either wired
>>> box. However, I tried pinging from the router and that worked fine (so
> On 01/25/15 11:16, Jim Lewis wrote:
>>
>> Okay, I was able to recreate the other problem after rebooting laptop1
>> (Fedora 21 Mate-Compbiz Spin). I could not ping it from either wired
>> box. However, I tried pinging from the router and that worked fine (so
>> did traceroute). Speaking of tra
On 01/25/15 11:16, Jim Lewis wrote:
>
> Okay, I was able to recreate the other problem after rebooting laptop1
> (Fedora 21 Mate-Compbiz Spin). I could not ping it from either wired
> box. However, I tried pinging from the router and that worked fine (so
> did traceroute). Speaking of traceroute,
> Hey Jim.
>
> I'm going to cheat!! But given that you're retired, you might have a
> bit of time. Is there a "big box" (staples/bestbuy/radioshack/etc...)
> close by. If there is, go get a cheap/different router
> (wired/wireless) and test to see if this box gives you the same
> behaviour.
>
> To
Hey Jim.
I'm going to cheat!! But given that you're retired, you might have a
bit of time. Is there a "big box" (staples/bestbuy/radioshack/etc...)
close by. If there is, go get a cheap/different router
(wired/wireless) and test to see if this box gives you the same
behaviour.
To be honest, never
> On 01/24/15 09:59, bruce wrote:
>> Just sort of following the thread.
>>
>> Does this same behaviour happen if you have a separate box running a
>> different distro? Can it not ping as well?
>>
>> Curious.
>
> Sort of doing the same as well
>
> FWIW, the router itself has a "diagnostic" scre
On 01/24/15 09:59, bruce wrote:
> Just sort of following the thread.
>
> Does this same behaviour happen if you have a separate box running a
> different distro? Can it not ping as well?
>
> Curious.
Sort of doing the same as well
FWIW, the router itself has a "diagnostic" screen and one opti
Hi.
Just sort of following the thread.
Does this same behaviour happen if you have a separate box running a
different distro? Can it not ping as well?
Curious.
Thanks...
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Jim Lewis wrote:
>
>> On 01/23/2015 05:46 PM, poma wrote:
>>
>> > http://www.dd-wrt.com/w
> On 01/23/2015 05:46 PM, poma wrote:
>
> > http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Linksys_E3000
>
> Honestly, reading this nightmare I would invest ~$65 in a TP-LINK
> TL-WDR3600
>
> It has similar performance, Atheros hardware and perfect dd-wrt/openwrt
> support...
>
> regards Jens
>
Calling t
On 01/23/2015 05:46 PM, poma wrote:
> http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Linksys_E3000
Honestly, reading this nightmare I would invest ~$65 in a TP-LINK TL-WDR3600
It has similar performance, Atheros hardware and perfect dd-wrt/openwrt
support...
regards Jens
--
users mailin
On 23.01.2015 02:30, Jim Lewis wrote:
...
> I use a LinkSys E3000 which I have had for a very long time. I checked
> their site and looked at the Release Notes for firmware upgrades. No
> mention of this issue and so I am hesitant to perform it (I did however
> download the latest file). I got in
On 01/23/2015 02:30 AM, Jim Lewis wrote:
I just realized that my wireless computers can't ping each other.
I would assume the ordinary first, your AP is in "isolate" mode. Lots of
routers do this on default, in OpenWRT or similar you can usually
configure this. However, not all AP hardware d
Sounds to me like broadcasts aren't being forwarded by the router to the
wireless network - check router settings ?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 23 Jan 2015, at 02:14, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>> On 01/22/2015 05:30 PM, Jim Lewis wrote:
>>
>> I just realized that my wireless computers can't ping ea
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:58:07PM -1000, Jim Lewis wrote:
>
> >
> > I just realized that my wireless computers can't ping each other.
> > Wireless to wired and vice versa is just fine. The IP addresses (DHCP)
> > are all on the same subnet. If I switch to wired the computer can then
> > ping a w
>
> I just realized that my wireless computers can't ping each other.
> Wireless to wired and vice versa is just fine. The IP addresses (DHCP)
> are all on the same subnet. If I switch to wired the computer can then
> ping a wired or wireless. The computers can all access the Internet at
> any ti
> On 01/22/2015 05:30 PM, Jim Lewis wrote:
>>
>> I just realized that my wireless computers can't ping each other.
>> Wireless to wired and vice versa is just fine. The IP addresses (DHCP)
>> are all on the same subnet. If I switch to wired the computer can then
>> ping a wired or wireless. The
On 01/22/2015 05:30 PM, Jim Lewis wrote:
I just realized that my wireless computers can't ping each other.
Wireless to wired and vice versa is just fine. The IP addresses (DHCP)
are all on the same subnet. If I switch to wired the computer can then
ping a wired or wireless. The computers can a
Dave Ihnat writes:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 05:32:03PM +0100, antonio wrote:
>> as network is a an extension of an office network, I do not want
>> anybody even see that network is extended
>
> With all due respect, it doesn't matter. The Bad Guys(Tm) *will* see it,
> SSID or not. WiFi sca
On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 17:32 +0100, antonio wrote:
> as network is a an extension of an office network, I do not want
> anybody even see that network is extended
That doesn't work, it doesn't do what you think it does.
As I'd already pointed out, removing the SSID doesn't hide the network.
It'
Robert !!
Thanks you...
All my point was.. >> was, what's the app "supposed" to be doing, and
is it correctly doing it! I really don't care what the answer is, and
I've got no dog in the fight. Just that whatever the "?" was/is
supposed to represent is documented, or is a bug!!
The issue of whet
On 12/28/2014 02:34 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
> I am connected to a Picostation as repeater: sometimes laptop is
> disconnected and I see a question mark on the top line wireless icon,
> and it connects again only if I switch of and then on the wirelss...
> in F20 it never happened.Smarthphone
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 05:32:03PM +0100, antonio wrote:
> as network is a an extension of an office network, I do not want
> anybody even see that network is extended
With all due respect, it doesn't matter. The Bad Guys(Tm) *will* see it,
SSID or not. WiFi scanning tools return all channel
Tim ha scrito il 30/12/2014 alle 15:47:
Allegedly, on or about 30 December 2014, bruce sent:
whether or not hiding does any good or not isn't the issue with what
antonio was/is presenting..
he;s simply saying/asking if there should be a bug filed in this case,
or if seeing a "?" is the correct
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 10:13:18AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Eventhough I wrote the paper on the Myth of hiding SSIDs in '03 and
> provided the method for exposing hidden SSIDs, many wireless
> professionals still push this as a valuable tool to protect your
> networks.
You can't kill some
On 12/30/2014 06:54 AM, Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 18:13 +0100, antonio wrote:
if this behaviour is connected to hidden SSID
You're only hurting yourself by hiding it. Seriously, hiding it doesn't
do you *any* good.
Eventhough I wrote the paper on the Myth of hiding SSIDs in '03 and
bruce ha scrito il 30/12/2014 alle 13:57:
whether or not hiding does any good or not isn't the issue with what
antonio was/is presenting..
he;s simply saying/asking if there should be a bug filed in this case,
or if seeing a "?" is the correct behaviour in the case of there being
hidden SSIDs?
Allegedly, on or about 30 December 2014, bruce sent:
> whether or not hiding does any good or not isn't the issue with what
> antonio was/is presenting..
>
> he;s simply saying/asking if there should be a bug filed in this case,
> or if seeing a "?" is the correct behaviour in the case of there be
whether or not hiding does any good or not isn't the issue with what
antonio was/is presenting..
he;s simply saying/asking if there should be a bug filed in this case,
or if seeing a "?" is the correct behaviour in the case of there being
hidden SSIDs?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Tim wrot
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 18:13 +0100, antonio wrote:
> if this behaviour is connected to hidden SSID
You're only hurting yourself by hiding it. Seriously, hiding it doesn't
do you *any* good.
--
tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.17.7-200.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 04:08:31 UTC 2014 i686
A
antonio montagnani ha scrito il 28/12/2014 alle 09:34:
I am connected to a Picostation as repeater: sometimes laptop is
disconnected and I see a question mark on the top line wireless icon,
and it connects again only if I switch of and then on the wirelss...
in F20 it never happened.Smarthphone i
On 10.06.2014 18:36, Bill Murray wrote:
Dear Fedorians,
I am using F20 gnome on my laptop, and have great
suspend/resume
as I wander from meeting to meeting in different rooms. Except for the
wireless.
Maybe 1 time in 3 or 50-50 the wireless fails to connect on resume - it
On 03/12/2014 09:14 PM, Jim wrote:
FC18/KDE , I can no longer update F18 any more
I have a Dell D600 Latitude that is dropping the router dd-wrt.
Wireless networking is okay for about 20- 30 minutes before it drops
If I try to reconnect Wlan0 and Connections there is no dd-wrt router
shown i
On 03/12/2014 06:14 PM, Jim wrote:
FC18/KDE , I can no longer update F18 any more
You do know, don't you, that F18 has passed End Of Life and there will
never be any more updates for it, even for security?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscripti
the hardware is OK... the only difference is the version of the OS.
From: Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA)
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 07:46
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: RE: Wireless networking degraded with Fedora 18
-Original Message-
From: R
-Original Message-
From: Ranjan Maitra [mailto:maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:36 AM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: Wireless networking degraded with Fedora 18
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:24:05 + "Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA)"
w
-Original Message-
From: Ranjan Maitra [mailto:maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:36 AM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: Wireless networking degraded with Fedora 18
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:24:05 + "Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA)&qu
Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA):
>> I recently upgraded to Fedora 18, and have noticed a big difference
>> between wireless networking performance. With Fedora 18 running, and
>> sitting about 10 feet from a Linksys WAP54G access point I get "one
>> bar" on the Gnome icon... if I double the distance, I
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:24:05 + "Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA)"
wrote:
> I have an HP laptop with an integrated Broadcom controller:
>
> 02:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless
> LAN Controller (rev 01)
>
> I recently upgraded to Fedora 18, and have notice
On 30/04/13 21:17, Fred Roller wrote:
When f18 updated the kernel to 3.8.8.203 my wireless started dropping after a
few minutes of use and had still kept dropping into kernel update 3.8.9.200. I
[snip]
Edit connections and on tab ipv6 select "ignore".
--
Erik
Concordia parvæ res crescunt di
Am 30.04.2013 21:17, schrieb Fred Roller:
> When f18 updated the kernel to 3.8.8.203 my wireless started dropping after a
> few minutes of use and had still kept
> dropping into kernel update 3.8.9.200. I finally found that IPV6 enabled may
> be the cause. The procedure at:
>
> http://www.li
Roger wrote:
> I started the install of b43-fwcutter and after using make it gives errors:
> DEPEND dep/md5.d
> DEPEND /dep/fwcutter.d
> make: *** [obj /fwcutter.0] Error 127
>
> What does this mean please?
Instead of compiling the tool you should install it from the official
Fedora repository.
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 15:57 +1000, Roger wrote:
> I started the install of b43-fwcutter and after using make it gives errors:
> DEPEND dep/md5.d
> DEPEND /dep/fwcutter.d
> make: *** [obj /fwcutter.0] Error 127
>
> What does this mean please?
Do you have gcc installed?
rpm -q gcc
--
Mike Chamb
I'm fairly certain that laptop does have a Broadcom 43xx wireless
adapter, but you can check with ’lspci’.
There are instructions for downloading and installing firmware for
that adapter here:
http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/b43#Fedora
> The Laptop wireless worked well in Ubuntu O
On Apr 3, 2012 10:24 PM, "Roger" wrote:
>
> I have had problems where emails from my Fedora box go missing so am
resending from Ubuntu box.
> Please accept my apologies for double posting if this happens.
>
> I sent an email from the Fedora16 box earlier this afternoon about my
daughter's Dell 154
Thanks. I did and its working OK now.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.f
On 01/31/2012 04:01 PM, linux guy wrote:
> I'm running F16-KDE-64 on a Dell XPS17 laptop.
>
> It is continually dropping wireless connections. It works and then it
> doesn't work. Very annoying.
>
> I am managing wireless with Network manager.
>
> Any ideas ?
>
> Thanks
>
> $ lspci | grep Ne
On 02/01/2012 06:01 AM, linux guy wrote:
> I'm running F16-KDE-64 on a Dell XPS17 laptop.
>
> It is continually dropping wireless connections. It works and then it
> doesn't work. Very annoying.
>
> I am managing wireless with Network manager.
>
> Any ideas ?
>
> Thanks
>
> $ lspci | grep Network
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:03 -0600
Steven Stern wrote:
> Since installing the latest kernel, 3.2.2-1.fc16.i686.PAE, my
> wireless connection dies after several hours. The access point is
> functioning normally -- all other devices continue to work.
>
> Once this happens, NetworkManager shows t
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Danishka Navin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:39 PM, JD wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Danishka Navin
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I have installed driver for rtl8192ce on Dell inspiron mini 1018.
>> >
>> > I could not 'on' the wireless.
>> >
>> >
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 23:28 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> > I have installed driver for rtl8192ce on Dell inspiron mini 1018.
> >
> > I could not 'on' the wireless.
> >
> > Here is the dmesg and rfkill list http://fpaste.org/Oqmv/
> >
> >
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 23:28 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> I have installed driver for rtl8192ce on Dell inspiron mini 1018.
>
> I could not 'on' the wireless.
>
> Here is the dmesg and rfkill list http://fpaste.org/Oqmv/
>
> log file; http://fpaste.org/4Ev5/
>
>
> --
> Danishka Navin
> htt
I found a key (f2) but not sure weather it works. :(
btw, bluetooth is on (right now i am away from that system but i could
check it tomorrow morning.
is it possible to turn on the turns the radio (transceiver) using
alternative method?
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:39 PM, JD wrote:
> On Mon, Ja
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Danishka Navin wrote:
>
> I have installed driver for rtl8192ce on Dell inspiron mini 1018.
>
> I could not 'on' the wireless.
>
> Here is the dmesg and rfkill list http://fpaste.org/Oqmv/
>
> log file; http://fpaste.org/4Ev5/
>
>
Do you have a physical switch
On 9/17/11 9:15 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
>
>>> This caused NM to modify or create files all over the place,
>>> including deleting everything in /etc/resolv.conf .
>>> This is a habit of NM that I don't understand -
>>> I cannot think of any circumstances where an empty resolv
Mmm, seems a module (driver) issue to me.
Does your other F-machines have the same wireless card? Also, can you
connect using wpa_supplicant or other DEs like GNOME?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
Craig White wrote:
> seems as if your manual configuration attempts are interfering with the
> GUI since at the point where you left-click on wlan0, it should do the
> equivalent to a iwlist scan command and list the available wireless
> networks (whether AP's or Ad-Hoc) - at least it does for me.
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
