On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 10:32 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 12:02 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 22:20 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > > > > With the move to mailman3, the list footer c
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 12:02 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 22:20 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
With the move to mailman3, the list footer cannot be set via
the web-based admin interface. I dug into the mail
On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:29:27 -0700
Dave Stevens wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 17:07:01 -0700
> Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > On 03/20/2018 07:49 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> > >
> > > yes, in my client I highlight a point as I've done here then hit
> > > reply and get no cruft and just the point I
On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 17:07:01 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 03/20/2018 07:49 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:29:29 -0400
> > Todd Zullinger wrote:
> >
> >>> If there's something you're replying to in particular,
> >>> maybe quote that one line but there's no need to quote th
On 03/21/2018 11:47 AM, chicago wrote:
yes, in my client I highlight a point as I've done here then hit
reply
and get no cruft and just the point I want to discuss. Claws mail.
(if
it's good enough for Richard Stallman it's good enough for me!)
Same in Evolution. In fact even the Gmail web c
On 03/20/2018 07:49 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:29:29 -0400
Todd Zullinger wrote:
If there's something you're replying to in particular,
maybe quote that one line but there's no need to quote the
entire thread so far in every email in the thread.
yes, in my client I highli
Il giorno gio 22 mar 2018 alle 0:47, Richard England
<"pdx.limey"@gmail.com> ha scritto:
On 03/21/2018 02:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Same in Evolution. In fact even the Gmail web client used to do this
when properly configured, but Google seem to have broken it now.
Same in Thunberbi
On 21 March 2018 at 23:49, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On 03/21/2018 02:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>
>>> Same in Evolution. In fact even the Gmail web client used to do this
>>> when properly configured, but Google seem to have broken it now.
>>
>>
> It's a bit of a pain in gmail but I've gotte
>
> On 03/21/2018 02:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>> Same in Evolution. In fact even the Gmail web client used to do this
>> when properly configured, but Google seem to have broken it now.
>
>
It's a bit of a pain in gmail but I've gotten used to it. After clicking
reply I use Ctl-A which e
On 03/21/2018 02:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Same in Evolution. In fact even the Gmail web client used to do this
when properly configured, but Google seem to have broken it now.
Same in Thunberbird.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedorap
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 19:49:26 -0700
Dave Stevens wrote:
> yes, in my client I highlight a point as I've done here then hit reply
> and get no cruft and just the point I want to discuss. Claws mail. (if
> it's good enough for Richard Stallman it's good enough for me!)
Wow - using Claws Mail since
On 03/21/2018 11:47 AM, chicago wrote:
>> yes, in my client I highlight a point as I've done here then hit
>> reply
>>> and get no cruft and just the point I want to discuss. Claws mail.
>> (if
>>> it's good enough for Richard Stallman it's good enough for me!)
>>
>> Same in Evolution. In fact even
> yes, in my client I highlight a point as I've done here then hit
>reply
>> and get no cruft and just the point I want to discuss. Claws mail.
>(if
>> it's good enough for Richard Stallman it's good enough for me!)
>
>Same in Evolution. In fact even the Gmail web client used to do this
>when prope
On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 12:02 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 22:20 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > > With the move to mailman3, the list footer cannot be set via
> > > the web-based admin interface. I dug into the mailman3
> > > documentation and
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 22:20 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> With the move to mailman3, the list footer cannot be set via
>> the web-based admin interface. I dug into the mailman3
>> documentation and filed an infrastructure ticket to see
>> about adding guidelines link
On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 22:20 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Top-posting is specifically discouraged by the Guidelines
> > of this and other lists hosted by Fedora, not to mention
> > many other mailing lists of a technical nature. Please
> > read:
> >
> > https://fedo
On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 19:49 -0700, Dave Stevens wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:29:29 -0400
> Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> > > If there's something you're replying to in particular,
> > > maybe quote that one line but there's no need to quote the
> > > entire thread so far in every email in the thre
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:29:29 -0400
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > If there's something you're replying to in particular,
> > maybe quote that one line but there's no need to quote the
> > entire thread so far in every email in the thread.
yes, in my client I highlight a point as I've done here the
On 11/28/2011 02:08 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 10:58 AM, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
>> Well, I'm sure that some folks are of the opinion that the GNOME developers
>> attitudes and responses to user concerns are pretty fascist.
> Only those who use the term as a generic insult and haven't the
On 11/29/2011 12:35 AM, Matt Rose wrote:
>> Sorry POC for inserting here.
>>
>> I just want to congratulate all the participants in this thread and
>> resulting tangents. You've manged to hit at least 3 most often
>> recurring themes.
> I realize nothing can be done about the meta "Guidelines"
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 11:15 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 28.11.2011 09:12, schrieb les:
> > On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 20:00 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> in business-communication top posting and TOFU is normally
> >> because with TOFU you need only the last mail of a conversation
> >> and wi
On 11/28/2011 10:58 AM, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
> Well, I'm sure that some folks are of the opinion that the GNOME developers
> attitudes and responses to user concerns are pretty fascist.
Only those who use the term as a generic insult and haven't the
slightest idea what it means.
--
users mail
On 11/28/2011 01:49 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 05:30 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> The only thing missing is the confirmation of the Godwin's law. :-D
> Well, the number of people hating Gnome proves that Ugol's Law still
> works. Now, all we need is an example of Cole's Law
Well, I'm su
On 11/28/2011 05:30 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> The only thing missing is the confirmation of the Godwin's law. :-D
Well, the number of people hating Gnome proves that Ugol's Law still
works. Now, all we need is an example of Cole's Law.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
Just correcting the typo in the subject line
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: ht
> Sorry POC for inserting here.
>
> I just want to congratulate all the participants in this thread and
> resulting tangents. You've manged to hit at least 3 most often
> recurring themes.
I realize nothing can be done about the meta "Guidelines" thrash, but you
know, some would say that if s
On Monday 28 November 2011 20:03:02 Ed Greshko wrote:
> Sorry POC for inserting here.
>
> I just want to congratulate all the participants in this thread and
> resulting tangents. You've manged to hit at least 3 most often
> recurring themes.
>
>
>
> A. GNOME 3 is the most hated desktop
Sorry POC for inserting here.
I just want to congratulate all the participants in this thread and
resulting tangents. You've manged to hit at least 3 most often
recurring themes.
A. GNOME 3 is the most hated desktop since the introduction of KDE 4.
B. Licensing in Fedora. Or: Why c
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 21:49 +1100, Roger wrote:
> Also consider that with several contributors commenting on the same
> post it gets boring scrolling down each one through the same
> information
> Roger
That's why you edit. Whatever posting style you use, you need to edit.
You can't keep every si
Am 28.11.2011 12:47, schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> 1) Business mail top-posts and quotes everything because that's the way
> Outlook works and to a significant percentage of business users
> "Outlook"and "Email" are synonyms. The single advantage to doing it this
> way is that you can shovel over
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 21:49 +1100, Roger wrote:
> Also consider that with several contributors commenting on the same
> post
> it gets boring scrolling down each one through the same information
It gets even more boring when posters can't be bothered to trim the
stuff they're quoting. If quotes w
Also consider that with several contributors commenting on the same post
it gets boring scrolling down each one through the same information
Roger
in business-communication top posting and TOFU is normally
because with TOFU you need only the last mail of a conversation
and with the top-posting y
Am 28.11.2011 09:12, schrieb les:
> On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 20:00 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> in business-communication top posting and TOFU is normally
>> because with TOFU you need only the last mail of a conversation
>> and with the top-posting you need not to scroll and see the whole
>> answ
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:12:14 -0800
les wrote:
I love this mlist more and more!
all started with Fedora - time to blink and now we are behind this "querelle"
that is older than internet ;)
you are amazing, guys :)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscri
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 20:00 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 27.11.2011 19:32, schrieb Maurizio Marini:
> > On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:13:53 +
> > Frank Murphy wrote:
> >
> >> That's what top-posting brings. (Not JZ)
> >> Let's see the rant's now.
> >
> > A. Because people read from top to bo
> | But side posting is more fun = It
> | and by far a more interesting = certainly
> | challenge, isn't it? = is
> |= more
> | {O,o} Ack! = challenging
> > -- = with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/27/2011 06:28 PM, jdow wrote:
> On 2011/11/27 15:42, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>> Well, considering that top posting | But side posting is more fun
> > is strongly discourages in the | and by far a more interesting
>> list guidelines,
On 2011/11/27 15:42, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> On 11/27/2011 01:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 27.11.2011 19:32, schrieb Maurizio Marini:
>>>
>>> A. Because people read from top to bottom.
>>> Q. Why should I not top post?
>>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally r
On 11/27/2011 01:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.11.2011 19:32, schrieb Maurizio Marini:
>>
>> A. Because people read from top to bottom.
>> Q. Why should I not top post?
>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>>
On Sunday 27 November 2011 20:00:20 Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 27.11.2011 19:32, schrieb Maurizio Marini:
> > A. Because people read from top to bottom.
> > Q. Why should I not top post?
> > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad th
On 11/27/2011 12:13 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 27/11/11 17:08, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Possibly so someone can say
>> "It's not bloated, you installed all that stuff"
>>
>> Please get your attributions right. There's n
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 13:00:20 -0600 Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.11.2011 19:32, schrieb Maurizio Marini:
> > On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:13:53 +
> > Frank Murphy wrote:
> >
> >> That's what top-posting brings. (Not JZ)
> >> Let's see the rant's now.
> >
> > A. Because people read from top
Am 27.11.2011 19:32, schrieb Maurizio Marini:
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:13:53 +
> Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>> That's what top-posting brings. (Not JZ)
>> Let's see the rant's now.
>
> A. Because people read from top to bottom.
> Q. Why should I not top post?
> A: Because it messes up the order
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:13:53 +
Frank Murphy wrote:
> That's what top-posting brings. (Not JZ)
> Let's see the rant's now.
A. Because people read from top to bottom.
Q. Why should I not top post?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 06/29/2010 07:48 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>
>> "Fool." was deliberately ambiguous.
>> That was its point.
>
> For goodness' sake, we have enough accidental ambiguousness on this
> list without people adding it deliberately! Please stop.
Don't worr
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Joel Rees wrote:
> Mail User Agents are notoriously bad at the automatic quoting game
> (partly because different mail browsers implement quoting
It's what one does after the automatic quoting that counts.
I wouldn't expect a MUA to trim boilerplate for me.
I do that myself.
On 06/29/2010 07:48 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> "Fool." was deliberately ambiguous.
> That was its point.
For goodness' sake, we have enough accidental ambiguousness on this
list without people adding it deliberately! Please stop.
Andrew.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 02:48:30 pm Michael Hennebry wrote:
>
> "Fool." was deliberately ambiguous.
> That was its point.
>
> I stated that Carroll was smarter than you because
> Carroll noticed that "Fool." was top-posted.
> It was a clue.
> As I have little evidence regarding the smartness o
On 06/30/2010 07:10 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> In an ideal world, people would know why and how the tools they use
> should be used in certain ways when and where, and they would use
> their tools accordingly, and we would never need to question what
> their intent was.
>
That's why we have Vi
Mail User Agents are notoriously bad at the automatic quoting game
(partly because different mail browsers implement quoting
differently, partly because the 800 pound gorilla who joined the
internet game late has never understood it, partly because context
always has more effect than we exp
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Jesus Arocho wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:31:13 am Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Jesus Arocho wrote:
>>> On Monday, June 28, 2010 02:51:37 pm Michael Hennebry wrote:
> Perhaps it's a typo?
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010
On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:31:13 am Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Jesus Arocho wrote:
> > On Monday, June 28, 2010 02:51:37 pm Michael Hennebry wrote:
> >>> Perhaps it's a typo?
> >>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-June/376308.html
> >>>
> >>> (at the very t
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Jesus Arocho wrote:
> On Monday, June 28, 2010 02:51:37 pm Michael Hennebry wrote:
>
>>> Perhaps it's a typo?
>>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-June/376308.html
>>>
>>> (at the very top -- ahead of the "Frank Murphy said" line)
>>
>> 'Tain't a typo.
>> Th
On Monday, June 28, 2010 02:51:37 pm Michael Hennebry wrote:
> > Perhaps it's a typo?
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-June/376308.html
> >
> > (at the very top -- ahead of the "Frank Murphy said" line)
>
> 'Tain't a typo.
> That said, Carroll Grigsby seems smarter than Je
On Monday, June 28, 2010 11:46:54 am Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> > Who are you accusing me of calling a fool?
>
> Perhaps it's a typo?
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-June/376308.html
>
> (at the very top -- ahead of the "Frank Murphy said" line)
>
Could be, if so, my apolog
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:27:12 -0500 (CDT)
> Michael Hennebry wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Jesus Arocho wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, June 25, 2010 03:20:53 pm Michael Hennebry wrote:
Fool.
>>>
>>> Regardless of the relative merits of top or bo
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:27:12 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Jesus Arocho wrote:
>
> > On Friday, June 25, 2010 03:20:53 pm Michael Hennebry wrote:
> >> Fool.
> >>
> >
> > Regardless of the relative merits of top or bottom posting the
> > 'fool' comment is uncalled for
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Jesus Arocho wrote:
> On Friday, June 25, 2010 03:20:53 pm Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> Fool.
>>
>
> Regardless of the relative merits of top or bottom posting the 'fool' comment
> is uncalled for. How is it that such a trivial issue can drive us to such
> comments; unless perh
On Sunday, June 27, 2010 07:25:31 Dale J. Chatham wrote:
> Calling all net nazis...
>
> Sheesh!
Are you calling me a nazi? Why?
I offered a technical solution that can basically remove most of the top/bottom
posting problems in an automatic way, fitting the preferences of each user
individuall
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 10:53 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> While viewing any message in the thread, press the letter "k" on the
> keyboard. It's a shortcut for Message->Ignore Thread.
Does that have the benefit of also killing off thread hijacking? ;-)
(Where someone replies to a message, inste
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 10:53 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 06/27/2010 07:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 14:05 +0530, steve wrote:
> >> On 06/25/2010 01:48 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >>> On Friday 25 June 2010 12:52 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> If there are posts you
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 07:25 -0500, Dale J. Chatham wrote:
> Calling all net nazis...
[Please don't top-post on this list. Didn't you get the memo? :-]
If you read the OP's message you'll see his "solution" is entirely local
to each user. It has no effect on the list itself or on the list
archives
On 06/27/2010 07:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 14:05 +0530, steve wrote:
>> On 06/25/2010 01:48 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> On Friday 25 June 2010 12:52 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
If there are posts you don't like think killfile.
>>>
>>> I keep hearing about this, how
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 07:57:31 -0430
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I like the unconscious irony of "if the context is clear". The *only*
> justification for top-posting is to be able to include the entire
> history of the thread in such a way as not to force the reader to deal
> with it. IOW it was
Calling all net nazis...
Sheesh!
On 06/27/2010 02:08 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Friday, June 25, 2010 00:50:10 JD wrote:
>
>> I see so many top-posting replies to threads, mixed with correct bottom
>> appended replies makes it very difficult to read a thread. Are there any
>> watchdogs o
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 19:35 +0930, Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 00:35 -0700, Julius Smith wrote:
>
> > * Top posting is more efficient for all if the context is clear
>
> Oh rubbish, it's just the easiest solution for the laziest. Nothing to
> do with "efficiency."
I like the unconscious
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 14:05 +0530, steve wrote:
> On 06/25/2010 01:48 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Friday 25 June 2010 12:52 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> >> If there are posts you don't like think killfile.
> >
> > I keep hearing about this, how does one do that in Thunderbird? A quick
> > google sea
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 00:35 -0700, Julius Smith wrote:
> * Top posting is more efficient for all if the context is clear
Oh rubbish, it's just the easiest solution for the laziest. Nothing to
do with "efficiency."
> * Top posting makes it easier to respond to only one point of many
Doesn't mak
On 06/27/2010 02:05 PM, steve wrote:
> On 06/25/2010 01:48 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> On Friday 25 June 2010 12:52 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> If there are posts you don't like think killfile.
>>
>> I keep hearing about this, how does one do that in Thunderbird? A quick
>> google search yielded
On 06/25/2010 01:48 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Friday 25 June 2010 12:52 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> If there are posts you don't like think killfile.
>
> I keep hearing about this, how does one do that in Thunderbird? A quick
> google search yielded some old threads leading up to no solutions or
>
Some points:
* Top posting is more efficient for all if the context is clear
* Top posting makes it easier to respond to only one point of many
* For the blind listening to text-to-speech reading of the page,
top-posting is the only way to go
* I vote for top-posting, including quoted snippets
On Friday, June 25, 2010 00:50:10 JD wrote:
> I see so many top-posting replies to threads, mixed with correct bottom
> appended replies makes it very difficult to read a thread. Are there any
> watchdogs on this list that tell top posters to stop it?
Umm, how about maybe take a look at:
http://l
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Jesus Arocho wrote:
> On Friday, June 25, 2010 03:20:53 pm Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> Fool.
>>
>
> Regardless of the relative merits of top or bottom posting the 'fool' comment
> is uncalled for. How is it that such a trivial issue can drive us to such
> comments; unless perh
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 11:32 +0930, Tim wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 15:06 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > bottom-posting has been the standard on Usenet for basically forever,
>
> To be pedantic, no it hasn't. ;-)
>
> Usenet quoting style has traditionally been "interspersed" (replying
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 15:06 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> bottom-posting has been the standard on Usenet for basically forever,
To be pedantic, no it hasn't. ;-)
Usenet quoting style has traditionally been "interspersed" (replying
in-line, throughout the message), which is not the same a
On Friday, June 25, 2010 03:20:53 pm Michael Hennebry wrote:
> Fool.
>
Regardless of the relative merits of top or bottom posting the 'fool' comment
is uncalled for. How is it that such a trivial issue can drive us to such
comments; unless perhaps the anonymity of the internet has also made us
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:06:49 -0430
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Almost
> every message you see on these systems quote the entire thread in every
> message. Lose lose lose.
That seems to have developed from rancidly bad email customer support
systems which couldn't be bothered to keep track of old
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:20 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> The best that can be said about top-posting is that
> it is better than bottom-posting without trimming.
> Internal- and bottom-posting allow responses
> to be near their inspirations.
Agreed, but in reality either method would be accep
Fool.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 25/06/10 16:53, Jesus Arocho wrote:
> --snip--
> People do, continue to and will always top post
>>
>> Thanks for the comment. Although I do try to work within the standards of a
>> group, I do prefer top posting, but do not mind reading emails
On 06/25/2010 08:50 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Friday 25 June 2010 03:16 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 06/25/2010 09:18 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> On Friday 25 June 2010 12:52 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
If there are posts you don't like think killfile.
>>>
>>> I keep hearing about this, how does o
On 25/06/10 16:53, Jesus Arocho wrote:
--snip--
People do, continue to and will always top post
>
> Thanks for the comment. Although I do try to work within the standards of a
> group, I do prefer top posting, but do not mind reading emails otherwise
> composed. The argument does seem similar
On Friday, June 25, 2010 09:13:50 am Michal wrote:
> This noise is proving to be more annoying then what your talking about.
> If someone does it, give them a polite nudge. If it annoyes you that
> much, ignore it. But please, stop filling this place with pointless
> noise. People do, continue to a
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 08:01 -0600, Patrick Kobly wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:13 +0100, Michal wrote:
> > This noise is proving to be more annoying then what your talking about.
> > If someone does it, give them a polite nudge. If it annoyes you that
> > much, ignore it. But please, stop fil
On 6/25/10, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
>> Marvin Kosmal :
>>There should be
>
> Must be...
> --
>
I am going to have to admit..
I am not real good at snipping old parts of the message.
Left up to me ...It would all be there ..
Not practical!!!
This a GREAT LIST
Thanks
Marvi
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:13 +0100, Michal wrote:
> This noise is proving to be more annoying then what your talking about.
> If someone does it, give them a polite nudge. If it annoyes you that
> much, ignore it. But please, stop filling this place with pointless
> noise. People do, continue to
On 06/25/2010 01:50 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Friday 25 June 2010 03:16 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 06/25/2010 09:18 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> On Friday 25 June 2010 12:52 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
If there are posts you don't like think killfile.
>>>
>>> I keep hearing about this, how does o
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 08:06 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 05:50:47 -0700,
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> > Like I said in my post, that requires me to create a filter for every
> > such case.
>
> You could probably detect them using pattern matching. If you keep your
> em
On 25/06/10 14:13, Michal wrote:
> This noise is proving to be more annoying then what your talking about.
> If someone does it, give them a polite nudge. If it annoyes you that
> much, ignore it. But please, stop filling this place with pointless
> noise. People do, continue to and will always
This noise is proving to be more annoying then what your talking about.
If someone does it, give them a polite nudge. If it annoyes you that
much, ignore it. But please, stop filling this place with pointless
noise. People do, continue to and will always top post
--
users mailing list
users@lis
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 22:50 -0700, JD wrote:
> I see so many top-posting replies to threads, mixed with correct bottom
> appended replies makes it very difficult to read a thread. Are there any
> watchdogs on this list that tell top posters to stop it?
There are no official watchdogs (or if they
On 25/06/10 13:50, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Friday 25 June 2010 03:16 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 06/25/2010 09:18 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> On Friday 25 June 2010 12:52 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
If there are posts you don't like think killfile.
>>>
>>> I keep hearing about this, how does one do
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 05:50:47 -0700,
Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
> Like I said in my post, that requires me to create a filter for every
> such case.
You could probably detect them using pattern matching. If you keep your
email locally, you could check the messages on delivery and drop ones
that a
On Friday 25 June 2010 03:16 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 06/25/2010 09:18 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> On Friday 25 June 2010 12:52 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> If there are posts you don't like think killfile.
>>
>> I keep hearing about this, how does one do that in Thunderbird?
>
> Tools>Message Filt
On 06/25/2010 09:18 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Friday 25 June 2010 12:52 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> If there are posts you don't like think killfile.
>
> I keep hearing about this, how does one do that in Thunderbird?
Tools>Message Filters>New
Move message to > trash
--
users mailing list
user
On Friday 25 June 2010 12:52 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> If there are posts you don't like think killfile.
I keep hearing about this, how does one do that in Thunderbird? A quick
google search yielded some old threads leading up to no solutions or
suggesting filters for every poster/thread I want
On 06/25/2010 03:50 PM, Tim wrote:
> Sometimes I just hit delete on crap
> messages, even if I have the answer to their problem. And I'm not the
> only one who'll do that.
>
That's for sure
--
Ever get the feeling that the world's on tape and one of the reels is
missing? -- Rich Little 葛斯
On 25/06/10 08:47, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
>> Marvin Kosmal :
>> There should be
>
> Must be...
There is, but when it is mentioned on list.
It's bar-b-q time *sizzle sizzle*
If there are posts you don't like think killfile.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
-
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 22:50 -0700, JD wrote:
> Are there any watchdogs on this list that tell top posters to stop it?
There are a few, who say so from time to time, myself included. And
then someone complains about it...
I agree that it makes it a pain to read. Plus all the full-quoting,
where
> Marvin Kosmal :
>There should be
Must be...
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
On 6/24/10, JD wrote:
> I see so many top-posting replies to threads, mixed with correct bottom
> appended replies makes it very difficult to read a thread. Are there any
> watchdogs on this list that tell top posters to stop it?
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsub
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
