On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 15:55:06 -0500
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> EFI boot entries are built based on the UUID of the volume and then a
> path to the EFI executable, so you would just need to create another
> EFI entry, either for a different EFI volume with a standard path or
> the same EFI volume wi
On Jan 7, 2022, at 11:16, stan via users wrote:
>
> Thanks for the information, but you lost me at the multiple EFI
> executables in different directories. How would boot know which
> executable to choose? I thought it was the /boot/efi/EFI/fedora that
> cued it that this is the system to boot.
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 22:09:42 -0500
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> But you can have multiple EFI volumes, and with boot loader spec
> configuration, you don’t need a lot of special configuration in the
> EFI volume anymore, so I bet you can get away with multiple EFI
> executables in different directo
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 14:13, stan via users
wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:25:10 -0500
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:12:04 -0500
> > Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >
> > > that sounds interesting, but don't you also need separate /
> > > partitions with all the release specific sof
On Jan 6, 2022, at 13:14, stan via users wrote:
>
> It doesn't work with EFI, because EFI only allows a single version of
> any OS; so only a single fedora version. Systemd-boot *does* allow
> booting multiple versions of an OS, but *only* EFI.
That’s not really a limit with EFI. It’s more that
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022, Matthew Miller wrote:
Thanks! Yeah, I agree that that's confusing. The problem is that that
document is coming from our Program Management team, and that team mostly is
concerned with the releases we're developing ? so current releases are
"old". :)
Perhaps old could be cha
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:25:10 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:12:04 -0500
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> > that sounds interesting, but don't you also need separate /
> > partitions with all the release specific software?
>
> Yep. My actual scheme has a tiny grub2 stand alone pa
Hi
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:30 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> In addition to fixing the typo, I also de-indented the "Supported
> Releases" and "EOL Releases" (thus removing the "Old Releases") in the
> navigation bar to help make things more clear.
>
Quick note: The gmane link in that page is dead be
On 1/5/2022 8:47 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> Three approaches:
>
> Upgrade 1 release close to the EOL of current release. This way you are
> moving to a mature release.
I generally like to recommend staying 1 release behind for stability... but as
you note:
>
> Choose your poison.
it's
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:12:04 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> that sounds interesting, but don't you also need separate / partitions
> with all the release specific software?
Yep. My actual scheme has a tiny grub2 stand alone partition
which uses the "configfile" grub command to be able to boot
on
On 1/5/22 21:03, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 20:47:06 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Three approaches:
I go with the 4th approach: Keep two separate boot partitions and
upgrade right away in one of them so I can go back to previous
version trivially if it turns out something is horr
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 20:47:06 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Three approaches:
I go with the 4th approach: Keep two separate boot partitions and
upgrade right away in one of them so I can go back to previous
version trivially if it turns out something is horribly wrong.
I running fedora 35 now wi
On 1/4/22 18:20, Slade Watkins via users wrote:
hi,
Until when will Fedora 34 be supported?
if I recall correctly, the End of Life (EOL) date is May 17th, 2022. someone
else on the list can correct me if I am wrong though.
Is it highly recommended that I upgrade to Fedora 35 at this point?
On 1/5/2022 12:59 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:32 AM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> Oh! I see Ben has already changed it. Should be live soon. :)
>
> Well, once the build failures[1] are fixed.
>
> In addition to fixing the typo, I also de-indented the "Supported
> Releases" an
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:32 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
> Oh! I see Ben has already changed it. Should be live soon. :)
Well, once the build failures[1] are fixed.
In addition to fixing the typo, I also de-indented the "Supported
Releases" and "EOL Releases" (thus removing the "Old Releases") in t
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022, at 3:11 PM, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
> I will ask this question here since I didn't understand the
> explanations I found elsewhere.
> Until when will Fedora 34 be supported?
> Is it highly recommended that I upgrade to Fedora 35 at this point?
I know this is all sorted
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:26:40AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Thanks! Yeah, I agree that that's confusing. The problem is that that
> document is coming from our Program Management team, and that team mostly is
> concerned with the releases we're developing — so current releases are
> "old". :)
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:05:03AM -0500, Slade Watkins wrote:
> yes, happy to help! what I was referring to was the sorting of the
> sections in the sidebar on this page:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/lifecycle/
Thanks! Yeah, I agree that that's confusing. The problem is that t
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:45 AM Anil Felipe Duggirala
wrote:
>
> Then I consulted this site,
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/lifecycle/
> That site says exactly what you confirmed (13 months after the release).
> However I got a bit confused in the section called Maintenance sched
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 03:44, Anil Felipe Duggirala <
anilduggir...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022, at 7:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 06:11:24PM -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
> >> I will ask this question here since I didn't understand the
> explanations
On 1/4/2022 10:57 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Sorry, which section? Do you have a link? We're working on redesigning the
> layout of our docs, so looking at this is timely. :)
>
yes, happy to help! what I was referring to was the sorting of the sections in
the sidebar on this page:
https://d
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022, at 7:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 06:11:24PM -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
>> I will ask this question here since I didn't understand the explanations I
>> found elsewhere. Until when will Fedora 34 be supported?
>
> Until 4 weeks after the Fedor
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 08:06:29PM -0500, Slade Watkins via users wrote:
> >I'm curious where you found the explanations that were confusing, and how
> >we could improve them.
> hi,
> for me, it's not necessarily that the explanations were confusing,
> but rather the section on the site itself.
So
On 1/4/2022 7:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Until 4 weeks after the Fedora Linux 36 release. That's currently scheduled
for 2022-04-19, which makes EOL for Fedora Linux 34 2022-05-17.
I'm curious where you found the explanations that were confusing, and how we
could improve them.
hi,
for me, i
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 06:11:24PM -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
> I will ask this question here since I didn't understand the explanations I
> found elsewhere. Until when will Fedora 34 be supported?
Until 4 weeks after the Fedora Linux 36 release. That's currently scheduled
for 2022-04-19,
hi,
> Until when will Fedora 34 be supported?
if I recall correctly, the End of Life (EOL) date is May 17th, 2022. someone
else on the list can correct me if I am wrong though.
> Is it highly recommended that I upgrade to Fedora 35 at this point?
would worry about it closer to EOL.
best,
slade
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Antonio M wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 2012/7/5 Bill Davidsen mailto:david...@tmr.com>>
>>
>> JD wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>> I was planning to purchase one of these.
>> Is it supported in Fedora?
>>
>> Got a spec telling what
Antonio M wrote:
2012/7/5 Bill Davidsen mailto:david...@tmr.com>>
JD wrote:
Hi All,
I was planning to purchase one of these.
Is it supported in Fedora?
Got a spec telling what chipset it uses? I admit that some of the stuff I
use does require a vendor driv
2012/7/5 Bill Davidsen
> JD wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> I was planning to purchase one of these.
>> Is it supported in Fedora?
>>
>> Got a spec telling what chipset it uses? I admit that some of the stuff
> I use does require a vendor driver, although the kernel stuff is getting
> better.
>
>
> --
>
JD wrote:
Hi All,
I was planning to purchase one of these.
Is it supported in Fedora?
Got a spec telling what chipset it uses? I admit that some of the stuff I use
does require a vendor driver, although the kernel stuff is getting better.
--
Bill Davidsen
"We have more to fear from the bu
On 05/07/12 04:25, JD wrote:
Hi All,
I was planning to purchase one of these.
Is it supported in Fedora?
Not easily
We have had trouble both on ubuntu and fedora 16
Roger
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorapr
Hi Anthony,
Thanks for the response. That would be helpful.
Do you happen to know about the support for RFC 6187.
Thanks
Anamitra
On 3/3/12 7:18 AM, "Anthony R Fletcher" wrote:
>
>On 03 Mar 2012 at 01:19:21, Anamitra Dutta Majumdar wrote:
>> Hi Anthony ,
>>
>> Thanks for your responses.
>> I
On 03 Mar 2012 at 01:19:21, Anamitra Dutta Majumdar wrote:
> Hi Anthony ,
>
> Thanks for your responses.
> I have initiated a new thread.
> Can you provide me with further details.
>
> Thanks,
> Anamitra
>
>
>
> Hello Anamitra,
>
> I suggest you start a new thread on the list but, yes, there
On 03/02/2012 09:36 PM, Anamitra Dutta Majumdar *broke* thread:
*recommend some info on hot to upgrade from F15 to F16 using preupgrade*
anamitra,
please do not break threads.
please open your own thread.
thank you.
--
peace out.
tc.hago,
g
.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP dig
On 01/12/2012 07:25 PM, Kyle Pablo wrote:
<>
hi kyle.
i wish i could help you with your problem, but i can not and leave
that to other readers of this 'tsl'.
to help you reach more subscribers, i will make a suggestion, put
list name, users@lists.fedoraproject.org, in "To:" field.
what ever yo
Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> Does or will Linux have software to support the new 6g hard drives and
> motherboards that have 6g ports on them?
WFM. I added a pair of 2TB drives on the last spare SATA posrt I had, and 6Gbit
seems to work ok, although there's no promise that your devices will drive i
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 06:14 -0600, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> Does or will Linux have software to support the new 6g hard drives and
> motherboards that have 6g ports on them?
I assume that you mean SATA III / 6Gbit?
The answer is: As long as your SATA chipset is supported, yes - but
you'll have t
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> > I was wondering why Fedora 14 does not have an automatic detection and
>>> > setup for a BCM4321 802.11 a/b/g/n wireless network adapter?
>> Sadly, the free drivers don't support that chip I don't think, and
>> broadcom is very uncooperat
Hey guys and girls,
I solved the problem.
Using a USB wireless adapter,
I installed kmod with fusionRPM free and non-free, via terminal
restarted the computer and it recognised the BMC43XX.
thanks for the help.
Cheers!!!
Chris...
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sunday
On Sunday 26 December 2010 10:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:22:38 +1100
> chris rawling wrote:
>
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> >
>> > I was wondering why Fedora 14 does not have an automatic detection and
>> > setup for a BCM4321 802.11 a/b/g/n wireless network adapter?
> Sadly, the fr
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:22:38 +1100
chris rawling wrote:
> Hey,
>
>
> I was wondering why Fedora 14 does not have an automatic detection and
> setup for a BCM4321 802.11 a/b/g/n wireless network adapter?
Sadly, the free drivers don't support that chip I don't think, and
broadcom is very uncoope
Does no one use USB audio?
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 08:19 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> This may be related to x86_64 install, but I'm told there's an issue in
>> 32 bit as well.
>>
>> I have a webcam, Logitech laptop model, and I'm trying to capture to
>> sound and audio.
>>
>
>
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 08:19 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>> This may be related to x86_64 install, but I'm told there's an issue in
>> 32 bit as well.
>>
>> I have a webcam, Logitech laptop model, and I'm trying to capture to
>> sound and audio.
>>
>>
>
> File a bug repor
On 06/14/2010 08:19 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> This may be related to x86_64 install, but I'm told there's an issue in
> 32 bit as well.
>
> I have a webcam, Logitech laptop model, and I'm trying to capture to
> sound and audio.
>
File a bug report against the kernel and cc hdegoede AT redha
44 matches
Mail list logo
