Re: questions: file systems (was: /var/lib/flatpak/repo/objects...)

(responding to both Samuel and Jonathan) (Samuel) There's no lockin for the filesystem. Even Fedora server uses a different default than Fedora workstation. But either way, you can select whichever filesystem you want at installation. But I must say that I am loving the subvolume options of

Re: questions: file systems (was: /var/lib/flatpak/repo/objects...)

On Jan 20, 2025, at 23:50, home user via users wrote: > > Am I the only one sensing a business inconsistency in what Fedora and Redhat > are doing? Since Fedora is the upstream for RHEL, and RHEL forks off Fedora, > I would think that they would have the same default file system unless Red >

Re: questions: file systems (was: /var/lib/flatpak/repo/objects...)

On 1/20/25 8:49 PM, home user via users wrote: I'm almost certain that I'll want a dual-boot system on the new workstation: Fedora + one other t.b.d. Linux distribution.  In that situation, does it matter which file system I'll use?  Also, am I correct in assuming that file system choice do not

Re: questions: file systems (was: /var/lib/flatpak/repo/objects...)

(responding to Patrick, George, and Samuel) Thank-you for your responses. I'm almost certain that I'll want a dual-boot system on the new workstation: Fedora + one other t.b.d. Linux distribution. In that situation, does it matter which file system I'll use? Also, am I correct in assuming th

Re: questions: file systems (was: /var/lib/flatpak/repo/objects...)

On 1/20/25 3:37 PM, George N. White III wrote: filesystems. The advantages of btrfs are not "free" -- btrfs requires maintenance and is not properly supported by legacy tools (df). I still disagree with the "required maintenance" thing and "df" works well enough for almost all purposes. --

Re: questions: file systems (was: /var/lib/flatpak/repo/objects...)

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 6:28 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Mon, 2025-01-20 at 13:18 -0700, home user via users wrote: > > So Red Hat has abandoned btrfs, XFS is the default. Fedora is upstream for > > RHEL, so... > > * Why is btrfs still default for Fedora? > I'm not party to RHEL's reas

Re: questions: file systems (was: /var/lib/flatpak/repo/objects...)

On Mon, 2025-01-20 at 13:18 -0700, home user via users wrote: > So Red Hat has abandoned btrfs, XFS is the default.  Fedora is upstream for > RHEL, so... > * Why is btrfs still default for Fedora? IIRC Fedora adopted BTRFS as the standard for Workstation *after* RedHat had decided not to use it f

Re: questions: file systems (was: /var/lib/flatpak/repo/objects...)

On 1/20/25 12:25 PM, Will McDonald wrote: On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 at 19:20, home user via users mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: For Red Hat Enterprise, all I've found on the internet is negative (it does not use...), and nothing more recent that version 8.  But it's currently at 9

Re: questions: file systems (was: /var/lib/flatpak/repo/objects...)

On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 at 19:20, home user via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > For Red Hat Enterprise, all I've found on the internet is negative (it > does not use...), and nothing more recent that version 8. But it's > currently at 9. > What is the default file system in Red Hat En

Re: questions: file systems (was: /var/lib/flatpak/repo/objects...)

On 1/20/25 11:09 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 1/20/25 1:04 PM, home user via users wrote: On 1/20/25 12:35 AM, Robin Laing wrote: ... I have lost data with LVM's and btrfs at different times in the past and have to regain my trust. ... The Btrfs file system received numerous updates

Re: questions: file systems (was: /var/lib/flatpak/repo/objects...)

On 1/20/25 1:04 PM, home user via users wrote: On 1/20/25 12:35 AM, Robin Laing wrote: ... I have lost data with LVM's and btrfs at different times in the past and have to regain my trust. ... The Btrfs file system received numerous updates from the upstream in Red Hat Enterprise Linux versi

Re: Questions about virtiofs

Any takes on this, guys? Thanks Frank On 2024-03-23 11:30, Frank Bures wrote: Hi, I have several separate file systems, amongst them /home on btrfs and media depository /archives on xfs (RAID-5). I am running Win11 guest in QEMU on F39 host.  I installed winfsp in the guest and I can acces

Re: Questions on creating RPM Package??

On 2 Jul 2021 at 7:35, stan via users wrote: Date sent: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 07:35:17 -0700 To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject:Re: Questions on creating RPM Package?? Organization: zohofree Send reply to: Community support for

Re: Questions on creating RPM Package??

On Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:30:14 +1000 "Michael D. Setzer II via users" wrote: > Thanks for the reply. Comments below > > On 1 Jul 2021 at 18:35, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > Subject: Re: Questions on creating RPM > Package?? > To: users

Re: Questions on creating RPM Package??

Thanks for the reply. Comments below On 1 Jul 2021 at 18:35, Samuel Sieb wrote: Subject:Re: Questions on creating RPM Package?? To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org From: Samuel Sieb Date sent: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 18:35:01 -0700 Send

Re: Questions on creating RPM Package??

On 2021-06-28 3:39 p.m., Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: That would then add options to the grub boot menu similar to how memtest worked to add option. It would load kernel image, and then g4l in ram to run. Looked at memtest, but note that they don't have an option with the EFI version, wh

Re: Questions about Fedora andsounds

In the Mate DE, selecting Startup Applications in the Control Center and checking Login sound brings up the Edit Startup Programs window. In the command window I've entered "mpv /home/a/.config/autostart/login.mp3" (without the quotes) where /home/a/.config/autostart/login.mp3 is the sound file

Re: Questions about Fedora andsounds

On 6/22/21 2:04 PM, Cisco Tissera wrote: The questions, in more detail, are these: is there a way on Fedora 34 to play a sound of my choosing at startup or log in? If yes, how? You can use aplay even when nobody is logged in. Supported formats are voc, wav, raw or au, with wav as the default

Re: questions after upgrade to fedora34

On Fri, 2021-05-21 at 10:59 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > josef radinger via users wrote: > > i'm using xfce, though it happens with gnome, too. > > the solution - as mathhew miller brought to my attention - is > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954366 > > > > or > > > > disabling

Re: questions after upgrade to fedora34

josef radinger via users wrote: > i'm using xfce, though it happens with gnome, too. > the solution - as mathhew miller brought to my attention - is > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954366 > > or > > disabling "enable-bracketed-paste" by adding in ~/.inputrc the following > line: >

Re: questions after upgrade to fedora34

On Thu, 20 May 2021, Joe Zeff wrote: On 5/20/21 8:53 AM, josef radinger via users wrote: * copy/paste in xterm/terminator now paints the copied text with reversed colors. in fedora 33 it was clear that in my black on white terminal marked text is colored white with black background. that p

Re: questions after upgrade to fedora34

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 04:02:57PM -0600, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 5/20/21 3:54 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >>This is a new readline feature. You are not the only to notice > >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954366 > >Glad to see it's not just me who hates this highlighting. > > Sta

Re: questions after upgrade to fedora34

On 21/05/2021 05:54, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 11:47 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 04:53:12PM +0200, josef radinger via users wrote: i have two problems after upgrading to fedora34: * copy/paste in xterm/terminator now paints the copied text with re

Re: questions after upgrade to fedora34

On 5/20/21 3:54 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: This is a new readline feature. You are not the only to notice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954366 Glad to see it's not just me who hates this highlighting. Status: CLOSED NOTABUG ___

Re: questions after upgrade to fedora34

On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 11:47 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 04:53:12PM +0200, josef radinger via users > wrote: > > i have two problems after upgrading to fedora34: > > * copy/paste in xterm/terminator now paints the copied text with > > reversed colors. in fedora 33 it was c

Re: questions after upgrade to fedora34

On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 11:47 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 04:53:12PM +0200, josef radinger via users > wrote: > > i have two problems after upgrading to fedora34: > > * copy/paste in xterm/terminator now paints the copied text with > > reversed colors. in fedora 33 it was c

Re: questions after upgrade to fedora34

On 5/20/21 8:53 AM, josef radinger via users wrote: * copy/paste in xterm/terminator now paints the copied text with reversed colors. in fedora 33 it was clear that in my black on white terminal marked text is colored white with black background. that part works the same in f34. pasting is diff

Re: questions after upgrade to fedora34

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 04:53:12PM +0200, josef radinger via users wrote: > i have two problems after upgrading to fedora34: > * copy/paste in xterm/terminator now paints the copied text with > reversed colors. in fedora 33 it was clear that in my black on white > terminal marked text is colored wh

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On 2021-05-02 8:52 a.m., None via users wrote: Is there a way to disable non-HTTPS mirrors? I don't see any reason why your ISP should be able to see what distribution you use, and most importantly, the exact package versions you're installing/updating. (I know DNF will only install signed pack

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

Michal Domonkos wrote: > Another correction - turns out I didn't read Stan's reply carefully; he says it's sent to a mirror, however that's not the case :) It's just the MirrorManager instance that receives it. Ah, I see. Many thanks for the clarification. Matthew Miller wrote: > I hope y

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 03:35:48AM +0200, None via users wrote: > I recently got to know that Fedora's DNF creates an UUID to help keep > track of the number of unique Fedora users. It does not. I initially proposed this, similar to what openSUSE does, but the actual implementation does not use a

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:47 PM Michal Domonkos wrote: > > On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:15 PM stan via users > wrote: > > I think the answer to your question is that the variable is sent to > > the mirror, so yes, a mirror will receive the flag. However, they > > appear to have gone to great lengths t

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:47 PM Michal Domonkos wrote: > 1) the age of the installation (one of 4 values, see the link above) Oh, just a little correction - there were some later changes made to that man page (the age "buckets" in particular) that are not reflected in the linked PR, so please chec

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:15 PM stan via users wrote: > I think the answer to your question is that the variable is sent to > the mirror, so yes, a mirror will receive the flag. However, they > appear to have gone to great lengths to avoid leaking any > identifiable information. See this link: > >

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On Sun, 2 May 2021 05:12:55 +0200 (CEST) None via users wrote: > ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: > > > This would also be of interest to you... > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672504 > > > The link was helpful. I have one more question: > > - Where is this countme variable

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: > This would also be of interest to you... > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672504 > The link was helpful. I have one more question: - Where is this countme variable sent? Is it to Fedora itself (the host getfedora.org), or the package mirrors, that

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On 02/05/2021 10:28, ml-de...@keemail.me wrote: - And, have you read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Better_Counting I went through it; it seems like there's no UUID created—just a "countme" variable. Is that right? This

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On 02/05/2021 10:28, ml-de...@keemail.me wrote: - And, have you read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Better_Counting I went through it; it seems like there's no UUID created—just a "countme" variable. Is that right? Corr

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

- And, have you read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Better_Counting I went through it; it seems like there's no UUID created—just a "countme" variable. Is that right? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe sen

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On 02/05/2021 09:35, None via users wrote: I recently got to know that Fedora's DNF creates an UUID to help keep track of the number of unique Fedora users. As per my understanding, before implementing this UUID mechanism, they obtained their user-base estimate through the use of IP addresses.

Re: Questions on DNF's UUID

On 02/05/2021 09:35, None via users wrote: - Is there any way to opt out of providing data for this user-base statistical analysis? Yes. Go to /etc/yum.repos.d and remove "countme=1" from any of *.repo files. -- Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.

Re: Questions on grub2 kernel options.

On 9 Dec 2020 at 8:28, stan via users wrote: Date sent: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:28:19 -0700 To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject:Re: Questions on grub2 kernel options. Organization: zohofree Send reply to: Community support for

Re: Questions on grub2 kernel options.

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, 12:43 AM Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > In previous configurations the grub.cfg file contained the kernel lines, > now it doesn't seem to have them included. > grub.cfg is not intended to be user configurable. The user config for this is /etc/default/grub and then you run gru

Re: Questions on grub2 kernel options.

On 9 Dec 2020 at 8:28, stan via users wrote: Date sent: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:28:19 -0700 To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject:Re: Questions on grub2 kernel options. Organization: zohofree Send reply to: Community support for

Re: Questions on grub2 kernel options.

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 9:32 AM Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > > > > Sometimes have the rescue kernel around is handy. Had people > sometime move a hard disk to a different system with a diskcontroller > that wasn't included by the standard kernel. The rescue kernel generally > has the support for m

Re: Questions on grub2 kernel options.

On 9 Dec 2020 at 9:44, Jorge Fábregas wrote: Subject:Re: Questions on grub2 kernel options. To: Community support for Fedora users From: Jorge Fábregas Date sent: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 09:44:16 -0400 Send reply to: Community

Re: Questions on grub2 kernel options.

On Wed, 09 Dec 2020 17:42:32 +1000 "Michael D. Setzer II" wrote: > Noticed that my rescue kernels on one machine were actually a couple > years old. Machine had been upgraded a couple times using dnf. > > Moved the rescue files to another locations, and thought the system > was suppose to automa

Re: Questions on grub2 kernel options.

I didn't understand what you mean On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, 2:44 PM Jorge Fábregas wrote: > On 12/9/20 3:42 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > > In previous configurations the grub.cfg file contained the kernel > > lines, now it doesn't seem to have them included. > > The entries are in /boot/loader/

Re: Questions on grub2 kernel options.

On 12/9/20 3:42 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > In previous configurations the grub.cfg file contained the kernel > lines, now it doesn't seem to have them included. The entries are in /boot/loader/entries/See the new darling: See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BootLoaderSpecByDefa

Re: Questions for the hard disk recovery gurus

On Sun, Aug 30, 2020, 2:01 AM Philip Rhoades wrote: > Samuel, > > > On 2020-08-30 17:12, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 8/30/20 12:07 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: > >> that it would take weeks! So unless someone can suggest a faster > >> method of fixing the partition (mainly just as an exercise now) or

Re: Questions for the hard disk recovery gurus

On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 at 04:08, Philip Rhoades wrote: > People, > > I know this is not strictly a Fedora issue but I only use Fedora so I am > hoping people here can help - maybe we should have a separate mailing > list or forum topic for this sort of hard disk stuff? > > Just after a full backup (

Re: Questions for the hard disk recovery gurus

On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 08:10 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 8/30/20 3:01 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: > > Samuel, > > > > > > On 2020-08-30 17:12, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > On 8/30/20 12:07 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: > > > > that it would take weeks! So unless someone can suggest a faster > > > >

Re: Questions for the hard disk recovery gurus

On 8/30/20 3:01 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: Samuel, On 2020-08-30 17:12, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 8/30/20 12:07 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: that it would take weeks!  So unless someone can suggest a faster method of fixing the partition (mainly just as an exercise now) or at least just working out

Re: Questions for the hard disk recovery gurus

Samuel, On 2020-08-30 17:12, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 8/30/20 12:07 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: that it would take weeks!  So unless someone can suggest a faster method of fixing the partition (mainly just as an exercise now) or at least just working out what is wrong with it, I guess I will just

Re: Questions for the hard disk recovery gurus

On 8/30/20 12:07 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: that it would take weeks!  So unless someone can suggest a faster method of fixing the partition (mainly just as an exercise now) or at least just working out what is wrong with it, I guess I will just have to re-create the partition? Since you have

Re: questions about the Athenaeum game manager

This is a follow-up to my post last night about the new Athenaeum game manager.I say "new" only because it is a fairly recent project. I ran an update via terminal in both dnf and flatpak, and the Athenaeum-installed-apps did not update. But Gnome Software said all the twenty-four games ( tha

Re: Questions regarding dual booting with Windows 8.1

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > Hello, > > I have to install Windows 8.1 so that Dell technician can troubleshoot my > system. I have not installed Windows in years, so, I wanted to confirm the > process before destroying my system. > > I will create a 50GB partition fo

Re: Questions regarding dual booting with Windows 8.1

On 12/15/2017 10:21 AM, Sudhir Khanger wrote: I have to install Windows 8.1 so that Dell technician can troubleshoot my system. I have not installed Windows in years, so, I wanted to confirm the process before destroying my system. I will create a 50GB partition for Windows 8.1. I installed Fe

Re: Questions regarding dual booting with Windows 8.1

On 12/15/2017 11:21 AM, Sudhir Khanger wrote: Hello, I have to install Windows 8.1 so that Dell technician can troubleshoot my system. I have not installed Windows in years, so, I wanted to confirm the process before destroying my system. I will create a 50GB partition for Windows 8.1. I in

Re: Questions about Webalizer

On 12Dec2017 12:11, Rick Stevens wrote: On 12/12/2017 09:09 AM, Charlie Dennett wrote: I have a small web server and user webalizer.  I recently converted to all https.  You say you "added" the ssl access log.  That makes me think you have two log files defined in your webalizer.conf file.  Fro

Re: Questions about Webalizer

Thank you all, I have both access_log and ssl_access_log. I hoped for an easy solution but it's clear that it is not such thing. I will switch to only https. C.S. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Questions about Webalizer

On 12/12/2017 09:09 AM, Charlie Dennett wrote: > I have a small web server and user webalizer.  I recently converted to > all https.  You say you "added" the ssl access log.  That makes me think > you have two log files defined in your webalizer.conf file.  From what I > understand, webalizer only

Re: Questions about Webalizer

I have a small web server and user webalizer. I recently converted to all https. You say you "added" the ssl access log. That makes me think you have two log files defined in your webalizer.conf file. From what I understand, webalizer only supports one log file. (Someone will correct me if I'm

Re: Questions about Webalizer

Quoting Cristian Sava : Hi all, I have some problems with Webalizer: 1) It can be manually started but not with cron. 2) I have http and https on the same server and it refuse to show statistics for ssl_access_log I tried to add "LogFile /var/log/httpd/ssl_access_log" to /etc/webalizer.conf wi

Re: Questions on Anaconda Hub and spokes model

Hi On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:36 PM, shankha wrote: > Hi, > I had few questions on anaconda hub and spokes model. Is it the > correct list to ask those questions. > Try anaconda-devel list instead Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription o

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 10.12.2014 04:37, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 00:58 +0100, poma wrote: > >> On 09.12.2014 23:49, Jeffrey Needle wrote: >>> On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 15:25 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote:

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

Hi On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 12/09/2014 07:36 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > >> >> Not the way I took it. I installed it, thinking it was a graphical >> interface for yum. >> > > It is a graphical interface for yum, but I gather that when dnf is ready, > yumex will use

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 12/09/2014 07:36 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: Not the way I took it. I installed it, thinking it was a graphical interface for yum. It is a graphical interface for yum, but I gather that when dnf is ready, yumex will use it instead. I don't think that it can do everything that yum does, su

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 00:58 +0100, poma wrote: > On 09.12.2014 23:49, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 15:25 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > >> > >> My vote: some ability to install whatev

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 22:57 +, Ian Malone wrote: > On 9 December 2014 at 22:46, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > >> > >> On 12/09/2014 12:25 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > >>>

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 14:50 -0800, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 20:46 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 18:55 +, Bill Oliver wrote: > > > So you really mean Fedora 14? I don't think that's supported, though > > > I may be wrong. > > > > Nothing ea

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 09.12.2014 23:49, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 15:25 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> >> >> Hi >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: >> >> My vote: some ability to install whatever is available in the >> repositories, without having to ju

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 10.12.2014 00:47, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 12/09/2014 02:57 PM, Ian Malone wrote: >> This is just a guess, but looks like Joe thought you were suggesting >> using yumex to search for a graphical interface. > > No, I misread what he wrote and thought he was saying that yumex wasn't > a GUI. > "GU

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 12/09/2014 02:57 PM, Ian Malone wrote: This is just a guess, but looks like Joe thought you were suggesting using yumex to search for a graphical interface. No, I misread what he wrote and thought he was saying that yumex wasn't a GUI. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

Hi On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Ian Malone wrote: > > This is just a guess, but looks like Joe thought you were suggesting > using yumex to search for a graphical interface > Ah, I see. I was suggesting that the user either use the command line (ie) dnf or yum directly or use yumex if the us

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 9 December 2014 at 22:46, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: >> >> On 12/09/2014 12:25 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: >>> >>> __ >>> My vote: some ability to install whatever is availab

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 15:25 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > Hi > > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > > My vote: some ability to install whatever is available in the > repositories, without having to jump all over the place to > find stuff. >

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 20:46 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 18:55 +, Bill Oliver wrote: > > So you really mean Fedora 14? I don't think that's supported, though > > I may be wrong. > > Nothing earlier than F19 is supported, and in a month or so F19 won't be > either

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

Hi On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 12/09/2014 12:25 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: >> >> __ >> My vote: some ability to install whatever is available in the >> repositories, without having to jump all over the

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:46:17PM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > So you really mean Fedora 14? I don't think that's supported, though > > I may be wrong. > Nothing earlier than F19 is supported, and in a month or so F19 won't be > either, judging from historical practice. Judging from pol

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 18:55 +, Bill Oliver wrote: > So you really mean Fedora 14? I don't think that's supported, though > I may be wrong. Nothing earlier than F19 is supported, and in a month or so F19 won't be either, judging from historical practice. poc -- users mailing list users@list

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On 12/09/2014 12:25 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: __ My vote: some ability to install whatever is available in the repositories, without having to jump all over the place to find stuff. Either command line or yumex for a graphical

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

Hi On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > My vote: some ability to install whatever is available in the > repositories, without having to jump all over the place to find stuff. > Either command line or yumex for a graphical interface can help with that Rahul -- users mailing

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 14:58 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:07:11AM -0800, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > > So, how do I discover what's in the standard repositories? Yes, I used > > Software Center, thinking everything would be there. > > There's been some debate around this.

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:07:11AM -0800, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > So, how do I discover what's in the standard repositories? Yes, I used > Software Center, thinking everything would be there. There's been some debate around this. The idea is that the Software Center is focused on showing the most

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 18:55 +, Bill Oliver wrote: > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > > > Just downloaded the .iso and installed it on my desktop. Really nice! > > > > The repositories seem to be a bit limited, though. No Chrome or Chromium, > > but I've installed it directly fro

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 13:50 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:42:48AM -0800, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > > The repositories seem to be a bit limited, though. No Chrome or > > Chromium, but I've installed it directly from Google's download page. > > > Chrome isn't open source

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Jeffrey Needle wrote: Just downloaded the .iso and installed it on my desktop.  Really nice! The repositories seem to be a bit limited, though.  No Chrome or Chromium, but I've installed it directly from Google's download page.  And I need the program gpart in order to atte

Re: Questions about Fedora 14 Workstation

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:42:48AM -0800, Jeffrey Needle wrote: > The repositories seem to be a bit limited, though. No Chrome or > Chromium, but I've installed it directly from Google's download page. Chrome isn't open source, and Chromium is a difficult case. See

Re: questions on package management

On 07/13/2013 07:42 PM, lee wrote: "Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes: On 07/13/2013 10:07 AM, lee wrote: "Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes: On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote: Another question: It is possible to have version 1 and version 2 of package A installed at the same time, like version 1

Re: questions on package management

Kevin Fenzi writes: > On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:27:52 +0200 > lee wrote: > >> Yes, this situation was the result of an upgrade that didn't finish. >> Are you saying that 'yum list installed' doesn't really tell you what >> is actually installed and you need to use 'rpm -V' instead? >> >> What are

Re: questions on package management

"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes: > On 07/13/2013 10:07 AM, lee wrote: >> "Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes: >> >>> On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote: Another question: It is possible to have version 1 and version 2 of package A installed at the same time, like version 1 from Fedora 17 and

Re: questions on package management

On 07/13/2013 10:07 AM, lee wrote: "Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes: On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote: Another question: It is possible to have version 1 and version 2 of package A installed at the same time, like version 1 from Fedora 17 and version 2 from Fedora 18. Imagine this package A p

Re: questions on package management

On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:27:52 +0200 lee wrote: > Assuming that package A doesn't work with the more recent version of > package C? Right, that was my assumption. If it does, then it would just update them all. ...snip... > Yes, this situation was the result of an upgrade that didn't finish. >

Re: questions on package management

Kevin Fenzi writes: > On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 03:11:20 +0200 > lee wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> imagine you have the following: >> >> >> package A, depends on C, installed >> package B, depends on C, not installed >> package C, installed >> >> >> All the packages are version 1. After a while, you ins

Re: questions on package management

"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes: > On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote: >> Another question: It is possible to have version 1 and version 2 of >> package A installed at the same time, like version 1 from Fedora 17 and >> version 2 from Fedora 18. Imagine this package A provides a file >> '/bin/ls'.

Re: questions on package management

On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 03:11:20 +0200 lee wrote: > Hi, > > imagine you have the following: > > > package A, depends on C, installed > package B, depends on C, not installed > package C, installed > > > All the packages are version 1. After a while, you install package B, > and in the meantime,

Re: questions on package management

On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote: Hi, imagine you have the following: package A, depends on C, installed package B, depends on C, not installed package C, installed All the packages are version 1. After a while, you install package B, and in the meantime, package B has been updated to vers

Re: questions about f-16

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:06:25 +0100, François Patte wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Bonjour, > > 1- I am wondering if I have any chances to use my gnome-2 config if I > install f-16 on my computers. I can't believe that developpers do not > care about backward c

Re: questions about f-16

On Monday 13 February 2012 12:51:57 François Patte wrote: > Le 13/02/2012 11:55, Marko Vojinovic a écrit : > > On Monday 13 February 2012 10:06:25 François Patte wrote: > >> 2- Are there LTSP packages in f-16 > > > > [root@Yoda ~]# yum search ltsp > > [snip] > > = >

  1   2   >