On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 08:10 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 8/30/20 3:01 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> > Samuel,
> > 
> > 
> > On 2020-08-30 17:12, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > On 8/30/20 12:07 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> > > > that it would take weeks!  So unless someone can suggest a faster 
> > > > method of fixing the partition (mainly just as an exercise now) or at 
> > > > least just working out what is wrong with it, I guess I will just have 
> > > > to re-create the partition?
> > > 
> > > Since you have a very recent full backup, I would recommend just
> > > reformatting the partition.  If the damage is that extensive, it's not
> > > worth trying to fix it.
> > 
> > You are probably right - it would be an interesting exercise if it could be 
> > done though . .
> 
> There is no point in even trying. "Multiply claimed blocks" is an 
> unrecoverable situation. Sure, each block can be cloned to give each file its 
> own copy. The filesystem will now be consistent, but the some files will have 
> corrupted content. Only one of those files (probably the newest one) claiming 
> the block will hold its correct data. It's the job of _fsck_ to make the 
> filesystem consistent, and not necessarily to preserve user data in the 
> process. Having a consistent filesystem with corrupted file content is 
> arguably a worse situation than a filesystem with known, detectable 
> corruption.

I always used to tell people that "an empty filesystem is consistent".

poc
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to