On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 08:10 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 8/30/20 3:01 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: > > Samuel, > > > > > > On 2020-08-30 17:12, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > On 8/30/20 12:07 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: > > > > that it would take weeks! So unless someone can suggest a faster > > > > method of fixing the partition (mainly just as an exercise now) or at > > > > least just working out what is wrong with it, I guess I will just have > > > > to re-create the partition? > > > > > > Since you have a very recent full backup, I would recommend just > > > reformatting the partition. If the damage is that extensive, it's not > > > worth trying to fix it. > > > > You are probably right - it would be an interesting exercise if it could be > > done though . . > > There is no point in even trying. "Multiply claimed blocks" is an > unrecoverable situation. Sure, each block can be cloned to give each file its > own copy. The filesystem will now be consistent, but the some files will have > corrupted content. Only one of those files (probably the newest one) claiming > the block will hold its correct data. It's the job of _fsck_ to make the > filesystem consistent, and not necessarily to preserve user data in the > process. Having a consistent filesystem with corrupted file content is > arguably a worse situation than a filesystem with known, detectable > corruption.
I always used to tell people that "an empty filesystem is consistent". poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org