Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

On 26/05/2021 16:15, Frank Elsner via users wrote: Hi, I'm a podcaster and therefore I need a functional audio environment. Currently I use pulseaudio on a Fedora 33 system. Works for me. Will this also work if I upgrade to Fedora 34? Is there an equivalent to pavucontrol? I need it to adjust

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

On 29/05/2021 15:31, George N. White III wrote: On Sat, 29 May 2021 at 11:00, Steve Underwood > wrote: > [...] When I upgraded from F32 to F33 pulseaudio changed from something with a few quirks, to something very troublesome. The main issue was I

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

On Sat, 29 May 2021 at 11:00, Steve Underwood wrote: > > [...] > When I upgraded from F32 to F33 pulseaudio changed from something with a > few quirks, to something very troublesome. The main issue was I had to > restart pulseaudio several times after logging in before it would > actually find my

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

On 26/05/2021 09:15, Frank Elsner via users wrote: Hi, I'm a podcaster and therefore I need a functional audio environment. Currently I use pulseaudio on a Fedora 33 system. Works for me. Will this also work if I upgrade to Fedora 34? Is there an equivalent to pavucontrol? I need it to adjust

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

to, 2021-05-27 kello 23:43 +0300, Matti Pulkkinen kirjoitti: > The improved: > I would also sometimes get this weird problem where the > output was selected correctly, and the meter was moving when audio > was > being output, but nothing could be heard through the headphones. I've > experienced non

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

On Wed, 26 May 2021 10:15:39 +0200 Frank Elsner via users wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a podcaster and therefore I need a functional audio environment. > Currently I use pulseaudio on a Fedora 33 system. Works for me. > > Will this also work if I upgrade to Fedora 34? > > Is there an equivalent to pavuc

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

On Thu, 2021-05-27 at 10:08 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > I don't do any exotic audio usage, but the only difference > I've seen is that it no longer takes audio a second or two > to start working again if I pause a youtube video for a while > then come back later and start it up again. I used to alw

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

ke, 2021-05-26 kello 10:15 +0200, Frank Elsner via users kirjoitti: > Hi, > > I'm a podcaster and therefore I need a functional audio environment. > Currently I use pulseaudio on a Fedora 33 system. Works for me. > > Will this also work if I upgrade to Fedora 34? > > Is there an equivalent to pa

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

Yes, either pulseaudio or pipewire can be installed, from my history: 1137 | install pulseaudio-module-bluetooth --allowerasing | 2021-05-19 14:33 | E, I |2 1136 | install pulseaudio --allowerasing | 2021-05-19 14:32 | E, I |3 EE On Thu, May 27,

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

On Thu, 27 May 2021 16:21:24 +0300 Kseniya Blashchuk wrote: > I use pulseaudio at the moment with fedora 34, tried pipewire but had much > headache with bluetooth headphones. However I should admit that HSP/HFP > profile started working with pipewire (did not work with pulseaudio at > all). Still i

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

On Thu, 27 May 2021 14:04:28 +0100 Tethys wrote: > I'd also say that they've significantly heavier weight than pulseaudio > was. Between then, pipewire and pipewire-pulse are consistently using > 10% of my available CPU time between them, which is insane. I just tried playing a youtube video whil

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

I use pulseaudio at the moment with fedora 34, tried pipewire but had much headache with bluetooth headphones. However I should admit that HSP/HFP profile started working with pipewire (did not work with pulseaudio at all). Still it is quite unstable, so I had to switch back to pulseaudio and use i

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

On Thu, 27 May 2021 14:04:28 +0100 Tethys wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 4:19 PM Tethys wrote: > > > I've had mixed success. pavucontrol continues to work. However, > > alsamixer and amixer (both of which I relied on in various places) > > don't. The switch to pipewire has not been a pleasant e

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 4:19 PM Tethys wrote: > I've had mixed success. pavucontrol continues to work. However, > alsamixer and amixer (both of which I relied on in various places) > don't. The switch to pipewire has not been a pleasant experience for > me. I'd also say that they've significantl

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 9:16 AM Frank Elsner via users wrote: > Is there an equivalent to pavucontrol? I need it to adjust > the level of my external audio interface? > > I'm heavy interested in any experience - especially pitfalls - before > I start the upgrade. I've had mixed success. pavucont

Re: pulseaudio -> pipewire

On 26/05/2021 16:15, Frank Elsner via users wrote: Hi, I'm a podcaster and therefore I need a functional audio environment. Currently I use pulseaudio on a Fedora 33 system. Works for me. Will this also work if I upgrade to Fedora 34? Is there an equivalent to pavucontrol? I need it to adjust

Re: pulseaudio over network

On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 17:15 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > I didn't want to get specific as it's not a use case for many others > outside of ham radio. Digital communications with ham radio is done > with a sound card and the audio is sent to the radio and transmitted > over the air where it is then

Re: pulseaudio over network

On 7/7/20 3:15 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I didn't want to get specific as it's not a use case for many others outside of ham radio. Digital communications with ham radio is done with a sound card and the audio is sent to the radio and transmitted over the air where it is then captured and interpr

Re: pulseaudio over network

On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 5:09 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 7/7/20 2:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I plan on doing a demonstration for an Emergency Management meeting and > > I need to have two computers cross connected via audio. > > > > Ideally this would be between two sound cards but laptops with

Re: pulseaudio over network

On 7/7/20 2:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I plan on doing a demonstration for an Emergency Management meeting and I need to have two computers cross connected via audio. Ideally this would be between two sound cards but laptops with a single 3.5mm audio jack seem to be problematic. I've ordered a

Re: Sound-setup with alsa and pulseaudio [was: Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!]

On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 20:43:07 -0800 Mike Wright wrote: > On 11/24/2017 01:02 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > Doug, Philip, and Everyone > > > > I started a new thread with the quotes below to make > > sure to not hijack the thread where they were taken from ... > > > > Short version: > > The wh

Re: Sound-setup with alsa and pulseaudio [was: Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!]

On 11/24/2017 01:02 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: Doug, Philip, and Everyone I started a new thread with the quotes below to make sure to not hijack the thread where they were taken from ... Short version: The whole thing isn't that important - if in doubt, ignore it ... :) The main reason I wro

Re: Sound-setup with alsa and pulseaudio [was: Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!]

On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 07:32:53 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: > On 11/25/17 05:02, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > >[ ... ] namely to feed > > sound on a Linux machine to two audio systems at the same time: to > > internal speakers on the computer and to external ones like, e.g., > > those in a TV, via HDMI.

Re: Sound-setup with alsa and pulseaudio [was: Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!]

On 11/25/17 05:02, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > Doug, Philip, and Everyone > > I started a new thread with the quotes below to make > sure to not hijack the thread where they were taken from ... > > Short version: > The whole thing isn't that important - if in doubt, ignore it ... :) > The main reaso

Re: Sound-setup with alsa and pulseaudio [was: Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!]

On 11/24/2017 04:02 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: Doug, Philip, and Everyone I started a new thread with the quotes below to make sure to not hijack the thread where they were taken from ... Short version: The whole thing isn't that important - if in doubt, ignore it ... :) The main reason I wr

Sound-setup with alsa and pulseaudio [was: Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!]

Doug, Philip, and Everyone I started a new thread with the quotes below to make sure to not hijack the thread where they were taken from ... Short version: The whole thing isn't that important - if in doubt, ignore it ... :) The main reason I wrote this email is plain and simple curiosity about w

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:09:07 -0500 Tom Horsley wrote: > On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:49:17 -0500 > Doug wrote: > > > It may take some serious fiddling > > around with the possibilities in PA > > My most annoying PA experience was it doing something > a bit like that all by itself. All I did was app

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:49:17 -0500 Doug wrote: > It may take some serious fiddling > around with the possibilities in PA My most annoying PA experience was it doing something a bit like that all by itself. All I did was apply updates one day, and suddenly only about half the media apps on my syst

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On 11/23/2017 07:04 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: On 11/23/17, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/23/2017 01:59 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: I ended up removing pulseaudio but couldn't get alsa to work either, so I now have a sound-less system just like in my AMD 386 running OS/2 back in 1993 before the Sou

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:59:15 -0300 Fernando Cassia wrote: > Where do I sign?. Unfortunately I have a LinuxMINT system w AMD APU > and where audio over HDMI never actually worked. > > I purchased three cheap USB Sound adapters in the hope of getting > audio out that way, but I don't get sound fro

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:14:37 -0500 "David A. De Graaf" wrote: > By fine, I mean, for example, that scripts that generate sound can be > invoked by any user, in any environment:  In /etc/rc.d/rc.local > during boot by root, in a plain text terminal, in an X window by any > user, including root,

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:04:51 -0300 Fernando Cassia wrote: > If there's something like that, I'd like to know about it. There is pacmd which has the world's most obscure interface but does allow you to do things like change the output device (once you spend 2 hours decrypting how to use it). It i

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On 11/23/17, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 11/23/2017 01:59 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >> I ended up removing pulseaudio but couldn't get alsa to work either, >> so I now have a sound-less system just like in my AMD 386 running OS/2 >> back in 1993 before the SoundBlaster 16 arrived. > > If ALSA isn't w

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

Wolfgang, Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:07:08 +0100 From: Wolfgang Pfeiffer Subject: Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE! To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Message-ID: <20171123210708.26f09cb4@aw17> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 20:02:47 +0100 Wolfgang Pfeiffer

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On 11/23/2017 01:59 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: I ended up removing pulseaudio but couldn't get alsa to work either, so I now have a sound-less system just like in my AMD 386 running OS/2 back in 1993 before the SoundBlaster 16 arrived. If ALSA isn't working, then PulseAudio won't either since i

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On 11/22/17, David A. De Graaf wrote: > Sound now works perfectly - just the way it should. > I cannot discern any important loss of function from the deleted 34 > packages so far. aplay, vlc, xmms, mythfrontend and even > skypeforlinux all work fine with alsa. > > pulseaudio should just go away

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On 11/23/2017 08:14 AM, David A. De Graaf wrote: By fine, I mean, for example, that scripts that generate sound can be invoked by any user, in any environment:  In /etc/rc.d/rc.local during boot by root, in a plain text terminal, in an X window by any user, including root, in a crontab job run

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 20:02:47 +0100 Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 20:10:19 -0500 > Doug wrote: > > > On 11/22/2017 05:36 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote: > > > [ ... ] > > > > > > Today I held an exorcism and have slain the damned thing: > > > dnf remove pulseaudio > > > whic

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 20:10:19 -0500 Doug wrote: > On 11/22/2017 05:36 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote: > > pulseaudio became unusable on F26 with the upgrade to vers 11.1.2 a > > few weeks ago. It rapidly filled the log files with trash - and > > produced no sound. > > By using dnf downgrade "*puls

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On 11/22/17 21:59, Tim wrote: Allegedly, on or about 22 November 2017, David A. De Graaf sent: I've fought with this miserable pulseaudio creation for several years, trying to get sound to work *properly*, but this is the last straw. I can't say I've had any real problems with it. I used to ha

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On 11/22/17 19:38, Sam Varshavchik wrote: David A. De Graaf writes: Today I held an exorcism and have slain the damned thing:     dnf remove pulseaudio which, amazingly, took out 34 packages. Sound now works perfectly - just the way it should. I cannot discern any important loss of function fr

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

Allegedly, on or about 22 November 2017, David A. De Graaf sent: > I've fought with this miserable pulseaudio creation for several > years, trying to get sound to work *properly*, but this is the > last straw. I can't say I've had any real problems with it. I used to have lots of problems with wh

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On 11/22/2017 05:36 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote: pulseaudio became unusable on F26 with the upgrade to vers 11.1.2 a few weeks ago. It rapidly filled the log files with trash - and produced no sound. By using dnf downgrade "*pulseaudio*"I was able to restore sanity. Yesterday I freshly i

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

David A. De Graaf writes: Today I held an exorcism and have slain the damned thing:     dnf remove pulseaudio which, amazingly, took out 34 packages. Sound now works perfectly - just the way it should. I cannot discern any important loss of function from the deleted 34 packages so far.  aplay,

Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!

On 11/23/17 06:36, David A. De Graaf wrote: > pulseaudio became unusable on F26 with the upgrade to vers 11.1.2 a few > weeks ago.  It rapidly filled the log files with trash - and produced > no sound. > By using   dnf downgrade "*pulseaudio*"    I was able to restore sanity. > > Yesterday I freshl

{SOLVED] Re: Pulseaudio: Hardware Routing

On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 18:00:38 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: [ ... ] > The server /usr/bin/pulseaudio isn't started at boot time. It is a user > process that > is started at user login. So, rc.local would not be an appropriate place for > that > command for that reason. > > You may want to try p

Re: Pulseaudio: Hardware Routing

On 06/30/2017 12:01 AM, Frank Elsner wrote: Hello, Hi, BTW, rc.local doesnt't work. When rc.local was taken over by systemd a little hitch was added. From "/lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service" # This unit gets pulled automatically into multi-user.target by # systemd-rc-local-generator

Re: Pulseaudio: Hardware Routing

On 06/30/17 15:01, Frank Elsner wrote: > for reasons I have to send the input from an audio interface to an other. > > I can do this with > >pactl load-module module-loopback \ > > source="alsa_input.usb-Burr-Brown_from_TI_USB_Audio_CODEC-00.analog-stereo" \ >sink="alsa_output.usb-M-AUD

Re: PulseAudio

On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 21:44:34 +0100 Richard Ibbotson wrote: > > Ok, so either you haven't loaded the necessary kernel module for > > your sound card (the modules typically have the text "snd" in their > > name) or your sound card went bye-bye. Try "lspci | grep -i audio" > > and see what you get.

Re: PulseAudio

> Ok, so either you haven't loaded the necessary kernel module for > your sound card (the modules typically have the text "snd" in their > name) or your sound card went bye-bye. Try "lspci | grep -i audio" > and see what you get. On my desktop (with several physical sound > devices) https://ask.fe

Re: PulseAudio

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:02:32 +0100 Richard Ibbotson wrote: > On Friday 25 March 2016 14:01:32 Stan wrote: > > > While you're at it run > > aplay -lL > > It says > > aplay -lL train-door-close-2a-no-beeping.wav > null > Discard all samples (playback) or generate zero samples (capture

Re: PulseAudio

On Monday 28 March 2016 14:21:45 Rick Stevens wrote: > > PulseAudio Sound Server > > > > aplay: device_list:268: no soundcards found. > > Ok, so either you haven't loaded the necessary kernel module for > your sound card (the modules typically have the text "snd" in their > name) or your s

Re: PulseAudio

On 03/28/2016 02:02 PM, Richard Ibbotson wrote: On Friday 25 March 2016 14:01:32 Stan wrote: While you're at it run aplay -lL It says aplay -lL train-door-close-2a-no-beeping.wav null Discard all samples (playback) or generate zero samples (capture) jack JACK Audio Connection K

Re: PulseAudio

On Friday 25 March 2016 14:01:32 Stan wrote: > While you're at it run > aplay -lL It says aplay -lL train-door-close-2a-no-beeping.wav null Discard all samples (playback) or generate zero samples (capture) jack JACK Audio Connection Kit pulse PulseAudio Sound Server aplay: devic

Re: PulseAudio

On 03/25/2016 03:21 PM, Richard Ibbotson wrote: After running 'pacmd list-sinks' I can see 1 sink(s) available. * index: 0 name: driver: AFAIK, this is not standard. Have you customized PulseAudio in any way? You may try renaming ~/.pulse (to ~/.pulse-old) and insurin

Re: PulseAudio

On 03/25/2016 12:49 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 03/25/2016 06:58 AM, Richard Ibbotson wrote: On Friday 25 March 2016 09:41:05 Daniel J Walsh wrote: What avcs are you seeing ausearch -m avc -ts recent Well, that just about proves that SELinux isn't involved, doesn't it? Well maybe. Could yo

Re: PulseAudio

On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:20:46 + Richard Ibbotson wrote: > I know a lot of people don't like PulseAudio but that's what comes That's so 5 years ago. ;-) > PulseAudio has ceased > to work properly. Do you have a wav file available. If not, just grab one off the web. Then run the command a

Re: PulseAudio

On 03/25/2016 01:21 PM, Richard Ibbotson wrote: On Friday 25 March 2016 14:05:24 Tom Horsley wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:20:46 + The command line pactl interface, however, worked flawlessly and I was able to change setting that way (after figuring out the obscure syntax). Not that this

Re: PulseAudio

On Friday 25 March 2016 14:05:24 Tom Horsley wrote: > On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:20:46 + > The command line pactl interface, however, worked flawlessly > and I was able to change setting that way (after figuring out > the obscure syntax). > > After a few week, the gnome control panel started work

Re: PulseAudio

On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:20:46 + Richard Ibbotson wrote: > I've seen this somewhere before but can't find it on the internet with > a search. I don't know if this is the same problem I had or not, but for several weeks, the gnome-control-panel "sound" settings would not work for me to change d

Re: PulseAudio

On 03/25/2016 06:58 AM, Richard Ibbotson wrote: On Friday 25 March 2016 09:41:05 Daniel J Walsh wrote: What avcs are you seeing ausearch -m avc -ts recent Well, that just about proves that SELinux isn't involved, doesn't it? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscri

Re: PulseAudio

On Friday 25 March 2016 09:41:05 Daniel J Walsh wrote: > What avcs are you seeing > > ausearch -m avc -ts recent -- Richard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of

Re: PulseAudio

On 03/25/2016 09:20 AM, Richard Ibbotson wrote: Hi I know a lot of people don't like PulseAudio but that's what comes with Fedora 23. My problem is this. After a dnf update I find that selinux has done something it didn't do before. PulseAudio has ceased to work properly. I'm looking at a dumm

Re: pulseaudio-equalizer

On 08/09/2015 01:51 AM, François Patte wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 09/08/2015 01:02, Ed Greshko a écrit : On 08/09/15 06:11, Rex Dieter wrote: Ed Greshko wrote: On 08/09/15 01:19, François Patte wrote: I tried to use pulseaudio-equalizer, but if I launch it the

Re: pulseaudio-equalizer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/09/15 15:51, François Patte wrote: > Not for me. Same behaviour: I try to adjust the equalizer and > immediately the soud stops! I have to kill pulseaudio, then to restart > it Try deleting the ~/.pulse directory and ~/pulse-cookie file

Re: pulseaudio-equalizer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 09/08/2015 01:02, Ed Greshko a écrit : > On 08/09/15 06:11, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Ed Greshko wrote: >> >>> On 08/09/15 01:19, François Patte wrote: I tried to use pulseaudio-equalizer, but if I launch it the sound no more work on my comput

Re: pulseaudio-equalizer

On 08/09/15 06:11, Rex Dieter wrote: > Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 08/09/15 01:19, François Patte wrote: >>> I tried to use pulseaudio-equalizer, but if I launch it the sound no >>> more work on my computer Is there a special configuration to >>> perform to use it? >> All I can do at this moment

Re: pulseaudio-equalizer

Ed Greshko wrote: > On 08/09/15 01:19, François Patte wrote: >> I tried to use pulseaudio-equalizer, but if I launch it the sound no >> more work on my computer Is there a special configuration to >> perform to use it? > > All I can do at this moment is to confirm your findings. > > I use KD

Re: pulseaudio-equalizer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/09/15 01:19, François Patte wrote: > I tried to use pulseaudio-equalizer, but if I launch it the sound no > more work on my computer Is there a special configuration to > perform to use it? All I can do at this moment is to confirm your fin

Re: Pulseaudio volume control crashes sound

On 05/11/2014 12:42 PM, Paul Cartwright issued this missive: I was trying to make a call on skype, and they couldn't hear me ( I guess I need to plug in a microphone;-) but in the process I ran the PA volume control, or tried to. It started, brought up a window saying something like " trying to t

Re: pulseaudio using cpu?

On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:07:50 -0400 Tom Horsley wrote: > Does anyone know why top says pulseaudio is using > 1.7% of the cpu doing nothing at all? AARGH! Something else to track down and drive a stake into! Looking at the sound control center, I see 5 copies of "speech-dispatcher" claiming to be

Re: pulseaudio using cpu?

On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 08:39:02 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: > I don't know why I said ptracemust be distracted watching March > Madness. :-) Well, ptrace is the name of the system service that strace uses :-). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscr

Re: pulseaudio using cpu?

On 03/23/14 08:35, Ed Greshko wrote: > Maybe you can use something like strace or ptrace to see what is up to? I don't know why I said ptracemust be distracted watching March Madness. :-) -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lis

Re: pulseaudio using cpu?

On 03/23/14 08:07, Tom Horsley wrote: > Nothing is playing any sound on my system at the > moment. > > Does anyone know why top says pulseaudio is using > 1.7% of the cpu doing nothing at all? Don't know top -p for my system shows... PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM

Re: PulseAudio in restricted X environment

On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:03:14 AM Eric Viseur wrote: > Just solved it, a much easier way. Thanks you for your advices, I directed > me to taking a closer look to the logs. It lead me to discover that PA > indeed started, but actually couldn't reach the sound card. > > What I did was simply

Re: PulseAudio in restricted X environment

Just solved it, a much easier way. Thanks you for your advices, I directed me to taking a closer look to the logs. It lead me to discover that PA indeed started, but actually couldn't reach the sound card. What I did was simply add my lowpriv user to the group audio, then start PulseAudio, unmut

Re: PulseAudio in restricted X environment

On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 04:01:47 PM Eric Viseur wrote: > I'm currently working on a virtualization project using F18. One of the use > cases is booting on the multi-user systemd target, then starting the Spice > client in a very restricted X environment by simply issuing > > $ xinit /usr/bin/sp

Re: PulseAudio in restricted X environment

Eric Viseur wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently working on a virtualization project using F18. One of the > use cases is booting on the multi-user systemd target, then starting the > Spice client in a very restricted X environment by simply issuing > > *$ xinit /usr/bin/spicec (some parameters)* >

Re: PulseAudio in restricted X environment

Sadly the daemon refuses to start. When started from console without the log-level=0, the daemon seems to start, but I still can't get any sound out of the box. Eric Viseur 2013/7/9 Reindl Harald > > > Am 09.07.2013 16:01, schrieb Eric Viseur: > > I'm currently working on a virtualization pro

Re: PulseAudio in restricted X environment

Am 09.07.2013 16:01, schrieb Eric Viseur: > I'm currently working on a virtualization project using F18. One of the use > cases is booting on the multi-user > systemd target, then starting the Spice client in a very restricted X > environment by simply issuing > > /$ xinit /usr/bin/spicec (so

Re: pulseaudio multiple outputs?

On 23.06.2013 15:56, Tom Horsley wrote: … > Can I have my normal system beeps and wot-not > going to HDMI, but tell mplayer to output to > the S/PDIF output? If so, anyone have any > examples of the syntax I need to use on the > mplayer command line? man 1 mplayer - pulse poma -- users mailin

Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:29 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote: > I've discovered a solution. It is now necessary to remove two > packages: > > alsa-plugins-pulseaudio > alsa-plugins-maemo You just saved me a lot of time. I was fighting the same issue the other night. I deleted these package

Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:53:15AM +0100, Ian Malone wrote: > On 30 June 2012 08:41, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > On 06/30/2012 03:53 AM, suvayu ali wrote: > > > >> I thought it solved the problem of multiple applications play some > >> sound simultaneously on the same device? It's not as rare as you

Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

On 30 June 2012 08:41, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 06/30/2012 03:53 AM, suvayu ali wrote: > >> I thought it solved the problem of multiple applications play some >> sound simultaneously on the same device? It's not as rare as you might >> think; a voip call while you are listening to music for exam

Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

On 06/30/2012 03:53 AM, suvayu ali wrote: > I thought it solved the problem of multiple applications play some > sound simultaneously on the same device? It's not as rare as you might > think; a voip call while you are listening to music for example. That was already solved by alsa dmix. --

Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: > Pulseaudio has always struck me as a solution looking for a problem and > failing to find one. I thought it solved the problem of multiple applications play some sound simultaneously on the same device? It's not as rare as you might think; a voi

Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

On 06/29/2012 03:31 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: Security. If it can't be used it can't be misused. If it can't be used, it's worthless. Pulseaudio has always struck me as a solution looking for a problem and failing to find one. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscri

Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

Am 30.06.2012 00:31, schrieb Bill Davidsen: > Robert Arkiletian wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:22 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote: >>> Does anyone know how to allow root and users other than me to use the >>> sound system? >>> >>> Ever since pulseaudio was introduced in Fedora 8 and Mr. Lennar

Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

Robert Arkiletian wrote: On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:22 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote: Does anyone know how to allow root and users other than me to use the sound system? Ever since pulseaudio was introduced in Fedora 8 and Mr. Lennart Poettering inflicted his peculiar ideas of security on us, th

Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:59:30PM -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/27/2012 10:57 AM, David A. De Graaf wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 08:24:05PM -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > >> You may want to look into running PA as a sys

Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/27/2012 10:57 AM, David A. De Graaf wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 08:24:05PM -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: >> You may want to look into running PA as a system daemon instead of a >> user daemon. > > I have done so, and it didn't work. Spe

Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 08:24:05PM -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/26/2012 02:22 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote: > > Does anyone know how to allow root and users other than me to use the > > sound system? > > > > Ever since pulseaudio w

Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:22 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote: > Does anyone know how to allow root and users other than me to use the > sound system? > > Ever since pulseaudio was introduced in Fedora 8 and Mr. Lennart > Poettering inflicted his peculiar ideas of security on us, the default > install

Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/26/2012 02:22 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote: > Does anyone know how to allow root and users other than me to use the > sound system? > > Ever since pulseaudio was introduced in Fedora 8 and Mr. Lennart > Poettering inflicted his peculiar ideas of

Re: pulseaudio command line control?

On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:17:49 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > pasuspender -- ./tdmlauncher.linux > > The double hyphen is important! That would probably work, but I finally searched for the right phrase and got a hit on "pacmd". Looks like I can feed it commands to set the profile of some card to "off

Re: pulseaudio command line control?

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > By running "gnome-control-center sound" I can get a GUI app > in which I can set a device profile to "off" so that pulse > will stop fooling with it, and I am then free to talk to > it directly with alsa to do special things like ac3 > passthrou

Re: Pulseaudio 40% of CPU

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:36:54PM -0700, JD wrote: > On 10/25/2010 10:26 PM, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:45:03AM -0700, JD wrote: > >>On 10/25/2010 04:11 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > >>> On Monday, October 25, 2010 04:39:53 JD wrote: > On 10/24/2010 08:28 P

Re: Pulseaudio 40% of CPU

On 10/25/2010 10:26 PM, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:45:03AM -0700, JD wrote: >>On 10/25/2010 04:11 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: >>> On Monday, October 25, 2010 04:39:53 JD wrote: On 10/24/2010 08:28 PM, JD wrote: > --- snip --- > No matter what we think

Re: Pulseaudio 40% of CPU

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:45:03AM -0700, JD wrote: > On 10/25/2010 04:11 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > On Monday, October 25, 2010 04:39:53 JD wrote: > >>On 10/24/2010 08:28 PM, JD wrote: > >>> --- snip --- > >>> No matter what we think of flash, pulseaudio is not a product > >>> of the fla

Re: Pulseaudio 40% of CPU

On 10/25/2010 04:11 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Monday, October 25, 2010 04:39:53 JD wrote: >>On 10/24/2010 08:28 PM, JD wrote: >>> --- snip --- >>> No matter what we think of flash, pulseaudio is not a product >>> of the flash plugin. It is a free and opensource linux product. >>> I just

  1   2   >