Upon looking back to when I first started finding an interest in Linux,
the biggest "problem" I had?..was deciding WHICH distro to install!
There were TONS of them!from the Debian & Debian-based, to the Gnome
styles, to the KDE'sLXDE'sLXFCE etc. I finally figured out that
KDE wa
Am 07.07.2012 16:47, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> On 07/07/12 14:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> The tread is about _Fedora_
>>
>> you refuse to understand what i am saying
>>
>> Fedora is NOT relevant because the point is how to run
>> ANY FREE operating system (Linux, BSD, OpenSolaris, Whatever)
>
> T
On 08/07/12 19:09, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 08.07.2012, Roger wrote:
Microsoft caused Linux to happen.
Linus Torvalds caused Linux to happen, as a hobby and being
disappointed with minix..
Although, I reckon what came as a result of Linus Torvalds work happened
through devs getting together whi
On 08/07/12 19:09, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 08.07.2012, Roger wrote:
Microsoft caused Linux to happen.
Linus Torvalds caused Linux to happen, as a hobby and being
disappointed with minix..
Oops. Soribouthat.
Roger
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change sub
On 08.07.2012, Roger wrote:
> Microsoft caused Linux to happen.
Linus Torvalds caused Linux to happen, as a hobby and being
disappointed with minix..
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
On 08/07/12 15:52, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote:
On 07/08/2012 01:13 AM, Roger wrote:
My opinion.
so NO microsoft is not in any position to control the x86 market
I have been watching this thread with interest.
Conversation to date raises, for me, a number of points.
1. None of this would be
On 07/08/2012 01:13 AM, Roger wrote:
My opinion.
so NO microsoft is not in any position to control the x86 market
I have been watching this thread with interest.
Conversation to date raises, for me, a number of points.
1. None of this would be necessary if Microsoft produced quality,
secure
My opinion.
so NO microsoft is not in any position to control the x86 market
I have been watching this thread with interest.
Conversation to date raises, for me, a number of points.
1. None of this would be necessary if Microsoft produced quality, secure
operating systems in the first instanc
On 07/07/2012 11:37 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
so NO microsoft is not in any position to control the x86
market
if they try federal commissions and the european union are
the
first rember them on their own history (maybe you are not
^(remember)
aware of
because too young)
http://en.w
> so NO microsoft is not in any position to control the x86
> market
> if they try federal commissions and the european union are
> the
> first rember them on their own history (maybe you are not
^(remember)
> aware of
> because too young)
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v.
On 07/07/12 14:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
The tread is about _Fedora_
you refuse to understand what i am saying
Fedora is NOT relevant because the point is how to run
ANY FREE operating system (Linux, BSD, OpenSolaris, Whatever)
To you maybe:
The OP asked as per Subject:Fedora 18 and UEF
Am 07.07.2012 14:51, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> On 07/07/12 13:48, Reindl Harald wrote:
there is a big enough market with customers which will
make the pressure to the manufacturers to produce
recent hardware where you can urn off secure boot
>>>
>>> Verified Statistics please?
>>
>>
On 07/07/12 13:48, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.07.2012 14:45, schrieb Frank Murphy:
On 07/07/12 13:34, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.07.2012 14:19, schrieb Frank Murphy:
On 07/07/12 12:58, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
I think we are bigger enough to say no and buy only hardware compatible.
Not
13 matches
Mail list logo
