> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-
> boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Jim Duda
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:39 AM
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: fedora 17 yum update
>
> I did a fresh install of fedora 1
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 01:39:11PM -0400, Jim Duda wrote:
> I did a fresh install of fedora 17 a couple of months ago.
> I did yum update after the install.
> After almost two months, I don't have any new updates, which I find odd.
> I've done a yum clean all.
> package-cleanup --problems, orphans
Hi Jim,
This is because F17 has reached its EOL. Typically, FX's reach their
EOL one month after the release of F(X+2).
So, suggestion to you would be to upgrade.
Ranjan
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:39:11 -0400 Jim Duda wrote:
> I did a fresh install of fedora 17 a couple of months ago.
> I did yum
Steve wrote:
>
> Recently the F17 (x64) install on my Dell XPS 17 isn't waking up from
> the sleep state. I'm not sure if I'm invoking it to go into sleep or
> if its an inactivity induced sleep. Prior to recently, it always woke
> up from sleep without any issues.
>
> Furthermore, once in
Solved.
The correct keyword is pgsql_servers - with a 's' on the end.
Gary
On Tuesday 26 March 2013 11:16:32 Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I'm setting up a new server and trying to configure Exim. For the first
> time I'm trying to use Postgresql with it, so have installed the exim-pgsql
On 03/20/2013 11:35 PM, Frank Murphy issued this missive:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:00:30 -0700
Rick Stevens wrote:
"ifconfig eth0 up" does NOT invoke the DHCP client software needed
to get an IP from your DHCP server. The old "ifup eth0" should do
it, or run the dhclient app yourself (as root).
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:18:50 -0700
Joe Zeff wrote:
> If the IP is reserved, why not just set it to a static IP and be
> done with it? I don't know if it would help in this case, but it
> might simplify things. And, while I'm thinking about it, are there
> other machines set up the same way? If
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:00:30 -0700
Rick Stevens wrote:
> "ifconfig eth0 up" does NOT invoke the DHCP client software needed
> to get an IP from your DHCP server. The old "ifup eth0" should do
> it, or run the dhclient app yourself (as root).
>
> # ifconfig eth0 up
> # dhclient eth0
>
On 03/20/2013 12:07 PM, Frank Murphy issued this missive:
Have googled, and done all I can think
NIC works fine with F17-boot disc in rescue mode.
cat5 cables have been changed and work on other nodes.
Box normally gets it's reserved-ip from Dovado router.
Jumbo frames disabled on everything
#
On 03/20/2013 12:07 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
NIC works fine with F17-boot disc in rescue mode.
cat5 cables have been changed and work on other nodes.
Box normally gets it's reserved-ip from Dovado router.
Jumbo frames disabled on everything
If the IP is reserved, why not just set it to a static
On 02/03/2013 08:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
ls -lha -R/boot/
This is the command output:
/boot/:
total 75M
dr-xr-xr-x. 5 root root 4.0K Jan 27 17:01 .
dr-xr-xr-x. 18 root root 4.0K Feb 3 22:52 ..
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 120K Dec 18 09:20 config-3.6.11-1.fc17.x86_64
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root
>> I am having dual boot Winxp / Fedora 17. In winxp everything is working
>> fine.
>>
>> By mistake the "Shift key" was pressed for a long time, It displayed
>> to activate "sticky key". I clicked on "Activate" button blindly.
>> (As I was not aware of it)
>>
>> At that time keyboard of my lapt
Am 03.02.2013 06:29, schrieb Stephen Morris:
> Correct me if I am wrong, but I though grubby was for updating legacy grub,
> hence why is the process invoking
> grubby at all for a grub2 update?
because it just works how it is suspposed to work instead
mangling the cleaned up menu with grub2-mk
On 2/2/2013 8:36 AM, santosh wrote:
I am having dual boot Winxp / Fedora 17. In winxp everything is working fine.
By mistake the "Shift key" was pressed for a long time, It displayed
to activate "sticky key". I clicked on "Activate" button blindly.
(As I was not aware of it)
At that time keyb
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> First time to try to use wireless since installing F17. Connects, but
> doesn't succeed at authorizing. Keeps trying to authorize for several
> minutes, then gives up.
>
> /var/log/messages shows stuff like
>
> NetworkManager[483]: (wlan0): dev
Joel Rees wrote:
> First time to try to use wireless since installing F17. Connects, but
> doesn't succeed at authorizing. Keeps trying to authorize for several
> minutes, then gives up.
You could try right-clicking on the WiFi icon in the panel,
going to Network Management Settings, then Wireles
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Marc Blanc wrote:
> Le Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:30:49 +0100,
> Heinz Diehl a écrit :
>
>>I use emacs daily, and it's fast on my machine (F17).
>
> Idem with xemacs and WindowMaker on F17.
>
After a lot of testing it turned out that it wasn't Gnome 3, the Mac
or lack of
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:00:41PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> GNOME is not interested in their userbase and was never really
In your view.
> so use KDE which is after the 4.0 disaster now really fine again
> sad that the ignorant GNOME developers did not learn from what
> happened with KDE 4.0
On 12/30/2012 10:54 AM, Thomas Dineen wrote:
I am running the original unedited nfs file:
;
more /etc/sysconfig/nfs
#
sounds like old /etc/sysconfig/nfs file is messing up the NFS
server. rpc.idmapd
like stated on the article and howto in the following link. hope it
helps:-)
http:/
:
> On 12/29/2012 01:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > so use KDE which is after the 4.0 disaster now really fine again
> > sad that the ignorant GNOME developers did not learn from what
> > happened with KDE 4.0 release for the userbase and made it even
> > worser, the definition of stupidity is no
El sáb, 29-12-2012 a las 22:00 +0100, Reindl Harald escribió:
>
> Am 29.12.2012 21:05, schrieb Mika Suomalainen:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On 29.12.2012 20:57, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> >>
> >> Please, Please, Please if you must keep Gnome 3 then Keep the
> >
Hi, Happy New Year!
You can install any of the other desktop spins like KDE,
XFCE & LXDE. And, plus of that, you can install a lot of other desktops
like Cinnamon, Mate and Razor, aside of what you already have.
Feel free of try and choose what you like most.
Regards,
Lailah
On 30 December 2012 04:27, Thomas Dineen wrote:
>
> 1) The on screen menus, located at the top left of the screen, seem very
> dark, to
> the point of being almost unreadable. Keep in mind it is not just the
> monitor, an HP
> w2408h, in that the computer shares the monitor with three others via
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 22:37 +0200, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
> 2012/12/29 Mika Suomalainen :
> > I (or actually not me, but many people whom I know) have another
> > problem with GNOME3, they don't know how to halt the computer
> > properly, because the "Shutdown" button is hidden behind the menu in
On 12/29/2012 01:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
so use KDE which is after the 4.0 disaster now really fine again
sad that the ignorant GNOME developers did not learn from what
happened with KDE 4.0 release for the userbase and made it even
worser, the definition of stupidity is not to learn from mis
>
> 2) Periodically parts of the screen, typically the area contained by the
> boundaries of menu
> entries will go all wankers, looking like a 1960's TV on an antenna that
> has lost horizontal
> sync.
>
> 3) Periodically the letters of the menus become a garbled to the point
> of being unre
Am 29.12.2012 21:05, schrieb Mika Suomalainen:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 29.12.2012 20:57, Thomas Dineen wrote:
>>
>> Please, Please, Please if you must keep Gnome 3 then Keep the
>> "Fall Back Mode" in ALL future versions of Fedora. Otherwise to me
>> Fedora wou
2012/12/29 Mika Suomalainen :
> I (or actually not me, but many people whom I know) have another
> problem with GNOME3, they don't know how to halt the computer
> properly, because the "Shutdown" button is hidden behind the menu in
> top-right and you must press "alt" to access the option.
Fortuna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 29.12.2012 20:57, Thomas Dineen wrote:
>
> Please, Please, Please if you must keep Gnome 3 then Keep the
> "Fall Back Mode" in ALL future versions of Fedora. Otherwise to me
> Fedora would be unusable.
I don't think that the "fallback mode" will
On 12/29/2012 12:57 PM, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> Gentle People:
>
>A heartfelt plea from a user:
>
> Please, Please, Please if you must keep Gnome 3 then
> Keep the "Fall Back Mode" in ALL future versions of Fedora.
> Otherwise to me Fedora would be unusable.
>
>Please read the justificati
Am 24.12.2012 19:24, schrieb Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.:
>>> --
>>> Antonio M
>>> Skype: amontag52
>>>
>>> Linux Fedora F17 (Beefy Miracle) on Acer 5720
>>>
>>> http://lugsaronno.altervista.org
>>> http://www.campingmonterosa.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> users mailing list
>>> users@lists.fedorapr
On 12/24/2012 07:00 AM, Luiz Emediato wrote:
I did not try it on another computer. It looks like Fedora 17 LIVE DVD
is working fine on the machine. Perhaps my hard drive (which is brand
new, 3TiB) is not good after all. I will reinstall the system on another HDD.
Thanks.
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at
Am 24.12.2012 18:21, schrieb Bill Davidsen:
> FC17 has been so stable for me that I'm planning to upgrade my FC16 VM
> hosting servers to it, after months of
> testing in a non-critical enviroment.
F17 IS stable
running on 19 VERY critical production servers on top of VMware ESXi
running on 4
Luiz Emediato wrote:
Hi there,
I am finding a lot of problems with Fedora 17. I have installed the
DVD distribution
and after a few days I got a kernel panic after an upgrade.
Fortunately after a few days I could re-upgrade the kernel to a newer
version available.
However many system commands do
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:13:39AM -0200, Luiz Emediato wrote:
> and after a few days I got a kernel panic after an upgrade.
> Fortunately after a few days I could re-upgrade the kernel to a newer
> version available.
> However many system commands do not obey me.
> For instance, it does not allow
On 24.12.2012, Luiz Emediato wrote:
> I did not try it on another computer. It looks like Fedora 17 LIVE DVD
> is working fine on the machine. Perhaps my hard drive (which is brand
> new, 3TiB) is not good after all. I will reinstall the system on another HDD.
Check your memory before you blame
I did not try it on another computer. It looks like Fedora 17 LIVE DVD
is working fine on the machine. Perhaps my hard drive (which is brand
new, 3TiB) is not good after all. I will reinstall the system on another HDD.
Thanks.
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 5:55 AM, antonio wrote:
> Luiz Emediato ha scr
Luiz Emediato ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 24/12/2012
03:13:
Hi there,
I am finding a lot of problems with Fedora 17. I have installed the
DVD distribution
and after a few days I got a kernel panic after an upgrade.
Fortunately after a few days I could re-upgrade the kernel to
Sounds like storage/disk problems, rather than specific to F17.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a questio
Le Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:30:49 +0100,
Heinz Diehl a écrit :
>I use emacs daily, and it's fast on my machine (F17).
Idem with xemacs and WindowMaker on F17.
--
M.B
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On 12/10/2012 12:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I expect that video driver regressions would be the most likely reason.
That's certainly one possibility. Another one is using a DE that's
getting bloated and taking up too much of the system resources. If
using a leaner desktop doesn't help,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 21:49:04 +0100,
Henrik Frisk wrote:
I was going to not comment on this since it's a bit off topic. I've
been running Linux on this machine all along and haven't had any
issues with it before. Why would hardware that ran Fedora 11-13
beautifully suddenly not be good fo
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> As has been mentioned, I'd be sceptical about putting Linux on my
> Macbook Pro although my wife ran Ubuntu for a while with no ill effects
> on her Macbook but she was mainly using it for surfing, email, that sort
> of thing but switched back
On 10.12.2012, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> As for emacs, I can't comment as I use vim & that doesn't suffer from bloat
> in the least :-)
I use emacs daily, and it's fast on my machine (F17).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://ad
On 12/10/2012 12:59 PM, Henrik Frisk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have now migrated to Fedora 17 (clean install) and configured and
> installed most of what I need. Though I think everything looks very
> good my computer is considerably less responsive than under fedora 13.
> I haven't worked that much yet
On 10.12.2012, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> 3. Write this in /etc/rc.config
Don't know how I could write this BS. Here's the correct file:
/etc/rc.d/rc.local
Sorry!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
On 10.12.2012, Alan Cox wrote:
> Throw out Gnome 3 and use Xfce as the desktop. That should get you back a
> ton of memory and video bandwidth.
I'll second that (using XFCE myself).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:59:28 +0100
Henrik Frisk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have now migrated to Fedora 17 (clean install) and configured and
> installed most of what I need. Though I think everything looks very
> good my computer is considerably less responsive than under fedora 13.
> I haven't worked t
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 10.12.2012, Henrik Frisk wrote:
>
>> Anyone knows of something I can do to get it a bit more speedy?
>
> Here's what works for me. For deeper explanation, use Google (I'm
> sitting with my exams in statistics and have no time for explaining,
On 10.12.2012, Henrik Frisk wrote:
> Anyone knows of something I can do to get it a bit more speedy?
Here's what works for me. For deeper explanation, use Google (I'm
sitting with my exams in statistics and have no time for explaining,
sorry!)
1. Buy a fast(er) harddisk
2. Compile a preempt ke
On 12/10/2012 03:59 PM, Henrik Frisk wrote:
I have now migrated to Fedora 17 (clean install)
Same here, but
- I choosed the LXDE spin
- the former version was F16 LXDE spin too
> and configured and
installed most of what I need. Though I think everything looks very
good my computer is conside
Henrik Frisk writes:
Hi,
I have now migrated to Fedora 17 (clean install) and configured and
installed most of what I need. Though I think everything looks very
good my computer is considerably less responsive than under fedora 13.
I haven't worked that much yet but emacs in particular is very
On 11/18/2012 11:29 PM, Rami Rosen wrote:
Hi, Brian,
You have F17 mirrors site in:
http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/17/
Just pick one of the mirror and navigate to the source subfloder.
There you have source iso or SRPMs.
For example, look under:
http://mirrors.dcarsat.com.ar
On 11/19/2012 12:22 PM, Brian West wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Where can I download the 64bit source code for fedora 17? Thanks in advance
> for your time.
>
> Brian West
http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/17/Fedora/source/iso/Fedora-17-source-DVD.iso
--
Programming t
Hi, Brian,
You have F17 mirrors site in:
http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/17/
Just pick one of the mirror and navigate to the source subfloder.
There you have source iso or SRPMs.
For example, look under:
http://mirrors.dcarsat.com.ar/fedora/releases/17/Fedora/source
Or pick a
Suvayu Ali writes:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:40:03PM +0100, lee wrote:
>> > I believe what you say above is wrong. NM respects the ifcfg-* scripts
>> > as it should. What the OP is missing is this line:
>>
>> Then how come that it has emptied out my /etc/resolv.conf though
>> resolving inf
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:40:03PM +0100, lee wrote:
> Suvayu Ali writes:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 02:04:09PM +0100, lee wrote:
> >>
> >> > Here is my ifcfg-networkname file looks like
> >>
> >> Shouldn't the file be named for the interface, like ifcfg-em1?
> >>
> >
> > No, it is the netw
Suvayu Ali writes:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 02:04:09PM +0100, lee wrote:
>>
>> > Here is my ifcfg-networkname file looks like
>>
>> Shouldn't the file be named for the interface, like ifcfg-em1?
>>
>
> No, it is the network name. You can have different network settings for
> the same network
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 02:04:09PM +0100, lee wrote:
>
> > Here is my ifcfg-networkname file looks like
>
> Shouldn't the file be named for the interface, like ifcfg-em1?
>
No, it is the network name. You can have different network settings for
the same network device and save them with differ
Arun SAG writes:
> Hi,
>
> How do i configure wireless networks in NetworkManager during install time
> so that the user don't have to configure it manually. I tried to drop in
> the file ifcfg-networkname in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/, but Network
> Manager keeps asking me to configure the
On 10/31/2012 01:32 AM, Rafnews wrote:
so nothing on USB (here is the lsusb output):
...
regarding dmesg output i attached to this message but i don't know if
forum rules will not block it. It's around 58kb file.
I don't see anything in dmesg, lsusb, or lspci that indicates that a
wireless c
On 10/28/2012 01:53 PM, Rafnews wrote:
ok so here it is (lspci):
Could you also include the output of "dmesg"?
It looks like my initial guess was incorrect. Rather than the PCI bus,
the device is probably attached to the USB. What is the output of "lsusb"?
--
users mailing list
users@lists
On 28.10.2012 18:13, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 10/28/2012 06:27 AM, Rafnews wrote:
i found several websites (e.g.:
http://www.ces.clemson.edu/linux/fc2-ipw2200.shtml) where some steps are
written how to make it works...however in my case, i have some errors
with make ieee80211-1.2.18.
Fedora 17
On 10/28/2012 06:27 AM, Rafnews wrote:
i found several websites (e.g.:
http://www.ces.clemson.edu/linux/fc2-ipw2200.shtml) where some steps are
written how to make it works...however in my case, i have some errors
with make ieee80211-1.2.18.
Fedora 17 already includes the driver, and apparently
Rafnews wrote:
> On 28.10.2012 15:03, Phil Dobbin wrote:
>> Rafnews wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i discovered that i can use fedora 17 on my old laptop IBM T42.
>>> i works great but my wireless adapter doesn't work.
>>>
>>> i found several websites (e.g.:
>>> http://www.ces.clemson.edu/linux/fc2-ipw
On 28.10.2012 15:03, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Rafnews wrote:
Hi,
i discovered that i can use fedora 17 on my old laptop IBM T42.
i works great but my wireless adapter doesn't work.
i found several websites (e.g.:
http://www.ces.clemson.edu/linux/fc2-ipw2200.shtml) where some steps are
written how t
Rafnews wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i discovered that i can use fedora 17 on my old laptop IBM T42.
> i works great but my wireless adapter doesn't work.
>
> i found several websites (e.g.:
> http://www.ces.clemson.edu/linux/fc2-ipw2200.shtml) where some steps are
> written how to make it works...however i
Hi,
You can set non dhcp Network Manager on a specified interface thus:
Right click on the network manager icon and click on edit
connections.
Navigate to "wireless" tab (in your case).
Go to "Edit" -> IPV4 setting
Set "Method" to Manual and assign a static IP.
Also to avoid IPV6 DHCP DISCOVER req
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 16:11:32 +0200
Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Is there a way to tell the Network Manager **not** to send DHCP
> requests in such a case
I don't know if NetworkManager can ever be taught to be polite.
Every time I try to use NM to see if it has gotten better,
I run into something like
On 10/11/2012 06:38 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Grub shows two entries for windows 7:
Windows 7 (loader) on (/dev/sda2)
Windows Recovery Environment (loader) (on /dev/sda3)
Sorry, I'm jumping in to this a bit late, but have you tried accessing
the recovery partition as the laptop boots up? It s
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:38:53 +0100 Alan Cox
wrote:
> > % grub2-install /dev/sda.(There is no grub-install)
> >
> > /usr/sbin/grub2-bios-setup: warning: this LDM has no Embedding
> > Partition; embedding won't be possible.
> >
> > /usr/sbin/grub2-bios-setup: warning: Embedding is not
> > pos
> % grub2-install /dev/sda.(There is no grub-install)
>
> /usr/sbin/grub2-bios-setup: warning: this LDM has no Embedding
> Partition; embedding won't be possible.
>
> /usr/sbin/grub2-bios-setup: warning: Embedding is not
> possible. GRUB can only be installed in this setup by using
> blocklis
Sorry, but all well up to step 10 but not after:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:02:37 +0300 Daniel Landau
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Ranjan Maitra
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:52:20 -0400 Jim wrote:
> >> On 10/09/2012 10:32 PM, JD wrote:
> >> > You need to contact HP and they wil
Thanks again!
Steps 1. and 2. have to be under fail-safe mode, or any terminal window?
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:55:57 +0300 Daniel Landau
wrote:
> On 11 Oct 2012 16:01, "Ranjan Maitra" wrote:
> > > 4. mount /dev/sdaX /mnt/fedora
> >
> > I guess the X is for wherever the / partition is?
> >
> > >
On 11 Oct 2012 16:01, "Ranjan Maitra" wrote:
> > 4. mount /dev/sdaX /mnt/fedora
>
> I guess the X is for wherever the / partition is?
>
> > (4.b mount /dev/sdaY /mnt/fedora/boot)
>
> This Y is for the /boot partition?
>
Exactly so.
> > 9. grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg (check here to find
Hi Daniel,
Thanks very much! I did not get a few points:
> If the install is otherwise fine except for the bootloader, you could
> boot from a live distro, chroot into the install and run "grub-install
> /dev/sda". The process in steps:
>
> 1. Boot in to live environment
> 2. Figure out in which
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:52:20 -0400 Jim wrote:
>> On 10/09/2012 10:32 PM, JD wrote:
>> > You need to contact HP and they will provide you
>> > with the recovery windows DVD. I have run into a similar problem.
>> > After fixing your windows, y
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:52:20 -0400 Jim wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 10:32 PM, JD wrote:
> >
> > On 10/09/2012 07:10 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >> Friends,
> >>
> >> After years of providing services to students for free in installing
> >> Fedora, I hit a wall this afternoon and don't quite know how to
On 10/09/2012 10:32 PM, JD wrote:
On 10/09/2012 07:10 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Friends,
After years of providing services to students for free in installing
Fedora, I hit a wall this afternoon and don't quite know how to get out
of it.
The offending laptop is a HP Pavilion DV6 with Windows 7
On 10/09/2012 07:10 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Friends,
After years of providing services to students for free in installing
Fedora, I hit a wall this afternoon and don't quite know how to get out
of it.
The offending laptop is a HP Pavilion DV6 with Windows 7 Home Premium
on it. We paritioned t
On 04/10/12 15:21, George wrote:
to show up when you choose a directory as a mount point. Could anyone
help me understand why this happened and if the lost+found file is not
supposed
to be there how can I correct the problem?
Thank you.
George
cat /etc/fstab
you will see "/" there,
--
Regar
On 10/04/2012 07:21 AM, George wrote:
When looking at the / directory using the ls command
I discovered that /lost+found file was there. I thought that this file
is supposed
to show up when you choose a directory as a mount point.
You're right. It shows up when a directory is used as a mount p
On 10/04/2012 03:21 PM, George wrote:
Hi all. I am a new user of Fedora 17. I am studying for the Linux
certification.
I installed Fedora 17 using Vmware Workstation 8. After I completed
the installation I checked the directories to insure that everything was
installed correctly. When looking at
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Marc Wäckerlin
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am working in Ubuntu and compiling RPMs for Fedora. That's why I install
> Fedora in
> a **chroot** environment. That works fine with Fedora 16, but fails with
> Fedora 17 due
> to the wrong "rpmlib(X-CheckUnifiedSystemdir)" depen
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 08:20:13PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> >I have a similar build system for SLC 5.7. Our software can also be
> >deployed in a VM; I have tried that but found the overhead of using a VM
> >(build times, test job run times and the fact that you have t
Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi Bill,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:31:20AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Marc Wäckerlin wrote:
Hi
I am working in Ubuntu and compiling RPMs for Fedora. That's why I install
Fedora in
a **chroot** environment. That works fine with Fedora 16, but fails with Fedora
17 due
to t
Hi Bill,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:31:20AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Marc Wäckerlin wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >I am working in Ubuntu and compiling RPMs for Fedora. That's why I install
> >Fedora in
> >a **chroot** environment. That works fine with Fedora 16, but fails with
> >Fedora 17 due
> >to
Marc Wäckerlin wrote:
Hi
I am working in Ubuntu and compiling RPMs for Fedora. That's why I install
Fedora in
a **chroot** environment. That works fine with Fedora 16, but fails with Fedora
17 due
to the wrong "rpmlib(X-CheckUnifiedSystemdir)" dependency.
I Do not upgrade and I cannot use dra
Solved! Many thanks. Details below...
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 6 September 2012 15:28, Stowell Davison wrote:
> >
> > I recently installed Fedora 17, 64 bit, on an HP h8-1320t. The machine
> has
> > an on-board ethernet port (RJ-45). According to the machine's
On 7 September 2012 02:08, Stowell Davison wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>>
>> On 09/06/2012 07:28 AM, Stowell Davison uttered this comment:
>>>
>>>
>>> I recently installed Fedora 17, 64 bit, on an HP h8-1320t. The machine
>>> has an on-board ethernet port (RJ
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 07:28 AM, Stowell Davison uttered this comment:
>
>>
>> I recently installed Fedora 17, 64 bit, on an HP h8-1320t. The machine
>> has an on-board ethernet port (RJ-45). According to the machine's spec
>> sheet, that is device i
Stowell Davison wrote:
I recently installed Fedora 17, 64 bit, on an HP h8-1320t. The machine has an
on-board ethernet port (RJ-45). According to the machine's spec sheet, that is
device is an "Atheros AR8161L".
Fedora does not see that interface device at all. Dmesg and /var/log/messages
co
On 09/06/2012 07:28 AM, Stowell Davison uttered this comment:
I recently installed Fedora 17, 64 bit, on an HP h8-1320t. The machine
has an on-board ethernet port (RJ-45). According to the machine's spec
sheet, that is device is an "Atheros AR8161L".
Atheros stuff is normally wi-fi, not wire
On 6 September 2012 15:28, Stowell Davison wrote:
>
> I recently installed Fedora 17, 64 bit, on an HP h8-1320t. The machine has
> an on-board ethernet port (RJ-45). According to the machine's spec sheet,
> that is device is an "Atheros AR8161L".
>
> Fedora does not see that interface device at
Once upon a time, Tom Horsley said:
> Confuses me as well, though as far as I know, sendmail has always
> been the default in fedora. I do see that redhat have switched
> to postfix as the default mailer on RHEL6, which makes fedora
> sticking with sendmail even more confusing.
RHEL is "downstrea
On 08/29/2012 11:46 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
Confuses me as well, though as far as I know, sendmail has always
been the default in fedora. I do see that redhat have switched
to postfix as the default mailer on RHEL6, which makes fedora
sticking with sendmail even more confusing.
Why? Fedora does
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:08:20 -0400
Lázaro Morales wrote:
> Why `postfix´ isn't not included in the Fedora 17 Official DVD? And why
> `sendmail´ comes now as the default mta agent?
Confuses me as well, though as far as I know, sendmail has always
been the default in fedora. I do see that redhat h
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Or maybe read this
>
> http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/07/unity-desktop-available-for-fedora
>
> I any event, if you go down this rabbit hole, I hope you don't post your
> problems here. :-)
Thanks for the heads-up Ed...
I sighed when
On 08/23/2012 12:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/24/2012 12:54 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/23/2012 03:31 AM, Lailah wrote:
How can Unity be installed in Fedora? Works fine?
See http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:GNOME_Ayatana
There are pros and cons. I for one, will not be testing.
Or may
On 08/24/2012 12:54 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 03:31 AM, Lailah wrote:
>>
>> How can Unity be installed in Fedora? Works fine?
> See http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:GNOME_Ayatana
>
> There are pros and cons. I for one, will not be testing.
>
Or maybe read this
http://www.omg
1 - 100 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
