Re: fedora 12 and no GUI

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:01 AM, gary clark wrote: > The problem was lack of RAM I only has 256 increased to 1G and all is good. Many old boxes have been / are / will be headed to the scrape pile because of memory limitations. You are lucky that you can add memory. Good luck with F12 but don't e

Re: fedora 12 and no GUI

The problem was lack of RAM I only has 256 increased to 1G and all is good. --- On Tue, 6/14/11, gary clark wrote: > From: gary clark > Subject: Re: fedora 12 and no GUI > To: "Community support for Fedora users" > Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2011, 5:11 PM > Hi, > &

Re: fedora 12 and no GUI

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:11 PM, gary clark wrote: > Hi, > > There is no gdm file or gdm-password file in this /etc/pam.d directory? > My installations have moved beyond F12 so I don't have an unaltered system to help you troubleshoot your problem. However, if you do an internet search for "root

Re: fedora 12 and no GUI

Hi, There is no gdm file or gdm-password file in this /etc/pam.d directory? Thanks, Gary C --- On Tue, 6/14/11, Kam Leo wrote: > From: Kam Leo > Subject: Re: fedora 12 and no GUI > To: "Community support for Fedora users" > Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2011, 4:42 PM > O

Re: fedora 12 and no GUI

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:57 PM, gary clark wrote: > Hello, > > I was was Fedora 4 and then Fedora 9 and just jumped to Fedora 12. When the > machine boots up I have only text based system to login as root. What > happened to the GUI? > > Any answers would really help? They disabled it for sec

Re: SOLVED - Re: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

On 2/27/11 5:54 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:37 PM, James McKenzie > wrote: > >>> Thanks to everyone!. Btw. this box had Fedora 10... not 12... :) I now >>> realize >> Time for an upgrade to the lastest version of Fedora? >> >> Definitely time to clean up the drive and

Re: SOLVED - Re: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:37 PM, James McKenzie wrote: >> Thanks to everyone!.  Btw. this box had Fedora 10... not 12... :) I now >> realize > Time for an upgrade to the lastest version of Fedora? > > Definitely time to clean up the drive and rid it of all unnecessary baggage. > > James McKenzie

Re: SOLVED - Re: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

On 2/27/11 4:01 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:43 PM, JB wrote: >> So it would be: >> selinux=0 enforcing=0 1 >> >> Try it and report back. > Worked like a charm. The combination of first booting to runlevel 1, > erasing some stuff to bring disk usage down from 100% to 98%

Re: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

Fernando Cassia gmail.com> writes: > ... > Ok, runlevel 1 I went and erased some VirtualBox VM vdis taking a > couple gigs. Now space free is 98% according to "df". I hope SELinux > stops panicking now. > > BTW: Is it "working as designed" to have an OS become comatose and > unable to boot when

Re: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

Please don´t fight, don´t need to. The problem was solved, thanks to you all. A little manners goes a long way. No need to point fingers and accuse others of being "wrong". :) FC On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:25 PM, compdoc wrote: >> Wrong.  Runlevel 1 is single-user mode. > > Naw, I wasn't wrong -

RE: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

> Wrong. Runlevel 1 is single-user mode. Naw, I wasn't wrong - I was just explaining in a way anyone can understand. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fe

Re: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

On 02/27/2011 02:43 PM, compdoc wrote: > As Kevin J. Cummings said, you want to boot to runlevel 1, which is text mode. > Boot to the command line, in other words. Wrong. Runlevel 1 is single-user mode. You aren't connected to the net by default and only the root partition (and, if needed, /boo

SOLVED - Re: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:43 PM, JB wrote: > > So it would be: > selinux=0 enforcing=0 1 > > Try it and report back. Worked like a charm. The combination of first booting to runlevel 1, erasing some stuff to bring disk usage down from 100% to 98% and then disabling SELinux did the trick. Thanks

Re: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > Thanks, will try that. > > Confirms my suspicion: SELinux´ best feature is to disable it. ;) (JOKE, JOKE) > FC Ok, runlevel 1 I went and erased some VirtualBox VM vdis taking a couple gigs. Now space free is 98% according to "df". I hope S

Re: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

Fernando Cassia gmail.com> writes: > > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:12 PM, JB gmail.com> wrote: > > Fernando Cassia gmail.com> writes: > > > >> ... > >> The issue is that I get the normal Fedora boot screen , then the > >> hourglass, then the log-in screen,then I get > >> > >> Oops, sealert hit a

RE: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

As Kevin J. Cummings said, you want to boot to runlevel 1, which is text mode. Boot to the command line, in other words. Google: fedora 12 runlevel 1 And if you are able to log in as root, you need to look at all of your partitions and see which one is full. If you aren't sure what to delete,

Re: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:12 PM, JB wrote: > Fernando Cassia gmail.com> writes: > >> ... >> The issue is that I get the normal Fedora boot screen , then the >> hourglass, then the log-in screen,then I get >> >> Oops, sealert hit an error! >> >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> ... > > Stop b

Re: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:12 PM, JB wrote: > Stop boot loader, edit kernel boot line, and disable selinux for now. >   kernel /boot/vmlinuz-... ... selinux=0 > > This may get you thru ... > > JB Thanks, will try that. Confirms my suspicion: SELinux´ best feature is to disable it. ;) (JOKE, JOKE)

Re: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

Fernando Cassia gmail.com> writes: > ... > The issue is that I get the normal Fedora boot screen , then the > hourglass, then the log-in screen,then I get > > Oops, sealert hit an error! > > Traceback (most recent call last): > ... Stop boot loader, edit kernel boot line, and disable selinux

Re: [Fedora 12] "IOError: [Erno 28] No space left on device"

On 02/27/2011 05:01 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > I have one old machine running Fedora 12, kernel 2.6.27. > Suddenly one day after doing system updates (and it was downloading > some torrents in the background) the system would no longer boot > properly, and the system says the disk is full (probab

Re: Fedora 12 automatically reboots

Suvayu Ali: >> I would say a more likely candidate for the 2nd might be bad >> configuration files for the desktop environment the OP is using. Joe Zeff: > You'd think so, but you'd be wrong. I've seen a number of threads on > this at fedroforum.org and it's not uncommon for video driver issues

Re: Fedora 12 automatically reboots

On 12/28/2010 02:20 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > I would say a more likely candidate for the 2nd might be bad > configuration files for the desktop environment the OP is using. You'd think so, but you'd be wrong. I've seen a number of threads on this at fedroforum.org and it's not uncommon for video

Re: Fedora 12 automatically reboots

On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 08:44:07 +1030 Tim wrote: > The first would be a really serious crash, the second (most likely) > something related with the graphics drivers. I would say a more likely candidate for the 2nd might be bad configuration files for the desktop environment the OP is using. -- Su

Re: Fedora 12 automatically reboots

On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 20:49 +, akash haibatpure wrote: > when I try to log in into system, system automatically reboots. Just to be clear, do you actually mean a complete reboot, or do you just end up back at the login screen? The first would be a really serious crash, the second (most likely

Re: Fedora 12 automatically reboots

JB gmail.com> writes: > ... Of course, you will need your installation /live cd to do the inspection, or perhaps you have another distro installed on your machine (and just mount your F12 root (/) partition that is causing you grief). Also possible causes: check any system-wide initialization f

Re: Fedora 12 automatically reboots

akash haibatpure rediffmail.com> writes: > > > I install Fedora 12 on my machine ( configuration RAM - 1GB HDD-160 GB AMD processor) > I used Fedora 2 month it works properly but before some days OS hangs and I reboot system after that when I try to log in into system, system automatically rebo

Re: Fedora 12

Gordon Messmer eburg.com> writes: > > On 11/01/2010 08:49 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > > > > Anyone know if there is an archive for Red Hat 9 and earlier? > > ftp://archive.download.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/ Thanks. Unfortunately, it looks like it only goes back to 6.2 - the earlier director

Re: Fedora 12

On 11/01/2010 08:49 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > > Anyone know if there is an archive for Red Hat 9 and earlier? ftp://archive.download.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: Fedora 12

Vaclav Mocek email.cz> writes: > > On 11/02/2010 12:54 AM, Adil Adil wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there a way to get and install fedora 12. The reason for that is that I'm gonna use a software that has been > tested only with fedora 12.na > > > > Thank you > > > > > > > Download the installatio

Re: Fedora 12

On 11/02/2010 12:54 AM, Adil Adil wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to get and install fedora 12. The reason for that is that I'm > gonna use a software that has been tested only with fedora 12.na > > Thank you > > > Download the installation ISO image, you can find the list of mirrors here: h

Re: Fedora 12, 13 /KDE freezing Desktop

On 10/03/2010 11:10 PM, JD wrote: > > On 10/03/2010 08:04 PM, stan wrote: >> On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 19:52:11 -0700 >> JD wrote: >> >>> By default: mlocate.cron >>> >>> #!/bin/sh >>> nodevs=$(< /proc/filesystems awk '$1 == "nodev" { print $2 }') >>> renice +19 -p $$>/dev/null 2>&1 >>> ionice -c2

Re: Fedora 12, 13 /KDE freezing Desktop

On 10/03/2010 08:04 PM, stan wrote: > On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 19:52:11 -0700 > JD wrote: > >> By default: mlocate.cron >> >> #!/bin/sh >> nodevs=$(< /proc/filesystems awk '$1 == "nodev" { print $2 }') >> renice +19 -p $$>/dev/null 2>&1 >> ionice -c2 -n7 -p $$>/dev/null 2>&1 >> /usr/bin/updatedb -f

Re: Fedora 12, 13 /KDE freezing Desktop

On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 19:52:11 -0700 JD wrote: > By default: mlocate.cron > > #!/bin/sh > nodevs=$(< /proc/filesystems awk '$1 == "nodev" { print $2 }') > renice +19 -p $$ >/dev/null 2>&1 > ionice -c2 -n7 -p $$ >/dev/null 2>&1 > /usr/bin/updatedb -f "$nodevs" > > So, it is already set to low prio

Re: Fedora 12, 13 /KDE freezing Desktop

On 10/03/2010 07:42 PM, stan wrote: > On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 20:08:28 -0400 > Jim wrote: > > >> I have 4 different Fedora boxes at different locations with KDE >> Desktops Freezing Applications or clicking on mouse for intervals of >> 10-15 seconds at a time. Nothing shows up in System Monitor to >

Re: Fedora 12, 13 /KDE freezing Desktop

On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 20:08:28 -0400 Jim wrote: > I have 4 different Fedora boxes at different locations with KDE > Desktops Freezing Applications or clicking on mouse for intervals of > 10-15 seconds at a time. Nothing shows up in System Monitor to > indicate why. > > Anyone have these problems

Re: Fedora 12, 13 /KDE freezing Desktop

On 10/03/2010 05:08 PM, Jim wrote: >Fedora 12, 13 /KDE Desktop > > I have 4 different Fedora boxes at different locations with KDE Desktops > Freezing Applications or clicking on mouse for intervals of 10-15 > seconds at a time. Nothing shows up in System Monitor to indicate why. > > Anyone h

Re: Fedora-12 yum update dependency problems

On 09/15/2010 03:03 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:04:19 -0700, Konstantin wrote: >> Most likely while updating tigervnc, yum didn't get to cleanup stage >> (failed, computer rebooted, etc) so the old version is marked as installed. >> You can clean it by running "yum remove

Re: Fedora-12 yum update dependency problems

On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:04:19 -0700, Konstantin wrote: > On 09/14/2010 08:23 PM, KC8LDO wrote: > > I just did my normal yum update routine and found several problems flagged > > as below: > > > > [r...@fedora-12 Desktop]# yum update > > Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit > > Setting up Up

Re: Fedora-12 yum update dependency problems

KC8LDO arrl.net> writes: > > I just did my normal yum update routine and found several problems flagged > as below: > > [root Fedora-12 Desktop]# yum update > Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit > Setting up Update Process > ** Found 1 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output

Re: Fedora-12 yum update dependency problems

On 09/14/2010 08:23 PM, KC8LDO wrote: > I just did my normal yum update routine and found several problems flagged > as below: > > [r...@fedora-12 Desktop]# yum update > Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit > Setting up Update Process > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction chec

Re: Fedora 12 installation issue

Any suggestions how to achieve this. Thanks, --Abhijeet On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:33 PM, abhijeet tripathi wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > Below is the lspci output: > > $ lspci -v > 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 0044 (rev 02) >        Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 146a >    

Re: Fedora 12 installation issue

Hi Paolo, Below is the lspci output: $ lspci -v 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 0044 (rev 02) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 146a Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Capabilities: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel 00:02.0 VGA comp

Re: Fedora 12 installation issue

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: > On 08/26/2010 04:52 PM, abhijeet tripathi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I tried installing FC-12 on my laptop which is having i5-430M >> processor. The installation got hung initially then I again restarted >> it with the basic graphics driver and the

Re: Fedora 12 installation issue

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Josep Sanchez wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Al 27/08/10 01:52, En/na abhijeet tripathi ha escrit: >> Hi, >> >> I tried installing FC-12 on my laptop which is having i5-430M >> processor. The installation got hung initially then I agai

Re: Fedora 12 installation issue

On 08/26/2010 04:52 PM, abhijeet tripathi wrote: > Hi, > > I tried installing FC-12 on my laptop which is having i5-430M > processor. The installation got hung initially then I again restarted > it with the basic graphics driver and the installation happened > successfully. > > Now I am having foll

Re: Fedora 12 installation issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Al 27/08/10 01:52, En/na abhijeet tripathi ha escrit: > Hi, > > I tried installing FC-12 on my laptop which is having i5-430M > processor. The installation got hung initially then I again restarted > it with the basic graphics driver and the installat

Re: Fedora 12 and Privoxy

Tim wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:09 -0700, Jason Turning wrote: >> It's on for runlevels 2 thru 5, but on boot up it fails with the >> following message from the Privoxy logfile: >> >> Jul 08 09:02:21.415 7f27343cd700 Fatal error: can't bind to 127.0.0.1:8118: >> The hostname is not resolva

Re: Fedora 12 and Privoxy

On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:09 -0700, Jason Turning wrote: > It's on for runlevels 2 thru 5, but on boot up it fails with the > following message from the Privoxy logfile: > > Jul 08 09:02:21.415 7f27343cd700 Fatal error: can't bind to 127.0.0.1:8118: > The hostname is not resolvable > > So I'm g

Re: Fedora 12 and Privoxy

Natxo Asenjo wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Jason Turning wrote: >> I just upgraded my laptop to Fedora 12, and now Privoxy is failing on bootup >> and has to be manually started. Anyone encountered this problem, and if so >> what >> was the fix? > > what does > > $/sbin/chkconfig --l

Re: Fedora 12 and Privoxy

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Jason Turning wrote: > > I just upgraded my laptop to Fedora 12, and now Privoxy is failing on bootup > and has to be manually started. Anyone encountered this problem, and if so > what > was the fix? what does $/sbin/chkconfig --list privoxy tell you? It shoul

Re: Fedora 12 not releasing ports

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:48:13 -0700 Jack Lauman wrote: > Upon rebooting the server ports 110 and 25 are not seen by netstat but > are seen by the tomcat application and the app aborts stating that the > ports are in use. That sounds to me like tomcat is allocating the port twice and failing on t

Re: Fedora 12 not releasing ports

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:48, Jack Lauman wrote: > Yes.. and chkconfig portreserve off > > Upon rebooting the server ports 110 and 25 are not seen by netstat but > are seen by the tomcat application and the app aborts stating that the > ports are in use. > > They only way I can get the app to lo

Re: Fedora 12 not releasing ports

I removed the portreserve rpm and it works fine now. Jack On 6/29/2010 4:32 PM, Doron Bar Zeev wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:16, Jack Lauman > wrote: > > Tried that... doesn't make any difference whatsoever. If I use > portreleast pop3 manually th

Re: Fedora 12 not releasing ports

Yes.. and chkconfig portreserve off Upon rebooting the server ports 110 and 25 are not seen by netstat but are seen by the tomcat application and the app aborts stating that the ports are in use. They only way I can get the app to load to to "manually" run portrelease regardless of whether the

Re: Fedora 12 not releasing ports

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:16, Jack Lauman wrote: > Tried that... doesn't make any difference whatsoever. If I use > portreleast pop3 manually the port will release and the tomcat > application can start. > > did you try service portreserve stop ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: Fedora 12 not releasing ports

Tried that... doesn't make any difference whatsoever. If I use portreleast pop3 manually the port will release and the tomcat application can start. Jack On 6/29/2010 4:01 PM, Doron Bar Zeev wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 18:34, Jack Lauman > wrote: > > >

Re: Fedora 12 not releasing ports

netstat -noa netstat -tap Nothing is using ports 110 or 25. All other IP4 services work fine, ie. SSH, SFTP, telnet, etc. If I launch Dovecot manually the server will listen on port 110. The only way tomcat and desknow will launch successfully is if I issue the following commands before starti

Re: Fedora 12 not releasing ports

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 18:34, Jack Lauman wrote: > > > When I start tomcat I get an error the port 110 is in use. Dovecot is > not enabled, netstat doesn't show port 110 in use. > > If I run "portrelease" on ports POP3, SMTP & 3306 manually prior Tomcat > startup and DeskNow runs normally. > >

Re: Fedora 12 not releasing ports

On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 08:34 -0700, Jack Lauman wrote: > When I start tomcat I get an error the port 110 is in use. Dovecot is > not enabled, netstat doesn't show port 110 in use. Perhaps something not sensibly handling you having IPv4 and IPv4 networking? What options did you try with netstat to

Re: Fedora 12/13 unexpected shut down Please help !!!

On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 15:48 +0530, Onkar Mahajan wrote: > I am doing kernel compilation on fedora 13 > like this > > $ make -j2 bzImage modules > > Strangely, FC12 & FC13 running on AMD x86_64 machine > happen to halts uncleanly (as if power goes off ) in the midst > of compilation process.

Re: Fedora 12/13 unexpected shut down Please help !!!

2 years huh? Get some canned air, and blow the dust out of the heat-sinks. Kernel compiles can get toasty. -- Chris Kloiber On 06/29/2010 06:18 AM, Onkar Mahajan wrote: I am doing kernel compilation on fedora 13 like this $ make -j2 bzImage modules Strangely, FC12 & FC13 running on AMD x86_

Re: Fedora 12 end-of-life and rolling our own Fedoras (Re: Fedora 11 End of Life)

On Jun 29, 2010, at 12:29 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 06/28/2010 09:38 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Joel Rees > > wrote: >> >> I suppose eol includes the PPC distro? >> >> which means I'm going to have to either start

Re: Fedora 12 end-of-life and rolling our own Fedoras (Re: Fedora 11 End of Life)

> On 06/28/2010 02:38 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Joel Rees > > wrote: >> >> I suppose eol includes the PPC distro? >> >> which means I'm going to have to either start learning how to >> roll my >> own Fedora now, or

Re: Fedora 12 end-of-life and rolling our own Fedoras (Re: Fedora 11 End of Life)

On 06/28/2010 09:38 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Joel Rees > wrote: > > I suppose eol includes the PPC distro? > > which means I'm going to have to either start learning how to roll my > own Fedora now, or start getting r

Re: Fedora 12 end-of-life and rolling our own Fedoras (Re: Fedora 11 End of Life)

On 06/28/2010 02:38 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Joel Rees > wrote: > > I suppose eol includes the PPC distro? > > which means I'm going to have to either start learning how to roll my > own Fedora now, or start getting r

Re: Fedora 12 end-of-life and rolling our own Fedoras (Re: Fedora 11 End of Life)

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Joel Rees wrote: > I suppose eol includes the PPC distro? > > which means I'm going to have to either start learning how to roll my > own Fedora now, or start getting ready to switch back to openBSD on > my PPC machines. > Instead of abandoning Linux, have you c

Re: Fedora 12 - how to run laptop with closed lid

On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 16:43 -0400, Edmon Begoli wrote: > I have a Dell Latitude 830 laptop with Fedora 12. I never move it, > so I want to be able to close to lid and just use monitor, but my OS > shuts down automatically. Just a warning: Does your laptop need the lid open for ventilation? Some d

Re: Fedora 12 - how to run laptop with closed lid

On 06/16/2010 01:43 PM, Edmon Begoli wrote: Hi, I have a Dell Latitude 830 laptop with Fedora 12. I never move it, so I want to be able to close to lid and just use monitor, but my OS shuts down automatically. Is there a way to enable this and if so, please tell me how I am using Xfce but I

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > When you use system-config-printer on the server is the printer marked > as shared? Assuming you have a ADSL router on your network does the web > interface ofthe router show her machine? Yes, if it was not shared then it wouldn't work errat

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 15:47 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 08:52 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Tim wrote: > >> > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 16:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> >> No, it

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:51:27 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > Then I decided to restart > NetworkManager and what do you know, it started working! A friend of mine has a system with the interface configured in NM to start at boot, but it only actually starts at boot about 50% of the time. I keep telli

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Tim wrote: > On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 14:25 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> I'm not sure if you read the first message, but yes, I have the >> appropriate holes poked in the firewall. My other desktop (MythTV >> machine) works fine. I have also verified the firewall wit

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 14:25 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm not sure if you read the first message, but yes, I have the > appropriate holes poked in the firewall. My other desktop (MythTV > machine) works fine. I have also verified the firewall with "iptables > -S | grep 631" I couldn't recall wh

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 08:52 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Tim wrote: >> > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 16:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >> No, it's connected through IPP: >> >> >> >> ipp://hobbes.localdomain:631

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 08:52 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Tim wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 16:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> No, it's connected through IPP: > >> > >> ipp://hobbes.localdomain:631/printers/Photosmart-C5500-series > > > > Does "hobbes.locald

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Tim wrote: > On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 08:52 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> I think it has something to do with my wife's laptop but I have no >> idea what's going on. I scanned her IP with nmap and it couldn't find >> any trace that her laptop is even there, however, a

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 08:52 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > I think it has something to do with my wife's laptop but I have no > idea what's going on. I scanned her IP with nmap and it couldn't find > any trace that her laptop is even there, however, all network > connections coming FROM her laptop co

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On 06/14/2010 09:52 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Tim wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 16:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >>> No, it's connected through IPP: >>> >>> ipp://hobbes.localdomain:631/printers/Photosmart-C5500-series >>> >> Does "hobbes.

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Tim wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 16:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> No, it's connected through IPP: >> >> ipp://hobbes.localdomain:631/printers/Photosmart-C5500-series > > Does "hobbes.localdomain" always resolve to the print server's IP > address?  And does it

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 16:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > No, it's connected through IPP: > > ipp://hobbes.localdomain:631/printers/Photosmart-C5500-series Does "hobbes.localdomain" always resolve to the print server's IP address? And does it do so on the other client computers? -- [...@localh

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Jim wrote: > On 06/11/2010 05:00 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Jim  wrote: >>> Is your printer setup like this ?  Fedora 12 network settings >>> >>> lpd://172.16.1.35/PASSTHRU    (using your own IP address) >>> >> No, it's connected th

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On 06/11/2010 05:00 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Jim wrote: > >> On 06/11/2010 02:46 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >>> I have an HP Photosmart C5580 connected to my desktop in the office I >>> have shared under both Fedora 12&13. The printer queue usually g

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Jim wrote: > On 06/11/2010 02:46 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> I have an HP Photosmart C5580 connected to my desktop in the office I >> have shared under both Fedora 12&  13. The printer queue usually gets >> detected by my wife's laptop after I poke the proper holes

Re: Fedora 12/13 network printer oddness

On 06/11/2010 02:46 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I have an HP Photosmart C5580 connected to my desktop in the office I > have shared under both Fedora 12& 13. The printer queue usually gets > detected by my wife's laptop after I poke the proper holes in both > firewalls. > > I'm not sure what the pro

Re: Fedora 12 Cups and Canon IP3000 from command line

On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 16:10 -0500, Javier Perez wrote: > I messed a little to be able to go into the administration menus from > another computer in the network. (Allow other_pc:631) > Nevertheless after I configure everything I cannot see it nor > recognize it from the network although it is suppo

Re: Fedora 12, Xorg, and Apex Outlook KVM, - can't nail resolution

On Wed, 26 May 2010 16:07:22 -0500 Styma, Robert E (Robert) wrote: > My desire now is to find the detected EDID and hardcode it as a kernel > parameter as was suggested when the thread first started. The /var/log/Xorg.0.log file usually has detected EDID info, so you might find what you need the

Re: Fedora 12, Xorg, and Apex Outlook KVM, - can't nail resolution

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 16:07:22 -0500, "Styma, Robert E (Robert)" wrote: > > My desire now is to find the detected EDID and hardcode it as a kernel > parameter as was suggested when the thread first started. A hex version of the EDID should be recorded in /var/log/Xorg.0.log when you boot wi

RE: Fedora 12, Xorg, and Apex Outlook KVM, - can't nail resolution

> > > It appears that Xorg has gotten so good at protecting me from myself that > > when it comes up with the wrong answer, I am just stuck. Maybe a different > > 8 port KVM might produce better results, but I am not ready to buy another. > It would be nice if old hardware was handled better,

Re: Fedora 12, Xorg, and Apex Outlook KVM, - can't nail resolution

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:12:09 -0500, "Styma, Robert E (Robert)" wrote: > > It appears that Xorg has gotten so good at protecting me from myself that > when it comes up with the wrong answer, I am just stuck. Maybe a different > 8 port KVM might produce better results, but I am not ready to

RE: Fedora 12, Xorg, and Apex Outlook KVM, - can't nail resolution

> > > > Since the video card is correctly identified, if it cannot figure > > out what the monitor is, it should let you use what the video > > card can handle instead of locking you in to 800x600. > > > > Except that using higher resolutions can damage monitors if they can't > handle

Re: Fedora 12, Xorg, and Apex Outlook KVM, - can't nail resolution

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:58:07 -0500, "Styma, Robert E (Robert)" wrote: > > Since the video card is correctly identified, if it cannot figure > out what the monitor is, it should let you use what the video > card can handle instead of locking you in to 800x600. > Except that usi

RE: Fedora 12, Xorg, and Apex Outlook KVM, - can't nail resolution

> Subject: Re: Fedora 12, Xorg, and Apex Outlook KVM, - can't nail > resolution > On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 19:21 -0600, Styma, Robert E (Robert) wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been looking at this for some time in both the > > archives of the list and the web in gene

Re: Fedora-12 boot fails at "Starting udev:"

> PS: Mike, it would be good if you could share how you got the chart > rendering to work. Maybe the OP can try too? Sure, but I'll answer it in your original post, so we can keep this thread about the booting problem, possibly due to udev. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

Re: Fedora-12 boot fails at "Starting udev:"

On 19 May 2010 13:28, Mike Park wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:08 AM, William Perkins wrote: >> >> I am having a boot problem on my work station with any of the >> Fedora-12 update kernels.  The hardware appears to lock up with >> no response possible from the keyboard.  They all fail by hang

Re: Fedora-12 boot fails at "Starting udev:"

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:08 AM, William Perkins wrote: > > I am having a boot problem on my work station with any of the > Fedora-12 update kernels.  The hardware appears to lock up with > no response possible from the keyboard.  They all fail by hanging > at the "Starting udev:" line during the

Re: Fedora-12 boot fails at "Starting udev:"

On Wed, 19 May 2010 12:24:00 -0400 Tom Horsley wrote: > On Wed, 19 May 2010 12:08:56 -0400 (EDT) > William Perkins wrote: > > > They all fail by hanging > > at the "Starting udev:" line during the boot process. > > The udev step tends to be where lots of drivers get loaded, > so it is probably

Re: Fedora-12 boot fails at "Starting udev:"

On Wed, 19 May 2010 12:08:56 -0400 (EDT) William Perkins wrote: > They all fail by hanging > at the "Starting udev:" line during the boot process. The udev step tends to be where lots of drivers get loaded, so it is probably some specific driver that is killing it. If you could find it and blackl

Re: Fedora 12 Update: trytond-1.2.4-1.fc12 - STRANGE MAIL BODY

On 05/09/2010 05:30 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote: > People, > > If I look at the source of this mail with an editor, the body of the > mail looks like this: > > LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t > LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0KRmVkb3JhIFVwZGF0ZSBOb3RpZmljYX

Re: Fedora 12 Update: trytond-1.2.4-1.fc12 - STRANGE MAIL BODY

Le 09/05/2010 11:30, Philip Rhoades a écrit : > People, > > If I look at the source of this mail with an editor, the body of the > mail looks like this: > > LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t > LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0KRmVkb3JhIFVwZGF0ZSBOb3RpZmlj

Re: Fedora 12 Update: trytond-1.2.4-1.fc12 - STRANGE MAIL BODY

People, If I look at the source of this mail with an editor, the body of the mail looks like this: LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0KRmVkb3JhIFVwZGF0ZSBOb3RpZmljYXRpb24KRkVET1JB LTIwMTAtMjQ4MwoyMDEwLTAyLTIzIDA0OjA1OjQzCi0

  1   2   3   4   >