Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-03-02 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Aaron Konstam wrote: > If something is rewritten does that mean it has to be renamed? That question is beyond the scope of this mailing list. Take it up with the Gnome folks. > And if dconf is usefull in F14 what will be its name in F15? dconf is dconf and will forever be known as dconf. -- us

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-03-02 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 16:04 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Tom H wrote: > > AFAIK gconf has been renamed dconf. > > It wasn't just renamed, it was rewritten. > > GConf was a XML-like configuration storage system. > > dconf is a binary (think Windows registry) configuration storage system.

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-03-01 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Tom H wrote: > AFAIK gconf has been renamed dconf. It wasn't just renamed, it was rewritten. GConf was a XML-like configuration storage system. dconf is a binary (think Windows registry) configuration storage system. It was designed for speed. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-03-01 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 11:48 -0500, Tom H wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 08:21 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> > >> It is configurable via dconf. > > > > I admit I don't know what dconf is. Running it causes a core dump on my > > machine;

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-03-01 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 08:21 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> >> It is configurable via dconf. > > I admit I don't know what dconf is. Running it causes a core dump on my > machine; and there is no : man dconf AFAIK gconf has been renamed dcon

Re: [Fwd: Re: FC15 and GNOME3]

2011-03-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:40 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: > Forwarded Message > From: Aaron Konstam > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: FC15 and GNOME3 > Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:35:46 -0600 > > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 08:21 +0530, Rahul Sundara

[Fwd: Re: FC15 and GNOME3]

2011-03-01 Thread Aaron Konstam
Forwarded Message From: Aaron Konstam To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: FC15 and GNOME3 Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:35:46 -0600 On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 08:21 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 02/28/2011 11:34 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > > > > Agreed.

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-03-01 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 08:21 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 02/28/2011 11:34 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > > > > Agreed. If I want lid close, suspend, let me select it. If I don't, > > let me select it. > > It is configurable via dconf. > > Rahul I admit I don't know what dconf is. Running it

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-02-28 Thread Tom H
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 02/28/2011 11:34 PM, James McKenzie wrote: >> >> Agreed.  If I want lid close, suspend, let me select it.  If I don't, >> let me select it. > > It is configurable via dconf. Which is where one of the reasons given for not providing a GUI

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-02-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 02/28/2011 11:34 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > > Agreed. If I want lid close, suspend, let me select it. If I don't, > let me select it. It is configurable via dconf. Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedorap

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-02-28 Thread Joe Zeff
On 02/28/2011 10:04 AM, James McKenzie wrote: > Agreed. If I want lid close, suspend, let me select it. If I don't, > let me select it. Yes. The Gnome devs have, once again, decided that the way they like to do things is the One True Way and everybody using Gnome must do things their way. I'

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-02-28 Thread James McKenzie
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 02/28/2011 11:45 AM, James McKenzie wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the prompt reply. I understand this choice came because some >>> Apple >>> laptops melt if you don't suspend when yo

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-02-28 Thread Genes MailLists
On 02/28/2011 11:45 AM, James McKenzie wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> >> Thanks for the prompt reply. I understand this choice came because some Apple >> laptops melt if you don't suspend when you close the cover, but after reading >> the article I checked the CP

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-02-28 Thread James McKenzie
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > Thanks for the prompt reply. I understand this choice came because some Apple > laptops melt if you don't suspend when you close the cover, but after reading > the article I checked the CPU temp on a few of mine, and they seem likely to > s

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-02-27 Thread bsfmig
Many useful configurations are missing from GNOME 3, I deeply hope them be back in later GNOME revise builds. GNOME3 is largely alike KDE 4.0.0 on the aspect of matureness seen now. On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 02:17, Tom H wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > Tom H wro

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-02-27 Thread Tom H
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Tom H wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Bill Davidsen  wrote: >>> >>> I read in a non-Fedora list that GNOME3 has dropped the ability to do power >>> management, and that all laptops will suspend when the cover is closed, >>> like

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-02-26 Thread Bill Davidsen
Tom H wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> >> I read in a non-Fedora list that GNOME3 has dropped the ability to do power >> management, and that all laptops will suspend when the cover is closed, like >> it >> or not. Hopefully that's just a users who doesn't know h

Re: FC15 and GNOME3

2011-02-26 Thread Tom H
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > I read in a non-Fedora list that GNOME3 has dropped the ability to do power > management, and that all laptops will suspend when the cover is closed, like > it > or not. Hopefully that's just a users who doesn't know how to do config, but