On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Craig White wrote:
> I would guess that terming rpmforge as 'volatile' would depend upon who
> you ask - I doubt Dag would agree. I tend to think of rpmforge as
> necessary for running CentOS/RHEL servers and think of EPEL as more
> 'volatile'
Sorry, I didn't act
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 08:46 +1000, Dan Irwin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Felix Schwarz
> wrote:
>
> > Some also have security impact. Basically the problem is that it is extremly
> > hard to provide the ABI/config stability for clamav. Combined with a few
> > questionable decisions
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Felix Schwarz
wrote:
> Some also have security impact. Basically the problem is that it is extremly
> hard to provide the ABI/config stability for clamav. Combined with a few
> questionable decisions when it came to packaging + a not-so-active maintainer
> and we
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:59:39 +0200
Felix Schwarz wrote:
> Am 21.04.2010 06:33, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:46:33 +1000
> > Dan Irwin wrote:
> >
> >> The clamav packages in EPEL are quite broken, and don't work out of
> >> the box. I think this has been the case for many month
Am 21.04.2010 06:33, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:46:33 +1000
> Dan Irwin wrote:
>
>> The clamav packages in EPEL are quite broken, and don't work out of
>> the box. I think this has been the case for many months.
>
> Have you filed any bugs? Whats broken?
There are a couple of b
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Craig White wrote:
> yes, rpmforge
>
> Fedora/EPEL clamav seems to really lag behind releases
>
Cool. I will look into this.
I had forgotten about rpmforge for some reason.
Cheers,
Dan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or chang
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:46:33 +1000
Dan Irwin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I couldn't find a EPEL users list, so I'm posting here.
Yeah, there isn't one, but the epel-devel list is open for anyone. ;)
> The clamav packages in EPEL are quite broken, and don't work out of
> the box. I think this has been
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 11:46 +1000, Dan Irwin wrote:
> On the off chance I'm "doing this wrong", is there a better source for
> clamav packages for RHEL/CentOS?
yes, rpmforge
Fedora/EPEL clamav seems to really lag behind releases
Craig
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dang
