Am 17.11.2012 20:04, schrieb lee:
> Reindl Harald writes:
>
>> Am 17.11.2012 16:25, schrieb lee:
>>> Networkmanager is forcibly installed by default and breaks things when
>>> you do that --- add that to the list of problems. It should either use
>>> its own independent way or operate accordin
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 17.11.2012 16:25, schrieb lee:
>> Networkmanager is forcibly installed by default and breaks things when
>> you do that --- add that to the list of problems. It should either use
>> its own independent way or operate according to the information provided
>> in such fil
Am 17.11.2012 16:25, schrieb lee:
> Networkmanager is forcibly installed by default and breaks things when
> you do that --- add that to the list of problems. It should either use
> its own independent way or operate according to the information provided
> in such files instead of messing things
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 17.11.2012 00:10, schrieb lee:
>
>>> You never get guest computers, or get asked to take in someone else's
>>> computer and fix it, or install Linux on it for them? You never add new
>>> devices? Some of which really expect DHCP (network printers, gaming
>>> consoles,
Allegedly, on or about 16 November 2012, Reindl Harald sent:
> i agree that it makes no sense if there is no useful domain but the
> benefits for cases where you have one beats the overhead easily
I've tended to find that it's easier to do things if you do have a
domain name, even if you've faked
Am 17.11.2012 00:10, schrieb lee:
>> You never get guest computers, or get asked to take in someone else's
>> computer and fix it, or install Linux on it for them? You never add new
>> devices? Some of which really expect DHCP (network printers, gaming
>> consoles, media devices). Or had to c
Tim writes:
> Tim:
>>> I'd say, if you're installing BIND, then run a DHCP server on that
>>> same computer, and disable any other DHCP servers on your LAN (such
>>> as in your modem/router). Configure your DHCP server to tell all
>>> clients on your network the addresses for configuring your ne
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 16.11.2012 21:45, schrieb lee:
>> 1.) omit the search option
>> 2.) put a non-existent domain into the search option
>> 3.) put an existing domain into the search option
>>
>>
>> No. 2.) isn't useful
>
> correct
>
>> no. 3.) leads to unexpected results and
>> confusio
Am 16.11.2012 21:45, schrieb lee:
> 1.) omit the search option
> 2.) put a non-existent domain into the search option
> 3.) put an existing domain into the search option
>
>
> No. 2.) isn't useful
correct
> no. 3.) leads to unexpected results and
> confusion[1] and therefore isn't very useful
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 15.11.2012 18:38, schrieb lee:
>> Tim writes:
>>
>>> Allegedly, on or about 12 November 2012, lee sent:
If you're using a chaching name server, you might not want the
"search" option.
>>>
>>> You probably do. It, or a similar option, will be used so that "p
Tim:
>> I'd say, if you're installing BIND, then run a DHCP server on that
>> same computer, and disable any other DHCP servers on your LAN (such
>> as in your modem/router). Configure your DHCP server to tell all
>> clients on your network the addresses for configuring your network
>> (gateway, D
Am 15.11.2012 18:38, schrieb lee:
> Tim writes:
>
>> Allegedly, on or about 12 November 2012, lee sent:
>>> If you're using a chaching name server, you might not want the
>>> "search" option.
>>
>> You probably do. It, or a similar option, will be used so that "ping
>> hostname" successfully t
Tim writes:
> Allegedly, on or about 12 November 2012, lee sent:
>> If you're using a chaching name server, you might not want the
>> "search" option.
>
> You probably do. It, or a similar option, will be used so that "ping
> hostname" successfully translates into "ping hostname.domainname" on
>
Allegedly, on or about 12 November 2012, lee sent:
> If you're using a chaching name server, you might not want the
> "search" option.
You probably do. It, or a similar option, will be used so that "ping
hostname" successfully translates into "ping hostname.domainname" on
your network.
> install
"Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" writes:
> On 11/11/12 14:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> "PEERDNS=no" is your friend touch prevent touch resolv.conf
>> and NO it is NOT ok to have ANY unrelieable DNS in
>> resolv.conf becasue as explaiend you have no control which is
>> used for a request, there
Reindl Harald:
> > maybe you have a crappy ISP which blocks DNS if it is
> > not their own one - let me guess: USA, here in europe
> > it is absolutely no probem to setup a dns-server which
> > does recursion and never tocuhes any ISp crap, some
> > providers think they knpw better what their users
Am 11.11.2012 21:50, schrieb Bob Goodwin - Zuni:
> On 11/11/12 15:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 11.11.2012 21:33, schrieb Bob Goodwin - Zuni:
>>> >**Changed PEERDNS=no back to PEERDNS=yes
>>> >
>>> > ** and then I could send ...
>> maybe you have a crappy ISP which blocks DNS if it is
>>
On 11/11/12 15:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.11.2012 21:33, schrieb Bob Goodwin - Zuni:
>**Changed PEERDNS=no back to PEERDNS=yes
>
> ** and then I could send ...
maybe you have a crappy ISP which blocks DNS if it is
not their own one - let me guess: USA, here in europe
it is absolutel
Am 11.11.2012 21:33, schrieb Bob Goodwin - Zuni:
>**Changed PEERDNS=no back to PEERDNS=yes
>
> ** and then I could send ...
maybe you have a crappy ISP which blocks DNS if it is
not their own one - let me guess: USA, here in europe
it is absolutely no probem to setup a dns-server which
On 11/11/12 14:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
"PEERDNS=no" is your friend touch prevent touch resolv.conf
and NO it is NOT ok to have ANY unrelieable DNS in
resolv.conf becasue as explaiend you have no control which is
used for a request, there is no order, the diesgn is to
configure equal namservers a
20 matches
Mail list logo
