On 05/11/2013 04:58 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
On 05/11/2013 01:04 PM, g wrote:
although you have already installed liveusb-creator, did you give
consideration to using;
dd if=/path/to/iso-file of=/dev/usb
i run fedora for special programs and mainly use scientific linux,
which alr
Am 11.05.2013 22:30, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 05/11/2013 12:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> i am a really hard figther against*useless* dependencies or
>> not fine enough splittet ones by subpackages pulling a X11
>> dependency-chain on servers
>
> You're not the only one. Did you know that gdm an
On 05/12/2013 12:01 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
Unless my memory's wrong, I found it several months ago, verified it
with others on the fedorafourm and we all dealt with it. I'm guessing
that it got fixed because at least one of the people who were involved
in that thread found that (at that time) it
On 05/11/2013 08:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
You don't really need to run Rawhide to check that. repoquery does the
job just fine and yes, it appears to be fixed in Rawhide. Next time,
when you do run into any unnecessary dependencies, please do file a bug
report. User mailing list isn't the
Hi
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 04:38 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>>
>> Did you file any bug reports? It has been obsoleted in Rawhide
>>
>
> No. I don't use PackageKit and, as I use Xfce, I don't really need gdm.
> I switched over to lightdm and got rid o
On 05/11/2013 04:38 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Did you file any bug reports? It has been obsoleted in Rawhide
No. I don't use PackageKit and, as I use Xfce, I don't really need gdm.
I switched over to lightdm and got rid of PackageKit, gdm and
preupgrade. (Personally, I don't ever use Raw
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 01:04 PM, g wrote:
>>
>>
>> although you have already installed liveusb-creator, did you give
>> consideration to using;
>>
>>dd if=/path/to/iso-file of=/dev/usb
>>
>> i run fedora for special programs and mainly use scientific linux,
>> which already
Hi
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 12:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> i am a really hard figther against*useless* dependencies or
>>
>> not fine enough splittet ones by subpackages pulling a X11
>> dependency-chain on servers
>>
>
> You're not the only one. Di
On 05/11/2013 01:04 PM, g wrote:
>
>
> although you have already installed liveusb-creator, did you give
> consideration to using;
>
>dd if=/path/to/iso-file of=/dev/usb
>
> i run fedora for special programs and mainly use scientific linux,
> which already had liveusb-creator installed.
>
Have
On 05/11/2013 12:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i am a really hard figther against*useless* dependencies or
not fine enough splittet ones by subpackages pulling a X11
dependency-chain on servers
You're not the only one. Did you know that gdm and PackageKit both have
preupgrade as a dependency,
Am 11.05.2013 21:03, schrieb Fernando Cassia:
> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM, "Germán A. Racca"
> wrote:
>> I sincerely think that this kind of complaints (I have seen several from you
>> too) won't take you nowhere.
>
> Yes, it takes me to nirvana. It shows me what software is well written
On 05/11/2013 04:03 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM, "Germán A. Racca"
wrote:
I sincerely think that this kind of complaints (I have seen several from you
too) won't take you nowhere.
Yes, it takes me to nirvana. It shows me what software is well written
and which
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM, "Germán A. Racca"
wrote:
> I sincerely think that this kind of complaints (I have seen several from you
> too) won't take you nowhere.
Yes, it takes me to nirvana. It shows me what software is well written
and which ones are not.
> Have you thought about program
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 2:04 PM, g wrote:
> i run fedora for special programs and mainly use scientific linux,
> which already had liveusb-creator installed.
that is a good approach (I mean, having LiveUSB-creator as part of the
base install) .
Like I said in a previous message, I solved it by u
On 05/10/2013 10:48 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
14 packages, 104 MB installed just for a simple GUI that calls
other low-level system utils...
Sheesh...
Thinking that liveusb-creator is often run from LiveCD, wouldn't it be
nice to create a statically linked liveusb-creator that can be
down
Am 11.05.2013 18:03, schrieb Germán A. Racca:
> First of all, it is NOT a simple GUI. It is a GUI programmed in Python using
> the Qt toolkit, so if you don't have
> Qt installed in your system, it pulls as a dependency, which is great,
> because otherwise you would have to install
> everything
On 05/10/2013 12:48 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
14 packages, 104 MB installed just for a simple GUI that calls
other low-level system utils...
Sheesh...
Thinking that liveusb-creator is often run from LiveCD, wouldn't it be
nice to create a statically linked liveusb-creator that can be
downlo
> 14 packages, 104 MB installed just for a simple GUI that calls
> other low-level system utils...
> Sheesh...
+1
For me, most of the time it even doesn't work correctly and fails with
obscure messages or stack-traces in some python code.
I switched to unetbootin, which has also a lot of depe
14 packages, 104 MB installed just for a simple GUI that calls
other low-level system utils...
Sheesh...
Thinking that liveusb-creator is often run from LiveCD, wouldn't it be
nice to create a statically linked liveusb-creator that can be
downloaded as a single binary and run?. Furthermore, su
19 matches
Mail list logo
