On 06/29/2010 11:34 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 June 2010 08:20 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>
>> The newest official Firefox version is 3.5.10.
>> Your version is not detected. Update now.
>>
>>
> Its 3.6.4.
>
>
It depends on the OS, on F12 it's 3.5.10. On F13 it's 3.6.4.
Paolo
-
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 08:20 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> The newest official Firefox version is 3.5.10.
> Your version is not detected. Update now.
>
Its 3.6.4.
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscr
Oh, man, I think I just figured out where you're coming from.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Robert Myers wrote:
> [...]
> I'm saying that because Flash is nothing but a source of problems, even on
> Windows.
Yesterday or the day before, after the periodic yum update on my
iBook, Firefox laun
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Craig White wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 10:17 -0400, Robert Myers wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Joel Rees
> > wrote:
>
> >
> > What bias. I hate Windows. If you want to see how the web looks to
> > someone other than a geek, you have to use Wi
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 10:17 -0400, Robert Myers wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Joel Rees
> wrote:
>
> What bias. I hate Windows. If you want to see how the web looks to
> someone other than a geek, you have to use Windows.
I don't understand this - I use both Windows and Linux
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Robert Myers wrote:
>
> > But there is a Fedora issue here. Why would anyone sane try to use
> > bleeding-edge Fedora for multi-media web surfing?
>
> Just curious, are you talking about rawhide or 64 bit? Pleas
On Jun 29, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Robert Myers wrote:
> But there is a Fedora issue here. Why would anyone sane try to use
> bleeding-edge Fedora for multi-media web surfing?
Just curious, are you talking about rawhide or 64 bit? Please be a
little more specific. Otherwise, you could hit someon
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Michal wrote:
> as issues, but those issues don't seem to affect
> > Chrome as much. I don't have Chrome suddenly go away while I'm perusing
> > some website as often happens with Firefox. But even when I'm not
> > visiting sites that use flash FF still consumes
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 13:12 -0700, Tim Van Dyne wrote:
> I'd also point out that with 50-60 tabs open at any given time I've
> simply not experienced the issues you're having with it personally.
I don't know how people manage that. Quite apart from being able to
pick the one that you want, I find
>
>
>>> It's not "my" Firefox that has problems, it's Firefox that has
issues.
>>> It doesn't render pages correctly, it crashes often, particularly on
>>> pages that have flash, and it consumes huge amounts of memory and
cpu.
>>>
>> The "particularly on pages that have flash" bit should
On 06/28/2010 10:00 AM, Michal wrote:
> as issues, but those issues don't seem to affect
>
>> Chrome as much. I don't have Chrome suddenly go away while I'm perusing
>> some website as often happens with Firefox. But even when I'm not
>> visiting sites that use flash FF still consumes a lot o
as issues, but those issues don't seem to affect
> Chrome as much. I don't have Chrome suddenly go away while I'm perusing
> some website as often happens with Firefox. But even when I'm not
> visiting sites that use flash FF still consumes a lot of memory. At
> least once a day I have to stop an
On 06/28/2010 09:34 AM, Chris Tyler wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 09:20 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>
>
>> It's not "my" Firefox that has problems, it's Firefox that has issues.
>> It doesn't render pages correctly, it crashes often, particularly on
>> pages that have flash, and it consumes h
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 09:20 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> It's not "my" Firefox that has problems, it's Firefox that has issues.
> It doesn't render pages correctly, it crashes often, particularly on
> pages that have flash, and it consumes huge amounts of memory and cpu.
The "particularly on pa
On 06/28/2010 07:30 AM, Tim Van Dyne wrote:
>> It seems firefox gets worse every release.
>>
Ya ever stop to wonder if it's simply the package on your own system?
Because I just rolled out the latest Firefox to 226 Fedora systems
over the weekend and they all work like a charm.
I do know that F
>> It seems firefox gets worse every release.
>>
Ya ever stop to wonder if it's simply the package on your own system?
Because I just rolled out the latest Firefox to 226 Fedora systems over
the weekend and they all work like a charm.
I do know that Firefox *sometimes* jacks up royally if you u
On 06/26/2010 09:24 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 08:02 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>
>> I logged into my laptop this AM and discovered that during the night
>> firefox had crashed. I restarted it and now it wont display any
>> sites. Every tab that is supposed to au
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 08:02 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I logged into my laptop this AM and discovered that during the night
> firefox had crashed. I restarted it and now it wont display any
> sites. Every tab that is supposed to auto start is blank, even though
> it remembers the site address
18 matches
Mail list logo
