Re: [Fedora] Re: Skype rpms discontinued

On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 6:02 PM Walter Cazzola wrote: > > >> Recently, the linux rpm distribution of skype has been discontinued: > > >> https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?332743-Updates-hang-on-skype&p=1883992 > > >> Is there some alternative to using snap or web-skype > > >> https://sn

Re: [Fedora] Re: Skype rpms discontinued

Hi On Tue, 4 Jun 2024, Tim via users wrote: On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 11:21 +0100, Paul Smith wrote: Recently, the linux rpm distribution of skype has been discontinued: https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?332743-Updates-hang-on-skype&p=1883992 Is there some alternative to using sn

Re: Skype rpms discontinued

It seems there's a flatpak: flatpak search skype Name Description Application ID Version Branch Remotes Skype Call and message skype users, with video chat support com.skype.Client8.119.0.201 stable flathub On 6/4/24 5:21 AM, Paul Smith

Re: Skype rpms discontinued

On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 11:21 +0100, Paul Smith wrote: > Recently, the linux rpm distribution of skype has been discontinued: > > https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?332743-Updates-hang-on-skype&p=1883992 > > Is there some alternative to using snap or web-skype > > https://snapcraft.io/i

Re: skype 8.69

On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 21:30, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > To update skype, I followed the instructions provided by: > > https://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2012/install-skype-on-fedora-centos-red-hat-rhel-scientific-linux-sl/ > > but > it finally failed > > dnf install > /home/pdupre/rpm

Re: skype 8.69

Very good, thanks you > > My suggestion - off topic - would be: ditch the Skype. - not > in official repos but in 'copr' you will Signal (hopefully > Fedora devel/maintainers will make Signal "official" soon) > Version I use is from: > copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:luminoso:Signal-Desktop > cheers

Re: skype 8.69

My suggestion - off topic - would be: ditch the Skype. - not in official repos but in 'copr' you will Signal (hopefully Fedora devel/maintainers will make Signal "official" soon) Version I use is from: copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:luminoso:Signal-Desktop cheers, L On 22/03/2021 21:29, Patric

Re: skype

Putting this back on the Fedora List On 03/03/2021 00:12, Patrick Dupre wrote: Finally, I have Name    Options fedora  system,oci flathub system flatpak search skype Name Description  Application ID Version   Branch Remotes Sky… Call and message skype users, w… com.skype.

RE: skype

Sorry, you'll have to wait till 2098 -Original Message- From: Tim via users Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 1:22 PM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: Tim Subject: Re: skype On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 01:19 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > Someone said that Microsoft will fix it "

Re: skype

On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 01:19 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > Someone said that Microsoft will fix it "soon". It's 2021, they still never got Win98 working properly... -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.15.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 3 15:06:38 UTC 2021 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to m

Re: skype

Resending  Sent off-list by mistake... On 02/03/2021 17:26, Patrick Dupre wrote: Name Options fedora system,oci You don't have [egreshko@meimei ~]$ flatpak remotes Name    Options fedora  system,oci flathub system You need to add the flathub remote. Sadly, I don't recall how to

Re: skype

Name Options fedora system,oci > > On 02/03/2021 16:48, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > flatpak search skype > > > > No matches found > > What do you have for > > flatpak remotes > > ? > > -- > People who believe they don't make mistakes have already made one. > ___

Re: skype

On 3/2/21 12:37 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: When I try to update skype to version 8.69.0.77-1.x86_64.rpm I get: Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides libatomic1 needed by skypeforlinux-8.69.0.77-1.x86_64 It's a packaging bug. Someone said that Microsoft will fix it "soon".

Re: skype

On 02/03/2021 16:48, Patrick Dupre wrote: flatpak search skype No matches found What do you have for flatpak remotes ? -- People who believe they don't make mistakes have already made one. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: skype

flatpak search skype No matches found > On 02/03/2021 16:37, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > When I try to update skype to version 8.69.0.77-1.x86_64.rpm > > I get: > > Error: > > Problem: conflicting requests > >- nothing provides libatomic1 needed by skypeforlinux-8.69.0.77-1.x86_64 > > (try to

Re: skype

On 02/03/2021 16:37, Patrick Dupre wrote: When I try to update skype to version 8.69.0.77-1.x86_64.rpm I get: Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides libatomic1 needed by skypeforlinux-8.69.0.77-1.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) dnf instal

Re: skype

On 23 January 2016 10:00:12 GMT, Dario Lesca wrote: >Il giorno ven, 22/01/2016 alle 15.17 +0100, Dario Lesca ha scritto: >> Il giorno mar, 19/01/2016 alle 10.28 +0100, Bob Marcan ha scritto: >> >   >> > What about http://www.viber.com/en/products/linux ? >> >> where is the source code? > >My ques

Re: skype

On 01/23/2016 02:00 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno ven, 22/01/2016 alle 15.17 +0100, Dario Lesca ha scritto: Il giorno mar, 19/01/2016 alle 10.28 +0100, Bob Marcan ha scritto: What about http://www.viber.com/en/products/linux ? where is the source code? My question is for Viber proposed

Re: skype

Il giorno ven, 22/01/2016 alle 15.17 +0100, Dario Lesca ha scritto: > Il giorno mar, 19/01/2016 alle 10.28 +0100, Bob Marcan ha scritto: > >   > > What about http://www.viber.com/en/products/linux ? > > where is the source code? My question is for Viber proposed by Bob, and not for tox I know wh

Re: skype

2016-01-22 19:12 GMT+01:00, Rick Stevens : > On 01/22/2016 09:51 AM, jd1008 wrote: >> >> >> On 01/22/2016 10:41 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: >>> On 01/22/2016 09:23 AM, Bob Marcan wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:17:19 +0100 Dario Lesca wrote: > Il giorno mar, 19/01/2016 alle 10.28 +010

Re: skype

On 01/22/2016 09:51 AM, jd1008 wrote: On 01/22/2016 10:41 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 01/22/2016 09:23 AM, Bob Marcan wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:17:19 +0100 Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno mar, 19/01/2016 alle 10.28 +0100, Bob Marcan ha scritto: What about http://www.viber.com/en/products

Re: skype

On 01/22/2016 10:41 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 01/22/2016 09:23 AM, Bob Marcan wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:17:19 +0100 Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno mar, 19/01/2016 alle 10.28 +0100, Bob Marcan ha scritto: What about http://www.viber.com/en/products/linux ? where is the source code? -

Re: skype

On 01/22/2016 09:23 AM, Bob Marcan wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:17:19 +0100 Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno mar, 19/01/2016 alle 10.28 +0100, Bob Marcan ha scritto: What about http://www.viber.com/en/products/linux ? where is the source code? -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 23

Re: skype

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:17:19 +0100 Dario Lesca wrote: > Il giorno mar, 19/01/2016 alle 10.28 +0100, Bob Marcan ha scritto: > >  > > What about http://www.viber.com/en/products/linux ? > > where is the source code? > > --  > Dario Lesca > (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 23 Workstation) > No so

Re: skype

Il giorno mar, 19/01/2016 alle 10.28 +0100, Bob Marcan ha scritto: >  > What about http://www.viber.com/en/products/linux ? where is the source code? --  Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 23 Workstation) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscr

Re: skype

Il giorno mar, 19/01/2016 alle 07.25 +0100, Outback Dingo ha scritto: > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Dario Lesca > wrote: > > Il giorno lun, 18/01/2016 alle 21.10 +0100, Outback Dingo ha > > scritto: > > > Ive given up on skype though its installed, Ive moved on to > > QTOX, > > > do

Re: skype

Allegedly, on or about 19 January 2016, jd1008 sent: > Yes - ALL businesses are only about MONEY. I call foul on that one. I've been in business for over twenty years, and that's not the case with me. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC

Re: skype

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:03:14AM -0800, Joe Zeff wrote: > This is a list for discussing Fedora Linux, not politics. What I > quoted was off-topic, and it doesn't matter if I agree with you or > not, it still doesn't belong here. I haven't called this to the > attention of the moderators, and I'

Re: skype

On 01/19/2016 09:49 AM, jd1008 wrote: I do not give any heed to anal censors. This is a list for discussing Fedora Linux, not politics. What I quoted was off-topic, and it doesn't matter if I agree with you or not, it still doesn't belong here. I haven't called this to the attention of the

Re: skype

On 01/19/2016 10:22 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 01/19/2016 09:17 AM, jd1008 wrote: Yes - ALL businesses are only about MONEY. But what is wrong with most businesses is that they resort to dishonesty, deception, theft of IP of smaller underfunded companies (which cannot defend themselves nor pay the

Re: skype

On 01/19/2016 09:17 AM, jd1008 wrote: Yes - ALL businesses are only about MONEY. But what is wrong with most businesses is that they resort to dishonesty, deception, theft of IP of smaller underfunded companies (which cannot defend themselves nor pay the huge attorney fees to file lawsuits), brib

Re: skype

On 01/18/2016 07:54 PM, Tim wrote: Allegedly, on or about 18 January 2016, jd1008 sent: So, I am wondering why is the skype implementation proprietary? Since it is the physical infrastructure (the communications equipment and accounts database computers ...etc) that is (are) the primary invest

Re: skype

On 01/18/2016 10:07 PM, jarmo wrote: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:59:04 -0800 Rick Stevens kirjoitti: I suppose someone with DEEP pockets could set up a VOIP gateway with landlines so we could use OSS like ekiga, twinkle, kopete, pidgin, etc. as normal and also have landline access. I don't see that

Re: skype

On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 07:07:09 +0200 jarmo wrote: > Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:59:04 -0800 > Rick Stevens kirjoitti: > > > > I suppose someone with DEEP pockets could set up a VOIP gateway with > > landlines so we could use OSS like ekiga, twinkle, kopete, pidgin, > > etc. as normal and also have landl

Re: skype

e Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 1:31 AM > From: jd1008 > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: skype > > > > On 01/18/2016 07:08

Re: skype

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: > Il giorno lun, 18/01/2016 alle 21.10 +0100, Outback Dingo ha scritto: > > Ive given up on skype though its installed, Ive moved on to QTOX, > > does pretty much the same thing in a secure manner. > > Where is qTox for Fedora? > https://t

Re: skype

Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:59:04 -0800 Rick Stevens kirjoitti: > I suppose someone with DEEP pockets could set up a VOIP gateway with > landlines so we could use OSS like ekiga, twinkle, kopete, pidgin, > etc. as normal and also have landline access. I don't see that > happening in the near future. Or

Re: skype

Allegedly, on or about 18 January 2016, jd1008 sent: > So, I am wondering why is the skype implementation proprietary? > Since it is the physical infrastructure (the communications equipment > and accounts database computers ...etc) that is (are) the primary > investment, why should the protocol i

Re: skype

On 01/18/2016 07:08 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, Is there any 64-bit version of skype for fedora 22 ? Thank. Hey Pat, where did u get the tox sources or binaries that you say you are now using? Thanx!! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscri

Re: skype

Il giorno lun, 18/01/2016 alle 21.10 +0100, Outback Dingo ha scritto: > Ive given up on skype though its installed, Ive moved on to QTOX, > does pretty much the same thing in a secure manner. Where is qTox for Fedora? Thanks -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 23 Workstation) --

Re: skype

On 01/18/2016 03:37 PM, Jack Craig wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Outback Dingo mailto:outbackdi...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:07 PM, jd1008 mailto:jd1...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 01/18/2016 12:59 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 01/18/2016

Re: skype

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Outback Dingo wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:07 PM, jd1008 wrote: > >> >> >> On 01/18/2016 12:59 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >> >>> On 01/18/2016 11:49 AM, jd1008 wrote: >>> On 01/18/2016 12:38 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 01/18/2016

Re: skype

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:07 PM, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 01/18/2016 12:59 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > >> On 01/18/2016 11:49 AM, jd1008 wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 01/18/2016 12:38 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >>> On 01/18/2016 06:43 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a 64-bit

Re: skype

> > So, I am wondering why is the skype implementation proprietary? > Since it is the physical infrastructure (the communications equipment > and accounts database computers ...etc) that is (are) the primary > investment, > why should the protocol implementation be so proprietary? > If anyone wante

Re: skype

On 01/18/2016 12:59 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 01/18/2016 11:49 AM, jd1008 wrote: On 01/18/2016 12:38 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 01/18/2016 06:43 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Hi, Is there a 64-bit version of skype for anything? MS users are two stupid to realize that their machines (no differ

Re: skype

On 01/18/2016 11:49 AM, jd1008 wrote: On 01/18/2016 12:38 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 01/18/2016 06:43 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Hi, Is there a 64-bit version of skype for anything? MS users are two stupid to realize that their machines (no different from ours) have been 64-bit for a long time

Re: skype

On 01/18/2016 12:38 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 01/18/2016 06:43 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Hi, Is there a 64-bit version of skype for anything? MS users are two stupid to realize that their machines (no different from ours) have been 64-bit for a long time I agree that it would be good

Re: skype

On 01/18/2016 06:43 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Hi, Is there a 64-bit version of skype for anything? MS users are two stupid to realize that their machines (no different from ours) have been 64-bit for a long time I agree that it would be good to not have to install a 32-bit skype and assoc

Re: skype

Hi, Is there a 64-bit version of skype for anything? MS users are two stupid to realize that their machines (no different from ours) have been 64-bit for a long time I agree that it would be good to not have to install a 32-bit skype and associated libraries, but I am not aware of such a p

Re: skype

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any 64-bit version of skype for fedora 22 ? > I don't know if this mailing list is the right place to ask this, maybe contact Skype support? I've been using 32-bit and I don't remember ever seeing a 64-bit alternative. D

Re: Skype in Fedora

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yes Just in 3 steps: 1: http://www.skype.com/es/download-skype/skype-for-linux/downloading/?type=fedora32 2: sudo yum localinstall skype* 3: open skype and login - -- Antonio Insuasti R. IBM “Linux System Administrator” #ECUSFQ00228 RHCE No: 130-065-63

Re: Skype in Fedora

Hi On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Mickey wrote: > Can Skype run in F20 with a Webcam ? Yes Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproj

Re: Skype 4 i Fedora 17

On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 09/15/2012 08:09 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote: > > > > On 09/15/2012 02:34 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > > > I should have read your spe

Re: Skype 4 i Fedora 17

On 09/15/2012 08:09 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Ed Greshko > wrote: > > On 09/15/2012 02:34 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > > I should have read your specs more carefully before responding, > apologies for that.

Re: Skype 4 i Fedora 17

On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 09/15/2012 02:34 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > > I should have read your specs more carefully before responding, > apologies for that. There are some hacks needed to get Skype running under > 64-bit, but this is obviously not your probl

Re: Skype 4 i Fedora 17

On 15.09.2012, Ed Greshko wrote: > [egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -q skype > skype-4.0.0.8-fc16.i586 > > [egreshko@meimei ~]$ uname -r > 3.5.3-1.fc17.x86_64 > > No problems, no hacks I have the just the same on my business machine, and I've never managed to get a "good" UDP-connection on both si

Re: Skype 4 i Fedora 17

On 09/15/2012 02:34 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > I should have read your specs more carefully before responding, apologies for > that. There are some hacks needed to get Skype running under 64-bit, but this > is obviously not your problem. > > Have you tried starting Skype from the terminal

Re: Skype 4 i Fedora 17

On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Christopher Svanefalk < christopher.svanef...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Jan Litwiński wrote: > >> J have laptop Lenovo G550 with Intel Celeron 1.8.GHz processor, 2 MB RAM >> and Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) >

Re: Skype 4 i Fedora 17

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Jan Litwiński wrote: > J have laptop Lenovo G550 with Intel Celeron 1.8.GHz processor, 2 MB RAM > and Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) > HD Audio Controller (rev 03). > I waned t to use Fedora but Skype completely freezes my desktop (it was >

Re: Skype 4 and F17

On 06/18/2012 10:41 PM, Matthew Saltzman wrote: Anyone have the new Skype 4.0.0.7 for Fedora working with F17? For me, it starts, but just waits forever while trying to log in. The old version 2.2.0.35 works fine. TIA. 4.0.0.7 works for me too. -- Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni

Re: Skype 4 and F17

On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 17:08 -0400, Martin Airs wrote: > On Monday 18 Jun 2012 16:41:56 Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > Anyone have the new Skype 4.0.0.7 for Fedora working with F17? For me, > > it starts, but just waits forever while trying to log in. The old > > version 2.2.0.35 works fine. > > It

Re: Skype 4 and F17

On 06/18/2012 03:41 PM, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > Anyone have the new Skype 4.0.0.7 for Fedora working with F17? For me, > it starts, but just waits forever while trying to log in. The old > version 2.2.0.35 works fine. > > TIA. > I just installed in and it works fine. -- -- Steve -- users

Re: Skype 4 and F17

On Monday 18 Jun 2012 16:41:56 Matthew Saltzman wrote: > Anyone have the new Skype 4.0.0.7 for Fedora working with F17? For me, > it starts, but just waits forever while trying to log in. The old > version 2.2.0.35 works fine. > > TIA. > -- > Matthew Saltzman > Clemson University Math Sciences

Re: Skype

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 08:33:31PM -0700, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > The only listing for Skype I can find is the .rpm used to install. "rpm -ql skype" will show you the files provided by the RPM. > Trying to start caused a error that libQtGui.so.4 does not exist. So I > will go try to get that.

Re: Skype

On Monday 14 November 2011 22:51:34 Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > On 11/14/2011 10:45 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > On Monday 14 November 2011 20:40:34 Mike Dwiggins wrote: > >> On 11/14/2011 8:33 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > >>> On 11/14/2011 8:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 11/15/2011 11:13 AM,

Re: Skype

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/14/2011 10:45 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Monday 14 November 2011 20:40:34 Mike Dwiggins wrote: >> On 11/14/2011 8:33 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: >>> On 11/14/2011 8:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 11/15/2011 11:13 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:

Re: Skype

On Monday 14 November 2011 20:40:34 Mike Dwiggins wrote: > On 11/14/2011 8:33 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > > On 11/14/2011 8:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 11/15/2011 11:13 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > >>> Anyone know where the config files for Skype are located? > >>> > >>> I have it installed on F

Re: Skype

On 11/14/2011 8:36 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: > On 11/15/2011 04:33 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: >> On 11/14/2011 8:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> On 11/15/2011 11:13 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: Anyone know where the config files for Skype are located? I have it installed on F14 _64 and it wi

Re: Skype

Try "yum whatprovides libname" On Nov 15, 2011 1:40 AM, "Mike Dwiggins" wrote: > > > On 11/14/2011 8:33 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > > On 11/14/2011 8:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 11/15/2011 11:13 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > >>> Anyone know where the config files for Skype are located? > >>> > >

Re: Skype

On 11/14/2011 8:33 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > On 11/14/2011 8:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 11/15/2011 11:13 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: >>> Anyone know where the config files for Skype are located? >>> >>> I have it installed on F14 _64 and it will not start up so I am guessing >>> it is a configu

Re: Skype

On 11/15/2011 04:33 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > On 11/14/2011 8:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 11/15/2011 11:13 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: >>> Anyone know where the config files for Skype are located? >>> >>> I have it installed on F14 _64 and it will not start up so I am guessing >>> it is a configur

Re: Skype

On 11/14/2011 8:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 11/15/2011 11:13 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: >> Anyone know where the config files for Skype are located? >> >> I have it installed on F14 _64 and it will not start up so I am guessing >> it is a configuration problem but, I cannot find the config files. >

Re: Skype

On 11/15/2011 11:13 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > Anyone know where the config files for Skype are located? > > I have it installed on F14 _64 and it will not start up so I am guessing > it is a configuration problem but, I cannot find the config files. > In an older install The files are in ~/

Re: Skype on Fedora 14

On 06/27/2011 03:10 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > I have heard of SELinux having problems with skype? If SELinux were the problems the SELinux Troubleshooter would be giving alerts. If it were, the OP would probably have mentioned it; if it isn't, it's not the problem. -- users mailing list user

Re: Skype on Fedora 14

Skype works on 64 bit system for me. I use fedora 14 and 15 too. the only problem, when you install skype it cannot use the 64 bit libraries. so you need to get the 32 bit libs which needs by skype. you can simply install it with the following rules: open a terminal type skype and press enter. The

Re: Skype on Fedora 14

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/27/2011 03:23 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > Has anyone had any luck running Skype on Fedora 14 86_x64. It installs > just fine but, when I try to launch it nothing happens! > > I get nothing in messages or demesg to show it even attempted to > l

Re: Skype on Fedora 14

Try to see which library is missing. From terminal: ldd `which skype` An example: ldd `which ping` libresolv.so.2 => not found libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x2b0f9000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x2acc7000) from the output can be seen that libresol

Re: Skype on Fedora 14

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > On 6/27/2011 12:29 AM, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote: >> Skype works fine for me on Fedora 15 86_x64 and it was working on F14. >> >> In case you are using the dynamic version of Skype. >> I think it needs some extra 32bit libraries to work. >>

Re: Skype on Fedora 14

On 6/27/2011 12:29 AM, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote: > Skype works fine for me on Fedora 15 86_x64 and it was working on F14. > > In case you are using the dynamic version of Skype. > I think it needs some extra 32bit libraries to work. > > as root: > > yum -y install pulseaudio-libs.i686 alsa-plugins

Re: Skype on Fedora 14

Skype works fine for me on Fedora 15 86_x64 and it was working on F14. In case you are using the dynamic version of Skype. I think it needs some extra 32bit libraries to work. as root: yum -y install pulseaudio-libs.i686 alsa-plugins-pulseaudio.i686 libv4l.i686 libXv.i686 libXScrnSaver.i686 db

Re: skype steals sound card

On Sat, 07 May 2011 09:55:23 +0200, FP wrote: > > Did you turn off Pulseaudio? Because it's supposed to prevent this behavior. > > No! skype uses pulseaudio (it is the only choice I have in the options. > > I listen to music by the way of xmms which does not semm to use > pulseaudio: I cannot se

Re: skype steals sound card

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 06/05/2011 16:41, Konstantin Svist a écrit : > On 05/06/2011 03:51 AM, François Patte wrote: >> I am wondering how to prevent skype from stealing the soud card >> everytime some of my contacts connect (even if he does not ring me)? >> i.e.: a contac

Re: skype steals sound card

On 05/06/2011 03:51 AM, François Patte wrote: > I am wondering how to prevent skype from stealing the soud card > everytime some of my contacts connect (even if he does not ring me)? > i.e.: a contact open skype while I am listening to some music, the music > is cut and I have to close skype (which

Re: Skype - No sound from microphone

2011/1/30 Matthew Saltzman : > On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 20:16 +0200, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote: > >> Using audacity for example . At first i could here no sound . But then >> when i went to preferences and chose the usb camera , things worked >> correctly . So i guess we can assume that the system itse

Re: Skype - No sound from microphone

On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 20:16 +0200, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote: > Using audacity for example . At first i could here no sound . But then > when i went to preferences and chose the usb camera , things worked > correctly . So i guess we can assume that the system itself is aware > of the microphone on

Re: Skype - No sound from microphone

On 01/30/11 11:16, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote: > On 30/01/2011 07:52 μμ, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > >> What devices are selected, and what are available for the microphone, >> speakers and ringing options? > > Well after thinking of it , i think that here is the problem . > Skype only gives me the

Re: Skype - No sound from microphone

On 30/01/2011 07:52 μμ, Marko Vojinovic wrote: Well at first all i managed to do is mess up everything . I couldn´t even hear anything system wide .Then after trying to revert changes didn´t brought the sound back i did a nice reboot which fixed up everything . So now i have playback sound and i

Re: Skype - No sound from microphone

On 30/01/2011 07:52 μμ, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > What devices are selected, and what are available for the microphone, > speakers and ringing options? Well after thinking of it , i think that here is the problem . Skype only gives me the option of PulseAudio server , so i have it for microphone

Re: Skype - No sound from microphone

On Sunday 30 January 2011 15:36:15 Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote: > Although am able to hear sounds ( in a call i can hear the caller ) the > caller > can´t hear me . System wide i have sounds. > > Now the odd thing is that if i go to PulseAudio Volume Control under > Multimedia > under the Recording d

Re: Skype - No sound from microphone

Kostas Sfakiotakis ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 30/01/2011 16:36: > I have an issue with Skype . > > Although am able to hear sounds ( in a call i can hear the caller ) the > caller > can´t hear me . System wide i have sounds. > > The version of Skype am using is : > > skype-2.1

Re: Skype startup

On 01/16/2011 09:28 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > And the only thing I need to do to maintain such a setup is to *not* close > any > apps when doing a shutdown. The session manager will remember that they were > active at the logout moment (before sending them the kill signal), and will > react

Re: Skype startup

On 01/16/11 18:12, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 23:22 +, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> Genes MailLists wrote: >> >>> On 01/16/2011 10:45 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Skype works fine under Fedora-14/KDE on my Thinkpad T43, but it starts automatically when I boot and logo

Re: Skype startup

On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 23:22 +, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Genes MailLists wrote: > > > On 01/16/2011 10:45 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > >> Skype works fine under Fedora-14/KDE on my Thinkpad T43, > >> but it starts automatically when I boot and logon. > >> I'd rather start it myself when I want to

Re: Skype startup

Genes MailLists wrote: > On 01/16/2011 10:45 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> Skype works fine under Fedora-14/KDE on my Thinkpad T43, >> but it starts automatically when I boot and logon. >> I'd rather start it myself when I want to. .. >> What exactly determines which programs startup on boot or log

Re: Skype startup

On 01/16/2011 10:45 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Skype works fine under Fedora-14/KDE on my Thinkpad T43, > but it starts automatically when I boot and logon. > I'd rather start it myself when I want to. > > Is this easy to set up? > What exactly determines which programs startup on boot or login?

Re: Skype startup

On 01/16/11 08:45, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Skype works fine under Fedora-14/KDE on my Thinkpad T43, > but it starts automatically when I boot and logon. > I'd rather start it myself when I want to. > > Is this easy to set up? > What exactly determines which programs startup on boot or login? > Ther

Re: skype on fedora 14 x86_64

On 01/02/2011 09:26 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Sunday 02 January 2011 18:15:31 Johan Scheepers wrote: >> On 01/02/2011 05:40 PM, Lucélio Gomes de Freitas wrote: Now I would like to get a webcam going. Did some google but it seem that this is still in diapers?? I do hav

Re: skype on fedora 14 x86_64

On 01/03/2011 03:04 PM, Lucélio Gomes de Freitas wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Johan, It works Plug and play, with Vx-1000, Vx-3000, and Vx-6000. All them from M$. Have a look at This Place. Bye, Lucélio. Thanks Luc

Re: skype on fedora 14 x86_64

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Johan, It works Plug and play, with Vx-1000, Vx-3000, and Vx-6000. All them from M$. Have a look at This Place. Bye, Lucélio. - -- Lucélio Gomes de Freitas ETFCSF-> U.G.F.-> P.U.C.(RJ) Engº, An

Re: skype on fedora 14 x86_64

Erik P. Olsen wrote: > On 02/01/11 21:14, Johan Scheepers wrote: >> On 01/02/2011 07:26 PM, Darlene Wallach wrote: >>> Johan, >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Johan Scheepers >>> wrote: On 01/02/2011 06:52 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Johan Sc

  1   2   >