On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:17:07 +0200, RH (Reindl) wrote:
> Am 20.04.2012 18:09, schrieb Davi Garcia:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm using Fedora 17 on my workstation but I'm having issue to upgrade my
> > system. I think someone pushed some Alpha
> > packages to the "updates-testing" repository. Does any
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 15:34 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 13:42 -0300, Davi Garcia wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thanks for all feedback! Sorry about post question to the wrong list
> > and about my poor problem description. Let me try explain better:
> >
> > I never decide
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 13:42 -0300, Davi Garcia wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for all feedback! Sorry about post question to the wrong list
> and about my poor problem description. Let me try explain better:
>
> I never decided to install Samba or Samba4 in my workstation, these
> packages were inst
Hi all,
Thanks for all feedback! Sorry about post question to the wrong list and
about my poor problem description. Let me try explain better:
I never decided to install Samba or Samba4 in my workstation, these
packages were installed by default. I know that I'm using F17 that is still
in beta, b
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 13:09:45 -0300,
Davi Garcia wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using Fedora 17 on my workstation but I'm having issue to upgrade my
system. I think someone pushed some Alpha packages to the "updates-testing"
repository. Does any one know if this is expected? The output below shows
"yu
On 20/04/12 17:17, Reindl Harald wrote:
first you are using a beta version of fedora
additionally you are using updates-testing on a beta-release
That is normal Fedora practice for pre-GA Branched.
fedora.repo & updates-testing.repo
which on GA, updates-testing.repo gets disabled,
updates.repo
Am 20.04.2012 18:09, schrieb Davi Garcia:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using Fedora 17 on my workstation but I'm having issue to upgrade my
> system. I think someone pushed some Alpha
> packages to the "updates-testing" repository. Does any one know if this is
> expected? The output below shows "yum
> up
On 20/04/12 17:09, Davi Garcia wrote:
Hi all,
Aside from posting to the wrong-list,
what the problem?
Did you check is Samba4 the Alpha?
f17 is currently at Beta not alpha.
Correct List for test-builds:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
On 04/21/2012 12:09 AM, Davi Garcia wrote:
> I'm using Fedora 17 on my workstation but I'm having issue to upgrade my
> system. I
> think someone pushed some Alpha packages to the "updates-testing" repository.
> Does
> any one know if this is expected? The output below shows "yum update
> --skip
Hi all,
I'm using Fedora 17 on my workstation but I'm having issue to upgrade my
system. I think someone pushed some Alpha packages to the "updates-testing"
repository. Does any one know if this is expected? The output below shows
"yum update --skip-broken".
Packages skipped because of dependency
10 matches
Mail list logo