On 12Jan2022 18:35, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Running a new shell under the old one is always safe (since the old
>shell is still there when you exit this one), and if you need "login"
>behavior, "bash -l" gives you that.
+100 for this. Ashamed that I forgot to suggest it. Thanks, Cameron
_
> Or you can source your .profile (or separate script):
>
> . ~/.bash_profile
Be very careful with sourcing. These scripts are likely to set things
in your environment or start processes that are appropriate at
initialization, but will trash your current environment. For example,
typi
On Jan 11, 2022, at 17:14, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> In a GUI such as a desktop the situation is more complicated:
>
> - the GUI startup does not automatically run a login shell (to some
> extend because interaction or mistakes can then easily break the GUI
> startup).
It’s actually a lot
On 11Jan2022 15:32, linux guy wrote:
>Comments below. Thanks for such a comprehensive answer.
>- when you start a terminal it may or may not run a login shell; this
>> can be controlled with the settings for your terminal emulator. What
>> are you using?
>
>Konsole. According to its settings
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 17:15, linux guy wrote:
> I'm trying to add a few directories to PATH in F35. I'm embarrassed to
> admit it isn't going well.
>
Don't be embarrassed, Managing the PATH has problematic since UNIX was a
teenager, as evidenced
by the date
Comments below. Thanks for such a comprehensive answer.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 3:13 PM Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 11Jan2022 14:15, linux guy wrote:
> >I'm trying to add a few directories to PATH in F35. I'm embarrassed to
> >admit it isn't going well.
>
On 12/01/2022 05:15, linux guy wrote:
I'm trying to add a few directories to PATH in F35. I'm embarrassed to admit
it isn't going well.
Where is PATH stored in F35 ?
When exactly does .bash_profile get executed ?
How does one get the bash environment reloaded without logging
On 11Jan2022 14:15, linux guy wrote:
>I'm trying to add a few directories to PATH in F35. I'm embarrassed to
>admit it isn't going well.
>
>Where is PATH stored in F35 ?
In your processes' memory. Unhelpful. But it is _initialised_ by your
login sequence.
I'm trying to add a few directories to PATH in F35. I'm embarrassed to
admit it isn't going well.
Where is PATH stored in F35 ?
When exactly does .bash_profile get executed ?
How does one get the bash environment reloaded without logging out and
logging in ? $source ? $exec
But boot from the grub menu fails:
'/efi/Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi' not found
because the grub path use lower case efi, while the the actual path
has it capitalized.
If you edit the boot command to be uppercase, does it work? The
partition is vfat, so it's supposed to
'/efi/Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi' not found
because the grub path use lower case efi, while the the actual path has
it capitalized.
If you edit the boot command to be uppercase, does it work? The
partition is vfat, so it's supposed to
#x27; not found
because the grub path use lower case efi, while the the actual path has
it capitalized.
Where does grub store the path it uses for the Windows boot manager ?
sean
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe s
On 03/25/2020 02:10 AM, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
thanks for the tips ..
I don't have experience writing bash scripts, (writing them is torture
because I'm always wrong ...;-) ),
This might be of some help: http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/
___
users ma
wrote:
> >I couldn't understand the reason for the double registration of the path :
> >(surly the script was executed twice).
>
> Or the same incantation is elsewhere in your setup, thus doing it twice.
> Eg .profile or something.
>
> >I write (for the benefit
On 25Mar2020 05:31, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
I couldn't understand the reason for the double registration of the path :
(surly the script was executed twice).
Or the same incantation is elsewhere in your setup, thus doing it twice.
Eg .profile or something.
I write (for the benef
I couldn't understand the reason for the double registration of the path :
(surly the script was executed twice).
I write (for the benefit of others) the solution I found:
(I modified the script with a condition).
-
newpath="/opt/netbeans/java/maven/bin"
if [[ "
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 19:23, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 24Mar2020 17:43, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >This is correct.
> >You add a new path to the old path. Then it duplicates the path
>
> No, his script is correct (to do it for all users).
>
> I expect he is runn
On 24Mar2020 17:43, Patrick Dupre wrote:
This is correct.
You add a new path to the old path. Then it duplicates the path
No, his script is correct (to do it for all users).
I expect he is running the PATH= command twice - once from
/etc/profile.d, and maybe once in his personal .profile or
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 14:42, Angelo Moreschini
wrote:
> so ...
> what is the correct content of the script
> in order to have only one instance of the new PATH to add ??
>
Look in /etc/profile for a function called pathmunge. This checks to see
if the
new PATH component is al
Then,
you can open a new shell
and/or set up you .bashrc
by the xorrect PATH,
and start a new shell (or login back).
Test you .bashrc before logout.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire
so ...
what is the correct content of the script
in order to have only one instance of the new PATH to add ??
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:45 PM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> This is correct.
>
> You add a new path to the old path. Then it duplicates
This is correct.
You add a new path to the old path. Then it duplicates the path
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078
Still thank you, ... it works now.
But I have still another (little) problem:
To change the path, I wrote in the directory /etc/profile.d, a shell script
with this content:
---
PATH=$PATH:/opt/netbeans/java/maven/bin
export PATH
-
I don't understand because the output of the command
gt; > installed in the directory: "/ opt / netbeans / java / maven / bin /
> mvn".
> >
> > And I can run it (maven) by giving its full path from the command line.
> >
> > I wanted to modify the PATH variable to use the simple name of the
>
On 3/24/20 8:11 AM, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
hi
I have a strange problem ...
On my computer "maven" (an IDE for developent in java language) is
installed in the directory: "/ opt / netbeans / java / maven / bin / mvn".
And I can run it (maven) by giving its full path from
hi
I have a strange problem ...
On my computer "maven" (an IDE for developent in java language) is
installed in the directory: "/ opt / netbeans / java / maven / bin / mvn".
And I can run it (maven) by giving its full path from the command line.
I wanted to modify the PATH
Allegedly, on or about 10 May 2018, stan sent:
> This turned out to be a file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d that had a path set
> to /usr/local/lib/firefox. When I removed that file and ran
> ldconfig, qutebrowser started just fine. And it had no effect on
> running nightly (firefox), which
On Thu, 10 May 2018 09:50:49 -0700
stan wrote:
This turned out to be a file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d that had a path set
to /usr/local/lib/firefox. When I removed that file and ran ldconfig,
qutebrowser started just fine. And it had no effect on running
nightly (firefox), which is installed in
On 17-08-31 14:43:10, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 08/31/2017 11:14 AM, Tony Nelson wrote:
> On 17-08-31 12:41:09, Mike Wright wrote:
>
>> How about using "env": env PATH="new_path" chroot /some_dir
>>
>> Wouldn't this preempt the passed PATH, prof
On 17-08-31 11:34:21, Kevin Cummings wrote:
On 08/30/17 15:16, Tony Nelson wrote:
> I have an old CentOS5 that I chroot into. On my old f20 box, PATH
> included /bin, but now on f26 it does not. I don't understand how
For a while now, /bin should be a link to /usr/bin. is /usr/b
On 08/31/2017 11:14 AM, Tony Nelson wrote:
> On 17-08-31 12:41:09, Mike Wright wrote:
>
>> How about using "env": env PATH="new_path" chroot /some_dir
>>
>> Wouldn't this preempt the passed PATH, profile, bashrc, and the dot
>> fil
On 17-08-31 12:41:09, Mike Wright wrote:
How about using "env": env PATH="new_path" chroot /some_dir
Wouldn't this preempt the passed PATH, profile, bashrc, and the dot
files? If so, chroot could be defined as an alias to "env ...
chroot" and thereb
On 17-08-31 12:18:38, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Tony Nelson
wrote:
>
> I have an old CentOS5 that I chroot into. On my old f20 box, PATH
> included /bin, but now on f26 it does not. I don't understand how
> this could happen; I would think that PATH is set
On 08/31/2017 09:41 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
> On 08/31/2017 09:26 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 08/31/2017 08:34 AM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
>>> On 08/30/17 15:16, Tony Nelson wrote:
>>>> I have an old CentOS5 that I chroot into. On my old f20 box, PATH
>>>>
On 08/31/2017 09:26 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 08/31/2017 08:34 AM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
On 08/30/17 15:16, Tony Nelson wrote:
I have an old CentOS5 that I chroot into. On my old f20 box, PATH
included /bin, but now on f26 it does not. I don't understand how
For a while now, /bin s
On 08/31/2017 08:34 AM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
> On 08/30/17 15:16, Tony Nelson wrote:
>> I have an old CentOS5 that I chroot into. On my old f20 box, PATH
>> included /bin, but now on f26 it does not. I don't understand how
>
> For a while now, /bin should be a link to
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Kevin Cummings
wrote:
> On 08/30/17 15:16, Tony Nelson wrote:
>>
>> I have an old CentOS5 that I chroot into. On my old f20 box, PATH
>> included /bin, but now on f26 it does not. I don't understand how
>
> For a while now, /bin
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Tony Nelson
wrote:
>
> I have an old CentOS5 that I chroot into. On my old f20 box, PATH
> included /bin, but now on f26 it does not. I don't understand how
> this could happen; I would think that PATH is set inside the chroot
> by the shell. H
On 08/30/17 15:16, Tony Nelson wrote:
> I have an old CentOS5 that I chroot into. On my old f20 box, PATH
> included /bin, but now on f26 it does not. I don't understand how
For a while now, /bin should be a link to /usr/bin. is /usr/bin in the
PATH?
> this could happen; I wo
I have an old CentOS5 that I chroot into. On my old f20 box, PATH
included /bin, but now on f26 it does not. I don't understand how
this could happen; I would think that PATH is set inside the chroot
by the shell. How does PATH get set? I see how it is modified and
have fixed my
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 13:22 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/26/2017 12:42 PM, evade. wrote:
> > Does anybody know the best way to upgrade from Fedora 25 LXDE to
> > Fedora 26 LXQt? I've not found an upgrade path documented
> > anywhere.
> >
> > I'm not
On 07/26/2017 06:17 PM, evade. wrote:
> Thanks very much!
> I would have missed step 3.
Welcome. If you did miss step 3 you'd have a minor problem. The removal of
LXDE
would remove lxdm so when you boot you wouldn't get into a graphical login
screen.
But that would be easy to fix.
>
> For the
On 26 July 2017 7:54:02 pm AEST, Ed Greshko wrote:
>On 07/26/2017 05:26 PM, evade. wrote:
>> On 26/07/17 15:22, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 07/26/2017 12:42 PM, evade. wrote:
>>>> Does anybody know the best way to upgrade from Fedora 25 LXDE to
>Fedora 26 LXQt?
&g
On 07/26/2017 05:26 PM, evade. wrote:
> On 26/07/17 15:22, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/26/2017 12:42 PM, evade. wrote:
>>> Does anybody know the best way to upgrade from Fedora 25 LXDE to Fedora 26
>>> LXQt?
>>> I've not found an upgrade path documented
On 26/07/17 15:22, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/26/2017 12:42 PM, evade. wrote:
Does anybody know the best way to upgrade from Fedora 25 LXDE to Fedora 26
LXQt? I've not found an upgrade path documented anywhere.
I'm not concerned about leaving configuration data behind, but would like
On 07/26/2017 12:42 PM, evade. wrote:
> Does anybody know the best way to upgrade from Fedora 25 LXDE to Fedora 26
> LXQt? I've not found an upgrade path documented anywhere.
>
> I'm not concerned about leaving configuration data behind, but would like to
> clean up u
Hello,
Does anybody know the best way to upgrade from Fedora 25 LXDE to Fedora 26
LXQt? I've not found an upgrade path documented anywhere.
I'm not concerned about leaving configuration data behind, but would like to
clean up unnecessary packages after the transition.
Rebuildin
On Sun, 2016-04-03 at 21:21 -0500, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> I just did a fresh install of Fedora 23, with a brand new user
> account. I proceeded to copy certain changes to my PATH from my old
> ~/.bashrc (created on Fedora 20) Didn't copy the whole thing over,
> just copy
Hello, Everyone
I will do detailed troubleshooting on this later today, but I thought
I'd see if you can figure this out with what I can remember...
I just did a fresh install of Fedora 23, with a brand new user account.
I proceeded to copy certain changes to my PATH from my old ~/.b
On 12/17/14 16:38, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When I login using terminal (for instance after pressing CTRL+ALT+F2)
> the `PATH ` environment variable looks like this:
>
> `/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin/:/usr/sbin:/home/user/.local/
On 12/17/2014 09:38 AM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When I login using terminal (for instance after pressing CTRL+ALT+F2)
> the `PATH ` environment variable looks like this:
>
> `/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin/:/usr/sbin:/home/user/.lo
Hi!
When I login using terminal (for instance after pressing CTRL+ALT+F2)
the `PATH ` environment variable looks like this:
`/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin/:/usr/sbin:/home/user/.local/bin:/home/user/bin`
However when I open new Konsole window it looks like
On 25/10/14 09:54, Roger wrote:
My $PATH has a trailing slash in the last directory path, is there any
way to remove it?
Instead you should try to investigate the cause. Candidates to look
into would be your account's ~/.profile and ~/.bashrc, and the scripts
below /etc/profile.d, shoul
My $PATH has a trailing slash in the last directory path, is there any
way to remove it?
Instead you should try to investigate the cause. Candidates to look
into would be your account's ~/.profile and ~/.bashrc, and the scripts
below /etc/profile.d, should you have customized these.
On 10/24/2014 10:33 AM, Roger wrote:
My $PATH has a trailing slash in the last directory path, is there any
way to remove it?
AS example: echo $PATH
/opt/OpenPrinting-Gutenprint/sbin:/opt/OpenPrinting-Gutenprint/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games:/usr
My $PATH has a trailing slash in the last directory path, is there any
way to remove it?
AS example: echo $PATH
/opt/OpenPrinting-Gutenprint/sbin:/opt/OpenPrinting-Gutenprint/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/I've
been googling with no
On my Fedora boxes I still use yum-updateonboot.
started with a custom .service file.
Is there any method
I can get it to reboot if a critpath rpm is updated,
I have as yet found an easy method,
without typing all installed @critpath into
/etc/sysconfig/yum-updateonboot,
--
Regards,
Frank
www
Hi: This box is running f16. It has been upgraded in stages from f10.
Two disks, and when last tried could boot Win Vista, Vista recovery,
f12 and f16. It usually runs MythTV under f16, 24/7.
Preupgrade appeared to run ok, with the expectation of downloading the
installer on reboot, as pre
On 18.09.2012 19:35, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks!
> Why do you think that disk manager is better than
> static entry in /etc/fstab ?
>
> rgs,
> Kevin
Actually I don't think so. I think that disk manager is easier to use
and guides the user through configuration process. Manual editing
/etc/
Fedora release 17 it is mounted under
>> /run/media/root/B5A2-5890
>>
>> Is there a way for setting a different path when inserting a disk on key
>> into fedora 17 ?
>>
>>
>
> Yes, but the path will be only slightly different. Simplest way to
>
On 17.09.2012 19:47, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Hello,
> When I insert a disk on key into a desktop running
> Fedora release 17 it is mounted under
> /run/media/root/B5A2-5890
>
> Is there a way for setting a different path when inserting a disk on key
> into fedora 17 ?
>
>
Hello,
When I insert a disk on key into a desktop running
Fedora release 17 it is mounted under
/run/media/root/B5A2-5890
Is there a way for setting a different path when inserting a disk on key
into fedora 17 ?
rgs,
Kevin
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
lots of stuff in that, so my path setting is somewhat
complex. In order of priority, arch=$(uname -m):
${HOME}/bin/${arch} user personal versions
/usr/local/${arch}machine local
/opt/bin machine local
/common/bin/${arch} site local
then
I forgot to CC the list when I wrote these messages:
First message:
I found something weird and I wonder if I should report a bug in the setup
> package or not.
> I've created /etc/profile.d/custom.sh, where I redefine PATH in order to
> have /usr/local after /usr for all users.
&
I believe it is complied into /bin/bash.
>
> If you edit the /etc/profile to first issue an echo $PATH > /tmp/test you
> will set
> that it is already set. Further, if you do a:
>
> strings /bin/bash | grep local
>
> you will see...
>
> /usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bi
On 03/17/2012 05:21 PM, enclair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> By default in Fedora /usr/local/bin is before /usr/bin
> Where is it defined?
> In /etc/profile, only /usr/local/sbin is set.
>
>
I believe it is complied into /bin/bash.
If you edit the /etc/profile to first issue an echo
On 03/17/2012 06:11 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 03/17/2012 10:21 AM, enclair wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> By default in Fedora /usr/local/bin is before /usr/bin
>> Where is it defined?
>> In /etc/profile, only /usr/local/sbin is set.
>>
> Which Fedora version?
>
> See: man systemd.path
>
OK, what does s
On 03/17/2012 10:21 AM, enclair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> By default in Fedora /usr/local/bin is before /usr/bin
> Where is it defined?
> In /etc/profile, only /usr/local/sbin is set.
>
Which Fedora version?
See: man systemd.path
--
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Descr
Hi,
By default in Fedora /usr/local/bin is before /usr/bin
Where is it defined?
In /etc/profile, only /usr/local/sbin is set.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 23:47 -0700, Adam Tong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intalled makagiga but look at the result of your command:
>
> # rpm -qil makagiga-3.8.13-1.noarch.rpm
> package makagiga-3.8.13-1.noarch.rpm is not installed
It's telling you there's no package called makagiga-3.8.13-1.noarch.r
Excellent it work perfectly
- Original Message
From: Ed Greshko
To: Community support for Fedora users
Sent: Fri, June 24, 2011 4:17:03 AM
Subject: Re: Java path
On 06/24/2011 02:47 PM, Adam Tong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intalled makagiga but look at the result of you
On 06/24/2011 02:47 PM, Adam Tong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intalled makagiga but look at the result of your command:
>
> # rpm -qil makagiga-3.8.13-1.noarch.rpm
> package makagiga-3.8.13-1.noarch.rpm is not installed
rpm -qil makagiga
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
1:23:57 AM
Subject: Re: Java path
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
Adam Tong wrote:
> wanna intall a oftware that ak me for java path. I ntalled java jdk uing yum.
> I there a way to know where a package i intalled?
rpm -qil packagename
which java
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Rea
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
Adam Tong wrote:
> wanna intall a oftware that ak me for java path. I ntalled java jdk uing yum.
> I there a way to know where a package i intalled?
rpm -qil packagename
which java
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital
Hi,
I wanna intall a oftware that ak me for java path. I ntalled java jdk uing yum.
I there a way to know where a package i intalled?
Thank you
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
s will have two different IP: a local IP address (e.g.
> 192.168.x.x) for the Wired, and a public IP address for the Wireless.
>
> How does an application know which network path to use ?
>
> For example, I want to be able to run SSH or Synergy to other machine
> on the LAN, so SSH would
; two different IP: a local IP address (e.g. 192.168.x.x) for the Wired,
> and a public IP address for the Wireless.
I hope you are saying that only one of these connections is ever
connected at one time
> How does an application know which network path to use ?
The network default ro
(e.g. 192.168.x.x) for the Wired, and a
public IP address for the Wireless.
How does an application know which network path to use ?
The application doesn't know and doesn't care. It's the kernel's job to
route the connection properly.
For example, I want to be able t
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Armelius Cameron
[armeli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 10:51 AM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: How to choose network path with two
, and a
public IP address for the Wireless.
How does an application know which network path to use ?
For example, I want to be able to run SSH or Synergy to other machine on the
LAN, so SSH would have to use the LAN network. But I also want to be able to
run mail client that is connected to an IMAP
On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 04:20:41 -0800
kellyremo wrote:
>
> https://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/hpn-v-ssh-tput.jpg
...snip...
This isn't the place to talk about ssh development. ;)
I would suggest asking the upstream openssh devel list, and/or filing a
bug with their bugtracker to get
ited statically
defined internal flow control buffers"?? It could be way faster, even 10x!!
With the HPN-SCP path it could be the descendant of FTP! Why aren't there any
""OpenSCP packages""? ('normal SCP+HPN-SCP path+no local user needed for
SCP
bug with the openssh sources in F13.
There is a patched openssh that will hit updates soon.
> 1) comment out the line with AuthorizedKeysFile
The AuthorizedKeysFile lines is not parsed correctly. Its is always turned into
an abs path. This is the bug the the update will fix.
>
> In
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Barry Scott wrote:
> We are seeing an sshd_config that used to work on f12 failing on f13.
>
> When doing ssh r...@host:
> Jun 10 11:34:32 f12barry sshd[23030]: Failed publickey for root from
> 192.168.7.232 port 39169 ssh2
>
> Notice the public key file is //.ssh
has no effect on the path check in the debug
log.
Has sshd got a bug in it or is there more config files that need to be changed
to allow the authorized_keys to be found?
Barry
Barry
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
Ed Greshko wrote:
> Sam Sharpe wrote:
>
>>
>> What about this then?
>>
>> [...@samlap ~]$ echo $PATH
>> /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/opt/real/RealPlayer:/home/sam/.bin
shed merely made sudo -V stop printing anything except
the version so it no longer conflicts :-).
At some point they did at least add a secure_path option you can
set in the sudoers file like so:
Defaultssecure_path = "/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin"
You still get a ha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> As far as I understand this, sudo still uses your (the regular user's)
>>>>> $PATH.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Nope, that's merely what the docs claim.
On 5 February 2010 01:14, Ed Greshko wrote:
> suvayu ali wrote:
>> On 4 February 2010 16:13, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:00:39 -0800
>>> suvayu ali wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> As far as I understand this, sudo still u
On 4 February 2010 17:14, Ed Greshko wrote:
> suvayu ali wrote:
>> On 4 February 2010 16:13, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:00:39 -0800
>>> suvayu ali wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> As far as I understand this, sudo still u
suvayu ali wrote:
> On 4 February 2010 16:13, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:00:39 -0800
>> suvayu ali wrote:
>>
>>
>>> As far as I understand this, sudo still uses your (the regular user's)
>>> $PATH.
>>>
On 4 February 2010 16:13, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:00:39 -0800
> suvayu ali wrote:
>
>> As far as I understand this, sudo still uses your (the regular user's)
>> $PATH.
>
> Nope, that's merely what the docs claim. In fact, the security geek
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:00:39 -0800
suvayu ali wrote:
> As far as I understand this, sudo still uses your (the regular user's)
> $PATH.
Nope, that's merely what the docs claim. In fact, the security geeks
decided sudo absolutely needed to have a hard coded PATH and as far
as I know
On 4 February 2010 15:13, Richard R. Cahilig wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem with my fedora 12 box. There is no /sbin and /usr/sbin PATH
> after using sudo. This is the output if I run the command echo $PATH.
> /usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
>
> I t
Hello,
I have a problem with my fedora 12 box. There is no /sbin and /usr/sbin PATH
after using sudo. This is the output if I run the command echo $PATH.
/usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
I tried to add the /sbin and /usr/sbin PATH in .bash_profile but I still have
the same
95 matches
Mail list logo
