Advanced Github Notifier Firefox plugin layout issue

e bit bigger than the plugin thinks it is, so things get cut off, especially above and below the notification text. I hope that the tiny attached image makes it clear what I'm talking about, see below. This seems to be issue on Fedora, hence me asking here. The notifications' la

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

Garry T. Williams writes: On Sunday, 20 April 2025 17:45:44 EDT Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I estimate that I'll be able to use my setup for no more than 2-3 > years, max, before X11 is sacrificed on the altar of progress, and > latest and greatest. I just updated a workstation to f41 and didn't

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

On Sun, 2025-04-20 at 22:16 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote: > On Sunday, 20 April 2025 17:45:44 EDT Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > I estimate that I'll be able to use my setup for no more than 2-3 > > years, max, before X11 is sacrificed on the altar of progress, and > > latest and greatest. > > I j

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

On 4/20/25 10:40 PM, Tim via users wrote: On Sun, 2025-04-20 at 22:16 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote: Wayland is still broken as far as I am concerned when it comes to session restore stuff and new window placement. But I notice that I can ssh to that system and run x11 apps (over the local net

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

On Sun, 2025-04-20 at 20:51 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I rooted through all of the gory details, icccm, ewmh, and X11 primitives, > some time ago. It's all there. The fly in the ointment is that the nuts and > the bolts of it are difficult use, cumbersome, and lack some convenient > feat

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

On Sun, 2025-04-20 at 22:16 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote: > Wayland is still broken as far as I am concerned when it comes to > session restore stuff and new window placement. But I notice that I > can ssh to that system and run x11 apps (over the local network) no > problem. Wayland supplies a

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

On Sunday, 20 April 2025 17:45:44 EDT Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I estimate that I'll be able to use my setup for no more than 2-3 > years, max, before X11 is sacrificed on the altar of progress, and > latest and greatest. I just updated a workstation to f41 and didn't install the x11 KDE componen

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

Patrick O'Callaghan writes: On Sun, 2025-04-20 at 17:45 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > One of the big problems with containers (including Flatpaks) is that > > they don't integrate well with the desktop environment. Then the app > > relies on the DE to (say) print things, there's usually some

F41->F42 Postgresql Collation issue

Greetings,    When the flip to F41 from F40 occurred last October I posted some emails and received helpful replies regarding a collation issue; the message on this go around is: WARNING:  database "" has a collation version mismatch DE

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

ction. It just works. > > I estimate that I'll be able to use my setup for no more than 2-3 years,  > max, before X11 is sacrificed on the altar of progress, and latest and  > greatest. The issue is not specific to one windowing system. Both X11 and Wayland based DEs have th

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

Joe Zeff writes: On 04/20/2025 06:14 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I think what this is, overall, is watching idiocracy evolve, in realtime. Personally, I've always considered Ubuntu to be designed for Windows refugees. They want to get away from the built in problems of Windows but don't

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

Patrick O'Callaghan writes: On Sun, 2025-04-20 at 08:14 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > The Firefox snap in Ubuntu doesn't even start in a VNC session. Everyone > appears to be ok with fiddling with environment variables, in order to do > that. Nobody appears to believe that there's something

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

On Sun, 2025-04-20 at 11:54 -0600, Joe Zeff wrote: > Personally, I've always considered Ubuntu to be designed for Windows > refugees. They want to get away from the built in problems of Windows > but don't want to learn how to do things properly. I'd come to a similar conclusion. Windows refug

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

On 04/20/2025 06:14 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I think what this is, overall, is watching idiocracy evolve, in realtime. Personally, I've always considered Ubuntu to be designed for Windows refugees. They want to get away from the built in problems of Windows but don't want to learn how to

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

On Sun, 2025-04-20 at 08:14 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Tim via users writes: > > > 3) Thanks to sandboxing, or just plain lack of functionality, > >we get apps that can't print, for instance. > > > > I've got ones that can't, I have to print to PDF, then find something > > else to print

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

Tim via users writes: 3) Thanks to sandboxing, or just plain lack of functionality, we get apps that can't print, for instance. I've got ones that can't, I have to print to PDF, then find something else to print that PDF (which will fail when they eventually appimage the whatever that prints

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

Tim: > > But I'd argue that the hierarchies were there for a good reason. > > *Simple* no-access to some things for some people/software. *Simple* > > more privileged access to things in /sbin to those who had it in their > > path, and lesser privileged versions of a command with the same name to

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

On Sat, 2025-04-19 at 17:07 +, Bob Marčan via users wrote: > On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 09:11:16 -0300 > "George N. White III" wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:32 PM Tim via users > > wrote: > > On Fri, 2025-04-18 at 18:38 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > > > This malarkey is up there wit

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 09:11:16 -0300 "George N. White III" wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:32 PM Tim via users > wrote: > On Fri, 2025-04-18 at 18:38 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > This malarkey is up there with we can't have /usr in a separate mount > > point, any more, because we've put

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:32 PM Tim via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2025-04-18 at 18:38 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > I forgot what were the actual, technical reasons for collapsing bin > > and sbin, except for "other distributions did it too". But the deed > > is

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

Tim via users writes: Hell, why don't just we just dump *everything* into one huge directory? That's make it really easy to manage (not). I get the impression that there's too many un-trained programmers in the world, and much of what they've learned has come from bad examples. This malarkey i

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

On Fri, 2025-04-18 at 18:38 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I forgot what were the actual, technical reasons for collapsing bin > and sbin, except for "other distributions did it too". But the deed > is done, and one just has to deal with the aftermath: The artificial idiot listed these summaries:

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

Charles Dennett writes: Just wanted to add that I found a bugzilla report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2360491 I predict there's going to be a lot of this, for a year or so. I forgot what were the actual, technical reasons for collapsing bin and sbin, except for "other dis

Re: Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

On 4/18/25 9:36 AM, Charles Dennett wrote: Upgraded my home server/desktop machine yesterday and all seemed ok. When I checked this morning I discovered that output from overnight cron jobs had gone to the journal log rather than being emailed to me.  Also logwatch had failed to run. I quickl

Fedora 42 upgrade issue with mail

Upgraded my home server/desktop machine yesterday and all seemed ok. When I checked this morning I discovered that output from overnight cron jobs had gone to the journal log rather than being emailed to me. Also logwatch had failed to run. I quickly checked logwatch first by manually running

Re: DNF Openjdk Update Issue in F41

On 12/2/25 08:39, Tim Evans wrote: On 2/11/25 4:23 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: The java-17-openjdk package is deprecated and may no longer receive updates. Since f42 install adoptium-temurin-java-repository and install temurin-17-jre https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThirdPartyLegacyJdks#a

Re: DNF Openjdk Update Issue in F41

On 2/11/25 4:23 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: The java-17-openjdk package is deprecated and may no longer receive updates. Since f42 install adoptium-temurin-java-repository and install temurin-17-jre https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThirdPartyLegacyJdks#adoptium- temurin-java-repository I

DNF Openjdk Update Issue in F41

Hi,     A "sudo dnf upgrade" produced the following messages twice at the beginning of the update process and again with the trigger scripts. These messages provide instructions for what to do in F42, but what is the solution for F41, or isn't there?     Also, what is the dnf 5 logs related

Re: DNF Stats Issue

On 18/12/24 09:22, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 5:09 PM Stephen Morris wrote: On 17/12/24 12:46, Tim via users wrote: On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 09:37 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: Why does dnf show the download, install and cleanup timings starting as negative values? Is it a cou

Re: DNF Stats Issue

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 5:09 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > On 17/12/24 12:46, Tim via users wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 09:37 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Why does dnf show the download, install and cleanup timings starting > as negative values? > > Is it a countdown to estimated time of c

Re: DNF Stats Issue

On 17/12/24 12:46, Tim via users wrote: On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 09:37 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: Why does dnf show the download, install and cleanup timings starting as negative values? Is it a countdown to estimated time of completion? I can see some logic in doing things that way. Although

Re: DNF Stats Issue

On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 09:37 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > Why does dnf show the download, install and cleanup timings starting > as negative values? Is it a countdown to estimated time of completion? I can see some logic in doing things that way. Although such things are rarely correct, it coul

Re: DNF Stats Issue

heck your scripts. When the message from the last script is shown, why does the "i" letter in the work "completing" replaced by an "!"? No idea. Check your script. These scripts are scripts being run as part of DNF package cleanup, they are not my scripts. Having

Re: DNF Stats Issue

On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 5:38 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > On 15/12/24 14:32, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 6:59 PM Stephen Morris > wrote: > > When I run "sudo dnf upgrade", as an example, and it displays the stats for > the downloads, installs and Removes (cleanup), the elap

Re: DNF Stats Issue

On 15/12/24 14:32, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 6:59 PM Stephen Morris wrote: When I run "sudo dnf upgrade", as an example, and it displays the stats for the downloads, installs and Removes (cleanup), the elapsed time column shows the times starting as negative and increasing

Re: DNF Stats Issue

On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 6:59 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > When I run "sudo dnf upgrade", as an example, and it displays the stats for > the downloads, installs and Removes (cleanup), the elapsed time column shows > the times starting as negative and increasing to 0 and above, and then when > th

DNF Stats Issue

When I run "sudo dnf upgrade", as an example, and it displays the stats for the downloads, installs and Removes (cleanup), the elapsed time column shows the times starting as negative and increasing to 0 and above, and then when the process is finished it then displays the time as the positive

Re: Web site issue

On Sun, 2024-12-01 at 16:03 +, Bob Marčan via users wrote: > Try any recipe in kulinarika.net. > For each recipe I get "Gah. Your Tab Just Crashed." > Firefox. > Validator? Disaster. > It would be interesting to find out which "tool" they use. HTML + JavaScript fed through a blender and fun

Re: Web site issue

On Sat, Nov 30, 2024, at 4:29 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Hi All, > > I can not get this web site to render properly > on my Fedora 41 host computer on any of the five > web browsers I tried (cache was cleared). > > https://www.tiyproducts.com/products/basic-tiy-water > > But, I can with qe

Re: Web site issue

On Sun, 01 Dec 2024 07:21:15 -0800 "ToddAndMargo via users" wrote: ... Oh no fooling! I ran it through W3C's validator: > > https://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tiyproducts.com%2Fproducts%2Fbasic-tiy-water > > it was a MASSACRE! > -- Try any recipe in kulinarika.net. For each r

Re: Web site issue

On 11/30/24 21:50, Tim via users wrote: On Sat, 2024-11-30 at 16:29 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I can not get this web site to render properly on my Fedora 41 host computer on any of the five web browsers I tried (cache was cleared). https://www.tiyproducts.com/products/basic-tiy-water

Re: Web site issue

On Sat, 2024-11-30 at 16:29 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > I can not get this web site to render properly > on my Fedora 41 host computer on any of the five > web browsers I tried (cache was cleared). > > https://www.tiyproducts.com/products/basic-tiy-water > Look at the source code. Ma

Re: Web site issue

On 11/30/24 16:40, Stephen Morris wrote: On 1/12/24 11:29, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, I can not get this web site to render properly on my Fedora 41 host computer on any of the five web browsers I tried (cache was cleared). https://www.tiyproducts.com/products/basic-tiy-water But,

Re: Web site issue

On 1/12/24 11:29, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, I can not get this web site to render properly on my Fedora 41 host computer on any of the five web browsers I tried (cache was cleared). https://www.tiyproducts.com/products/basic-tiy-water But, I can with qemu-kvm Tiny-11 (Stripped Wind

Web site issue

Hi All, I can not get this web site to render properly on my Fedora 41 host computer on any of the five web browsers I tried (cache was cleared). https://www.tiyproducts.com/products/basic-tiy-water But, I can with qemu-kvm Tiny-11 (Stripped Windows 11) operated through my FC41 host's firewall

Re: F41 installation issue on Framework 16 laptop: stuck keyboard input (solution)

Samuel Sieb writes: On 11/30/24 2:12 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Before doing that I booted the XFCE spin on the first laptop and it had the same problem. This ruled out a firnware difference as the issue. Then I burned the workstation image and booted it. No issues. I checked, and both

Re: F41 installation issue on Framework 16 laptop: stuck keyboard input (solution)

lem for you? > > Before doing that I booted the XFCE spin on the first laptop and it > had the same problem. This ruled out a firnware difference as the > issue. > > Then I burned the workstation image and booted it. No issues. > > I checked, and both the workstation i

Re: F41 installation issue on Framework 16 laptop: stuck keyboard input (solution)

nd it had the same problem. This ruled out a firnware difference as the issue. Then I burned the workstation image and booted it. No issues. I checked, and both the workstation image and the XFCE spin have the same kernel, 6.11.4. So, it's something specific to the XFCE spin and that

Re: F41 installation issue on Framework 16 laptop: stuck keyboard input (solution)

Before doing that I booted the XFCE spin on the first laptop and it > had the same problem. This ruled out a firnware difference as the > issue. > > Then I burned the workstation image and booted it. No issues. > > I checked, and both the workstation image and the XFCE spin

Re: F41 installation issue on Framework 16 laptop: stuck keyboard input (solution)

out a firnware difference as the issue. Then I burned the workstation image and booted it. No issues. I checked, and both the workstation image and the XFCE spin have the same kernel, 6.11.4. I've used the workstation live image on multiple systems with no problems and obviously there have

Re: F41 installation issue on Framework 16 laptop: stuck keyboard input (solution)

On 11/30/24 8:31 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I've been using a Framework 16 laptop that was originally installed with F40 and updated to F41 (XFCE Spin), without any issues. I just ran into a hillarious installation issue, posting it here in order to feed the search engines. I just recei

F41 installation issue on Framework 16 laptop: stuck keyboard input (solution)

I've been using a Framework 16 laptop that was originally installed with F40 and updated to F41 (XFCE Spin), without any issues. I just ran into a hillarious installation issue, posting it here in order to feed the search engines. I just received a second Framework 16, so I fed th

Re: security issue?

On 29/11/24 10:59, Barry wrote: On 28 Nov 2024, at 22:45, Stephen Morris wrote: being /usr/bin/egrep and /usr/bin/fgrep because it has said they have been replaced by a script, is that standard Fedora? Did you check what was in the files and where they were installed from? The scripts print

Re: [closed] Re: security issue?

On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 20:37 +, Will McDonald wrote: > Indeed. I've jumped between RH-based and Debian-based distros a little in > the last few years. I started tracking some of the deltas here: > https://github.com/wmcdonald404/distrosetta-stone You might want to change the yum references to d

Re: [closed] Re: security issue?

On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 20:01, George N. White III wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 3:09 PM Will McDonald wrote: > >> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 18:20, home user via users < >> users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> There's a lot of commonality across most distros, so while something (the >> link I

Re: [closed] Re: security issue?

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 3:09 PM Will McDonald wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 18:20, home user via users < > users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > There's a lot of commonality across most distros, so while something (the > link I referenced, for example) was from an Ask Ubuntu branch of > Stack

Re: [closed] Re: security issue?

On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 18:20, home user via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 11/28/24 10:24 AM, home user via users wrote: > > (f-40, stand-alone workstation, gnome) > > > > A few times in the past couple of months, I've received the following > warning from "chkrootkit": > > - -

[closed] Re: security issue?

On 11/28/24 10:24 AM, home user via users wrote: (f-40, stand-alone workstation, gnome) A few times in the past couple of months, I've received the following warning from "chkrootkit": - - - - - - bash.1[~]: chkrootkit ROOTDIR is `/' Checking `amd'... not found [snip] Checking `bindshell'... no

Re: security issue?

On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 at 17:38, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 12:25 PM home user via users > wrote: > > Checking `lkm'... You have 1 process hidden for ps command > > > > What's going on with that lkm warning? > > Do you really need us to google it for you? > And what Jeffer

Re: security issue?

> On 28 Nov 2024, at 22:45, Stephen Morris wrote: > > being /usr/bin/egrep and /usr/bin/fgrep because it has said they have been > replaced by a script, is that standard Fedora? Did you check what was in the files and where they were installed from? The scripts print a warning message then r

Re: security issue?

On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 09:45 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > I've run chkrootkit and it said there were no issues, but rkhunter has > reported two suspect files, being /usr/bin/egrep and /usr/bin/fgrep > because it has said they have been replaced by a script, is that > standard Fedora? fgrep and

Re: security issue?

On 29/11/24 04:37, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 12:25 PM home user via users wrote: (f-40, stand-alone workstation, gnome) A few times in the past couple of months, I've received the following warning from "chkrootkit": - - - - - - bash.1[~]: chkrootkit ROOTDIR is `/' Checking

Re: security issue?

On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 12:25 PM home user via users wrote: > > (f-40, stand-alone workstation, gnome) > > A few times in the past couple of months, I've received the following > warning from "chkrootkit": > - - - - - - > bash.1[~]: chkrootkit > ROOTDIR is `/' > Checking `amd'... not found > [snip

security issue?

(f-40, stand-alone workstation, gnome) A few times in the past couple of months, I've received the following warning from "chkrootkit": - - - - - - bash.1[~]: chkrootkit ROOTDIR is `/' Checking `amd'... not found [snip] Checking `bindshell'... not infected Checking `lkm'... You have 1 proce

Re: Packagekitd KDE Issue

On 19/11/24 09:13, Go Canes wrote: On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 4:48 PM Stephen Morris wrote: Hi, I having a little difficulty understanding the R+W graph display from IOTOP, and what the difference between a graph displayed by dots and graphs displayed by a solid block. Having said that

Re: Packagekitd KDE Issue

On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 4:48 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > Hi, > I having a little difficulty understanding the R+W graph display from > IOTOP, and what the difference between a graph displayed by dots and graphs > displayed by a solid block. > Having said that though, the thrashing of my

Packagekitd KDE Issue

Hi,     I having a little difficulty understanding the R+W graph display from IOTOP, and what the difference between a graph displayed by dots and graphs displayed by a solid block.     Having said that though, the thrashing of my hard disk for several minutes after the KDE desktop displays whe

Re: DNF Group Issue

                 no design-suite                Design Suite                 no desktop-accessibility       Desktop accessibility                  no development-tools           Development Tools ... uname -a ... ... 6.11.6-300.fc41.x86_64 #1 SMP Yep, that is exactly the issue I'm raising. re

Re: DNF Group Issue

$ dnf group list ... audio Audio Production no authoring-and-publishingAuthoring and Publishing no budgie-desktop Budgie no budgie-desktop-apps Budgie Desktop Applications no c-development C Development Tools and Libraries

Re: DNF Group Issue

On 13/11/24 09:14, Stephen Morris wrote: Why do, for example the Gnome group and the KDE/Plasma group no longer get listed as installed groups as they used to? Why have they removed the user friendly list output of installed groups under an appropriate heading followed by a list of all the avai

Re: DNF Group Issue

On 12/11/24 18:16, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Hi. On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 21:44:13 -0500 Todd Zullinger wrote: Stephen Morris wrote: While we are on this groups topic, I used to be able to issue commands dnf grouplist and dnf groupinstall as alternatives to dnf group list and dnf group

Re: DNF Group Issue

aller than what I remember (it might be F39 was the last time I used this). While we are on this groups topic, I used to be able to issue commands dnf grouplist and dnf groupinstall as alternatives to dnf group list and dnf group install, but the first two commands don't work anymore,

Re: DNF Group Issue

On 12/11/24 18:16, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Hi. On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 21:44:13 -0500 Todd Zullinger wrote: Stephen Morris wrote: While we are on this groups topic, I used to be able to issue commands dnf grouplist and dnf groupinstall as alternatives to dnf group list and dnf group

Re: DNF Group Issue

Hi. On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 21:44:13 -0500 Todd Zullinger wrote: > Stephen Morris wrote: >> While we are on this groups topic, I used to be able to issue commands >> dnf grouplist and dnf groupinstall as alternatives to dnf group list and dnf >> group install, but the first tw

Re: DNF Group Issue

On Mon, 2024-11-11 at 17:52 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > `dnf grouplist` and `dnf groupinstall` look like they are present in > dnf5, but they are subcommands of `dnf list`. See > . Going off on a tangent: What

Re: DNF Group Issue

Stephen Morris wrote: >     While we are on this groups topic, I used to be able to issue commands > dnf grouplist and dnf groupinstall as alternatives to dnf group list and dnf > group install, but the first two commands don't work anymore, was this a > deliberate alias removal a

Re: DNF Group Issue

what I remember (it > might be F39 was the last time I used this). > > While we are on this groups topic, I used to be able to issue commands > dnf grouplist and dnf groupinstall as alternatives to dnf group list and dnf > group install, but the first two commands don&#x

DNF Group Issue

this groups topic, I used to be able to issue commands dnf grouplist and dnf groupinstall as alternatives to dnf group list and dnf group install, but the first two commands don't work anymore, was this a deliberate alias removal and if so why? regards, Steve OpenPGP_0x1EBE7C07B0

Re: Issue with PHP based web service on Fedora 40

On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 02:41, Steven P. Ulrick wrote: > > On 11/6/24 8:03 PM, Will McDonald wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 at 17:11, Steven P. Ulrick > wrote: > > > I think there might be some missing steps here? > > > > 1. How did you install PHP? > dnf install from the standard fedora 40 repos >

Re: Issue with PHP based web service on Fedora 40

Potentially silly question: is PHP considered a module by httpd that needs to be loaded? There are some articles on the internet that talk about fixing problems like the one that I am having. When I run "httpd -M | grep php" nothing comes back. Please advise if  this is an issue,

Re: Issue with PHP based web service on Fedora 40

When I try to access my gallery3 installation using firefox, it just silently fails. When I try the exact same thing in Vivaldi, I get HTTP ERROR 500, which of course means absolutely nothing specific. But, that made me think of this: 1. If I go to http://www.afolkey2.us/gallery3, I get the 50

Re: Issue with PHP based web service on Fedora 40

On 11/6/24 8:41 PM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote: On 11/6/24 8:03 PM, Will McDonald wrote: [root@bf109911d54b /]# php -v PHP 8.3.13 (cli) (built: Oct 22 2024 18:39:14) (NTS gcc x86_64) Copyright (c) The PHP Group Zend Engine v4.3.13, Copyright (c) Zend Technologies     with Zend OPcache v8.3.13, Cop

Re: Issue with PHP based web service on Fedora 40

install Gallery3, but when I attempt to go to the gallery to add pictures, I just get a plain white screen in the web browser. Some of you might be thinking about now that this is a Gallery3 issue, not Fedora. But, when I run php -v, I get the following: > root@afolkey2:/

Re: Issue with PHP based web service on Fedora 40

to go to the gallery to add pictures, I just get a > plain white screen in the web browser. > > Some of you might be thinking about now that this is a Gallery3 issue, > not Fedora. But, when I run php -v, I get the following: > > > root@afolkey2:/var/log/httpd# php -v > > PH

Re: Issue with PHP based web service on Fedora 40

On 11/6/24 5:11 PM, Nathanael Noblet wrote: On Wed, 2024-11-06 at 11:11 -0600, Steven P. Ulrick wrote: The directory "/usr/lib64/php/modules/mysqli" does NOT exist. "/usr/lib64/php/modules/mysqli.so (/usr/lib64/php/modules/mysqli.so" DOES exist Take a look at files in /etc/php.d. There should

Re: Issue with PHP based web service on Fedora 40

On Wed, 2024-11-06 at 11:11 -0600, Steven P. Ulrick wrote: > > The directory "/usr/lib64/php/modules/mysqli" does NOT exist. > "/usr/lib64/php/modules/mysqli.so (/usr/lib64/php/modules/mysqli.so" > DOES exist Take a look at files in /etc/php.d. There should be lots of ini files there. Perhaps th

Issue with PHP based web service on Fedora 40

white screen in the web browser. Some of you might be thinking about now that this is a Gallery3 issue, not Fedora. But, when I run php -v, I get the following: root@afolkey2:/var/log/httpd# php -v PHP Warning:  PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'mysqli' (tried: /usr

Re: OT: Fedora 40 to 41 update - Strange WINEHQ issue.

t when they get to it. They actually got a little annoyed with me for trying to get them to jump pm the issue before FC41 went general release. In he mean time, this will get you your other updates and bypass WineHQ: sudo dnf upgrade --allowerasing --disablerepo=WineHQ HTH, -T (T/Mr.

Re: OT: Fedora 40 to 41 update - Strange WINEHQ issue.

On 3 Nov 2024 at 19:20, Jeffrey Walton wrote: Send reply to: noloa...@gmail.com From: Jeffrey Walton Date sent: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:20:40 -0500 Subject:Re: OT: Fedora 40 to 41 update - Strange WINEHQ issue. To: mi

Re: OT: Fedora 40 to 41 update - Strange WINEHQ issue.

On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 7:13 PM Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: > > Did an upgrade from Fedora 40 to 41 and everything went well > except for WINEHQ? > The Fedora 40 had the 9.20 version installed, but after the upgrade > the WINEHQ (winehq-devel) was changed to 9.17?? > > So, not clear why t

OT: Fedora 40 to 41 update - Strange WINEHQ issue.

Did an upgrade from Fedora 40 to 41 and everything went well except for WINEHQ? The Fedora 40 had the 9.20 version installed, but after the upgrade the WINEHQ (winehq-devel) was changed to 9.17?? So, not clear why that happened. Believe is mentioned 8 packages needed downgrading, but didn't no

Weird issue with kernel 6.10: notebook won't stay asleep

On my Thinkpad T14s Gen 4 AMD with Fedora 40, when I am using it unplugged and close the lid to sleep, it wakes back up when I plug it in to charge. This didn't happen with 6.9 and before. Not really sure how to debug this; I opened a BZ, but also curious if anybody else is seeing something simil

Re: Recent issue with hddtemp. [Resolved]

2f0-0fc6-4ba5-a420-c0874ef82...@heusel.eu/ > > > > The symptom for hddtemp is that it will show "drive is sleeping" > > unless > > you give the -w switch to "wake up the drive". You would need to > > use > > that each time you query it. I guess

Re: Recent issue with hddtemp.

u give the -w switch to "wake up the drive". You would need to use > that each time you query it. I guess the issue shows up in hdparm also > and some other stuff. So they might back this out, but the proper fix > should be to the stuff that is depending on non-spec output. Perso

Re: Recent issue with hddtemp.

On Fri, Aug 16, 2024, at 11:57 PM, Barry wrote: > Try contacting the author, there is an email address at the bottom of > the project page. > Here http://gkrellm.srcbox.net/ I checked the source of gkrellm and they are simply doing a query to the hddtemp daemon. I was not able to get that to wor

Re: Recent issue with hddtemp.

> On 16 Aug 2024, at 21:48, Doug Herr wrote: > > I can also just use `hddtemp -w` to show the temp, but again, it is `gkrellm` > that I want to work and I don't see a way to get it to add that "-w" when it > checks. Try contacting the author, there is an email address at the bottom of the p

Re: Recent issue with hddtemp.

On Fri, Aug 16, 2024, at 1:22 PM, Barry Scott wrote: > I can get the temp for my nvme drive with smartctl: Yes, that works for my SATA drives also. The problem for me is that I like using `gkrellm` to keep track of drive temp and to alert at my preferred setting of "too hot". I can also just us

Re: Recent issue with hddtemp.

> On 16 Aug 2024, at 17:17, Doug H. wrote: > > It turns out that the 6.10 kernel updates fixed something to spec that > thus broke some stuff that was depending on a non-spec output that had > been going on for some time. I can get the temp for my nvme drive with smartctl: $ smartctl -A /dev/

Re: Recent issue with hddtemp.

On Fri, 2024-08-16 at 12:30 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > And having a hdtemp command/smartctl command spin up a drive to ask > its temp is a power wasting command. The drive stays spun up for > several minutes and uses around 5w more while it is spun up. So one > cannot argue with it returning a

Re: Recent issue with hddtemp.

This is BROKEN user space code (hdparm assumes what is being returned). And broken userspace code is different. He does not like to break correct userspace code. And this code is in what I would classify as a non-critical path, this breaks some monitoring tools/utilities but does not impact crit

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >