Jeffrey Walton writes:
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 5:29 PM Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
>
> Todd Zullinger writes:
>
> > Not per https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xsane/c/2cc8bf4
> > (Drop GIMP plugin for Fedora >= 41, 2024-10-13) and the
> > follow-up which fixes the
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 5:29 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> Todd Zullinger writes:
>
> > Not per https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xsane/c/2cc8bf4
> > (Drop GIMP plugin for Fedora >= 41, 2024-10-13) and the
> > follow-up which fixes the reversed values in that commit
Todd Zullinger writes:
Not per https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xsane/c/2cc8bf4
(Drop GIMP plugin for Fedora >= 41, 2024-10-13) and the
follow-up which fixes the reversed values in that commit.
I would guess that's because gimp-3.x and the xsane-gimp
plugin don't play well toge
On Sat, 24 May 2025 at 19:12, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 12:19 PM Sam Varshavchik
> wrote:
> >>
> >> In gimp I'm missing the File/Create option to pull an image from a
> scanner.
> >> Google results
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 12:19 PM Sam Varshavchik
> wrote:
>>
>> In gimp I'm missing the File/Create option to pull an image from a scanner.
>> Google results mention the xsane-gimp package, but dnf in F42 knows nothing
>> about it.
>
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 12:19 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> In gimp I'm missing the File/Create option to pull an image from a scanner.
> Google results mention the xsane-gimp package, but dnf in F42 knows nothing
> about it.
>
> I did find /usr/share/sane/xsane/doc/sane-x
In gimp I'm missing the File/Create option to pull an image from a scanner.
Google results mention the xsane-gimp package, but dnf in F42 knows nothing
about it.
I did find /usr/share/sane/xsane/doc/sane-xsane-gimp-doc.html that tells me
to manually create a symbolic link. Huh? That&
On 10/21/24 16:46, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
I somehow got updated to gimp 2.99.19 (3.0 on the splash screen).
I lost my arrows.
Any idea how to get the back?
Everything I have found it for gimp 2.0.
-T
Follow up:
The provider of "Arrows" just posted an update an
On 10/21/24 16:46, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
I somehow got updated to gimp 2.99.19 (3.0 on the splash screen).
I lost my arrows.
Any idea how to get the back?
Everything I have found it for gimp 2.0.
-T
Somehow gimp got upgraded to 3.0. rpm -qa said it was
still on 2. So I
Hi All,
I somehow got updated to gimp 2.99.19 (3.0 on the splash screen).
I lost my arrows.
Any idea how to get the back?
Everything I have found it for gimp 2.0.
-T
--
~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
On Wed, 19 May 2021 05:49:15 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> Why don't you try the same thing in a newly created user account?
Actually, it seems to have stopped by itself. After I hit
"cancel" on the first request, it hasn't asked again in
On 19/05/2021 02:19, Tom Horsley wrote:
Just started gimp for the very first time on fedora 34
and it pops up a authenticate dialog asking for root
password.
What in the great googly-moogly is this about?
(Stderr has some message about xsane so maybe it wants
to configure a scanner which I do
Just started gimp for the very first time on fedora 34
and it pops up a authenticate dialog asking for root
password.
What in the great googly-moogly is this about?
(Stderr has some message about xsane so maybe it wants
to configure a scanner which I do not have on the system).
How do I make it
> On 29 Apr 2020, at 16:02, SternData wrote:
>
> I do not have gimp installed, but do have Glimpse installed via flatpak.
>
> system upgrade reports:
>
> Modular dependency problem:
>
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides module(platform:f31
On 4/29/20 11:56 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/29/20 8:02 AM, SternData wrote:
>> I do not have gimp installed, but do have Glimpse installed via flatpak.
>>
>> system upgrade reports:
>>
>> Modular dependency problem:
>>
>> Problem: conflic
On 4/29/20 8:02 AM, SternData wrote:
I do not have gimp installed, but do have Glimpse installed via flatpak.
system upgrade reports:
Modular dependency problem:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module
gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0
Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:02:11 -0500
SternData :
> I do not have gimp installed, but do have Glimpse installed via
> flatpak.
>
> system upgrade reports:
>
> Modular dependency problem:
>
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides module(platform:f31) n
I do not have gimp installed, but do have Glimpse installed via flatpak.
system upgrade reports:
Modular dependency problem:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module
gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64
removing glimpse and flatpak does
On 2020-03-13 00:22, François Patte wrote:
> Thank You! That's done the trick.
>
> Why are these modules installed and activated? It is the first time I
> have encounter this problem.
gimp is a module in F31. And, I'm guessing, a package in the the others was
installe
r Fedora 31 - Free - Updates 262
>>>>> kB/s | 387 kB 00:01
>>>>> RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Free 557
>>>>> kB/s | 663 kB 00:01
>>>>> RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree - Upda
557
>>>> kB/s | 663 kB 00:01
>>>> RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree - Updates111
>>>> kB/s | 67 kB 00:00
>>>> RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree 336
111
>>> kB/s | 67 kB 00:00
>>> RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree 336
>>> kB/s | 241 kB 00:00
>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of
>>> 'libdnf::ModulePackageContainer::EnableMultipleSt
00:00
>> terminate called after throwing an instance of
>> 'libdnf::ModulePackageContainer::EnableMultipleStreamsException'
>> what(): Cannot enable multiple streams for module 'gimp'
>> Abandon (core dumped)
>>
>> What'
111
> kB/s | 67 kB 00:00
> RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree 336
> kB/s | 241 kB 00:00
> terminate called after throwing an instance of
> 'libdnf::ModulePackageContainer::EnableMultipleStreamsException'
> what(): Ca
instance of
'libdnf::ModulePackageContainer::EnableMultipleStreamsException'
what(): Cannot enable multiple streams for module 'gimp'
Abandon (core dumped)
What's this? And what can I do?
Thank you?
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 21:26, ToddAndMargo via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> If I use the gimp erase tool to remove a customers name
> from a screen shot, is it really gone or just not showing?
> I want to make sure I don't post any private
On 2020-02-10 18:07, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 17:25 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
If I use the gimp erase tool to remove a customers name
from a screen shot, is it really gone or just not showing?
I want to make sure I don't post any private information.
If you e
On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 17:25 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> If I use the gimp erase tool to remove a customers name
> from a screen shot, is it really gone or just not showing?
> I want to make sure I don't post any private information.
If you export a flat file: PNG, JPEG,
Hi All,
If I use the gimp erase tool to remove a customers name
from a screen shot, is it really gone or just not showing?
I want to make sure I don't post any private information.
-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.o
d not figure out what you were saying. Thank you anyway! Gimp
is a nightmare to operate!
Hmm. I've /never/ used the GIMP, but it made sense to me, because it
sounded like advice for a similar package I've used.
Is the problem that you don't recognise the advice about the &#
; values to make the rectangle the desired size.
Both of these also provide a way of specifying units.
You can also drag the selected rectangle to the desired location, and
re-size the selected rectangle by dragging one of its corners.
Could not figure out what you were saying. Thank you a
of these also provide a way of specifying units.
You can also drag the selected rectangle to the desired location, and
re-size the selected rectangle by dragging one of its corners.
Could not figure out what you were saying. Thank you anyway! Gimp
is a nightmare to operate!
I did eventual
In the "Toolbox - Tool Options", with the rectangle selected,
* change the "Position:" values to move the rectangle to the desired
location; and
* change the "Size:" values to make the rectangle the desired size.
Both of these also provide a way of specifying units.
You can also drag the select
Hi All,
Gimp
I am pretty good at creating rectangles in GIMP.
What if I want to move or size the rectangle? Is
there a way to do this?
Many thanks,
-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le
stan writes:
Reading this thread, I think that Sam, William, and Wolfgang have
pretty much the same response to this, a very self-actualized response.
I congratulate you, because your attitude is a great one to have.
However, I want to point out that you are probably capable of that
attitude be
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:02:16PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Short version:
Grow some balls, guys, please!
That language certainly doesn't belong here.
Sorry about that.
And thanks to Rick Stevens for pointing to it.
Wolfgang
___
users mailin
ntact the Gimp people at their mailing list or whatever and
file a suggestion that grey-on-grey is a terrible UI decision and they
really should rethink that choice. Then change to a scheme you're
comfortable with and move on.
---
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 21:32:16 -0500
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> William Oliver writes:
>
> > The bottom line is that if someone desperately wants to be offended,
> > they will find a way. Conversely, if someone doesn't want to be
> > offended, it's almost impossible to offend them.
> >
> > This see
Allegedly, on or about 18 November 2018, William Oliver sent:
> The bottom line is that if someone desperately wants to be offended,
> they will find a way. Conversely, if someone doesn't want to be
> offended, it's almost impossible to offend them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceS_jkKjIgo
Bri
cannot see in his comment anything about anybody's in particular
background
They are suggesting all gnome designers are bad in this regard, exactly.
It's a generalization and is not about a specific idea (to criticize).
He's suggesting - at best - that gnome/gimp designers in ge
On 11/19/18 11:56 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Again, it is not welcome here.
+1
--
Right: I dislike the default color scheme
Wrong: What idiot picked the default color scheme
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
Juan R. de Silva wrote:
>>> As far as I can see from his comment he only disaprove some GNOME UI
>>> decisions not GNOME entirely.
>>>
kind of comment is not welcome on the mailing list.
>>>
>>> Well, IMHO his is entitled to have his opinion. His comment is on topic
>>> and in the right lis
William Oliver writes:
The bottom line is that if someone desperately wants to be offended,
they will find a way. Conversely, if someone doesn't want to be
offended, it's almost impossible to offend them.
This seems to be a mysterious secret to a lot of people. Many years
ago, I realized that
The bottom line is that if someone desperately wants to be offended,
they will find a way. Conversely, if someone doesn't want to be
offended, it's almost impossible to offend them.
This seems to be a mysterious secret to a lot of people. Many years
ago, I realized that being "offended" was com
stan writes:
The internet lends itself to critical comments. It's easy to post
such comments in an email list, or anywhere else on the web. Would you
say those kinds of things to the developer's faces? How likely would
you be to have a constructive conversation if you did?
Those are still pe
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:02:16PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
How likely would you be to have a constructive conversation if you
did?
See above: It wasn't a conversation with Gimp/Gnome coders - it was a
sarcastic comment about how the OP thinks coders build these programs.
On 18-11-18 14:15:05, Frau Silvia Sánchez wrote:
I don't know what is PC other than Personal Computer
Google "pc acronym" and you will get a reasonable list. You'd
probably choose Politically Correct from that list as appropriate for
the context.
Look up "pc" on wikipedia and learn much, much
faces?
It was no ad hominem sarcasm. It was a general sarcastic comment about
Gimp/Gnome and the way how coders build it.
How likely would you be to have a constructive conversation if you
did?
See above: It wasn't a conversation with Gimp/Gnome coders - it was a
sarcastic comment a
On 11/18/2018 12:15 PM, Frau Silvia Sánchez wrote:
)
I don't know what is PC other than Personal Computer
Here in the USA, it also stands for "Politically Correct."
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness)
___
users mailing list -- user
Allegedly, on or about 18 November 2018, Juan R. de Silva sent:
> As far as I can see from his comment he only disaprove some GNOME UI
> decisions not GNOME entirely.
If Gnome doesn't like being critiqued so much, perhaps they should stop
doing things that invite it. Such as removing user config
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 15:49:00 + (UTC)
"Juan R. de Silva" wrote:
> Irony and sarcasm are rarely considered "considerate or respectful"
> by those aimed. However, both irony and sarcasm belong to a civilized
> disputes toolset and are used in many public discussions on any level.
The internet
I don't know what is PC other than Personal Computer
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 at 18:23, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 11/18/2018 10:14 AM, Frau Silvia Sánchez wrote:
> > I don't know why do you think that comment was "police-like" or why do
> > you think that been disrespectful to Gnome designers is correc
On 11/18/2018 10:14 AM, Frau Silvia Sánchez wrote:
I don't know why do you think that comment was "police-like" or why do
you think that been disrespectful to Gnome designers is correct.
I can't speak for anybody else on the list, but to me, your comment came
across as very PC. I think it's
Hello Juan et all,
I don't know why do you think that comment was "police-like" or why do
you think that been disrespectful to Gnome designers is correct.
I don't like Gnome Shell, but I simply opt not to use it. I don't need to
be sarcastic and make comments on the people who work for the proje
>> As far as I can see from his comment he only disaprove some GNOME UI
>> decisions not GNOME entirely.
>>
>>> kind of comment is not welcome on the mailing list.
>>
>> Well, IMHO his is entitled to have his opinion. His comment is on topic
>> and in the right list.
>>
>> Your statement instead
Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 22:21:19 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
>> On 11/17/18 7:24 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>> That is, indeed, hideous.
>>>
>>> Some out of work Gnome 3 UI Expert must've found a home at the Gimp
>>>
On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 22:21:19 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/17/18 7:24 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> That is, indeed, hideous.
>>
>> Some out of work Gnome 3 UI Expert must've found a home at the Gimp
>> project.
>
> I think we've all figured out
On 11/17/18 7:24 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
That is, indeed, hideous.
Some out of work Gnome 3 UI Expert must've found a home at the Gimp
project.
I think we've all figured out by now that you don't like Gnome. This
kind of comment is not welcome on t
Tom Horsley writes:
Who decided that gray on gray icons were a good idea
in new default gimp theme? Thank God I can change the
theme and icon selections in preferences :-).
That is, indeed, hideous.
Some out of work Gnome 3 UI Expert must've found a home at the Gimp project.
Now if
Who decided that gray on gray icons were a good idea
in new default gimp theme? Thank God I can change the
theme and icon selections in preferences :-).
Now if there was only a preference to scale everything
up so the text is big enough to see on a 4K monitor.
(And why does the tools window take
I used to work with gimp+ufraw-gimp in F28. Now in F29, I can't use
them, Gimp has the option to use darktable or Rawtherapee as plugin
for raw files. Furthermore if I use Ufraw when I click on send to Gimp
I get an error opening Gimp, stating that file is not svg type. Any
idea??
An
On 08/07/2018 09:32 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/07/2018 08:18 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
How do I ell if I have Python support in Gimp?
Given that I see Python scripts getting loaded when I start gimp, I
assume it has Python support built-in. Also, Filters->Python
Fu->Console give
points using
selection tool. Control points are common points that
are overlapping in both the images to be stitched.
I do get the pop up. But how do I add selection points? If
I click on something in one of the images, it is just whatever
doodle tool Gimp is set on and nothing ever
On 08/07/2018 08:18 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
How do I ell if I have Python support in Gimp?
Given that I see Python scripts getting loaded when I start gimp, I
assume it has Python support built-in. Also, Filters->Python
Fu->Console gives me a python
Hi All,
How do I ell if I have Python support in Gimp?
And if not how do I install Python support into Gimp?
Many thanks,
-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 04:28:14PM +0200, François Patte wrote:
> I have seen that in fedora 28, 2.8 version of gimp is still provided
> Is there any chance to have the 2.10 version before f29 release?
Yes. 2.10 is actually also offered, as a module. However, modules don't
quite
On Sat, 19 May 2018 16:28:14 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> I have seen that in fedora 28, 2.8 version of gimp is still
> provided Is there any chance to have the 2.10 version before f29
> release?
You could open a request bugzilla asking the maintainer if they would
put the f29 v
Bonjour,
I have seen that in fedora 28, 2.8 version of gimp is still provided
Is there any chance to have the 2.10 version before f29 release?
Thank you.
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints
If I print in gimp syslog gets:
[system] Rejected send message, 10 matched rules; type="method_return",
sender=":1.3" (uid=70 pid=788 comm="avahi-daemon: starting up ")
interface="(unset)" member="(unset)" error name="(unset)"
reques
I signed on that mail list, thanks for pointing me to it, Poma.
By now, saving the picture with problems in a smaller size and
discarding its metadata works as a solution.
Thanks!
Sylvia
PS: I'll get back here if I find out what caused this issue. Thanks again.
2014-10-10 20:24 GMT-02:00, poma :
On 11.10.2014 00:14, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
> I've got the same error, BUT if I use another smaller picture I
> haven't any problem.
> Maybe the size or picture itself is giving problems?
>
Don't hesitate to ask at
http://www.gimp.org/mail_lists.html
Back to us with the answer. ;)
--
users m
I've got the same error, BUT if I use another smaller picture I
haven't any problem.
Maybe the size or picture itself is giving problems?
Cheers, thanks!
Sylvia
2014-10-10 20:04 GMT-02:00, poma :
> On 10.10.2014 18:45, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
>> No... No update related to G
On 10.10.2014 18:45, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
> No... No update related to Gimp or jpeg, or any other image format :-(
> I updated again just in case
>
Create a new user and run the GIMP instance from there.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
No... No update related to Gimp or jpeg, or any other image format :-(
I updated again just in case
Cheers, thanks
Sylvia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code
You could check the log file (/var/log/yum.log) or the `yum history`
command, if a library used by gimp for jpeg got updated. If so you can
try to get the older version of said library (if it was erased in the
first place) and symlink it in /usr/lib.
After that gimp should be able to save jpeg
Well, yes, I did a general update
Sylvia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/
Okay, that is strange. Did you install or update anything in since the
last time it worked?
- Nathan
--
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
\ / - against HTML emails
X - against proprietory attachments
/ \ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorap
Anyway, Error console says:
"Failed saving. JPEG complement couldn't save the image"
:-(
Cheers, thanks in advance
Sylvia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Cond
But why it was working fine before?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/M
On 10-09/19:22, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
> I can't save my work because The Gimp shows me an error message
> everytime I export it into jpeg format.
> The message is "Jpeg complement failed"
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
> Cheers, and thanks in advance
>
I can't save my work because The Gimp shows me an error message
everytime I export it into jpeg format.
The message is "Jpeg complement failed"
Any thoughts?
Cheers, and thanks in advance
Sylvia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subsc
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 09:51:35 +0100
Ambrogio De Lorenzo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> gimp 2.8.10 with new kernels core dump on creating or opening large
> image.
>
> There is a workaround to solve the problem.
> I aliased the gimp command with
> #alias gimp='MALLOC_MMAP_MA
Hi all,
gimp 2.8.10 with new kernels core dump on creating or opening large
image.
There is a workaround to solve the problem.
I aliased the gimp command with
#alias gimp='MALLOC_MMAP_MAX_=0 gimp'
The problem is related to new metods for allocation memory on the kernel
3.12.
More
On 03/11/13 03:59 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 15:55:18 -0500, Frank wrote:
I am trying to compile the FocusBlue plugin for GIMP on Fedora 19.
The make file spits out this error when linking:
/usr/bin/ld: diffusion.o: undefined reference to symbol 'expf@@GLIBC_2.0&
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 15:55:18 -0500, Frank wrote:
> I am trying to compile the FocusBlue plugin for GIMP on Fedora 19.
> The make file spits out this error when linking:
>
>
> /usr/bin/ld: diffusion.o: undefined reference to symbol 'expf@@GLIBC_2.0'
> /usr/bin/ld
I am trying to compile the FocusBlue plugin for GIMP on Fedora 19.
The make file spits out this error when linking:
/usr/bin/ld: diffusion.o: undefined reference to symbol 'expf@@GLIBC_2.0'
/usr/bin/ld: note: 'expf@@GLIBC_2.0' is defined in DSO /lib/libm.so.6 so
try add
I was trying to do a simple banner for a site using Gimp on Fedora 19.
Selecting a font other than the default crashes Gimp. I can reproduce this
100% by either trying to scroll for a font or selecting something else than
the default a couple of times.
Extremely annoying, anyone else seen this
gimp now works again. Do not known what made this happen.
Thanks for help.
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 12:30 +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > is croaking while reading/processing resource and config files.
>
> Removed that but still the same segfault.
>
> > If that doesn't do anything then try to rename resource files that gimp
> > seems to
> I'd next try to move off any ~/.gimp* directories. It looks like gimp
> is croaking while reading/processing resource and config files.
Removed that but still the same segfault.
> If that doesn't do anything then try to rename resource files that gimp
> seems to fi
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 23:09 +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > strace -o trace.lst gimp
>
> Below is the end of the trace (full log attached). Does it help?
>
> inotify_add_watch(8,
> "/usr/share/kde-settings/kde-profile/default/share/config",
>
> strace -o trace.lst gimp
Below is the end of the trace (full log attached). Does it help?
inotify_add_watch(8,
"/usr/share/kde-settings/kde-profile/default/share/config",
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote:"
> Yes I have seen that but still do not understand if this should make
> any difference.
No. Not by default. Think of it as just an alias.
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opt
ot;upgrade"
>
> >> What's the difference between upgrade and update?
> > upgrade
> > Is the same as the update command with the --obsoletes flag set. See
> > update for more details.
>
> Yes I have seen that but still do not understand if this should m
> i meant the complete OS and if this is also on
> teh latest uüdates it is not a "fresh install"
> by definition
OK after fresh install, I have of course done "yum update" but not "upgrade"
>> What's the difference between upgrade and update?
> upgrade
> Is the same as the update command with t
Am 08.02.2013 19:12, schrieb Frédéric Bron:
>>> I have tried "yum reinstall gimp" but same issue
>> yum upgrade
>
> I have already the latest built: 2.8.2
i meant the complete OS and if this is also on
teh latest uüdates it is not a "fresh install&quo
>> I have tried "yum reinstall gimp" but same issue
> yum upgrade
I have already the latest built: 2.8.2
What's the difference between upgrade and update?
I always use update.
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change sub
Am 08.02.2013 18:56, schrieb Frédéric Bron:
> on x86_64, HP Pavilion G6-2255sf.
> what can I do?
> I have tried "yum reinstall gimp" but same issue
yum upgrade
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
on x86_64, HP Pavilion G6-2255sf.
what can I do?
I have tried "yum reinstall gimp" but same issue.
Thanks,
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidel
| From: Bill Davidsen
| I have a bunch of laptops I would love to have on Fedora, but Fedora doesn't
| include the drivers, rpmfusion has them, but the Live-CD and install kernels
| in fc18 don't match the driver, I can't D/L drivers because I don't have the
| drivers, if I did I could download b
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
