On 10/23/2011 09:24 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 10/23/2011 04:42 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
>> I installed Sugar as additional Windows Manager, but when I removed all
>> sugar group also gdm was removed, so I couldn't restart graphically.I
>> had to start in text mode, and re-install it.
>> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/23/2011 03:14 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/23/2011 12:55 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> How do you determine whether or not a given wm needs gdm? Any wm can equally
>> well use kdm instead of gdm, so it is actually a conditional dependency ---
>> "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/23/2011 03:26 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sunday 23 October 2011 21:14:17 Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 10/23/2011 12:55 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>> How do you determine whether or not a given wm needs gdm? Any wm can
>>> equally well use kdm inst
On Sunday 23 October 2011 21:19:57 Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/23/2011 12:55 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Sorry to be sending this to the list, but as you'll see, it's the only
> way I can do this. Please remove your own email address from the Reply
> To: field until you've got it working again. Ever
On Sunday 23 October 2011 21:14:17 Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/23/2011 12:55 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > How do you determine whether or not a given wm needs gdm? Any wm can
> > equally well use kdm instead of gdm, so it is actually a conditional
> > dependency --- "if there is no other dm installed
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sunday 23 October 2011 19:17:54 Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 10/23/2011 07:20 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
>> > A simple solution would be not disinstall GDM by default in any WM group
>> > disinstallation: I guess that many people want to tr
On 10/23/2011 12:55 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Best, :-)
> Marko
Sorry to be sending this to the list, but as you'll see, it's the only
way I can do this. Please remove your own email address from the Reply
To: field until you've got it working again. Every time I reply to one
of your posts
On 10/23/2011 12:55 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> How do you determine whether or not a given wm needs gdm? Any wm can equally
> well use kdm instead of gdm, so it is actually a conditional dependency ---
> "if there is no other dm installed, and if there is some wm which depends on
> the presence o
On Sunday 23 October 2011 19:17:54 Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/23/2011 07:20 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
> > A simple solution would be not disinstall GDM by default in any WM group
> > disinstallation: I guess that many people want to try different WM's and
> > in case they decided to disinstall som
On 10/23/2011 07:20 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
> A simple solution would be not disinstall GDM by default in any WM group
> disinstallation: I guess that many people want to try different WM's and
> in case they decided to disinstall some WM, their GDM would be killed,
> that is not fair. How ab
On 10/23/2011 10:44 PM, Tim wrote:
> The problem sounds far stupider, to me, than the proposal to avoid it.
> The problem sounds like dependencies in the wrong direction.
The solution is silly regardless of the problem. There are no reverse
dependencies in play here. If you want to understand t
antonio montagnani:
>> A simple solution would be not disinstall GDM by default in any WM group
>> disinstallation: I guess that many people want to try different WM's and
>> in case they decided to disinstall some WM, their GDM would be killed,
>> that is not fair. How about this simple decisio
Rahul Sundaram ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on
23/10/2011 16:52:
> On 10/23/2011 07:50 PM, antonio montagnani wrote:
>
>> A simple solution would be not disinstall GDM by default in any WM group
>> disinstallation: I guess that many people want to try different WM's and
>> in case
On 10/23/2011 07:50 PM, antonio montagnani wrote:
> A simple solution would be not disinstall GDM by default in any WM group
> disinstallation: I guess that many people want to try different WM's and
> in case they decided to disinstall some WM, their GDM would be killed,
> that is not fair. Ho
Mark LaPierre ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 23/10/2011
16:13:
> On 10/23/2011 09:28 AM, antonio wrote:
>> Mark LaPierre ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 23/10/2011
>> 15:24:
>>> On 10/23/2011 04:42 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
I installed Sugar as additional
On 10/23/2011 09:28 AM, antonio wrote:
> Mark LaPierre ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 23/10/2011
> 15:24:
>> On 10/23/2011 04:42 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
>>> I installed Sugar as additional Windows Manager, but when I removed all
>>> sugar group also gdm was removed, so I coul
Mark LaPierre ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 23/10/2011
15:24:
> On 10/23/2011 04:42 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
>> I installed Sugar as additional Windows Manager, but when I removed all
>> sugar group also gdm was removed, so I couldn't restart graphically.I
>> had to start in
On 10/23/2011 04:42 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
> I installed Sugar as additional Windows Manager, but when I removed all
> sugar group also gdm was removed, so I couldn't restart graphically.I
> had to start in text mode, and re-install it.
> I suppose that this is not correct, but what is wrong
I installed Sugar as additional Windows Manager, but when I removed all
sugar group also gdm was removed, so I couldn't restart graphically.I
had to start in text mode, and re-install it.
I suppose that this is not correct, but what is wrong??
--
Antonio M
Skype: amontag52
Linux Fedora F15 (Lo
19 matches
Mail list logo
