> --
>
> Message: 12
>
> Did you remove nspluginwrapper?
Yes, but firefox still doesn't run
>
> What about removing packages from fc10 and fc11?
>
> goffice04-0.4.3-5.fc11.i586
> libdhcp4client-4.0.0-37.fc10.i386
> libdvdcss-1.2.10-1.i386
> libvolume_id-141-7.fc11.i
On Monday 05 April 2010 08:44 AM, David García Granda wrote:
>
> Did you remove nspluginwrapper?
>
Yes, please try this before we can say we give up. :)
>> I tried to clean things up a bit using package-cleanup but didn't do much.
>> I did clean out old kernels and kernel-devel files. That did
Hi Don,
2010/4/5 Don Vogt :
>> >>> Hopefully this will solve your problems. :)
>> >>
>> >> probably but to be honest, I haven't been tracking
>> this problem but
>> >> generally, you can just nuke the file,
>> >>
>> ~/.mozilla/firefox/YOUR_SALTED_PROFILE/pluginreg.dat and it
>> will be
>> >>
> >>> Hopefully this will solve your problems. :)
> >>
> >> probably but to be honest, I haven't been tracking
> this problem but
> >> generally, you can just nuke the file,
> >>
> ~/.mozilla/firefox/YOUR_SALTED_PROFILE/pluginreg.dat and it
> will be
> >> rebuilt on the next Firefox startup.
>
2010/4/4 Suvayu Ali :
> On Saturday 03 April 2010 10:28 PM, Craig White wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 22:20 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> Hi Don,
>>>
>>> That actually helps a lot. :)
>>>
>>> On Saturday 03 April 2010 09:49 PM, Don Vogt wrote:
> I would like to avoid removing and installing ag
On Saturday 03 April 2010 10:28 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 22:20 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> That actually helps a lot. :)
>>
>> On Saturday 03 April 2010 09:49 PM, Don Vogt wrote:
I would like to avoid removing and installing again firefox and
xulrunner,
On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 22:20 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> That actually helps a lot. :)
>
> On Saturday 03 April 2010 09:49 PM, Don Vogt wrote:
> >> I would like to avoid removing and installing again firefox and
> >> xulrunner, but maybe as last option it would work :-?
> >
> >> Regar
Hi Don,
That actually helps a lot. :)
On Saturday 03 April 2010 09:49 PM, Don Vogt wrote:
>> I would like to avoid removing and installing again firefox and
>> xulrunner, but maybe as last option it would work :-?
>
>> Regards,
>
>> David
>
> After removing and re-installing xulrunner (which re
> I would like to avoid removing and installing again firefox and
> xulrunner, but maybe as last option it would work :-?
> Regards,
> David
After removing and re-installing xulrunner (which removed and re-installed
firefox again ), I ran firefox from a terminal and got back a little bit more
> --
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:30:31 +0200
> From: David Garc?a Granda
> Subject: Re: Firefox not running : unable to load XPCOM
> (was Re:)
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Typ
Hi Don,
>> > I finally got straight on what you wanted for strace.
>> > I have attached a gzipped copy, but I don't know if it
>> will go through the list, and I lost track of who wanted it.
>> If it doesen't go through let me know and I will send it
>> direct.
>> > It makes absolutely no sense to
> --
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 10:58:43 +0200
> From: David Garc?a Granda
> Subject: Re: Firefox not running : unable to load XPCOM
> (was Re:)
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Typ
Hi Don,
> I finally got straight on what you wanted for strace.
> I have attached a gzipped copy, but I don't know if it will go through the
> list, and I lost track of who wanted it. If it doesen't go through let me
> know and I will send it direct.
> It makes absolutely no sense to me at all.
I finally got straight on what you wanted for strace.
I have attached a gzipped copy, but I don't know if it will go through the
list, and I lost track of who wanted it. If it doesen't go through let me know
and I will send it direct.
It makes absolutely no sense to me at all.
strace.l
Hello Don,
On Friday 02 April 2010 07:38 AM, David García Granda wrote:
>>>
>>> 1.- Did you try strace (strace -o strace.log firefox)?. If
>>> not, please
>>> do it and post trace output file (strace.log in the example
>>> mentioned)
>>> for inspection.
>>>
>>> 2.- Which architecture are you runni
Hi Don,
>> > >>> or advice would be appreciated.
>>
>> Is it possible for you to check if XPCOM
>> files related
>> >>> from VirtualBox
>> conflict with Firefox/xulrunner ones?.
>> Maybe something
>> >>> not compatible
>> from VirtualBox is loaded instead of the
>> right one.
>
--- On Fri, 4/2/10, David García Granda wrote:
> From: David García Granda
> Subject: Firefox not running: unable to load XPCOM (was Re: )
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Cc: "Don Vogt"
> Date: Friday, April 2, 2010, 3:48 AM
> Hi Don,
Hi Don,
Please have proper a subject and trim the replies appropriately, I
missed your earlier reply because of a missing subject and it was quite
difficult to pick out your responses.
On Friday 02 April 2010 12:48 AM, David García Granda wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> I tried starting firefox in a t
Hi Don,
Yesterday I updated to kernel 2.6.32.9.70 fc12 and to
>>> firefox-3.5.9-1.fc12 and now firefox won't start. I get a
>>> notice in the bottom bar for a few seconds and then it goes
>>> blank.
>>>
>>> Strange, I have the same package versions and firefox runs
>>> fine...
>>>
I trie
19 matches
Mail list logo
