Hi,
I have the Plasma program launch feedback enabled in system
settings, and the icons on my desktop have launch feedback enabled, but
when I run a program from the desktop or from the task bar I don't get
any launch feedback in F34. I am running F34 in a Vmware Player vm, but
I
For newbies pondering a build of a new computer with Ryzen platform.
( to run Fedora, of course, or at least an rpm-based Linux distro )
If not interested, please hit delete button now.
If you want more details than what is below, then please message me
privately,
meaning please do not respond u
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 17:14 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/16/20 12:43 AM, David wrote:
> > I have a new point-release of Firefox. Why out of all the packages
> > that
> > gets updated is Firefox the most finicky ?and requiring a reboot ?
>
> You don't need to reboot for a Firefox upd
On 4/16/20 12:43 AM, David wrote:
I have a new point-release of Firefox. Why out of all the packages
that
gets updated is Firefox the most finicky ? and requiring a reboot ?
You don't need to reboot for a Firefox update, but you should at least
restart it. Where do you see that it r
oops,
Please ignore my previous comment about cups in my
email.I am typing while half-asleep.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:/
Today's update, went smoothly for my install of Workstation.
My kernel is now:5.7.0-0.rc1.20200414git8632e9b5645b.1.fc33
My backup kernel is: 5.7.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc33
And my emergency kernel is the crusty old 5.7.0-0.rc0.git8.1.fc33
The only fc31 package on my install is TrouSerS
drives show up.
Thanks
JohanS
***
FEEDBACK***
On the first reported drive after some more testing it was found that
sometimes no partitions
and sometimes it displays the partitions.
SO.. maybe it is the drive??
Done a new install on another drive, well it is like betting on the
On 22/01/12 23:16, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Then, just "systemctl enable fixfiles.service" and you should be all set.
-T.C.
We'll after seeing the example you have given me.
I May try to come up with something for yum-updateonboot.
Still a SysV service.
Will run it by here when ready.
--
R
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 4:09 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
wrote:
> Drop this in /etc/systemd/system/fixfiles.service or such and it
> should do the trick:
Sorry, itchy submit finger. Needs a little more:
[Unit]
Name=Fix SELinux Contexts on Shutdown
DefaultDependencies=no
After=local-fs.target sysinit
On 22/01/12 23:09, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
For starters, you can't add arbitrary commands to systemd unit files
like that; you'd have to write a unit file. Secondly, you don't need
to mess with poweroff.service.
-T.C.
Apprecitae the service file.
Am still not comfortable
with trying to cr
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Looking for feedback
>
> I havn't seen anything in
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd
>
> Google not much help.
>
> but I would like
> "fixfiles onboot"
> to run just before poweroff both
Looking for feedback
I havn't seen anything in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd
Google not much help.
but I would like
"fixfiles onboot"
to run just before poweroff both cli\gui
not sure how
"Requires=fixfiles"
"After="fixfiles onboot"
would
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, JD wrote:
On 11/08/2010 03:08 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello to every one,
So,
I nicely upgrade my system from fc10 to fc11 with the advises available
on the fedora web site. Then I was stocked there, I tried 5 times
(reinstalling from fc11)
to upgrade either to 12 or 13 wi
On 11/8/10, JD wrote:
> On 11/08/2010 03:08 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> Hello to every one,
>>
>> So,
>> I nicely upgrade my system from fc10 to fc11 with the advises available
>> on the fedora web site. Then I was stocked there, I tried 5 times
>> (reinstalling from fc11)
>> to upgrade either to
On 11/08/2010 03:08 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello to every one,
>
> So,
> I nicely upgrade my system from fc10 to fc11 with the advises available
> on the fedora web site. Then I was stocked there, I tried 5 times
> (reinstalling from fc11)
> to upgrade either to 12 or 13 with the same result (
Hello to every one,
So,
I nicely upgrade my system from fc10 to fc11 with the advises available
on the fedora web site. Then I was stocked there, I tried 5 times
(reinstalling from fc11)
to upgrade either to 12 or 13 with the same result (using preupgrade of
the dvd).
I was usually able to rebo
--- On Sun, 11/7/10, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Thank, you are probably right.
> After 5 attempts to udgrade my fedora 11 system to 12 or
> 13. I just
> gave up. In my opinion, there is a problem with the rpm
> db.
> I checked the hardware.
> The system became unstable after an access to the rpmdb.
>
On 11/08/2010 12:32 PM, Tim wrote:
> The notion that you save time by upgrading then sorting out what went
> wrong has been destroyed by my prior experiences (fresh install in
> *well* under an hour, versus many hours of install routine CPU and disc
> grinding, and post-install repairs), and watchi
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 12:30 -0800, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> when I see someone post about "updating" from one ancient Fedora
> version to another and complaining that something isn't working, I
> ignore it.
I tend to do the same, mostly because I don't do it, so I wouldn't be
able to offer a
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
wrote:
>
> Patrick Dupre writes:
>> My last 5 or 6 posts did not receive any feedback.
>> This is bothering a bit !
>> For now, I am trying for the 4th time to update a system from
>> fedora 11 to f
Patrick Dupre writes:
> My last 5 or 6 posts did not receive any feedback.
> This is bothering a bit !
> For now, I am trying for the 4th time to update a system from
> fedora 11 to fedora 12. I started 2 week ago !
> Apparently the update looks OK, but then, after I log, I cab
&
2010/11/7 Bruno Wolff III
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 19:45:37 +,
> Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > I did, but at one point, the system is unstable.
> > All the commands give one after the other with a
> > segmenation fault
> > or non sense.
> >
> > And no way to reboot.
>
> Have you done any hardw
On 11/07/2010 11:45 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, JD wrote:
>
>> On 11/07/2010 11:36 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>> On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 19:14:54 +,
Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> Thank, you are probably right.
>
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 19:45:37 +,
Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I did, but at one point, the system is unstable.
> All the commands give one after the other with a
> segmenation fault
> or non sense.
>
> And no way to reboot.
Have you done any hardware testing?
Does a live image work on your s
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, JD wrote:
On 11/07/2010 11:36 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 19:14:54 +,
Patrick Dupre wrote:
Thank, you are probably right.
After 5 attempts to udgrade my fedora 11 system to 12 or 13. I just
gave up. In
On 11/07/2010 11:36 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 19:14:54 +,
>> Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank, you are probably right.
>>> After 5 attempts to udgrade my fedora 11 system to 12 or 13. I just
>>> gave up. In my opinion,
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 19:14:54 +,
Patrick Dupre wrote:
Thank, you are probably right.
After 5 attempts to udgrade my fedora 11 system to 12 or 13. I just
gave up. In my opinion, there is a problem with the rpm db.
I checked the hardware.
The s
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 19:14:54 +,
Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> Thank, you are probably right.
> After 5 attempts to udgrade my fedora 11 system to 12 or 13. I just
> gave up. In my opinion, there is a problem with the rpm db.
> I checked the hardware.
> The system became unstable after an acc
feedback.
Either people aren't interested or don't have an idea or you formulated
your problem not very well and people don't understand it.
This is bothering a bit !
I guess you can always ask for your money back :-)
For now, I am trying for the 4th time to update a system fr
On 11/06/2010 11:19 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My last 5 or 6 posts did not receive any feedback.
Either people aren't interested or don't have an idea or you formulated
your problem not very well and people don't understand it.
> This is bothering a bit !
Hello,
My last 5 or 6 posts did not receive any feedback.
This is bothering a bit !
For now, I am trying for the 4th time to update a system from
fedora 11 to fedora 12. I started 2 week ago !
Apparently the update looks OK, but then, after I log, I cab
rebuild the db but then any rpm -Uvh
On 10/31/2010 12:41 PM, Hiisi wrote:
> And you've broadcast-ed your useful notes instead of mailing them
> directly to webmaster of fedoraproject.og.
correct you are. my error.
after looking at new pages, request of where to send had slipped
from thought.
thank you.
my apologies to list.
--
On 10/31/2010 12:41 PM, Hiisi wrote:
> And you've broadcast-ed your useful notes instead of mailing them
> directly to webmaster of fedoraproject.og.
correct you are. my error.
after looking at new pages, request of where to send had slipped
from thought.
thank you.
--
peace out.
tc.hago,
su, 2010-10-31 kello 12:24 +, g kirjoitti:
> first off, you limited your audience using 'html' because there are
> readers
> of this list who send 'html' to "Trash".
And you've broadcast-ed your useful notes instead of mailing them
directly to webmaster of fedoraproject.og.
--
Nothing is ill
site and
> send your feedback to webmaster AT fedoraproject.org
first off, you limited your audience using 'html' because there are readers
of this list who send 'html' to "Trash".
pages are not 'lhj' and are an improvement over first attempt.
pages do
Hi
As many of you might have already noticed, fedoraproject.org now has a new
design. Since we have a new release of Fedora 14 coming up in 4 days,
maybe you can take a few minutes of your time to go through the site and
send your feedback to webmaster AT fedoraproject.org
Rahul
--
users
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:59 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> I've really enjoyed all of the default desktops from Fedora Core 1 through
> Fedora 13, but I have to say that the default wallpaper chosen for Fedora 14
> is something I'll have to change, it's simply too dark for my tastes. Well,
> t
Hi Tom!
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 10:21 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I gotta say I don't really care what happens to the wallpaper
> since I always use my own anyway, but some of the wallpaper I
> use is pictures taken by me so I'd be happy to contribute
> them in case anyone else likes them too, but I
I gotta say I don't really care what happens to the wallpaper
since I always use my own anyway, but some of the wallpaper I
use is pictures taken by me so I'd be happy to contribute
them in case anyone else likes them too, but I don't understand
the instructions in the web page. The convenient uplo
On 07/15/2010 02:38 PM, dexter wrote:
> 2010/7/15 Máirín Duffy:
>
>> I just wanted to re-emphasize that we're really hoping to hear from you
>> - what do you think of our designs so far? It's important to us to make
>> sure Fedora 14's theme is something that you'll enjoy.
>>
>>
> Its g
On 07/16/2010 04:35 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 14:41 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
>> On 07/16/2010 06:40 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> What is it about these ones that appealed to you?
>>
>> 1. The graphic quality.
>
> What do you mean about the graphic quality? Saying y
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 14:41 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> On 07/16/2010 06:40 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
> >
> > What is it about these ones that appealed to you?
>
> 1. The graphic quality.
What do you mean about the graphic quality? Saying you liked it, and
saying it was good quality, unfort
On 07/16/2010 06:40 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
> What is it about these ones that appealed to you?
1. The graphic quality.
2. High definition of the object (DNA, Ballon, Sun, Rocket trails)
> What do you mean? Do you mean the changes that normally take place while
> a single wallpaper is being de
On 07/16/2010 03:31 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Thursday 15 July 2010 02:59 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>> I've really enjoyed all of the default desktops from Fedora Core 1 through
>> Fedora 13, but I have to say that the default wallpaper chosen for Fedora 14
>> is something I'll have to change
On Thursday 15 July 2010 02:59 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> I've really enjoyed all of the default desktops from Fedora Core 1 through
> Fedora 13, but I have to say that the default wallpaper chosen for Fedora 14
> is something I'll have to change, it's simply too dark for my tastes.
I on the
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:40:42 -0400
Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 23:30 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> > > I've really enjoyed all of the default desktops from Fedora Core 1
> > > through Fedora 13,
> >
> > IMHO, the best Fedora wallpaper was "Fedora 7" flying high. Fedora Core
>
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 23:30 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> > I've really enjoyed all of the default desktops from Fedora Core 1
> > through Fedora 13,
>
> IMHO, the best Fedora wallpaper was "Fedora 7" flying high. Fedora Core
> 6, Fedora 10 and 13 wallpapers are also good.
What is it about th
simply too dark
> for my tastes. Well, to be fair, I guess I didn't care so much for
> Core 3 and Core 4's, either.
Thanks for your feedback. I do want to make it very clear that the
images in the blog post you were pointed to are conceptual images, and
not even representative of the w
> I've really enjoyed all of the default desktops from Fedora Core 1
> through Fedora 13,
IMHO, the best Fedora wallpaper was "Fedora 7" flying high. Fedora Core
6, Fedora 10 and 13 wallpapers are also good.
I think that it will be nice to see some variation of the chosen
wallpaper, maybe peop
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:38 PM, dexter wrote:
> 2010/7/15 Máirín Duffy :
> > I just wanted to re-emphasize that we're really hoping to hear from you
> > - what do you think of our designs so far? It's important to us to make
> > sure Fedora 14's theme is something that you'll enjoy.
> >
> Its go
2010/7/15 Máirín Duffy :
> I just wanted to re-emphasize that we're really hoping to hear from you
> - what do you think of our designs so far? It's important to us to make
> sure Fedora 14's theme is something that you'll enjoy.
>
Its good I like it :-) but maybe to dark for some.
...dex
--
user
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 20:09 +0200, Jef van Schendel wrote:
> I'm looking forward to hearing what all of you think, and hope to
> collect some great supplemental wallpapers. If you have any questions,
> drop by on the #fedora-design IRC channel where the Design Team hangs
> out.
I just wanted to re
ks about it!
Máirín Duffy blogged [1] about the new wallpaper. This is only a very
early version and we're still working on it, but in order to do this
right we want to know what everyone thinks. If you any suggestions,
comments, questions or other feedback, feel free to leave a message
behind
53 matches
Mail list logo
