lee wrote:
Bill Davidsen writes:
lee wrote:
Queue your posts before sending them.
I tried that, and wound up not remembering to post afterword. It
sounds better than it works, at least for me.
It can happen --- since I got used to it, I don't forget it anymore.
Even if I do, nothing te
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 21:40 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Just think about what you'd tell me, if I tell you: "You must do it
this
way" ... You'd likely take it as a rudity.
However, this is the 1:1 translation of what Germans would use to
express what US Americans are
lee wrote:
Reindl Harald writes:
the real problem is thread-view
Perhaps you'd be happier with a different MUA. You seem to be using
something similar to the MUA built into seamonkey. I have always found
it totally unsuited for managing more than a very few mails.
Yes, Seamonkey has watc
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.07.2013 20:10, schrieb Robert Holtzman:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:55:15PM -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote:
Hi Reindl,
first: my intention is *not* to start another epic thread
since i am always the unholy prick here after i lose patience
maybe others should also rec
> How do you let go of your cultural and other frames of reference and yet
> figure out what a subject at hand is? I don't think that's possible and
> that it's only possible to be more or less aware of these factors and to
> try to somehow deal with them.
>
> Still, being a German, you can say
Am 16.07.2013 03:49, schrieb lee:
> Reindl Harald writes:
>
>> the real problem is thread-view
>
> Perhaps you'd be happier with a different MUA. You seem to be using
> something similar to the MUA built into seamonkey. I have always found
> it totally unsuited for managing more than a very
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 16.07.2013 03:49, schrieb lee:
>> Reindl Harald writes:
>>
>>> the real problem is thread-view
>>
>> Perhaps you'd be happier with a different MUA. You seem to be using
>> something similar to the MUA built into seamonkey. I have always found
>> it totally unsuited
Bill Davidsen writes:
>> lee wrote:
>>
>
>> Queue your posts before sending them.
>>
> I tried that, and wound up not remembering to post afterword. It
> sounds better than it works, at least for me.
It can happen --- since I got used to it, I don't forget it anymore.
Even if I do, nothing terri
Reindl Harald writes:
> the real problem is thread-view
Perhaps you'd be happier with a different MUA. You seem to be using
something similar to the MUA built into seamonkey. I have always found
it totally unsuited for managing more than a very few mails.
Have you tried gnus or mutt?
--
Fe
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 21:40 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Just think about what you'd tell me, if I tell you: "You must do it
> this
> way" ... You'd likely take it as a rudity.
>
> However, this is the 1:1 translation of what Germans would use to
> express what US Americans are likely to expre
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
and the next problem that over time it becomes unclear to what
people responded - the original thread or subthreads, that feels
like if you have a tech meeting with 10 people and then one
marketing guy steps in the room and fire his statements
Not if t
Les Howell writes:
> Culture is absorbed.
> [...]
>
> These frames of reference and culture impact how one perceives what is
> said. Much or most of face to face speaking is the unspoken language of
> eye contact, facial expression, posture, tone and word choice, written
> communication uses pu
Am 15.07.2013 20:10, schrieb Robert Holtzman:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:55:15PM -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote:
>> Hi Reindl,
>>> first: my intention is *not* to start another epic thread
>>>
>>> since i am always the unholy prick here after i lose patience
>>> maybe others should also reconside
On 07/15/2013 12:40 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Just think about what you'd tell me, if I tell you: "You must do it this
way" ... You'd likely take it as a rudity.
No, at least I wouldn't. Now, I'd probably consider it as rude if you
said, "Listen, stupid, this is the way you have to do it."
-
On 07/15/2013 11:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 06:27 +0200, lee wrote:
You need to realise that native speakers of English have a tendency to
be overly polite and to expect others to be just as overly polite as
they are, in ways non-native speakers of English mostly can
Les Howell wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:47 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 06:27 +0200, lee wrote:
You need to realise that native speakers of English have a tendency to
be overly polite and to expect others to be just as overly polite as
they are, in ways non-native
lee wrote:
Reindl Harald writes:
Queue your posts before sending them. After reading and/or writing some
more posts while going through the list, you may have changed your mind
and may be glad you queued what you've been writing.
I tried that, and wound up not remembering to post afterword
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:55:15PM -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote:
> Hi Reindl,
> > first: my intention is *not* to start another epic thread
> >
> > since i am always the unholy prick here after i lose patience
> > maybe others should also reconsider *not* hijacking threads by
>
> Thanks for clarif
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:47 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 06:27 +0200, lee wrote:
> > You need to realise that native speakers of English have a tendency to
> > be overly polite and to expect others to be just as overly polite as
> > they are, in ways non-native speakers
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 06:27 +0200, lee wrote:
> You need to realise that native speakers of English have a tendency to
> be overly polite and to expect others to be just as overly polite as
> they are, in ways non-native speakers of English mostly cannot fathom
> (at least Germans cannot). At the
Reindl Harald writes:
> first: my intention is *not* to start another epic thread
What is your intention?
> since i am always the unholy prick here after i lose patience
Don't lose patience. If you don't like someones posts, put the author
into your score file and have their posts scored down
Hi Reindl,
> first: my intention is *not* to start another epic thread
>
> since i am always the unholy prick here after i lose patience
> maybe others should also reconsider *not* hijacking threads by
Thanks for clarification. Changing the subject (and keeping the original
one with a [Re:]) is st
first: my intention is *not* to start another epic thread
since i am always the unholy prick here after i lose patience
maybe others should also reconsider *not* hijacking threads by
* change the subject in a reply which is *uneccaptable*
especially if the subjet contained the initial question
23 matches
Mail list logo
