On 01/14/2016 11:45 PM, Tod Merley wrote:
potential issues: mbr uefi - many ways to solve none easy.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Kevin Cummings
mailto:cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net>> wrote:
On 01/14/16 22:19, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> My Classroom Lab at the College has Lenov
potential issues: mbr uefi - many ways to solve none easy.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
> On 01/14/16 22:19, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > My Classroom Lab at the College has Lenovo I7 computers that came with
> > Windows 7 about 2 years ago. I changed them to dual bo
On 01/14/16 22:19, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> My Classroom Lab at the College has Lenovo I7 computers that came with
> Windows 7 about 2 years ago. I changed them to dual boot with Fedora, and
> just recently upgraded them to Fedora 23. Never had any issues with the
> installation of the Fedo
My Classroom Lab at the College has Lenovo I7 computers that came with
Windows 7 about 2 years ago. I changed them to dual boot with Fedora, and
just recently upgraded them to Fedora 23. Never had any issues with the
installation of the Fedora or doing updates. I wanted to check out the
Windows
On 6 January 2016 at 23:54, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 18:44 +, Ian Malone wrote:
>> I think gparted should be able to do this for you, first move the
>> start of the linux partition and filesystem towards the end of the
>> disc (you'll have to shrink that filesystem, a
On 01/06/2016 12:16 PM, jd1008 wrote:
by catenation to a partition on an external drive.
I do not want to shrink the fedora partition, but I could
if necessary; in which case does fedora have a partition
resizer?
I know I can back up the fedora partition, resize it and
and restore from backup
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 18:44 +, Ian Malone wrote:
> I think gparted should be able to do this for you, first move the
> start of the linux partition and filesystem towards the end of the
> disc (you'll have to shrink that filesystem, also done in gparted)
> and then move it to create free space
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 10:49 -0700, jd1008 wrote:
> sda3 is the fedora boot partition and formatted and mounted as ext4.
You can shrink ext4 filesystem using resize2fs (assuming it has enough
unused space of course). The fs has to be unmounted of course, so you
may want to do it in single-user mode
On 6 January 2016 at 17:49, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 01/06/2016 10:32 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 10:16 -0700, jd1008 wrote:
>>>
>>> by catenation to a partition on an external drive.
>>>
>>> I do not want to shrink the fedora partition, but I could
>>> if necessary; i
On 01/06/2016 10:32 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 10:16 -0700, jd1008 wrote:
by catenation to a partition on an external drive.
I do not want to shrink the fedora partition, but I could
if necessary; in which case does fedora have a partition
resizer?
I know I can back
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 10:16 -0700, jd1008 wrote:
> by catenation to a partition on an external drive.
>
> I do not want to shrink the fedora partition, but I could
> if necessary; in which case does fedora have a partition
> resizer?
>
> I know I can back up the fedora partition, resize it and
>
by catenation to a partition on an external drive.
I do not want to shrink the fedora partition, but I could
if necessary; in which case does fedora have a partition
resizer?
I know I can back up the fedora partition, resize it and
and restore from backup. But that could take many hours
of down
On Aug 31, 2014, at 8:50 AM, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> As I type this, I'm installing Fedora 20 on a UEFI system which already
> has CentOS 7 (and nothing else).
>
> Should the two systems share /boot/efi?
Ideally yes, although it's not required by the UEFI spec.
>
> As I understand it, t
As I type this, I'm installing Fedora 20 on a UEFI system which already
has CentOS 7 (and nothing else).
Should the two systems share /boot/efi?
As I understand it, the answer is yes: /boot/efi is universal on a
machine. It is where the firmware goes to load things. Not just OS
bootloader: man
Does any one have experience with a common /boot for a dual OS system?
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Robin Laing wrote:
> On 2014-04-17 01:31, Javier Perez wrote:
>
>> Hi Arthur
>> That is exactly the scenario that I want to avoid by having separate /home
>> and soft-linking the Data partiti
On 2014-04-17 01:31, Javier Perez wrote:
Hi Arthur
That is exactly the scenario that I want to avoid by having separate /home
and soft-linking the Data partition.
I wonder should I set /var on the HDD to save wear and tear on the SSD?
JP
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Arthur Dent wrote:
Hi Arthur
That is exactly the scenario that I want to avoid by having separate /home
and soft-linking the Data partition.
I wonder should I set /var on the HDD to save wear and tear on the SSD?
JP
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Arthur Dent wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 00:43 -0500, Javier P
On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 00:43 -0500, Javier Perez wrote:
> My Idea is to have sda=SSD, sdb=HDD
>
>
> /dev/sda1 = /boot, about 1G
>
> /dev/sda2 = / Ubuntu 50G aprox
>
> /dev/sda3 = / Fedora 50G aprox
>
> /dev/sda4 = swap * (I know i know, let's forget about extended/logical
> for the moment)
On 4/16/2014 10:46 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
It is not a bad idea per se.
The thing is that the reason I installed Ubuntu is because at some
time (I think it was Fedora 16 or 17, don't remember now) Fedora could
not set the right resolution for my display, 1920x1080, but Ubuntu
indeed could do i
Hi again:
Well your scheme is not bad. 50 GB for each OS is a lot, even if you don't
store a lot of information in logs for run a server or something like that.
I never use to install the \boot in a separate partition. I install the
root (\) of each one inside it's own partition and the GRUB do th
It is not a bad idea per se.
The thing is that the reason I installed Ubuntu is because at some time (I
think it was Fedora 16 or 17, don't remember now) Fedora could not set the
right resolution for my display, 1920x1080, but Ubuntu indeed could do it
without problem.
Virtualizing it would defeat
My Idea is to have sda=SSD, sdb=HDD
/dev/sda1 = /boot, about 1G
/dev/sda2 = / Ubuntu 50G aprox
/dev/sda3 = / Fedora 50G aprox
/dev/sda4 = swap * (I know i know, let's forget about extended/logical for
the moment)
/dev/sdb1= /MyData (to be available under both OS
Then for both Ubuntu and Fedo
On 4/16/2014 8:49 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
Hi
I need some advice here regarding partitioning my home system.
My home system is a triple boot system: Windows 2K, Fedora 20 and
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
I have three disks, one devoted to each operating system.
The first disk has two partitions, one for th
Hello:
Well I have few experience with dual systems, and I don't understand your
idea. You can have a SSD Hard Disk wherein you install one or more OS. You
don't need to have a lot of physical hard disk for that. In fact in only
one you can get two OS doing the right partions in a common hard disk
Hi
I need some advice here regarding partitioning my home system.
My home system is a triple boot system: Windows 2K, Fedora 20 and Ubuntu
12.04 LTS
I have three disks, one devoted to each operating system.
The first disk has two partitions, one for the OS (win2k), the rest for
data to be shared w
25 matches
Mail list logo
