Re: [389-users] replication stopped after server restart - problem to reenable

Hi Rich, hi Jeroen, Am Monday, 17. February 2014 schrieb Jan Kowalsky: > Am Saturday, 15. February 2014 schrieb Rich Megginson: > > On 02/14/2014 05:20 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: > > > On 2014-02-14 23:03, Jan Kowalsky wrote: > > >> On 2014-02-14 22:15, Rich Megginson wrote: >

Re: [389-users] replication stopped after server restart - problem to reenable

On 02/13/2014 02:05 AM, Jan Kowalsky wrote: On 2014-02-12 23:25, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/12/2014 02:34 PM, Jan Kowalsky wrote: Hi Rich, thank you for answering, Since this is my first experience with replication I don't know if I do something completely wrong or it's a but. I folled the

Re: [389-users] replication stopped after server restart - problem to reenable

On 02/12/2014 06:29 AM, Jan Kowalsky wrote: Hi all, this is my first post on the list. I'm using 389ds inside a kolab environment. We are going to migrate to the new kolab version which runs now 389ds. At the moment we are testing different scenarios for replication. I don't have much experie

Re: [389-users] Replication error

On 01/21/2014 05:16 AM, Diego Woitasen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Diego Woitasen wrote: >> Hi, >> I have a replication error with 389DS. If I try a full resync, >> replication works. But if I modify something after that, it fails. The >> only lines that I see in the logs are: >> >>

Re: [389-users] Replication fails: id2entry.db4 too large?

On 03/05/2013 07:58 AM, Luigi Santangelo wrote: What is the platform for A and B? What are the 389-ds-base versions on A and B? A and B are Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Tikanga); 389-ds-base are 389 Directory Server version 1.2.5 Note that it is going to be very difficult to s

Re: [389-users] Replication fails: id2entry.db4 too large?

> What is the platform for A and B? What are the 389-ds-base versions on A > and B? A and B are Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Tikanga); 389-ds-base are 389 Directory Server version 1.2.5 > What about A? Any clues in the A errors log? The service is online, we have disabled the s

[389-users] Replication Agreement Between DS 8.2 and 9.0

I am looking everywhere on Internet/Google and cannot find anything that tells me whether or not I can stand up a DS 9 (389DS) and replicate with DS 8.2. Can someone tell me where I might find this answer? Or just tell me the answer?I am running a multi-master environment and want to stand up DS9,

Re: [389-users] replication from 1.2.8.3 to 1.2.10.4

On 07/12/2012 08:50 AM, Robert Viduya wrote: On Jul 11, 2012, at 7:17 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/11/2012 11:12 AM, Robert Viduya wrote: Is replication from a 1.2.8.3 server to a 1.2.10.4 server known to work or not work? We're having changelog issues. Background: We have an ldap servi

Re: [389-users] Replication field doubt

Rich, I found a problem, seems to be a bug: When I delete the user from my AD the plugin did not update the group (did not test deleting first in 389 DS). So the user does not exist, but in 389 DS group shows me the entry. When I create the user again, the 389 (replication plugin or whatever) de

Re: [389-users] Replication not excluding attributes

On 03/28/2012 10:08 AM, Iain Morgan wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 20:07:07 -0500, Rich Megginson wrote: On 03/27/2012 05:11 PM, Iain Morgan wrote: Hi, I recently tried to setup a slave replica using fractional replication. The slave replica works, but the attributes which I had intended to ex

Re: [389-users] Replication integrity tool/script

orrectly sincronized, but I've still a mismatch. Is there any way to check that? Thanks & Regards. Manel Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:18:21 -0600 From: rmegg...@redhat.com To: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org CC: magi

Re: [389-users] Replication integrity tool/script

de after "the problem" are correctly > sincronized, but I've still a mismatch. > > Is there any way to check that? > > Thanks & Regards. > > Manel > > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:18:21 -0600 > From: rmegg...@redhat.com > To: 389-us...@lists.fed

Re: [389-users] replication errors

On 03/01/2012 04:53 PM, Ellsworth, Josh wrote: I am trying to set up replication between 2 389 servers. The master is running the following packages: 389-admin.x86_64 1.1.16-1.el5 installed 389-admin-console.noarch 1.1.7-1.el5

[389-users] replication errors

I am trying to set up replication between 2 389 servers. The master is running the following packages: 389-admin.x86_64 1.1.16-1.el5 installed 389-admin-console.noarch 1.1.7-1.el5 installed 389-admin-console-doc.noarc

Re: [389-users] replication failure - clock skew

On 02/10/2012 09:07 AM, Greg Kuchyt wrote: On 02/09/2012 03:03 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/09/2012 12:52 PM, Greg Kuchyt wrote: On 02/09/2012 02:38 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/09/2012 12:23 PM, Greg Kuchyt wrote: Yesterday afternoon, one of my consumers randomly crashed/rebooted. Upon

Re: [389-users] replication failure - clock skew

On 02/09/2012 03:03 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/09/2012 12:52 PM, Greg Kuchyt wrote: On 02/09/2012 02:38 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/09/2012 12:23 PM, Greg Kuchyt wrote: Yesterday afternoon, one of my consumers randomly crashed/rebooted. Upon rebooting, its replication agreement with i

[389-users] replication failure - clock skew

Yesterday afternoon, one of my consumers randomly crashed/rebooted. Upon rebooting, its replication agreement with its master failed with the following error: Unable to acquire replica: Excessive clock skew between the supplier and the consumer. Replication is aborting I did a little bit of

Re: [389-users] Replication and Password Changes

On 11/08/2011 06:11 PM, Tom Tucker wrote: Please pardon any blunders in my LDAP vernacular. My LDAP exposure has been limited thus far. I am testing Fedora 389 Directory Server as a replacement from my antique Sun One (5.X) directory server. Things have gone well so far btw. Q1) My first

[389-users] replication issues with promoting hub to master

All, I am having issues with replication breaking once I promote a hub to a multi-master. My test set-up has a master/hub/slave environment using basic replication. This works as intended. However, once I select multi-master and set the replica id for the hub/new master, replication no longe

Re: [389-users] Replication issue

.; Marc Sauton *Subject:* Re: [389-users] Replication issue On 10/12/2011 02:16 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote: Good. what about the different generation ID message? Is it possible that this could be caused by a re-initialize? Yes. But then, I thought a re-initialize would fix this error, if it o

Re: [389-users] Replication issue

Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:29 PM To: Reinhard Nappert Cc: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.; Marc Sauton Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication issue On 10/12/2011 02:16 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote: Good. what about the different generation ID message? Is it possible

Re: [389-users] Replication issue

: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:11 PM To: Reinhard Nappert Cc: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.; Marc Sauton Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication issue On 10/12/2011 02:08 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote: Rich, I was thinking about the "Replica has a different generation ID tha

Re: [389-users] Replication issue

discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. *Cc:* Reinhard Nappert; Marc Sauton *Subject:* Re: [389-users] Replication issue On 10/11/2011 02:41 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote: How do I do this manually on server A? The other question is, what kind of impact does it have when I re-iitialize

Re: [389-users] Replication issue

rmegg...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:00 PM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. Cc: Reinhard Nappert; Marc Sauton Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication issue On 10/11/2011 02:41 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote: How do I do this manually on server A? The other

Re: [389-users] Replication issue

6 PM *To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. *Cc:* Reinhard Nappert *Subject:* Re: [389-users] Replication issue On 10/11/2011 01:22 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote: Hi, I encountered the following logs in the errors: [06/Oct/2011:10:11:57 +] NSMMReplicationPlug

Re: [389-users] Replication questions.

...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 2:54 PM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. Cc: Reinhard Nappert Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication questions. On 09/19/2011 12:46 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote: Hi, I have a multi-master setup with three masters. All of them

Re: [389-users] Replication questions.

On 09/19/2011 12:46 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote: Hi, I have a multi-master setup with three masters. All of them are running 1.2.8.2. I had created and deleted the replication environment at least 3 times. The current setup looks like the following. Svr A has replication id 1, Srv B has the repl

[389-users] Replication questions.

Hi, I have a multi-master setup with three masters. All of them are running 1.2.8.2. I had created and deleted the replication environment at least 3 times. The current setup looks like the following. Svr A has replication id 1, Srv B has the replication id 3 and Srv C has the id 4. The replica

Re: [389-users] Replication trouble

On 07/13/2011 04:44 AM, Andrea Modesto Rossi wrote: > Ciao, > > Since last week i had no problem and all my configuration worked properly. > Due to NTPD error (my VMs runs on KVM server), ntpd error? Did this have the effect of incorrectly changing the time on one or more systems? > today i have

Re: [389-users] Replication trouble when promoting dedicated Consumer to Multiple master

ssion list for the 389 Directory server project. Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication trouble when promoting dedicated Consumer to Multiple master Hi Penedo... Thanks for your reply Yes.. I did that already a couple of times. I am always coming to the same error message... Rola

Re: [389-users] replication with ssl

On 05/18/2011 08:35 AM, solarflow99 wrote: I just wonder why i'm getting: RESULT err=2 when I try to use replication over simple SSL. The replication agreement works when I use ldap with no encryption, but when I select SSL encryption with ldap it just gives that error. I'm not looking to use

Re: [389-users] Replication with 1.2.7.5

Hi Rich, I think I figured out what was going on. It looks like the share/dirsrv/data/template-dse.ldif file was incomplete after the build process. I did not go through the entire plugin list, but the cn=Multimaster Replication Plugin,cn=plugins,cn=config object was missing in the template fi

Re: [389-users] Replication

On Jan 14, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 01/14/2011 10:32 AM, Brian LaMere wrote: Odd, I got MMR working with SSL...and I only referenced that documentation which documentation? (well, and assistance from this list and the IRC room...). It was 1.2.6, but surely that didn't

Re: [389-users] Replication

On 01/14/2011 10:57 AM, Brian LaMere wrote: On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Rich Megginson > wrote: On 01/14/2011 10:32 AM, Brian LaMere wrote: Odd, I got MMR working with SSL...and I only referenced that documentation which documentation? the doc

Re: [389-users] Replication

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 01/14/2011 10:32 AM, Brian LaMere wrote: > > Odd, I got MMR working with SSL...and I only referenced that documentation > > which documentation? > the documentation that references things which are no longer true, and points at a scrip

Re: [389-users] Replication

arry.dev...@faa.gov <mailto:harry.dev...@faa.gov> >> >> -Rich Megginson mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote: - >> >> To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project." >> <389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [389-users] Replication

t; Any thoughts? > >> Harry > >> > >> Harry Devine > >> Common ARTS Software Development > >> AJT-144 > >> (609)485-4218 > >> harry.dev...@faa.gov > >> > >> -----Rich Megginson wrote: - > >> > >

Re: [389-users] Replication with 1.2.7.5

Of Reinhard Nappert Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 1:32 PM To: Rich Megginson Cc: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication with 1.2.7.5 Yes, I did report a bug regarding the deletion of the replica configuration, but my testing are not related to this. I want to re

Re: [389-users] Replication

o: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project." <389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org> From: Rich Megginson Date: 01/11/2011 03:09PM cc: Harry Devine/ACT/f...@faa, Ted Rush/ACT/f...@faa Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication On 01/11/2011 12:53 PM,

Re: [389-users] Replication

-4218harry.dev...@faa.gov-Rich Megginson wrote: -To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project." <389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org>From: Rich Megginson Date: 01/11/2011 03:09PMcc: Harry Devine/ACT/f...@faa, Ted Rush/ACT/f...@faaSubject: Re: [389-us

Re: [389-users] Replication

On 01/11/2011 12:53 PM, harry.dev...@faa.gov wrote: OK, so we are testing 389-ds in our environment (version 1.2.7.5). We have 1 machine set up with user accounts, and we just set another one up. The new one doesn't have any accounts or anything on it yet. We would like to get replication go

[389-users] Replication

OK, so we are testing 389-ds in our environment (version 1.2.7.5).  We have 1 machine set up with user accounts, and we just set another one up.  The new one doesn't have any accounts or anything on it yet.  We would like to get replication going between the 2 DS's, but can't find any current docum

Re: [389-users] Replication with 1.2.7.5

Yes, I did report a bug regarding the deletion of the replica configuration, but my testing are not related to this. I want to re-create the situation where the slapd process "freezes" with a 1.2.x release. Remember, you analyzed some coredumps of 1.1.2. I want to produce some cores with 1.2.x f

Re: [389-users] Replication with 1.2.7.5

On 01/10/2011 11:16 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote: > After I did set it to start and did do a ldapsearch and > nsds5beginreplicarefresh was still set to start. None of the other > replication attributes was set. It looks to me that the server did not do any > replication related operations. Is thi

Re: [389-users] Replication with 1.2.7.5

After I did set it to start and did do a ldapsearch and nsds5beginreplicarefresh was still set to start. None of the other replication attributes was set. It looks to me that the server did not do any replication related operations. For now, I suggest to not "waste" any time on it, since I've

Re: [389-users] Replication with 1.2.7.5

On 01/10/2011 08:18 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote: > Rich, > > I had log level set to 8192 and still there was nothing in errors. I've tried to reproduce the problem with the latest epel released 1.2.7.5 on RHEL 5, and with 1.2.7.5 built from source on RHEL 6 - in both cases, I created the replicati

Re: [389-users] Replication from 1.2.5 to 1.2.6 failed

On 10/16/2010 11:42 AM, Edward Z. Yang wrote: > I've got a failure, and I'm able to gdb it. However, I don't > know what to look for. What kind of tracing would you like to > see? I was going to wireshark but decrypting the Kerberos would > be annoying. > If you can break in acquire_replica(

[389-users] replication between 1.2.2 and 1.2.6.1

Can we expect replication between 1.2.2 and 1.2.6.1 to work? I'm trying to set up MMR between two servers running the two different versions and the 1.2.6.1 master is failing with the following message in it's errors log: [14/Oct/2010:16:26:19 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn=people moul

Re: [389-users] Replication initialization keeps getting wedged

Edward Z. Yang wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm trying to recover a 5-master setup by reinitializing some > of the masters off of other masters. However, when I initiate > a full update using > > nsDS5BeginReplicaRefresh: start > > I see the following line in the target: > > [23/Sep/2010:17:57:30 -040

[389-users] Replication initialization keeps getting wedged

Hello all, I'm trying to recover a 5-master setup by reinitializing some of the masters off of other masters. However, when I initiate a full update using nsDS5BeginReplicaRefresh: start I see the following line in the target: [23/Sep/2010:17:57:30 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin - multimaster_

[389-users] Replication from Fedora DS to OpenLDAP

I've been doing some investigation for getting replication between DS and OL working. According to http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:OpenldapIntegration it is possible but not documented. After reading this http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/2007-September/006162.html

Re: [389-users] Replication without password

Prashanth Sundaram wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to have different password store on two ldap servers > and also setup replication in M-M or M-S(slave) fashion? In other > words can I exclude the ‘userPassword’ field from being replicated > between two servers? http://www.redhat.com/docs/manua

Re: [389-users] Replication error acquiring replica: permission denied error code 3

Sean Carolan wrote: > I'm attempting to get single-master replication working but am stuck > with this cryptic "error code 3". Are there detailed descriptions of > the error codes somewhere? > It depends. Can you post the full error message? > I followed the directions on this page to a T, but

[SPAM] Re: [389-users] replication agreement accounts syncing but not passwords

Centos 5.3 x86_64 389-ds-console-doc-1.2.0-4.el5 389-ds-1.1.3-4.el5 389-admin-console-1.1.4-1.el5 389-admin-1.1.8-4.el5 389-dsgw-1.1.4-1.el5 389-ds-console-1.2.0-4.el5 389-admin-console-doc-1.1.4-1.el5 389-ds-base-1.2.2-1.el5 389-console-1.1.3-3.el5 Thanks Rich Megginson wrote: > Jeff Gamsby wrot