Re: [389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

2013-11-04 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/04/2013 09:39 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 11/04/2013 09:06 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: No matter that they are different versions??? Yes. The replication protocol is the same. The only problems you might have are schema and sy

Re: [389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

2013-11-04 Thread Ezequiel Larrarte
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 11/04/2013 09:06 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: >> >> No matter that they are different versions??? > > > Yes. The replication protocol is the same. > The only problems you might have are schema and syntax incompatibility. > > >> >> I thoug

Re: [389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

2013-11-04 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/04/2013 09:06 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: No matter that they are different versions??? Yes. The replication protocol is the same. The only problems you might have are schema and syntax incompatibility. I thought that EPEL would package the same version of 389DS for both systems Cent

Re: [389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

2013-11-04 Thread Ezequiel Larrarte
No matter that they are different versions??? I thought that EPEL would package the same version of 389DS for both systems CentOS 5 and 6 for compatibility reasons, but that 's not what they have in their repositories. The thing is ... If I have 3 server with CentOS 5 and 389DS 1.2.1 replicating