Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6

Aaron Hagopian wrote: > Been using passwordless cert the whole time. This worked fine until I > upgraded to 1.2.6 final. I suppose it is possible that something happened during the upgrade to reset the password. Try using the modutil command - see modutil -H for details - modutil -dbdir /etc/d

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6

Aaron Hagopian wrote: > > > grep nsslapd-localuser /etc/dirsrv/slapd-instance/dse.ldif > > > nsslapd-localuser: nobody > > ls -al /etc/dirsrv/slapd-instance > > > [r...@barfolomew slapd-barfolomew]# ls -al /etc/dirsrv/slapd-barfolomew > total 364 > drwxrwx---. 3 nobody nobody 4096 Sep 16 0

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6

So i removed my entire setup and tried to re-setup. Now when I try to enable SSL for my directory server I get the following error: [15/Sep/2010:10:25:45 -0500] - SSL alert: Security Initialization: Unable to authenticate (Netscape Portable Runtime error -8192 - An I/O error occurred during secur

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6

Think I figured it out, a while back when I had to do the manual steps from something like RC5->RC6, my netscapeRoot didn't load back properly leaving with an empty o=netscapeRoot On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: > Aaron Hagopian wrote: > > After upgrading, although it's po

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6

Aaron Hagopian wrote: > After upgrading, although it's possible it broke on one of the RCs > since I do not usually run the admin server on my development > environment, when I try to connect using the 389-console I get an > error 32, cannot connect to the directory server > > When I look th

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 7

Thanks, bumped in Gentoo. -- Fabio Erculiani http://lxnay.com http://www.sabayon.org http://www.gentoo.org -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 7

Fabio Erculiani wrote: > Where are the sources? > http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/ > It is there now. rob -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

[389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 7

The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Release Candidate 7 of version 1.2.6. This release has one bug fix. WARNING: If you are upgrading from a previous 1.2.6 release candidate, you will need to run fixfiles to fix some SELinux AVCs, or directory server will not start. See bug

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3

Aaron Hagopian wrote: > I filed a bug per Rich: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616206 > > > How did you create the ldif file in > "/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-/ldif/"? Did you move the ldif > file there from elsewhere on your system? That could explain why > your ldif fil

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3

I filed a bug per Rich: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616206 > How did you create the ldif file in > "/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-/ldif/"? Did you move the ldif file there > from elsewhere on your system? That could explain why your ldif file ha

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3

On 07/19/2010 08:47 AM, Aaron Hagopian wrote: Ok this time I think I have hit a legit issue with SELinux and 1.2.6 RC3. On my workstation to sync up my ldap server with production I take a ldif dump from production and load it into my system with the ldif2db.pl script. For

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3

I upgraded my fedora 13 x86_64 machine to the RC3 using the rpms in updates-testing and now I cannot start the admin server with selinux enabled. I am attaching the selinux message. It does start when I disable selinux. On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > The 389 team is p

[389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3

The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Release Candidate 3 of version 1.2.6. This release has a few bug fixes. ***We need your help! Please help us test this software.*** It is a release candidate, so it may have a few glitches, but it has been tested for regressions and for ne

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > And how will replication behave? Will this change be propagated to the > rest of the servers, or will it be overriden with the definition that > thare is now in the rest of the servers? Hmm - ok - if you want it to replicate, then make the change using ldapmodify wh

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

And how will replication behave? Will this change be propagated to the rest of the servers, or will it be overriden with the definition that thare is now in the rest of the servers? Can I change directly the 99user.ldif without restarting the server and then reload the schema using teh script for

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > Hi again > > What will happen if I modify the schema, creating a new aattribute > without specifying any matching rule? Will the directory use the > default rules for for the attribute syntax? Yes. > > Anuyway, how can I change now the matching rules for the existing

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > Hi > > The package 389-ds-console-1.2.3 is not available in EPEL Testing: > > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/testing/5/i386/ > > Just version 1.2.0 in EPEL Stable: > > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386/ > > Regards. https://bugzilla.redhat.c

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

Hi again What will happen if I modify the schema, creating a new aattribute without specifying any matching rule? Will the directory use the default rules for for the attribute syntax? Anuyway, how can I change now the matching rules for the existing attributes that gives that warning? In the con

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

Hi The package 389-ds-console-1.2.3 is not available in EPEL Testing: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/testing/5/i386/ Just version 1.2.0 in EPEL Stable: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386/ Regards. 2010/6/23 Rich Megginson > Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > > Hi > >

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > Hi > > I have upgraded our test server(from version 1.2.5, > 389-ds-base-1.2.6-0.7.rc2.el5.i386 and > 389-admin-1.1.11-0.5.rc1.el5.i386), and when running > "setup-ds-admin.pl -u", i get many messages > like this (all about custom attribu

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

Hi I have upgraded our test server(from version 1.2.5, 389-ds-base-1.2.6-0.7.rc2.el5.i386 and 389-admin-1.1.11-0.5.rc1.el5.i386), and when running "setup-ds-admin.pl -u", i get many messages like this (all about custom attributes): [22/Jun/2010:10:24:58 +0200] attr_syntax_create - Error: the EQUA

[389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Release Candidate 1 of version 1.2.6. This release a couple of bug fixes. ***We need your help! Please help us test this software.*** It is a release candidate, so it may have a few glitches, but it has been tested for regressions and fo

[389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Alpha 4

The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Alpha 4 of version 1.2.6. This release contains a new replication session API, auto DN index upgrade, and several bug fixes. ***We need your help! Please help us test this software.*** It is an Alpha release, so it may have a few glitches,

[389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Alpha 2

The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Alpha 2 of version 1.2.6. This release contains some major new features - Subtree Rename, SELinux policy, Matching Rules - as well as many bug fixes. NOTE: Packages for Enterprise Linux are available from EPEL. We will no longer have a sep