4.0.0-6.fc37
@fedora
libvirt-gobject.x86_64 4.0.0-6.fc37
@fedora
libvirt-libs.x86_64 8.6.0-5.fc37
@updates
python3-libvirt.x86_64 8.6.0-1.fc37
@fedora
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 10:01 AM Jeff
I have a freepbx vm. A month ago it was working perfectly.
Then either a patch or me playing with docker broke something. ( I had
updated my system before starting to play with Docker
So the logs after the break show as follows
15018 [2023-01-25 18:53:59] NOTICE[32354] res_pjsip/pjsip_distributor.
Now that I know what to look for I found the relevant page
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> Andreas Schneider: helped me fix the issue.
> Seems there was a flag I was missing from my smb.conf file that is
>
Andreas Schneider: helped me fix the issue.
Seems there was a flag I was missing from my smb.conf file that is
needed in fedora.
I needed the line
idmap config SUBDOMAIN:unix_nss_info = yes
added to my smb.conf
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:33 PM, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:31 PM, Jeff Sadowski
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Jeff Sadowski
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
>>> wrote:
>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:31 PM, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Jeff Sadowski
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 16:25 -0700, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
>>>>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 16:25 -0700, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
>>> My AD has the rfc2307 flags to provide home directories and shells.
>>> The ub
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 16:25 -0700, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
>> My AD has the rfc2307 flags to provide home directories and shells.
>> The ubuntu 16.04 and centos 6.9 correctly get the AD flags for the
>>
My AD has the rfc2307 flags to provide home directories and shells.
The ubuntu 16.04 and centos 6.9 correctly get the AD flags for the
home directory and shells.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> yes it joined the domain and wbinfo -u shows my users.
>
> id jefft
Fedora seems to be ignoring these flags.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> My AD has the rfc2307 flags to provide home directories and shells.
> The ubuntu 16.04 and centos 6.9 correctly get the AD flags for the
> home directory and shells.
>
> On Wed, Jan 2
yes it joined the domain and wbinfo -u shows my users.
id jefftest shows correctly.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Michael Singh wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 15:17 -0700, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
>> Expected result:
>> root@ubuntu16:~# getent passwd jefftest
>> jefftest:*
yes jefftest is an AD user. No local user for jefftest.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 01/24/2018 02:17 PM, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
>>
>> Expected result:
>> root@ubuntu16:~# getent passwd jefftest
>> jefftest:*:11507:8004:Jeff Test:/
auth = no
client ldap sasl wrapping = plain
Expected result:
root@ubuntu16:~# getent passwd jefftest
jefftest:*:11507:8004:Jeff Test:/nfsmount/jefftest:/bin/bash
Fedora27 result:
[root@fedora27 ~]# getent passwd jefftest
jefftest:*:11507:8513::/home/SUBDOMAIN
usion still has the i386 listed on its main page, so
you should be able to get repo files from there.
> I feel as if now, with Fedora 26/i386 moving to fedora-secondary,
> installation became much more complicated.
I understand. Unfortunately, we x86 users are a small part of the
communi
t
> sender = fail2...@example.com
> destemail = root
> action = %(action_mwl)s
to jaild/10-sshd.conf
> [sshd]
> enabled=true
> # findtime: 1 day
> findtime = 86400
> # bantime: 1 year
> bantime = 31536000
and yes the system is currently setup to accept only public/private
ora. Memory usage is normally in the 75M range. Fedora
is still a good a distro for little servers, despite the minimum spec
creep.
jeff
--
Jeff Backus
jeff.bac...@gmail.com
http://github.com/jsbackus
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraprojec
you an i686 user? Do you want to continue to have the latest,
shiniest Fedora on your hardware? Then please come join us. The rest
of the community will give us the space and the positive vibes to
continue that support. We just need to help support the parts of
Fedora that are important to us.
your 2¢ worth. One of the reasons this issue has
come up is because it is quite difficult to quantify how popular a
feature is within Fedora. The more people who are (positively) vocal
about the parts of Fedora that are important to them, the more desire
there is within the community to suppo
question. If there isn't
enough interest within the community to actually support i686, or any
feature for that matter, then it makes sense to move on. One of the
great things about the Fedora community is that it quite supportive of
such things - if there is enough interest to drive it.
jeff
othing but x64 machines)just my two cents. Also I'll
> be passing this link on to those who might be able to contribute. I might
> even find an old PC and try to help out myselfanything for the
> "Fedorians" that make my computing life easier and more pleasant!)
Gr
x...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/x86.lists.fedoraproject.org/
We're also holding an organizational meeting on IRC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
September 6th at 1900 UTC. We'd love to see you there!
jeff
--
Jeff Backus
jeff.bac...@gmail.com
ht
Wanted to write a program in C , but I can not find the include files to
be able to! I used to have Fedora 7, now have 23, but it doesn't even
seem to be available any more... Anybody know why?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
ht
/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum
Note that is the live update via yum which can be a bit more trickier. I
can't recall serious issues with upgrades using the normal upgrade
procedure. I'm sure there have been some, but none that were serious
enough to note.
...Jeff
--
users mailing list
users@l
lp0s29f7u7: link is not ready
[ 35.306178] sky2 :09:00.0 p3p1: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex,
flow control rx
[ 35.306178] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): p3p1: link becomes ready
Anybody got a clue what's going on?
--
Jeff Simmons
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 03:57:03AM +0200, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Thursday, 23. August 2012. 11.53.33 Joe Zeff wrote:
On 08/23/2012 11:09 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> As many times before it is counter productive to call someone stupid,
> even if you mispell stupid.
*Especially* if you misspell
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 02:10:35PM +0200, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Jeff Gipson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 01:44:47PM +0200, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
Problem has been solved for the record - followed a recommendation and
notched vcore up to 1.280
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 01:44:47PM +0200, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
Problem has been solved for the record - followed a recommendation and
notched vcore up to 1.280, misread one of the original graphs.
--
Best,
Christopher Svanefalk
### End of Message from Christopher Svanefalk ##
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 08:17:44AM -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 07:42 -0500, Jeff Gipson wrote:
[something]
You just sent an S/Mime-encrypted message to a mailing list. I presume
that was a mistake.
poc
### End of Message from Patrick O'Callaghan
smime.p7m
Description: S/MIME encrypted message
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: h
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 02:13:00AM +0200, Chris wrote:
2012/6/16 Jeff Gipson :
What is the output of
rpm -q -f /etc/postfix/chroot-update
rpm -q -f /etc/postfix/chroot-update
error: file /etc/postfix/chroot-update: No such file or directory
--
Chris
--
users mailing list
users
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:18:55PM +0200, Chris wrote:
2012/6/15 Jeff Gipson :
Is this F15, F16 or F17? I use postfix and have no
/etc/postfix/chroot-update. Are you using the postfix package from Fedora,
or did you go third party?
Hi,
Fedora 17 package, fresh new install with standard
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 09:20:12PM +0200, Chris wrote:
Hi,
I get this error with postfix and systemd:
systemd[809]: Failed at step EXEC spawning /etc/postfix/chroot-update:
No such file or directory
# service postfix status | grep chroot-update
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status postfix.ser
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:32:08AM -0500, Jeff Gipson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:24:23PM +0800, Fajrian Yunus wrote:
hi all,
asking for help. whenever i start my computer, by the time i (supposedly)
reach the login screen, i'm only shown the background image, WITHOUT the
login b
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:08:47PM -0700, Pete Stieber wrote:
I'm trying to setup a git server on a Fedora 17 box. I created user
name git and setup bare Git repos under /home/git/repos. When I clone
these repos from another machine using
$ git clone git@server_name/repos/RepoName.git RepoN
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:26:03PM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I have a number of F14 partitions which must be mounted unchanged on
the new F16 system. It turns out that I get unexpected permission
problems with this approach. I use the same user name on both systems
but on F14 I got userID 500
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:24:23PM +0800, Fajrian Yunus wrote:
hi all,
asking for help. whenever i start my computer, by the time i (supposedly)
reach the login screen, i'm only shown the background image, WITHOUT the
login box. i can see the background image (fireworks image), i can see my
mous
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:17:47PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 12:35:34 -0700, jdow wrote:
On 2012/06/05 11:55, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:40:23 -0400, Alex wrote:
>
>> It's used in shell scripts, such as an "if" statement, such as "if [
>> $? -eq 0 ]
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 09:49:53AM -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
I've about had it with this bloody upgrade nonsense. Nothing I do
gets me past the 'dirty filesystems' dialog when trying to upgrade. I
filed a bug report, but so far no answer.
Has anyone else found a way to make this go away? Shor
Hrm, for me I still have an F16 kernel that seems to be eclipsing the
F17 kernel:
mcpierce@mcpierce-laptop:~ $ rpm -qa kernel
kernel-3.3.7-1.fc16.x86_64
kernel-3.3.7-1.fc17.x86_64
kernel-3.3.6-3.fc16.x86_64
mcpierce@mcpierce-laptop:~ $ uname -r
3.3.7-1.fc16.x86_64
--
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Sof
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 08:53:59AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 04:28:01AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>No, but it sounds like a kernel panic.
In my case, it was an obvious kernel panic.
AFAIS, the cause was running a Fedora 16 kernel underneath of Fedora
17. Preupgra
> Where do you place your backups, Jeff? :-)
>
> Paul
> --
Well, I just started using SpiderOak. Jury's still out. Their
deduplication and compression ratio seems pretty good (185GiB on my disk
becomes 145GiB in their system), and they support file versioning, but
don't s
> I have already an external disk formatted with ext3, but for safety
> reasons I am now wanting to have two external disks with the same
> backups. When I formatted the first external disk, I did not know
> about ext4 (only knew about ext3). So, from what you are suggestion,
> ext4 is superior t
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 03:01:09PM +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/31/2012 02:35 PM, Jeff Gipson wrote:
> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:15:58PM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >>
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:15:58PM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have got a new external hard disk, which I would like to use as a
> mirror of my home directory (for backup purpose). What format for the
> external disk filesystem do you recommend? And what the proper command
> to acco
name '*.mydomain.com' does not match
target host name 'myserver.ldap.mydomain.com'
Am I not able to use a wildcard SSL cert in this instance? If that is the
case, what would my best course of action be?
Thanks,
-Jeff
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
(which is what I
suspected), I ended up taking a ride down to the datacenter and verifying
the BIOS.
The original question although no longer important remains, can you tell
which disk the initial load occurred from? I did run dmidecode and found
nothing of value.
Thanks, Jeff
--
users mailing list
us
s UUID is the RAID device UUID,
make sure it is not pointing to the UUID of the disk.
line 4 shows the UUID for the md3 partition.
Hopefully its this simple and not something else going on.
Jeff
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
h
ver reason isn't contacting PAM properly.
>
> sysconfig/saslauthd:
>
> SOCKETDIR=/var/run/saslauthd
> MECH=pam
> FLAGS=
>
> /etc/pam.d/exim:
>
> #%PAM-1.0
> auth include password-auth
> account include password-auth
>
etc/pam.d/exim:
#%PAM-1.0
authinclude password-auth
account include password-auth
selinux is disabled
I know I'm missing something pretty simple but not sure where to look,
suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks, Jeff
--
users mailing li
ction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/dtrace.1.gz from install of
systemtap-sdt-devel-1.5-1.fc16.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
systemtap-1.4-2.fc14.x86_64
Error Summary
-
and everything stops at this point, suggestions for a work-around?
Thanks, Jeff
search showed the same error with the debug repo
>> but this is obviously not the debug repository.
>>
>> Thanks, Jeff
>>
>
> Same URL is working fine here with curl. I think PYCURL ERROR 6 is:
>
>6 Couldnt resolve host. The given remote host was not
>
link
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-f14&arch=x86_64
error was
14: PYCURL ERROR 6 - ""
Any thoughts? I quick search showed the same error with the debug repo
but this is obviously not the debug repository.
Thanks, Jeff
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
the
option to hibernate. There may be other problems, but those are the ones
that I noticed immediately.
I am guessing this is some sort of dbus/polkit issue, but I don't know
where to start looking to troubleshoot the problem. Does anyone have any
ideas?
Hello!
Just bought a used lap-top (-for our child) which has the 'Fedora 13' OS
installed.
(-the presence of LINUX was a positive influence in our decision to buy this
lap-top)
Unfortunately, my knowledge/familiarity with anything other than MS XP is:
ZERO !
After our purchase, I
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Somehow this reminds me of the message boards they have
> put in over I-95 in south Florida. They are also supposed
> to be for "important" information, but all too often
> whoever is in control of them puts completely irrelevant
> messages on
Hello everyone,
I was wondering what everyone's opinion is as to the best command/program to
use for backups? I don't need to preserve the partition table, basically
just copy files to a backup hard drive.
Thanks!
Jeff
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
At command line type free. This will show where and how your memory is
allocated.
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Jatin K
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 12:50 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: RAM show
nvolved at all.
>
> By the way:
>
> [a...@agena ~]$ cd /media/My*
> bash: cd: /media/My: No such file or directory
>
> Thanks, anyway.
>
Try
cd /media
ls -bl
and send us the results.
Jeff
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Jeff Sadino wrote:
> Hello Fedora users,
>
> When I log into my account using the original home directory, my terminal,
> as expected, shows this:
>
> [mriu...@localhost ~]$ ssh te...@10.1.1.13
> te...@10.1.1.13's password:
> Last lo
roject.org] On Behalf Of jack craig
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 4:37 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: authentication problem
On 04/15/2010 02:04 PM, Jeff Kittle wrote:
> Has anyone experienced issues with openssh 5.2 and Putty, keep getting
> strange behavior, IE: p
Has anyone experienced issues with openssh 5.2 and Putty, keep getting
strange behavior, IE: putty hangs, used
To work no problem with Fedora 9. Right now I have the iptables firewall
disabled just to eliminate it as
A problem.
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.o
@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Strange 'ls' listing
Jeff Kittle wrote:
> Has anyone noticed that the ls command tacks on '.' Character at the end
> of each permission string , example:
It is to signify an SELinux context exists on the file. This is
something new to coretutils i
4-07 20:19 etc
drwxrwxrwx. 7 jeff jeff 4096 2010-04-07 22:42 jeff
drwxrwxrwt. 8 root root 4096 2010-04-07 22:55 tmp
Pretty much screws up WInSCP unless I change the protocol from 'SCP' to
'SFTP'
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
aproject.org] On Behalf Of Kevin J.
Cummings
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 11:38 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: F11 -> F12 woes
On 04/05/2010 12:02 AM, Jeff Kittle wrote:
>> /usr/lib64/pm-utils/pm-functions: line 259: echo: write error: Device
>
> Take a
> /usr/lib64/pm-utils/pm-functions: line 259: echo: write error: Device
Take a look at /usr/lib64/pm-utils/pm-functions to see what device is busy,
it looks like a shell script
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On
-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Sam Varshavchik
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 5:53 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: Fedora 12 install trashed boot sector of hard rive
Jeff Kittle writes:
> Hi
>
> Trying to install Fedora 12 x86_64 and the disk partition tool h
Gparted didn't work, it aborted with a disk error
From: Aioanei Rares [mailto:fedora.lis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 5:09 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Cc: Jeff Kittle
Subject: Re: Fedora 12 install trashed boot sector of hard rive
On 04/05/2010 01:03 AM,
Hi
Trying to install Fedora 12 x86_64 and the disk partition tool hung. Had to
power down machine. Now when I try to install, it always goes
To the basic text type of install and tells me I have no hard drive defined.
I need some answers please
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapro
dia.org/wiki/Godwins_law
>
> poc
>
Since Godwin's Law has been mentioned before its prerequisites have been
satisfied it is no longer applicable.
Jeff
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproje
wrote:
Journals make the problem far worse.
Good to know and understand.
On restore you will restore a journal log no longer related to whats on
the media, then risk replaying it and causing further damage.
This makes sense. It was not clear to me that the journal was being stored in
the "du
s working? Would anyone be willing to help me write a HOWTO
on getting this working so that it would be outlined more effectively for newer
users?
Thanks.
--
Jeff Moody
Senior Systems Engineer
Electronic Vaulting Services
5050 Poplar Ave., Suite 1600
Memphis, TN 38157
(901) 259-2387 - 24x7 Helpd
I was able to get around the issue by removing the 12-174 kernel using
yumex as suggested then re-installing it by using yum in a terminal
session.
Thanks for the help.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.
After installing the latest upgrades including Kernel updates, I have
the following message when rebooting:
Fatal could not
load /lib/modules/2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.i686/modules.dep
No root device found
boot has failed, sleeping forever
I am able to boot using the prior version of the Kernel.
-27 10:49 abc
-rw-rw-r--. 2 javoskam javoskam 0 2010-01-27 10:49 def
-rw-rw-r--. 1 javoskam javoskam 0 2010-01-27 10:49 ghi
[javos...@amnesia z]$ echo "hello there" >>abc
[javos...@amnesia z]$ ls -l
total 8
-rw-rw-r--. 2 javoskam javoskam 12 2010-01-27 10:50 abc
-rw-rw-r--. 2 javoskam
Centos 5.3 x86_64
389-ds-console-doc-1.2.0-4.el5
389-ds-1.1.3-4.el5
389-admin-console-1.1.4-1.el5
389-admin-1.1.8-4.el5
389-dsgw-1.1.4-1.el5
389-ds-console-1.2.0-4.el5
389-admin-console-doc-1.1.4-1.el5
389-ds-base-1.2.2-1.el5
389-console-1.1.3-3.el5
Thanks
Rich Megginson wrote:
> Jeff Gam
76 matches
Mail list logo
