Sendmail auth mechanisms missing after upgrade to Fedora 37

Hi, Having upgraded to the new Fedora 37, I cannot now send mail via sendmail remotely using auth. Looking at /var/log/maillog, when I try and connect to send an email I get: "AUTH warning: no mechanisms” Looking at the application log I can see: 250- Hello , pleased to meet you 250-ENHAN

MongoDB Community edition

Hi, Does anyone have any hints for installing MongoDB on Fedora 34? I updated from F33 and whilst it’s still working/running, I can’t update it. Am I missing a compat lib or something? I’m using the repo at https://repo.mongodb.org/yum/redhat/8Server/mongodb-org/4.4/x86_64/

Re: Network problem

> On 5. Nov 2020, at 03:17, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Nov 4, 2020, at 18:39, Roger Heflin wrote: >> >> Typically if you want put 3 ip addresses in the same subnet on a >> network usually you use a single network adaptor and add extra VIPs on >> it. >> >> see: >> https://www.jamescoyle

Network problem

Hi, I’ve managed to do something accidentally to my network config and I’m not sure what. I’m running a server inside of an ESXi host It’s running using NetworkManager with 3x fixed IP addresses manually configured, .215, .216 and .217 There are 3 virtual adaptors attached to the VM in questi

Fail2ban-all

I’m running F32 Trying to update today and I get: Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package fail2ban-all-0.11.1-6.fc32.noarch - nothing provides python2-inotify needed by fail2ban-all-0.11.1-9.fc32.noarch Anyone have any ideas if this is something I’ve done or if there’s a

Re: F32 Supervisord

Answering my own question - seems there’s a version in Rawhide that works - the change was made upstream for supervisor 4.1 and current Fedora version is 4.0.4 > On 1. May 2020, at 08:16, Scott van Looy via users > wrote: > > Signed PGP part > Hi, > > I upgraded to F32 a

F32 Supervisord

Hi, I upgraded to F32 and now I get an error when I try and run Supervisord - am I missing a compat library or something? supervisorctl status Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/supervisorctl", line 11, in load_entry_point('supervisor==4.0.4', 'console_scripts', 'supervisor

http failing on boot

This is probably something super simple, but… My httpd is failing on boot. The server has 3x adaptors, all are static IPs and don’t require DHCP or anything. Addresses, etc are specified in the config files. All are present once boot has ended. All are managed by NetworkManager, yet I get this

Re: spamprobe

valid log LSN: file: 1 offset 28 But I’m pretty confused about how this is meant to work! Scott On 1. May 2019, at 20:48, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 5/1/19 1:22 AM, Scott van Looy via users wrote: >>> On 1. May 2019, at 09:22, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>> >>> On 4/3

Re: spamprobe

> On 1. May 2019, at 09:22, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 4/30/19 11:30 PM, Scott van Looy via users wrote: >> What format does spamprobe use for the db and is it repairable somehow? > > Try running the "file" command on the database file and see what it says. &g

spamprobe

Hi, I recently recovered my home partition from some corruption. Most of everything is working OK but my spamprobe database appears not to be I use spam probe in a procmail recipe, from their examples in the man page: :0 SCORE=| /bin/spamprobe train :0 wf | formail -I "X-SpamProbe:

Re: HTTPD shutting down every night

ndering if there’s something else weird going on here? Regards, Scott > On 12. Nov 2018, at 16:32, Scott van Looy via users > wrote: > > Thanks for this. > > Certwatch is uninstalled now, it just tells me if any of my certs have > expired and as I don’t have any on th

Re: HTTPD shutting down every night

Thanks for this. Certwatch is uninstalled now, it just tells me if any of my certs have expired and as I don’t have any on that box any more it’s kinda pointless :) I’ve removed the stuff to hide the output from the apache restart in logrotate so I’m going to let it run tonight and see if anyth

Re: HTTPD shutting down every night

so I’ll see what happens tonight. Again, if anyone has any suggestions, it’d be great to try some stuff! Regards, Scott > On 11. Nov 2018, at 11:50, Scott van Looy via users > wrote: > > Thanks for this. > > I noticed last night that both https and bind had been ki

Re: HTTPD shutting down every night

Thanks for this. I noticed last night that both https and bind had been killed and failed to restart so I’m beginning to suspect maybe there’s a memory problem somewhere in the log rotate stuff - but I’m not sure. Lots of updates came down today, hoping it might magically fix itself :) Fun! S

Re: HTTPD shutting down every night

notifempty >sharedscripts >delaycompress >postrotate >/bin/systemctl reload httpd.service > /dev/null 2>/dev/null || true >endscript > } > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 5:53 AM Andy Blanchard wrote: >> >> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 10:40, Scott van Looy via

HTTPD shutting down every night

Hi, Since the upgrade to F29 my HTTPD has been shutting down around 3am every night. I’d like to try and investigate why, but the only thing in the log is: [mpm_event:notice] [pid 1096508:tid 140027704744192] AH00492: caught SIGWINCH, shutting down gracefully These all happen at roughly the sam

Weird Disk Usage Monitor messages

Hi, I’ve just started receiving low disk space warnings from my server. "Inodes: /dev/sda8 (/home) is 98% full -- 3.7M of 3.8M used, 99K remain” But df -h "/dev/sda860G 53G 3.9G 94% /home” Does anyone have any idea what could be up? Scott Latest version of Fedora, all up to date.

Unable to mount root filesystem, kicks me into emergency shell

Something happened recently in an update that’s rendered my system unbootable - am currently booted into an old (4.0.4) kernel after messing around with the boot parameters (specifically setting ROOT=/dev/sda7 and removing rhgb and other things). Does anyone have any suggestions as to what it m

Re: [SOLVED] sudo troubles

On 17 Feb 2013, at 17:23, Scott van Looy wrote: > Hi, > > I have some odd issues with sudo, specifically trying to execute a command > without being asked my password: > I've created a new file in /etc/sudoers.d/ called node > In that file is: > scott ALL=(root) N

sudo troubles

Hi, I have some odd issues with sudo, specifically trying to execute a command without being asked my password: I've created a new file in /etc/sudoers.d/ called node In that file is: scott ALL=(root) NOPASSWD:NOEXEC: /usr/local/bin/forever I was expecting I'd now be able to execute "forever" and

Apache 2.4 and mod_proxy problem

Hi, Before upgrading to Fedora 18, I had IIS in a VM serving pages via Apache and mod_proxy. All was good and lovely. Post and get requests all worked. I upgraded. Now, post requests above a certain size fail. ProxyRequests Off ProxyPreserveHost On ProxyPass / http://127.0.0.1:8891/ connectionti

Re: named

I had a look and followed the suggestions in the bug comments, but it doesn't seem to help at all. Thanks for the help though! Scott On 4 Apr 2012, at 17:41, Kevin Martin wrote: > > > On 04/04/2012 09:29 AM, Scott van Looy wrote: >> Hoping this might help someone debug

Re: named

28, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 2, NULL 1750 <... futex resumed> ) = 0 1748 <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 1750 futex(0x7f8148e22028, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1 trace.txt On 4 Apr 2012, at 11:54, Scott van Looy wrote: > I have a bit of an odd

named

I have a bit of an odd issue, in that when I start named, it sits using around 95% of CPU. I've changed nothing lately that I'm aware of, and the logs don't seem to show anything odd happening. Does anyone have any pointers on debugging this? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: issues with dracut

On 21 Jan 2012, at 16:19, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 01/21/2012 02:36 AM, Scott van Looy wrote: >> I had some problems with dracut on my server, upgrading kernels led to a >> "non fatal" error when using yum, which was dracut not writing out an >> initramfs, in turn m

issues with dracut

Hello! I had some problems with dracut on my server, upgrading kernels led to a "non fatal" error when using yum, which was dracut not writing out an initramfs, in turn making my server unbootable. Non fatal it was not. I spent some time manually installing kernels, then with the help of (the?

Re: kernel upgrade bug?

On 4 Dec 2011, at 10:56, Scott van Looy wrote: > Am perplexed and confused :) So I force removed bash and then reinstalled everything that dracut depends on and then reinstalled dracut and that seems to have fixed it. Fun Sunday morning for me :) Thanks for your help! Scott -- us

Re: kernel upgrade bug?

On 3 Dec 2011, at 21:57, Scott Doty wrote: > On 12/03/2011 12:14 PM, Scott van Looy wrote: >> On 3 Dec 2011, at 15:56, Scott Doty wrote: >> >>> On 12/03/2011 04:30 AM, Scott van Looy wrote: >>>> Isn't there supposed to be an initramfs for 3.1.2-1? >&

Re: kernel upgrade bug?

On 3 Dec 2011, at 15:56, Scott Doty wrote: > On 12/03/2011 04:30 AM, Scott van Looy wrote: >> >> Isn't there supposed to be an initramfs for 3.1.2-1? > > My system has: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15945815 Dec 1 21:24 > initramfs-3.1.2-1.fc16.x86_64.i

kernel upgrade bug?

I just did a yum update -- no errors, everything went fine, but now my /boot looks like this: dr-xr-xr-x. 6 root root 1024 Dec 3 12:23 ./ dr-xr-xr-x. 30 root root 4096 Dec 3 03:27 ../ -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 512 Dec 26 2001 boot.0300 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 512 Mar 21 200

grubby fatal error

Hi, I know it's not fully supported n stuff, but I upgraded from F15 to F16 and noticed an error during installation of the kernel. So I haven't restarted, I removed the kernel and reinstalled it again and I still get this error: Package(s) data still to download: 24 M kernel-3.1.0-7.fc16.x86_

installing a kernel gives fatal "non fatal error"

how I can fix this, it's very frustrating! Scott -- Scott van Looy - email:m...@ethosuk.org.uk | web:www.ethosuk.org.uk site:www.freakcity.net - the in place for outcasts since 2003 PGP Fingerprint: 7180 5543 C6C4

Re: non fatal POSTTRANS scriptlet failure

Today Harald Hoyer did spake thusly: > Am 26.05.2011 10:02, schrieb Scott van Looy: >> Running Transaction >> Installing : kernel-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.x86_64 >> 1/1 >> Non-fatal POSTTRANS scriptlet failure in rpm package >> kernel-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.x86_64 >>

non fatal POSTTRANS scriptlet failure

Running Transaction Installing : kernel-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.x86_64 1/1 Non-fatal POSTTRANS scriptlet failure in rpm package kernel-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.x86_64 I believe this is yum trying to run dracut and it failing. Is there any way I can see the output of what the failure was? -- Scott van

Re: kernel panic on boot with fedora 15

Today Harald Hoyer did spake thusly: > Am 26.05.2011 08:55, schrieb Scott van Looy: >> Today Harald Hoyer did spake thusly: >> >>> Am 26.05.2011 08:26, schrieb Scott van Looy: >>>> Aha! >>>> >>>> For some reason the initramfs is missing

Re: kernel panic on boot with fedora 15

Today Harald Hoyer did spake thusly: > Am 26.05.2011 08:26, schrieb Scott van Looy: >> Aha! >> >> For some reason the initramfs is missing from the Fedora 15 kernel on my >> system. Any idea how to get it back? :) > > # dracut /boot/initramfs-.img Thanks for

Re: kernel panic on boot with fedora 15

Aha! For some reason the initramfs is missing from the Fedora 15 kernel on my system. Any idea how to get it back? :) On May 25 Sam Varshavchik did spake thusly: > Scott van Looy writes: > >> I've upgraded my server, now when I boot it gets as far as this: >> md: Waitin

kernel panic on boot with fedora 15

e have any ideas why it would kernel panic? Should my boot be ext3 or something like that? it's an x86_64 box Regards, Scott -- Scott van Looy - email:m...@ethosuk.org.uk | web:www.ethosuk.org.uk site:www.freakcity.net - the in place for outcasts since 2003 PGP Fingerprint: 7180 5543 C6C4

Re: NodeJS

Today Frank Murphy did spake thusly: > On 24/02/11 15:59, Scott van Looy wrote: >> Hello - I'm looking in Rawhide and can't find any reference to NodeJS yet? >> I see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911 >> Is it likely that this will be in the next

NodeJS

Hello - I'm looking in Rawhide and can't find any reference to NodeJS yet? I see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911 Is it likely that this will be in the next release of Fedora, does anyone know? Scott -- Scott van Looy - email:m...@ethosuk.org.uk | web:www.etho